- 27 9月, 2013 20 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour. The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device bridge0. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we can have only one master upper neighbour, so it would be useful to create a symlink to it in the sysfs device directory, the way that bonding now does it, for every device. Lower devices from bridge/team/etc will automagically get it, so we could rely on it. Also, remove the same functionality from bonding. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
And all the initialization. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new function __bond_next_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Add a new function, __bond_next_slave(), which uses neighbours to find the next slave after the slave provided. It will be further used to gradually go start using neighbour netdev_adjacent infrastructure instead of bonding's own lists. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
For that, use netdev_adjacent_get_private(list_head) on bond's lower neighbour list members. Also, add a small macro - bond_slave_list(bond), which returns the bond list via neighbour list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
The same way as it was used for its own slave_list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable and easier to change in the future. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It has no users, so we can remove it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the next suitable slave. Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in *before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before, and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave. Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if it's suitable. After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up slave or the slave whose link came back earliest. We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it won't go away. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we're using bond_for_each_slave_from(), which is really hard to implement under RCU and/or neighbour list. Remove it and use bond_for_each_slave() instead, taking care of the last used slave. Also, rename next_rx_slave to rx_slave and store the current (last) rx_slave. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any suitable slave to send the packet through. Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found. Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit for readability. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We're safe agains removal there, cause we use neighbours primitives. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It needs a list_head *iter, so add it wherever needed. Use both non-rcu and rcu variants. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart bond_for_each_dev() instead. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It should be used under rtnl/bonding lock, so use the non-RCU version. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new provided function when attaching the lower slave to populate its ->private with struct slave *new_slave. Also, move it to the end to be able to 'find' it only after it was completely initialized, and deinitialize in the first place on release. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices. This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path. To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure - adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list), i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible, currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't change the main linked logic at all. Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following rules: netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_* If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to get better stack traces. CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
running bonding in ALB mode requires that learning packets be sent periodically, so that the switch knows where to send responding traffic. However, depending on switch configuration, there may not be any need to send traffic at the default rate of 3 packets per second, which represents little more than wasted data. Allow the ALB learning packet interval to be made configurable via sysfs Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NAcked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We make bond_arp_rcv global so it can be used in bond_sysfs if the bond interface is up and arp_interval is being changed to a positive value and cleared otherwise as per Jay's suggestion. This also fixes a problem where bond_arp_rcv was set even though arp_validate was disabled while the bond was up by unsetting recv_probe in bond_store_arp_validate and respectively setting it if enabled. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We need to protect store_arp_validate via rtnl because it can race with mode changing and we can end up having arp_validate set in a mode different from active-backup. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 9月, 2013 7 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
bond_compute_features is always called with RTNL held, so we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We're protected by RTNL so nothing can happen and we can safely drop the read bond->lock. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We can drop the use of bond->lock for mutual exclusion in bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate and use RTNL in the sysfs store function instead. This way we'll prevent races with mode change and interface up/down as well as simplify update_lacp_rate by removing the check for port->slave because it'll always be initialized (done while enslaving with RTNL). This change will also help in the future removal of reader bond->lock from bond_enslave. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We don't have to release all slaves when closing the bond dev, so remove the outdated comment and the braces around the left single statement. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
This patch aims to remove a use of the bond->lock for mutual exclusion which will later allow easier migration to RCU of the users of this functionality. We use RTNL as a synchronizing mechanism since it's always held when send_peer_notif is set, and when it is decremented from the notifier function. We can also drop some locking, and fix the leakage of the send_peer_notif counter. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Store VID in ->vlan_id (if any), and remove the useless ->tag. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We're using it currently to verify if we have vlans before getting the tag from the skb we're about to send. It's useless because the vlan_get_tag() verifies if the skb has the tag (and returns an error if not), and we can receive tagged skbs only if we *already* have vlans. Plus, the current RCUed implementation is kind of useless anyway - the we can remove the last vlan in the moment we return from the function. So remove the only usage of it and the whole function. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 8 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
They're simply annoying and will spam dmesg constantly if we hit them, so convert to pr_debug so that we still can access them in case of debugging. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently there are no real users of vlan_list/current_alb_vlan, only the helpers which maintain them, so remove them. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, if there are vlans on top of bond, alb_send_learning_packets() will never send LPs from the bond itself (i.e. untagged), which might leave untagged clients unupdated. Also, the 'circular vlan' logic (i.e. update only MAX_LP_BURST vlans at a time, and save the last vlan for the next update) is really suboptimal - in case of lots of vlans it will take a lot of time to update every vlan. It is also never called in any hot path and sends only a few small packets - thus the optimization by itself is useless. So remove the whole current_alb_vlan/MAX_LP_BURST logic from alb_send_learning_packets(). Instead, we'll first send a packet untagged and then traverse the upper dev list, sending a tagged packet for each vlan found. Also, remove the MAX_LP_BURST define - we already don't need it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Create alb_send_lp_vid(), which will handle the skb/lp creation, vlan tagging and sending, and use it in alb_send_learning_packets(). This way all the logic remains in alb_send_learning_packets(), which becomes a lot more cleaner and easier to understand. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We always hold the rtnl_lock() in __bond_release_one(), so use vlan_uses_dev() instead of bond_vlan_used(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, bond_has_this_ip() is aware only of vlan upper devices, and thus will return false if the address is associated with the upper bridge or any other device, and thus will break the arp logic. Fix this by using the upper device list. For every upper device we verify if the address associated with it is our address, and if yes - return true. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, bond_arp_send_all() is aware only of vlans, which breaks configurations like bond <- bridge (or any other 'upper' device) with IP (which is quite a common scenario for virt setups). To fix this we convert the bond_arp_send_all() to first verify if the rt device is the bond itself, and if not - to go through its list of upper vlans and their respectiv upper devices (if the vlan's upper device matches - tag the packet), if still not found - go through all of our upper list devices to see if any of them match the route device for the target. If the match is a vlan device - we also save its vlan_id and tag it in bond_arp_send(). Also, clean the function a bit to be more readable. CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Convert bond_vlan_used() to traverse the upper device list to see if we have any vlans above us. It's protected by rcu, and in case we are holding rtnl_lock we should call vlan_uses_dev() instead - it's faster. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Fix to return a negative error code in the add bond vlan ids error handling case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. Introduced by commit 1ff412ad. (bonding: change the bond's vlan syncing functions with the standard ones) Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn> Acked-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
In case of bond_add_vlan() failure currently we'll have the vlan's refcnt bumped up in all slaves, but it will never go down because it failed to get added to the bond, so properly unwind the added vlan if bond_add_vlan fails. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-