- 01 6月, 2018 13 次提交
-
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
They work better in the new alloc_init function. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
Preparing to add conditional LAYOUTGET to OPEN rpc, the LAYOUTGET will need the ctx info. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
nfs_init_sequence() will clear this for us. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
If the wait for a LOCK operation is interrupted, and then the file is closed, the locks cleanup code will assume that no new locks will be added to the inode after it has completed. We already have a mechanism to detect if there was signal, so let's use that to avoid recreating the local lock once the RPC completes. Also skip re-sending the LOCK operation for the various error cases if we were signaled. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> [Trond: Fix inverted test of locks_lock_inode_wait()] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we get an ESTALE error in response to an RPC call operating on the file on the MDS, we should immediately cancel the layout for that file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we pass down the inode of the file being deleted so that we can return any delegation being held. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Even then it isn't really necessary. The reason why we may not want to pass in a stateid in other cases is that we cannot use the delegation credential. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Having these exist as two functions doesn't seem to add anything useful, and I think merging them together makes this easier to follow. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
We currently have a separate function just to set this, but I think it makes more sense to set it at the same time as the other values in nfs4_init_sequence() Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Rather than doing this in the generic NFS client code. Let's put this with the other v4 stuff so it's all in one place. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
This doesn't really need to be in the generic NFS client code, and I think it makes more sense to keep the v4 code in one place. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 11 4月, 2018 15 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we use EXCLUSIVE4_1 mode, the server returns an attribute mask where all the bits indicate which attributes were set, and where the verifier was stored. In order to figure out which attribute we have to resend, we need to clear out the attributes that are set in exclcreat_bitmask. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> [Anna: Fixed typo NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4 -> NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Neither nfs_inode_set_delegation() nor nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() are generic code. They have no business delving into NFSv4 OPEN xdr structures, so let's replace the "struct nfs_openres" parameter. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we hold a delegation, then the results of the ACCESS call are protected anyway. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, if the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag is set, for instance by a call to nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(), then it will not be cleared until all the attributes have been revalidated. This means, for instance, that NFSv4 writes will always force a full attribute revalidation. Track the ctime, mtime, size and change attribute separately from the other attributes so that we can have nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked() set them correctly, and later have the cache consistency bitmask be able to clear them. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Starting with NFSv4.1, the server is able to deduce the client id from the SEQUENCE op which means it can always figure out whether or not the client is holding a delegation on a file that is being changed. For that reason, RFC5661 does not require a delegation to be unconditionally recalled on operations such as SETATTR, RENAME, or REMOVE. Note that for now, we continue to return READ delegations since that is still expected by the Linux knfsd server. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that when we do finally delete the file, then we return the delegation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation recall out of the generic code, and into the NFSv4 specific callback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation return out of generic code and down into the NFSv4 specific unlink code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation return out of generic code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The 'fmode' argument can take an FMODE_EXEC value, which we want to filter out before comparing to the delegation type. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
If we have a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with a populated cl_lock_waitq, then that implies that a reconnect has occurred. Since we can't expect a CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callback at that point, just wake up the entire queue so that all the tasks can re-poll for their locks. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The task is expected to sleep for a while here, and it's possible that a new EXCHANGE_ID has occurred in the interim, and we were assigned a new clientid. Since this is a per-client list, there isn't a lot of value in vetting the clientid on the incoming request. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We may get a notification and lose the race to another client. Ensure that we wait again for a notification in that case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
For NFS, we just use the "raw" API since the i_version is mostly managed by the server. The exception there is when the client holds a write delegation, but we only need to bump it once there anyway to handle CB_GETATTR. Tested-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
There are 2 comments in the NFSv4 code which suggest that SIGLOST should possibly be sent to a process. In these cases a lock has been lost. The current practice is to set NFS_LOCK_LOST so that read/write returns EIO when a lock is lost. So change these comments to code when sets NFS_LOCK_LOST. One case is when lock recovery after apparent server restart fails with NFS4ERR_DENIED, NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD, or NFS4ERRO_RECLAIM_CONFLICT. The other case is when a lock attempt as part of lease recovery fails with NFS4ERR_DENIED. In an ideal world, these should not happen. However I have a packet trace showing an NFSv4.1 session getting NFS4ERR_BADSESSION after an extended network parition. The NFSv4.1 client treats this like server reboot until/unless it get NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE, in which case it switches over to "nograce" recovery mode. In this network trace, the client attempts to recover a lock and the server (incorrectly) reports NFS4ERR_DENIED rather than NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE. This leads to the ineffective comment and the client then continues to write using the OPEN stateid. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Convert CLOSE so that it specifies the correct stateid and inode for the error handling. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Convert CLOSE so that it specifies the correct stateid, state and inode for the error handling. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2017 7 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
Commit e1293727 "NFS: Move the flock open mode check into nfs_flock()" changed NFSv3 behavior for flock() such that the open mode must match the lock type, however that requirement shouldn't be enforced for flock(). Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.12 Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Before traversing a referral and performing a mount, the mounted-on directory looks strange: dr-xr-xr-x. 2 4294967294 4294967294 0 Dec 31 1969 dir.0 nfs4_get_referral is wiping out any cached attributes with what was returned via GETATTR(fs_locations), but the bit mask for that operation does not request any file attributes. Retrieve owner and timestamp information so that the memcpy in nfs4_get_referral fills in more attributes. Changes since v1: - Don't request attributes that the client unconditionally replaces - Request only MOUNTED_ON_FILEID or FILEID attribute, not both - encode_fs_locations() doesn't use the third bitmask word Fixes: 6b97fd3d ("NFSv4: Follow a referral") Suggested-by: NPradeep Thomas <pradeepthomas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In nfs_set_open_stateid_locked, we must ignore stateids from closed state. Reported-by: NAndrew W Elble <aweits@rit.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If our layoutreturn returns an NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, then try to update the stateid and retry. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If our layoutreturn on close operation returns an NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, then try to update the stateid and retry. We know that there should be no further LAYOUTGET requests being launched. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-