- 18 3月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Xiaoguang Wang 提交于
While transaction is going to commit, it first sets its state to be T_LOCKED and waits all outstanding handles to complete, and the committing transaction will always be in locked state so long as it has outstanding handles, also the whole fs will be locked and all later fs modification operations will be stucked in wait_transaction_locked(). It's hard to tell why handles are that slow, so here we add a new staic tracepoint to track such slow handle, and show io wait time and sched wait time, output likes below: fsstress-20347 [024] .... 1570.305454: jbd2_slow_handle_stats: dev 254,17 tid 15853 type 4 line_no 3101 interval 126 sync 0 requested_blocks 24 dirtied_blocks 0 trans_wait 122 space_wait 0 sched_wait 0 io_wait 126 "trans_wait 122" means that this current committing transaction has been locked for 122ms, due to this handle is not completed quickly. From "io_wait 126", we can see that io is the major reason. In this patch, we also add a per fs control file used to determine whether a handle can be considered to be slow. /proc/fs/jbd2/vdb1-8/stall_thresh default value is 100ms, users can set new threshold by echoing new value to this file. Later I also plan to add a proc file fs per fs to record these info. Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
由 Xiaoguang Wang 提交于
If one process context is stucked in wait_on_buffer(), lock_buffer(), lock_page() and wait_on_page_writeback() and wait_on_bit_io(), it's hard to tell ture reason, for example, whether this page is under io, or this page is just locked too long by other process context. Normally io request has multiple bios, and every bio contains multiple pages which will hold data to be read from or written to device, so here we record page info or bio info in task_struct while process calls lock_page(), lock_buffer(), wait_on_page_writeback(), wait_on_buffer() and wait_on_bit_io(), we add a new proce interface: [lege@localhost linux]$ cat /proc/4516/wait_res 1 ffffd0969f95d3c0 4295369599 4295381596 Above info means that thread 4516 is waitting on a page, address is ffffd0969f95d3c0, and has waited for 11997ms. First field denotes the page address process is waitting on. Second field denotes the wait moment and the third denotes current moment. In practice, if we found a process waitting on one page for too long time, we can get page's address by reading /proc/$pid/wait_page, and search this page address in all block devices' /sys/kernel/debug/block/${devname}/rq_hang, if search operation hits one, we can get the request and know why this io request hangs that long. Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 zhangyi (F) 提交于
commit 597599268e3b91cac71faf48743f4783dec682fc upstream. We do not unmap and clear dirty flag when forgetting a buffer without journal or does not belongs to any transaction, so the invalid dirty data may still be written to the disk later. It's fine if the corresponding block is never used before the next mount, and it's also fine that we invoke clean_bdev_aliases() related functions to unmap the block device mapping when re-allocating such freed block as data block. But this logic is somewhat fragile and risky that may lead to data corruption if we forget to clean bdev aliases. So, It's better to discard dirty data during forget time. We have been already handled all the cases of forgetting journalled buffer, this patch deal with the remaining two cases. - buffer is not journalled yet, - buffer is journalled but doesn't belongs to any transaction. We invoke __bforget() instead of __brelese() when forgetting an un-journalled buffer in jbd2_journal_forget(). After this patch we can remove all clean_bdev_aliases() related calls in ext4. Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: NCaspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>
-
- 28 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
commit 6ba0e7dc64a5adcda2fbe65adc466891795d639e upstream. Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry. The consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the pages under writeback to be written out. The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from /dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem. This can cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of the entire dd operation. We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges associated with a given transaction. We do this via the jbd2_inode structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure. This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode in question is still being appended to. Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chengguang Xu 提交于
commit 0d52154bb0a700abb459a2cbce0a30fc2549b67e upstream. When failing from creating cache jbd2_inode_cache, we will destroy the previously created cache jbd2_handle_cache twice. This patch fixes this by moving each cache initialization/destruction to its own separate, individual function. Signed-off-by: NChengguang Xu <cgxu519@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 zhangyi (F) 提交于
commit 01215d3edb0f384ddeaa5e4a22c1ae5ff634149f upstream. The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them. In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0: fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’: ./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0) ^ fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here struct journal_head *jh; ^ In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0: fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’: ./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0) ^ fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here struct journal_head *jh; ^ Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 zhangyi (F) 提交于
commit 904cdbd41d749a476863a0ca41f6f396774f26e4 upstream. Now, we capture a data corruption problem on ext4 while we're truncating an extent index block. Imaging that if we are revoking a buffer which has been journaled by the committing transaction, the buffer's jbddirty flag will not be cleared in jbd2_journal_forget(), so the commit code will set the buffer dirty flag again after refile the buffer. fsx kjournald2 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction jbd2_journal_revoke commit phase 1~5... jbd2_journal_forget belongs to older transaction commit phase 6 jbddirty not clear __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer test_clear_buffer_jbddirty mark_buffer_dirty Finally, if the freed extent index block was allocated again as data block by some other files, it may corrupt the file data after writing cached pages later, such as during unmount time. (In general, clean_bdev_aliases() related helpers should be invoked after re-allocation to prevent the above corruption, but unfortunately we missed it when zeroout the head of extra extent blocks in ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()). This patch mark buffer as freed and set j_next_transaction to the new transaction when it already belongs to the committing transaction in jbd2_journal_forget(), so that commit code knows it should clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer. This problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/455 easily with seeds (3246 3247 3248 3249). Signed-off-by: Nzhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 17 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Do not set the b_modified flag in block's journal head should not until after we're sure that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadat() will not abort with an error due to there not being enough space reserved in the jbd2 handle. Otherwise, future attempts to modify the buffer may lead a large number of spurious errors and warnings. This addresses CVE-2018-10883. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200071Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 21 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Long 提交于
The kmem_cache_destroy() function already checks for null pointers, so we can remove the check at the call site. This patch also sets jbd2_handle_cache and jbd2_inode_cache to be NULL after freeing them in jbd2_journal_destroy_handle_cache(). Signed-off-by: NWang Long <wanglong19@meituan.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 18 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If ext4 tries to start a reserved handle via jbd2_journal_start_reserved(), and the journal has been aborted, this can result in a NULL pointer dereference. This is because the fields h_journal and h_transaction in the handle structure share the same memory, via a union, so jbd2_journal_start_reserved() will clear h_journal before calling start_this_handle(). If this function fails due to an aborted handle, h_journal will still be NULL, and the call to jbd2_journal_free_reserved() will pass a NULL journal to sub_reserve_credits(). This can be reproduced by running "kvm-xfstests -c dioread_nolock generic/475". Cc: stable@kernel.org # 3.11 Fixes: 8f7d89f3 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support") Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 10 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobin C. Harding 提交于
Sphinx emits various (26) warnings when building make target 'htmldocs'. Currently struct definitions contain duplicate documentation, some as kernel-docs and some as standard c89 comments. We can reduce duplication while cleaning up the kernel docs. Move all kernel-docs to right above each struct member. Use the set of all existing comments (kernel-doc and c89). Add documentation for missing struct members and function arguments. Signed-off-by: NTobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the automated conversion utilities. I've added SPDX tags for the rest. While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license, and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite surprising). I've not attempted to do any license changes. Even if it is perfectly legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should be done with ext4 developer community discussion. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 22 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tahsin Erdogan 提交于
When a transaction starts, start_this_handle() saves current PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS value so that it can be restored at journal stop time. Journal restart is a special case that calls start_this_handle() without stopping the transaction. start_this_handle() isn't aware that the original value is already stored so it overwrites it with current value. For instance, a call sequence like below leaves PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS flag set at the end: jbd2_journal_start() jbd2__journal_restart() jbd2_journal_stop() Make jbd2__journal_restart() restore the original value before calling start_this_handle(). Fixes: 81378da6 ("jbd2: mark the transaction context with the scope GFP_NOFS context") Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 16 5月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
kernel-doc will try to interpret a foo() string, except if properly escaped. Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
-
由 Mauro Carvalho Chehab 提交于
kernel-doc script expects that a function documentation to be just before the function, otherwise it will be ignored. So, move the kernel-doc markup to the right place. Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
-
- 04 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
now that we have memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} api we can mark the whole transaction context as implicitly GFP_NOFS. All allocations will automatically inherit GFP_NOFS this way. This means that we do not have to mark any of those requests with GFP_NOFS and moreover all the ext4_kv[mz]alloc(GFP_NOFS) are also safe now because even the hardcoded GFP_KERNEL allocations deep inside the vmalloc will be NOFS now. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306131408.9828-7-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the journal has been aborted, we shouldn't mark the underlying buffer head as dirty, since that will cause the metadata block to get modified. And if the journal has been aborted, we shouldn't allow this since it will almost certainly lead to a corrupted file system. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Taesoo Kim 提交于
When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below) J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ... 'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since the the lock is aquired only at the end of if / else-if statements (missing the else case). Signed-off-by: NTaesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> Fixes: 6e4862a5 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+
-
- 22 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Thomas has reported a lockdep splat hitting in add_transaction_credits(). The problem is that that function calls jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() while holding j_state_lock which is wrong (we do not really wait for transaction commit while holding that lock). Fix the problem by moving jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() into places where we are ready to wait for transaction commit and thus j_state_lock is unlocked. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1eaa566dReported-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
So far we were tracking only dependency on transaction commit due to starting a new handle (which may require commit to start a new transaction). Now add tracking also for other cases where we wait for transaction commit. This way lockdep can catch deadlocks e. g. because we call jbd2_journal_stop() for a synchronous handle with some locks held which rank below transaction start. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently lockdep map is tracked in each journal handle. To be able to expand lockdep support to cover also other cases where we depend on transaction commit and where handle is not available, move lockdep map into struct journal_s. Since this makes the lockdep map shared for all handles, we have to use rwsem_acquire_read() for acquisitions now. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The transaction the handle references is free to commit once we've decremented t_updates counter. Move the lockdep instrumentation to that place. Currently it was a bit later which did not really matter but subsequent improvements to lockdep instrumentation would cause false positives with it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently when filesystem needs to make sure data is on permanent storage before committing a transaction it adds inode to transaction's inode list. During transaction commit, jbd2 writes back all dirty buffers that have allocated underlying blocks and waits for the IO to finish. However when doing writeback for delayed allocated data, we allocate blocks and immediately submit the data. Thus asking jbd2 to write dirty pages just unnecessarily adds more work to jbd2 possibly writing back other redirtied blocks. Add support to jbd2 to allow filesystem to ask jbd2 to only wait for outstanding data writes before committing a transaction and thus avoid unnecessary writes. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 18 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
This patch fix spelling typos found in DocBook/filesystem.xml. It is because the file was generated from comments in code, I have to fix the comments in codes, instead of xml file. Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
Journal transaction might fail prematurely because the frozen_buffer is allocated by GFP_NOFS request: [ 72.440013] do_get_write_access: OOM for frozen_buffer [ 72.440014] EXT4-fs: ext4_reserve_inode_write:4729: aborting transaction: Out of memory in __ext4_journal_get_write_access [ 72.440015] EXT4-fs error (device sda1) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:4735: Out of memory (...snipped....) [ 72.495559] do_get_write_access: OOM for frozen_buffer [ 72.495560] EXT4-fs: ext4_reserve_inode_write:4729: aborting transaction: Out of memory in __ext4_journal_get_write_access [ 72.496839] do_get_write_access: OOM for frozen_buffer [ 72.496841] EXT4-fs: ext4_reserve_inode_write:4729: aborting transaction: Out of memory in __ext4_journal_get_write_access [ 72.505766] Aborting journal on device sda1-8. [ 72.505851] EXT4-fs (sda1): Remounting filesystem read-only This wasn't a problem until "mm: page_alloc: do not lock up GFP_NOFS allocations upon OOM" because small GPF_NOFS allocations never failed. This allocation seems essential for the journal and GFP_NOFS is too restrictive to the memory allocator so let's use __GFP_NOFAIL here to emulate the previous behavior. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 05 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junxiao Bi 提交于
introduced jbd2_write_access_granted() to improve write|undo_access speed, but missed to check the status of b_committed_data which caused a kernel panic on ocfs2. [ 6538.405938] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 6538.406686] kernel BUG at fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2400! [ 6538.406686] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 6538.406686] Modules linked in: ocfs2 nfsd lockd grace nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc autofs4 ocfs2_dlmfs ocfs2_stack_o2cb ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue configfs sd_mod sg ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 cxgb3i libcxgbi cxgb3 mdio ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr ipv6 iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ppdev xen_kbdfront xen_netfront xen_fbfront parport_pc parport pcspkr i2c_piix4 acpi_cpufreq ext4 jbd2 mbcache xen_blkfront floppy pata_acpi ata_generic ata_piix cirrus ttm drm_kms_helper drm fb_sys_fops sysimgblt sysfillrect i2c_core syscopyarea dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod [ 6538.406686] CPU: 1 PID: 16265 Comm: mmap_truncate Not tainted 4.3.0 #1 [ 6538.406686] Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.3.1OVM 05/14/2014 [ 6538.406686] task: ffff88007c2bab00 ti: ffff880075b78000 task.ti: ffff880075b78000 [ 6538.406686] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa06a286b>] [<ffffffffa06a286b>] ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits+0x23b/0x250 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] RSP: 0018:ffff880075b7b7f8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 6538.406686] RAX: ffff8800760c5b40 RBX: ffff88006c06a000 RCX: ffffffffa06e6df0 [ 6538.406686] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007a6f6ea0 RDI: ffff88007a760430 [ 6538.406686] RBP: ffff880075b7b878 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 6538.406686] R10: ffffffffa06769be R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 6538.406686] R13: ffffffffa06a1750 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88007a6f6ea0 [ 6538.406686] FS: 00007f17fde30720(0000) GS:ffff88007f040000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6538.406686] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6538.406686] CR2: 0000000000601730 CR3: 000000007aea0000 CR4: 00000000000406e0 [ 6538.406686] Stack: [ 6538.406686] ffff88007c2bb5b0 ffff880075b7b8e0 ffff88007a7604b0 ffff88006c640800 [ 6538.406686] ffff88007a7604b0 ffff880075d77390 0000000075b7b878 ffffffffa06a309d [ 6538.406686] ffff880075d752d8 ffff880075b7b990 ffff880075b7b898 0000000000000000 [ 6538.406686] Call Trace: [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a309d>] ? ocfs2_read_group_descriptor+0x6d/0xa0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a3654>] _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits+0xe4/0x320 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a397e>] _ocfs2_free_clusters+0xee/0x210 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a1750>] ? ocfs2_put_slot+0xf0/0xf0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0682d50>] ? ocfs2_extend_trans+0x50/0x1a0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06a3ad5>] ocfs2_free_clusters+0x15/0x20 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065072c>] ocfs2_replay_truncate_records+0xfc/0x290 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa06843ac>] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0xec/0x1d0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0654600>] __ocfs2_flush_truncate_log+0x140/0x2d0 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0654394>] ? ocfs2_reserve_blocks_for_rec_trunc.clone.0+0x44/0x170 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065acd4>] ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0x374/0x630 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa017486b>] ? jbd2_journal_stop+0x25b/0x470 [jbd2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa065d5b5>] ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x305/0x670 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa0683430>] ? ocfs2_journal_access_eb+0x20/0x20 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa067adb7>] ocfs2_truncate_file+0x297/0x380 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa01759e4>] ? jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate+0x64/0xc0 [jbd2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffffa067c7a2>] ocfs2_setattr+0x572/0x860 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff810e4a3f>] ? current_fs_time+0x3f/0x50 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff812124b7>] notify_change+0x1d7/0x340 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff8121abf9>] ? generic_getxattr+0x79/0x80 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5876>] do_truncate+0x66/0x90 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff81120e30>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xb0/0x110 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5bb3>] do_sys_ftruncate.clone.0+0xf3/0x120 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff811f5bee>] SyS_ftruncate+0xe/0x10 [ 6538.406686] [<ffffffff816aa2ae>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 [ 6538.406686] Code: 28 48 81 ee b0 04 00 00 48 8b 92 50 fb ff ff 48 8b 80 b0 03 00 00 48 39 90 88 00 00 00 0f 84 30 fe ff ff 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe <0f> 0b 0f 1f 00 eb fb 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 [ 6538.406686] RIP [<ffffffffa06a286b>] ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits+0x23b/0x250 [ocfs2] [ 6538.406686] RSP <ffff880075b7b7f8> [ 6538.691128] ---[ end trace 31cd7011d6770d7e ]--- [ 6538.694492] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 6538.695484] Kernel Offset: disabled Fixes: de92c8ca("jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_get_[write|undo]_access()") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Ted and Namjae have reported that truncated pages don't get timely reclaimed after being truncated in data=journal mode. The following test triggers the issue easily: for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { pwrite(fd, buf, 1024*1024, 0); fsync(fd); fsync(fd); ftruncate(fd, 0); } The reason is that journal_unmap_buffer() finds that truncated buffers are not journalled (jh->b_transaction == NULL), they are part of checkpoint list of a transaction (jh->b_cp_transaction != NULL) and have been already written out (!buffer_dirty(bh)). We clean such buffers but we leave them in the checkpoint list. Since checkpoint transaction holds a reference to the journal head, these buffers cannot be released until the checkpoint transaction is cleaned up. And at that point we don't call release_buffer_page() anymore so pages detached from mapping are lingering in the system waiting for reclaim to find them and free them. Fix the problem by removing buffers from transaction checkpoint lists when journal_unmap_buffer() finds out they don't have to be there anymore. Reported-and-tested-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Fixes: de1b7941Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently there is no limitation on number of reserved credits we can ask for. If we ask for more reserved credits than 1/2 of maximum transaction size, or if total number of credits exceeds the maximum transaction size per operation (which is currently only possible with the former) we will spin forever in start_this_handle(). Fix this by adding this limitation at the start of start_this_handle(). This patch also removes the credit limitation 1/2 of maximum transaction size, since we really only want to limit the number of reserved credits. There is not much point to limit the credits if there is still space in the journal. This accidentally also fixes the online resize, where due to the limitation of the journal credits we're unable to grow file systems with 1k block size and size between 16M and 32M. It has been partially fixed by 2c869b26, but not entirely. Thanks Jan Kara for helping me getting the correct fix. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or references. [ Note: this is a fixed version of commit 2143c196, which was reverted in ebeaa8dd due to a false positive triggering of an assertion check. -- Ted ] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit 2143c196. This commit seems to be the cause of the following jbd2 assertion failure: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1325! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: bnep bluetooth fuse ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 ... CPU: 7 PID: 5509 Comm: gcc Not tainted 4.1.0-10944-g2a298679 #1 Hardware name: /DH87RL, BIOS RLH8710H.86A.0327.2014.0924.1645 09/24/2014 task: ffff8803bf866040 ti: ffff880308528000 task.ti: ffff880308528000 RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x237/0x290 Call Trace: __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0x43/0x1f0 ext4_handle_dirty_dirent_node+0xde/0x160 ? jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x36/0x50 ext4_delete_entry+0x112/0x160 ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x52/0xb0 ext4_unlink+0xfa/0x260 vfs_unlink+0xec/0x190 do_unlinkat+0x24a/0x270 SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a ---[ end trace ae033ebde8d080b4 ]--- which is not easily reproducible (I've seen it just once, and then Ted was able to reproduce it once). Revert it while Ted and Jan try to figure out what is wrong. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
It is often the case that we mark buffer as having dirty metadata when the buffer is already in that state (frequent for bitmaps, inode table blocks, superblock). Thus it is unnecessary to contend on grabbing journal head reference and bh_state lock. Avoid that by checking whether any modification to the buffer is needed before grabbing any locks or references. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 6月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_journal_get_write_access() and jbd2_journal_get_create_access() are frequently called for buffers that are already part of the running transaction - most frequently it is the case for bitmaps, inode table blocks, and superblock. Since in such cases we have nothing to do, it is unfortunate we still grab reference to journal head, lock the bh, lock bh_state only to find out there's nothing to do. Improving this is a bit subtle though since until we find out journal head is attached to the running transaction, it can disappear from under us because checkpointing / commit decided it's no longer needed. We deal with this by protecting journal_head slab with RCU. We still have to be careful about journal head being freed & reallocated within slab and about exposing journal head in consistent state (in particular b_modified and b_frozen_data must be in correct state before we allow user to touch the buffer). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Check for the simple case of unjournaled buffer first, handle it and bail out. This allows us to remove one if and unindent the difficult case by one tab. The result is easier to read. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We were acquiring bh_state_lock when allocation of buffer failed in do_get_write_access() only to be able to jump to a label that releases the lock and does all other checks that don't make sense for this error path. Just jump into the right label instead. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
needs_copy is set only in one place in do_get_write_access(), just move the frozen buffer copying into that place and factor it out to a separate function to make do_get_write_access() slightly more readable. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 08 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
This basically reverts 47def826 (jbd2: Remove __GFP_NOFAIL from jbd2 layer). The deprecation of __GFP_NOFAIL was a bad choice because it led to open coding the endless loop around the allocator rather than removing the dependency on the non failing allocation. So the deprecation was a clear failure and the reality tells us that __GFP_NOFAIL is not even close to go away. It is still true that __GFP_NOFAIL allocations are generally discouraged and new uses should be evaluated and an alternative (pre-allocations or reservations) should be considered but it doesn't make any sense to lie the allocator about the requirements. Allocator can take steps to help making a progress if it knows the requirements. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently when journal restart fails, we'll have the h_transaction of the handle set to NULL to indicate that the handle has been effectively aborted. We handle this situation quietly in the jbd2_journal_stop() and just free the handle and exit because everything else has been done before we attempted (and failed) to restart the journal. Unfortunately there are a number of problems with that approach introduced with commit 41a5b913 "jbd2: invalidate handle if jbd2_journal_restart() fails" First of all in ext4 jbd2_journal_stop() will be called through __ext4_journal_stop() where we would try to get a hold of the superblock by dereferencing h_transaction which in this case would lead to NULL pointer dereference and crash. In addition we're going to free the handle regardless of the refcount which is bad as well, because others up the call chain will still reference the handle so we might potentially reference already freed memory. Moreover it's expected that we'll get aborted handle as well as detached handle in some of the journalling function as the error propagates up the stack, so it's unnecessary to call WARN_ON every time we get detached handle. And finally we might leak some memory by forgetting to free reserved handle in jbd2_journal_stop() in the case where handle was detached from the transaction (h_transaction is NULL). Fix the NULL pointer dereference in __ext4_journal_stop() by just calling jbd2_journal_stop() quietly as suggested by Jan Kara. Also fix the potential memory leak in jbd2_journal_stop() and use proper handle refcounting before we attempt to free it to avoid use-after-free issues. And finally remove all WARN_ON(!transaction) from the code so that we do not get random traces when something goes wrong because when journal restart fails we will get to some of those functions. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-