- 21 4月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
In addition to removing the dprintk(), this patch also initializes "res" to the default return value instead of doing this through an else condition. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Removing the dprintk()s lets us simplify the function by removing the else condition entirely and returning the status of initiate_{file,bulk}_draining() directly. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 02 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of grabbing the layout, we want to get the inode so that we can reduce races between layoutget and layoutrecall when the server does not support call referring. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Add a waitqueue head to the client structure. Have clients set a wait on that queue prior to requesting a lock from the server. If the lock is blocked, then we can use that to wait for wakeups. Note that we do need to do this "manually" since we need to set the wait on the waitqueue prior to requesting the lock, but requesting a lock can involve activities that can block. However, only do that for NFSv4.1 locks, either by compiling out all of the waitqueue handling when CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 is disabled, or skipping all of it at runtime if we're dealing with v4.0, or v4.1 servers that don't send lock callbacks. Note too that even when we expect to get a lock callback, RFC5661 section 20.11.4 is pretty clear that we still need to poll for them, so we do still sleep on a timeout. We do however always poll at the longest interval in that case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> [Anna: nfs4_retry_setlk() "status" should default to -ERESTARTSYS] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
For now, the callback doesn't do anything. Support for that will be added in later patches. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If CB_SEQUENCE tells us that the processing of this request depends on the completion of one or more referring triples (see RFC 5661 Section 2.10.6.3), delay the callback processing until after the RPC requests being referred to have completed. If we end up delaying for more than 1/2 second, then fall back to returning NFS4ERR_DELAY in reply to the callback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The slot table hasn't been an array since v3.7. Ensure that we use nfs4_lookup_slot() to access the slot correctly. Fixes: 87dda67e ("NFSv4.1: Allow SEQUENCE to resize the slot table...") Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.8+
-
- 25 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
That's already being taken care of in pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to evaluate in this order: If the client holds no layout for this inode, then return NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT; it probably forgot the layout. If the client finds the inode among the list of layouts, but the corresponding stateid has not yet been initialised, then return NFS4ERR_DELAY to ask the server to retry once the outstanding LAYOUTGET is complete. If the current layout stateid's "other" field does not match the recalled stateid, return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID. If already processing a layout recall with a newer stateid, return NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID. This can only happens for servers that are non-compliant with the NFSv4.1 protocol. If already processing a layout recall with an older stateid, return NFS4ERR_DELAY to ask the server to retry once the outstanding LAYOUTRETURN is complete. Again, this is technically incompliant with the NFSv4.1 protocol. If the current layout sequence id is newer than the recalled stateid's sequence id, return NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID. This too implies protocol non-compliance. If the current layout sequence id is older than the recalled stateid's sequence id+1, return NFS4ERR_DELAY. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
LAYOUTRETURN is "special" in that servers and clients are expected to work with old stateids. When the client sends a LAYOUTRETURN with an old stateid in it then the server is expected to only tear down layout segments that were present when that seqid was current. Ensure that the client handles its accounting accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
Commit 80f96427 ("NFSv4.x: Enforce the ca_maxreponsesize_cached on the back channel") causes an oops when it receives a callback with cachethis=yes. [ 109.667378] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000002c8 [ 109.669476] IP: [<ffffffffa08a3e68>] nfs4_callback_compound+0x4f8/0x690 [nfsv4] [ 109.671216] PGD 0 [ 109.671736] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 109.705427] CPU: 1 PID: 3579 Comm: nfsv4.1-svc Not tainted 4.5.0-rc1+ #1 [ 109.706987] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 05/20/2014 [ 109.709468] task: ffff8800b4408000 ti: ffff88008448c000 task.ti: ffff88008448c000 [ 109.711207] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa08a3e68>] [<ffffffffa08a3e68>] nfs4_callback_compound+0x4f8/0x690 [nfsv4] [ 109.713521] RSP: 0018:ffff88008448fca0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 109.714762] RAX: ffff880081ee202c RBX: ffff8800b7b5b600 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 109.716427] RDX: 0000000000000008 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 109.718091] RBP: ffff88008448fda8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000b000000 [ 109.719757] R10: ffff880137786000 R11: ffff8800b7b5b600 R12: 0000000001000000 [ 109.721415] R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000000053270000 R15: 000000000000000b [ 109.723061] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880139640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 109.724931] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 109.726278] CR2: 00000000000002c8 CR3: 0000000034d50000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ 109.727972] Stack: [ 109.728465] ffff880081ee202c ffff880081ee201c 000000008448fcc0 ffff8800baccb800 [ 109.730349] ffff8800baccc800 ffffffffa08d0380 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 109.732211] ffff8800b7b5b600 0000000000000001 ffffffff81d073c0 ffff880081ee3090 [ 109.734056] Call Trace: [ 109.734657] [<ffffffffa03795d4>] svc_process_common+0x5c4/0x6c0 [sunrpc] [ 109.736267] [<ffffffffa0379a4c>] bc_svc_process+0x1fc/0x360 [sunrpc] [ 109.737775] [<ffffffffa08a2c2c>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x10c/0x1d0 [nfsv4] [ 109.739335] [<ffffffff810cb380>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [ 109.740799] [<ffffffffa08a2b20>] ? nfs4_callback_svc+0x50/0x50 [nfsv4] [ 109.742349] [<ffffffff810a6998>] kthread+0xd8/0xf0 [ 109.743495] [<ffffffff810a68c0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 [ 109.744776] [<ffffffff816abc4f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 [ 109.746037] [<ffffffff810a68c0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 [ 109.747324] Code: cc 45 31 f6 48 8b 85 00 ff ff ff 44 89 30 48 8b 85 f8 fe ff ff 44 89 20 48 8b 9d 38 ff ff ff 48 8b bd 30 ff ff ff 48 85 db 74 4c <4c> 8b af c8 02 00 00 4d 8d a5 08 02 00 00 49 81 c5 98 02 00 00 [ 109.754361] RIP [<ffffffffa08a3e68>] nfs4_callback_compound+0x4f8/0x690 [nfsv4] [ 109.756123] RSP <ffff88008448fca0> [ 109.756951] CR2: 00000000000002c8 [ 109.757738] ---[ end trace 2b8555511ab5dfb4 ]--- [ 109.758819] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 109.760126] Kernel Offset: disabled [ 118.938934] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception It doesn't unlock the table nor does it set the cps->clp pointer which is later needed by nfs4_cb_free_slot(). Fixes: 80f96427 ("NFSv4.x: Enforce the ca_maxresponsesize_cached ...") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 02 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need to initialize cb_sequenceres information when reporting a NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP error, since that will apply to the next operation, not to the CB_SEQUENCE itself. Reported-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Hook the callback channel into the same session management machinery as we use for the forward channel. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We need to make sure that we don't allow args->csa_sequenceid == 0. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We have no duplicate reply cache, so we always set the back channel ca_maxresponsesize_cached to zero when negotiating the session. That means we should always error out as soon as we see the server set args->csa_cachethis. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
See RFC5661 Section 2.10.6.2: if retrying a request, and the old one is still in progress, we must return NFS4ERR_DELAY as the reply to sequence. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead, use the values encoded in the slot table itself. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Peng Tao points out that the call to pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() could race with pnfs_put_lseg(), in which case the layout segment is cleared, but no layoutreturn will be sent. Fix is to replace the call to pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid(). Reported-by: NPeng Tao <tao.peng@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout segment is invalid, then we should not be adding more write requests to the commit list. Instead, those writes should be replayed after requesting a new layout. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 12月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The stateid is extremely valuable when debugging. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client is promising to return the layout ASAP, then there is no need to return DELAY and have the server retry. Instead default to the normal procedure described in RFC5661. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The RFC requires us to check if the server is recalling a stateid that we haven't yet received. If so, tell it to wait. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the client needs to delay the layout callback, then speed up the recall process by marking the remaining layout segments to be actively returned by the client. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This ensures that we don't reuse the stateid if a layout return or implied layout return means that we've returned all layout segments Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kinglong Mee 提交于
It's not needed to checking NFS_DEBUG before define NFSDBG_FACILITY, remove it. Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Only support for single file layoutrecall for now. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
All these functions do is call nfs41_ping_server() without adding anything. Let's remove them and give nfs41_ping_server() a better name instead. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a callback slot table regression. Fixes: e937ee71 ("nfs: Only update callback sequnce id when CB_SEQUENCE success") Cc: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Kinglong Mee 提交于
For a cb_layoutrecall replay, nfsd got CB_SEQUENCE status of zero, but all informations of cb_sequenceres are zero too !!! validate_seqid() return NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP for a replay, and skip the initlize cb_sequenceres. Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Kinglong Mee 提交于
When testing pnfs layout, nfsd got error NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED. It is caused by nfs return NFS4ERR_DELAY before validate_seqid(), don't update the sequnce id, but nfsd updates the sequnce id !!! According to RFC5661 20.9.3, " If CB_SEQUENCE returns an error, then the state of the slot (sequence ID, cached reply) MUST NOT change. " Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server doesn't agree to out backchannel setup request, then don't set one up. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Recent work in the pgio layer made it possible for there to be more than one request per page. This caused a subtle change in commit behavior, because write.c:nfs_commit_unstable_pages compares the number of *pages* waiting for writeback against the number of requests on a commit list to choose when to send a COMMIT in a non-blocking flush. This is probably hard to hit in normal operation - you have to be using rsize/wsize < PAGE_SIZE, or pnfs with lots of boundaries that are not page aligned to have a noticeable change in behavior. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This code has been around for a while, but never was enabled, although it is in a working shape. Note that we implement NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE identical to NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE. Given that in either case we can't do anything but preventing further lookups of a given device ID there isn't much difference in semantics for the two. For the delete case the server MUST ensure that there are no outstanding layouts, while for the change case it doesn't, but that has little relevance to the client. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
If a layout driver keeps per-inode state outside of the layout segments it needs to be notified of any layout returns or recalls on an inode, and not just about the freeing of layout segments. Add a method to acomplish this, which will allow the block layout driver to handle the case of truncated and re-expanded files properly. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Expedite layout recall processing by forcing a layout commit when we see busy segments. Without it the layout recall might have to wait until the VM decided to start writeback for the file, which can introduce long delays. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the filehandles match, but the igrab() fails, or the layout is freed before we can get it, then just return NULL. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
It is not sufficient to compare filehandles when we receive a layout recall from the server; we also need to check that the layout stateids match. Reported-by: Nshaobingqing <shaobingqing@bwstor.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up, since slot and sequence numbers are all unsigned anyway. Among other things, squelch compiler warnings: linux/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: In function ‘nfs4_setup_sequence’: linux/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:703:2: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [-Wsign-compare] and linux/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c: In function ‘nfs4_alloc_slot’: linux/fs/nfs/nfs4session.c:151:31: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [-Wsign-compare] Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-