- 23 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
The recent iommu fix broke booting on some POWER4 and POWER5 LPAR boxes. It looks like we have been calling the non LPAR iommu_dev_setup on LPAR machines for a while. The recent iommu fix caused that code path to fail. It looks like we just need to hook up the devices iommu_table to the parents one, so do that instead of calling iommu_dev_setup_pSeries and crossing the streams. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Olof Johansson 提交于
Some RS64 systems (such as F80) have non-python host bridges with EADS. However, they have two EADS with 4 buses each under them, so the old logic that assumed no more than 7 busses per PHB failed miserably. Big thanks to Olaf Hering for helping me test this, he's got one of the few machines that broke from the previous logic. Also, to be a bit smarter at detecting the need for a PHB-level IOMMU table by checking for the presence of an ISA bus. Only PHBs with ISA bridges should need the PHB-level table. Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 09 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This patch pulls the PCI-related junk out of struct device_node and puts it in a separate structure, struct pci_dn. The device_node now just has a void * pointer in it, which points to a struct pci_dn for nodes that represent PCI devices. It could potentially be used in future for device-specific data for other sorts of devices, such as virtual I/O devices. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
Create the firmware_has_feature() inline and move the firmware feature stuff into its own header file. Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
The firmware_features field of struct cpu_spec should really be a separate variable as the firmware features do not depend on the chip and the bitmask is constructed independently. By removing it, we save 112 bytes from the cpu_specs array and we access the bitmask directly instead of via the cur_cpu_spec pointer. Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-