- 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Some minor cleanups: i) Remove the unlikely() from fd array map lookups and let the CPU branch predictor do its job, scenarios where there is not always a map entry are very well valid. ii) Move the attribute type check in the bpf_perf_event_read() helper a bit earlier so it's consistent wrt checks with bpf_perf_event_output() helper as well. iii) remove some comments that are self-documenting in kprobe_prog_is_valid_access() and therefore make it consistent to tp_prog_is_valid_access() as well. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Start address randomization and blinding in BPF currently use prandom_u32(). prandom_u32() values are not exposed to unpriviledged user space to my knowledge, but given other kernel facilities such as ASLR, stack canaries, etc make use of stronger get_random_int(), we better make use of it here as well given blinding requests successively new random values. get_random_int() has minimal entropy pool depletion, is not cryptographically secure, but doesn't need to be for our use cases here. Suggested-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
This work adds a generic facility for use from eBPF JIT compilers that allows for further hardening of JIT generated images through blinding constants. In response to the original work on BPF JIT spraying published by Keegan McAllister [1], most BPF JITs were changed to make images read-only and start at a randomized offset in the page, where the rest was filled with trap instructions. We have this nowadays in x86, arm, arm64 and s390 JIT compilers. Additionally, later work also made eBPF interpreter images read only for kernels supporting DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX, that is, x86, arm, arm64 and s390 archs as well currently. This is done by default for mentioned JITs when JITing is enabled. Furthermore, we had a generic and configurable constant blinding facility on our todo for quite some time now to further make spraying harder, and first implementation since around netconf 2016. We found that for systems where untrusted users can load cBPF/eBPF code where JIT is enabled, start offset randomization helps a bit to make jumps into crafted payload harder, but in case where larger programs that cross page boundary are injected, we again have some part of the program opcodes at a page start offset. With improved guessing and more reliable payload injection, chances can increase to jump into such payload. Elena Reshetova recently wrote a test case for it [2, 3]. Moreover, eBPF comes with 64 bit constants, which can leave some more room for payloads. Note that for all this, additional bugs in the kernel are still required to make the jump (and of course to guess right, to not jump into a trap) and naturally the JIT must be enabled, which is disabled by default. For helping mitigation, the general idea is to provide an option bpf_jit_harden that admins can tweak along with bpf_jit_enable, so that for cases where JIT should be enabled for performance reasons, the generated image can be further hardened with blinding constants for unpriviledged users (bpf_jit_harden == 1), with trading off performance for these, but not for privileged ones. We also added the option of blinding for all users (bpf_jit_harden == 2), which is quite helpful for testing f.e. with test_bpf.ko. There are no further e.g. hardening levels of bpf_jit_harden switch intended, rationale is to have it dead simple to use as on/off. Since this functionality would need to be duplicated over and over for JIT compilers to use, which are already complex enough, we provide a generic eBPF byte-code level based blinding implementation, which is then just transparently JITed. JIT compilers need to make only a few changes to integrate this facility and can be migrated one by one. This option is for eBPF JITs and will be used in x86, arm64, s390 without too much effort, and soon ppc64 JITs, thus that native eBPF can be blinded as well as cBPF to eBPF migrations, so that both can be covered with a single implementation. The rule for JITs is that bpf_jit_blind_constants() must be called from bpf_int_jit_compile(), and in case blinding is disabled, we follow normally with JITing the passed program. In case blinding is enabled and we fail during the process of blinding itself, we must return with the interpreter. Similarly, in case the JITing process after the blinding failed, we return normally to the interpreter with the non-blinded code. Meaning, interpreter doesn't change in any way and operates on eBPF code as usual. For doing this pre-JIT blinding step, we need to make use of a helper/auxiliary register, here BPF_REG_AX. This is strictly internal to the JIT and not in any way part of the eBPF architecture. Just like in the same way as JITs internally make use of some helper registers when emitting code, only that here the helper register is one abstraction level higher in eBPF bytecode, but nevertheless in JIT phase. That helper register is needed since f.e. manually written program can issue loads to all registers of eBPF architecture. The core concept with the additional register is: blind out all 32 and 64 bit constants by converting BPF_K based instructions into a small sequence from K_VAL into ((RND ^ K_VAL) ^ RND). Therefore, this is transformed into: BPF_REG_AX := (RND ^ K_VAL), BPF_REG_AX ^= RND, and REG <OP> BPF_REG_AX, so actual operation on the target register is translated from BPF_K into BPF_X one that is operating on BPF_REG_AX's content. During rewriting phase when blinding, RND is newly generated via prandom_u32() for each processed instruction. 64 bit loads are split into two 32 bit loads to make translation and patching not too complex. Only basic thing required by JITs is to call the helper bpf_jit_blind_constants()/bpf_jit_prog_release_other() pair, and to map BPF_REG_AX into an unused register. Small bpf_jit_disasm extract from [2] when applied to x86 JIT: echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden ffffffffa034f5e9 + <x>: [...] 39: mov $0xa8909090,%eax 3e: mov $0xa8909090,%eax 43: mov $0xa8ff3148,%eax 48: mov $0xa89081b4,%eax 4d: mov $0xa8900bb0,%eax 52: mov $0xa810e0c1,%eax 57: mov $0xa8908eb4,%eax 5c: mov $0xa89020b0,%eax [...] echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden ffffffffa034f1e5 + <x>: [...] 39: mov $0xe1192563,%r10d 3f: xor $0x4989b5f3,%r10d 46: mov %r10d,%eax 49: mov $0xb8296d93,%r10d 4f: xor $0x10b9fd03,%r10d 56: mov %r10d,%eax 59: mov $0x8c381146,%r10d 5f: xor $0x24c7200e,%r10d 66: mov %r10d,%eax 69: mov $0xeb2a830e,%r10d 6f: xor $0x43ba02ba,%r10d 76: mov %r10d,%eax 79: mov $0xd9730af,%r10d 7f: xor $0xa5073b1f,%r10d 86: mov %r10d,%eax 89: mov $0x9a45662b,%r10d 8f: xor $0x325586ea,%r10d 96: mov %r10d,%eax [...] As can be seen, original constants that carry payload are hidden when enabled, actual operations are transformed from constant-based to register-based ones, making jumps into constants ineffective. Above extract/example uses single BPF load instruction over and over, but of course all instructions with constants are blinded. Performance wise, JIT with blinding performs a bit slower than just JIT and faster than interpreter case. This is expected, since we still get all the performance benefits from JITing and in normal use-cases not every single instruction needs to be blinded. Summing up all 296 test cases averaged over multiple runs from test_bpf.ko suite, interpreter was 55% slower than JIT only and JIT with blinding was 8% slower than JIT only. Since there are also some extremes in the test suite, I expect for ordinary workloads that the performance for the JIT with blinding case is even closer to JIT only case, f.e. nmap test case from suite has averaged timings in ns 29 (JIT), 35 (+ blinding), and 151 (interpreter). BPF test suite, seccomp test suite, eBPF sample code and various bigger networking eBPF programs have been tested with this and were running fine. For testing purposes, I also adapted interpreter and redirected blinded eBPF image to interpreter and also here all tests pass. [1] http://mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.com/2012/11/attacking-hardened-linux-systems-with.html [2] https://github.com/01org/jit-spray-poc-for-ksp/ [3] http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2016/05/03/5Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: NElena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Since the blinding is strictly only called from inside eBPF JITs, we need to change signatures for bpf_int_jit_compile() and bpf_prog_select_runtime() first in order to prepare that the eBPF program we're dealing with can change underneath. Hence, for call sites, we need to return the latest prog. No functional change in this patch. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Move the functionality to patch instructions out of the verifier code and into the core as the new bpf_patch_insn_single() helper will be needed later on for blinding as well. No changes in functionality. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Besides others, remove redundant comments where the code is self documenting enough, and properly indent various bpf_verifier_ops and bpf_prog_type_list declarations. Moreover, remove two exports that actually have no module user. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Extended BPF carried over two instructions from classic to access packet data: LD_ABS and LD_IND. They're highly optimized in JITs, but due to their design they have to do length check for every access. When BPF is processing 20M packets per second single LD_ABS after JIT is consuming 3% cpu. Hence the need to optimize it further by amortizing the cost of 'off < skb_headlen' over multiple packet accesses. One option is to introduce two new eBPF instructions LD_ABS_DW and LD_IND_DW with similar usage as skb_header_pointer(). The kernel part for interpreter and x64 JIT was implemented in [1], but such new insns behave like old ld_abs and abort the program with 'return 0' if access is beyond linear data. Such hidden control flow is hard to workaround plus changing JITs and rolling out new llvm is incovenient. Therefore allow cls_bpf/act_bpf program access skb->data directly: int bpf_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct iphdr *ip; if (skb->data + sizeof(struct iphdr) + ETH_HLEN > skb->data_end) /* packet too small */ return 0; ip = skb->data + ETH_HLEN; /* access IP header fields with direct loads */ if (ip->version != 4 || ip->saddr == 0x7f000001) return 1; [...] } This solution avoids introduction of new instructions. llvm stays the same and all JITs stay the same, but verifier has to work extra hard to prove safety of the above program. For XDP the direct store instructions can be allowed as well. The skb->data is NET_IP_ALIGNED, so for common cases the verifier can check the alignment. The complex packet parsers where packet pointer is adjusted incrementally cannot be tracked for alignment, so allow byte access in such cases and misaligned access on architectures that define efficient_unaligned_access [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/ast/bpf.git/?h=ld_abs_dwSigned-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
This patch adds a new helper for cls/act programs that can push events to user space applications. For networking, this can be f.e. for sampling, debugging, logging purposes or pushing of arbitrary wake-up events. The idea is similar to a43eec30 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") and 39111695 ("samples: bpf: add bpf_perf_event_output example"). The eBPF program utilizes a perf event array map that user space populates with fds from perf_event_open(), the eBPF program calls into the helper f.e. as skb_event_output(skb, &my_map, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, raw, sizeof(raw)) so that the raw data is pushed into the fd f.e. at the map index of the current CPU. User space can poll/mmap/etc on this and has a data channel for receiving events that can be post-processed. The nice thing is that since the eBPF program and user space application making use of it are tightly coupled, they can define their own arbitrary raw data format and what/when they want to push. While f.e. packet headers could be one part of the meta data that is being pushed, this is not a substitute for things like packet sockets as whole packet is not being pushed and push is only done in a single direction. Intention is more of a generically usable, efficient event pipe to applications. Workflow is that tc can pin the map and applications can attach themselves e.g. after cls/act setup to one or multiple map slots, demuxing is done by the eBPF program. Adding this facility is with minimal effort, it reuses the helper introduced in a43eec30 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") and we get its functionality for free by overloading its BPF_FUNC_ identifier for cls/act programs, ctx is currently unused, but will be made use of in future. Example will be added to iproute2's BPF example files. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josh Poimboeuf 提交于
objtool reports the following false positive warnings: kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: __bpf_prog_run()+0x5c: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: __bpf_prog_run()+0x60: function has unreachable instruction kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: __bpf_prog_run()+0x64: function has unreachable instruction [...] It's confused by the following dynamic jump instruction in __bpf_prog_run():: jmp *(%r12,%rax,8) which corresponds to the following line in the C code: goto *jumptable[insn->code]; There's no way for objtool to deterministically find all possible branch targets for a dynamic jump, so it can't verify this code. In this case the jumps all stay within the function, and there's nothing unusual going on related to the stack, so we can whitelist the function. Signed-off-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b90e6bf3fdbfb5c4cc1b164b965502e53cf48935.1456719558.git.jpoimboe@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 19 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Back in the days where eBPF (or back then "internal BPF" ;->) was not exposed to user space, and only the classic BPF programs internally translated into eBPF programs, we missed the fact that for classic BPF A and X needed to be cleared. It was fixed back then via 83d5b7ef ("net: filter: initialize A and X registers"), and thus classic BPF specifics were added to the eBPF interpreter core to work around it. This added some confusion for JIT developers later on that take the eBPF interpreter code as an example for deriving their JIT. F.e. in f75298f5 ("s390/bpf: clear correct BPF accumulator register"), at least X could leak stack memory. Furthermore, since this is only needed for classic BPF translations and not for eBPF (verifier takes care that read access to regs cannot be done uninitialized), more complexity is added to JITs as they need to determine whether they deal with migrations or native eBPF where they can just omit clearing A/X in their prologue and thus reduce image size a bit, see f.e. cde66c2d ("s390/bpf: Only clear A and X for converted BPF programs"). In other cases (x86, arm64), A and X is being cleared in the prologue also for eBPF case, which is unnecessary. Lets move this into the BPF migration in bpf_convert_filter() where it actually belongs as long as the number of eBPF JITs are still few. It can thus be done generically; allowing us to remove the quirk from __bpf_prog_run() and to slightly reduce JIT image size in case of eBPF, while reducing code duplication on this matter in current(/future) eBPF JITs. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Acked-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> Acked-by: NZi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
We currently have duplicated cleanup code in bpf_prog_put() and bpf_prog_put_rcu() cleanup paths. Back then we decided that it was not worth it to make it a common helper called by both, but with the recent addition of resource charging, we could have avoided the fix in commit ac00737f ("bpf: Need to call bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock from bpf_prog_put") if we would have had only a single, common path. We can simplify it further by assigning aux->prog only once during allocation time. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
While recently arguing on a seccomp discussion that raw prandom_u32() access shouldn't be exposed to unpriviledged user space, I forgot the fact that SKF_AD_RANDOM extension actually already does it for some time in cBPF via commit 4cd3675e ("filter: added BPF random opcode"). Since prandom_u32() is being used in a lot of critical networking code, lets be more conservative and split their states. Furthermore, consolidate eBPF and cBPF prandom handlers to use the new internal PRNG. For eBPF, bpf_get_prandom_u32() was only accessible for priviledged users, but should that change one day, we also don't want to leak raw sequences through things like eBPF maps. One thought was also to have own per bpf_prog states, but due to ABI reasons this is not easily possible, i.e. the program code currently cannot access bpf_prog itself, and copying the rnd_state to/from the stack scratch space whenever a program uses the prng seems not really worth the trouble and seems too hacky. If needed, taus113 could in such cases be implemented within eBPF using a map entry to keep the state space, or get_random_bytes() could become a second helper in cases where performance would not be critical. Both sides can trigger a one-time late init via prandom_init_once() on the shared state. Performance-wise, there should even be a tiny gain as bpf_user_rnd_u32() saves one function call. The PRNG needs to live inside the BPF core since kernels could have a NET-less config as well. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
As we need to add further flags to the bpf_prog structure, lets migrate both bools to a bitfield representation. The size of the base structure (excluding insns) remains unchanged at 40 bytes. Add also tags for the kmemchecker, so that it doesn't throw false positives. Even in case gcc would generate suboptimal code, it's not being accessed in performance critical paths. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Nan 提交于
All the map backends are of generic nature. In order to avoid adding much special code into the eBPF core, rewrite part of the bpf_prog_array map code and make it more generic. So the new perf_event_array map type can reuse most of code with bpf_prog_array map and add fewer lines of special code. Signed-off-by: NWang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NKaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
improve accuracy of timing in test_bpf and add two stress tests: - {skb->data[0], get_smp_processor_id} repeated 2k times - {skb->data[0], vlan_push} x 68 followed by {skb->data[0], vlan_pop} x 68 1st test is useful to test performance of JIT implementation of BPF_LD_ABS together with BPF_CALL instructions. 2nd test is stressing skb_vlan_push/pop logic together with skb->data access via BPF_LD_ABS insn which checks that re-caching of skb->data is done correctly. In order to call bpf_skb_vlan_push() from test_bpf.ko have to add three export_symbol_gpl. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
ARG1 = BPF_R1 as it stands, evaluates to regs[BPF_REG_1] = regs[BPF_REG_1] and thus has no effect. Add a comment instead, explaining what happens and why it's okay to just remove it. Since from user space side, a tail call is invoked as a pseudo helper function via bpf_tail_call_proto, the verifier checks the arguments just like with any other helper function and makes sure that the first argument (regs[BPF_REG_1])'s type is ARG_PTR_TO_CTX. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
bpf_trace_printk() is a helper function used to debug eBPF programs. Let socket and TC programs use it as well. Note, it's DEBUG ONLY helper. If it's used in the program, the kernel will print warning banner to make sure users don't use it in production. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
eBPF programs attached to kprobes need to filter based on current->pid, uid and other fields, so introduce helper functions: u64 bpf_get_current_pid_tgid(void) Return: current->tgid << 32 | current->pid u64 bpf_get_current_uid_gid(void) Return: current_gid << 32 | current_uid bpf_get_current_comm(char *buf, int size_of_buf) stores current->comm into buf They can be used from the programs attached to TC as well to classify packets based on current task fields. Update tracex2 example to print histogram of write syscalls for each process instead of aggregated for all. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 6月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Besides others, move bpf_tail_call_proto to the remaining definitions of other protos, improve comments a bit (i.e. remove some obvious ones, where the code is already self-documenting, add objectives for others), simplify bpf_prog_array_compatible() a bit. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
As this is already exported from tracing side via commit d9847d31 ("tracing: Allow BPF programs to call bpf_ktime_get_ns()"), we might as well want to move it to the core, so also networking users can make use of it, e.g. to measure diffs for certain flows from ingress/egress. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
introduce bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index) helper function which can be used from BPF programs like: int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx) { ... bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index); ... } that is roughly equivalent to: int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx) { ... if (jmp_table[index]) return (*jmp_table[index])(ctx); ... } The important detail that it's not a normal call, but a tail call. The kernel stack is precious, so this helper reuses the current stack frame and jumps into another BPF program without adding extra call frame. It's trivially done in interpreter and a bit trickier in JITs. In case of x64 JIT the bigger part of generated assembler prologue is common for all programs, so it is simply skipped while jumping. Other JITs can do similar prologue-skipping optimization or do stack unwind before jumping into the next program. bpf_tail_call() arguments: ctx - context pointer jmp_table - one of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY maps used as the jump table index - index in the jump table Since all BPF programs are idenitified by file descriptor, user space need to populate the jmp_table with FDs of other BPF programs. If jmp_table[index] is empty the bpf_tail_call() doesn't jump anywhere and program execution continues as normal. New BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY map type is introduced so that user space can populate this jmp_table array with FDs of other bpf programs. Programs can share the same jmp_table array or use multiple jmp_tables. The chain of tail calls can form unpredictable dynamic loops therefore tail_call_cnt is used to limit the number of calls and currently is set to 32. Use cases: Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> ========== - simplify complex programs by splitting them into a sequence of small programs - dispatch routine For tracing and future seccomp the program may be triggered on all system calls, but processing of syscall arguments will be different. It's more efficient to implement them as: int syscall_entry(struct seccomp_data *ctx) { bpf_tail_call(ctx, &syscall_jmp_table, ctx->nr /* syscall number */); ... default: process unknown syscall ... } int sys_write_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...} int sys_read_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...} syscall_jmp_table[__NR_write] = sys_write_event; syscall_jmp_table[__NR_read] = sys_read_event; For networking the program may call into different parsers depending on packet format, like: int packet_parser(struct __sk_buff *skb) { ... parse L2, L3 here ... __u8 ipproto = load_byte(skb, ... offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol)); bpf_tail_call(skb, &ipproto_jmp_table, ipproto); ... default: process unknown protocol ... } int parse_tcp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...} int parse_udp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...} ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_TCP] = parse_tcp; ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_UDP] = parse_udp; - for TC use case, bpf_tail_call() allows to implement reclassify-like logic - bpf_map_update_elem/delete calls into BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY jump table are atomic, so user space can build chains of BPF programs on the fly Implementation details: ======================= - high performance of bpf_tail_call() is the goal. It could have been implemented without JIT changes as a wrapper on top of BPF_PROG_RUN() macro, but with two downsides: . all programs would have to pay performance penalty for this feature and tail call itself would be slower, since mandatory stack unwind, return, stack allocate would be done for every tailcall. . tailcall would be limited to programs running preempt_disabled, since generic 'void *ctx' doesn't have room for 'tail_call_cnt' and it would need to be either global per_cpu variable accessed by helper and by wrapper or global variable protected by locks. In this implementation x64 JIT bypasses stack unwind and jumps into the callee program after prologue. - bpf_prog_array_compatible() ensures that prog_type of callee and caller are the same and JITed/non-JITed flag is the same, since calling JITed program from non-JITed is invalid, since stack frames are different. Similarly calling kprobe type program from socket type program is invalid. - jump table is implemented as BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY to reuse 'map' abstraction, its user space API and all of verifier logic. It's in the existing arraymap.c file, since several functions are shared with regular array map. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
ALU64_DIV instruction should be dividing 64-bit by 64-bit, whereas do_div() does 64-bit by 32-bit divide. x64 and arm64 JITs correctly implement 64 by 64 unsigned divide. llvm BPF backend emits code assuming that ALU64_DIV does 64 by 64. Fixes: 89aa0758 ("net: sock: allow eBPF programs to be attached to sockets") Reported-by: NMichael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
This patch adds the possibility to obtain raw_smp_processor_id() in eBPF. Currently, this is only possible in classic BPF where commit da2033c2 ("filter: add SKF_AD_RXHASH and SKF_AD_CPU") has added facilities for this. Perhaps most importantly, this would also allow us to track per CPU statistics with eBPF maps, or to implement a poor-man's per CPU data structure through eBPF maps. Example function proto-type looks like: u32 (*smp_processor_id)(void) = (void *)BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id; Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
This work is similar to commit 4cd3675e ("filter: added BPF random opcode") and adds a possibility for packet sampling in eBPF. Currently, this is only possible in classic BPF and useful to combine sampling with f.e. packet sockets, possible also with tc. Example function proto-type looks like: u32 (*prandom_u32)(void) = (void *)BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32; Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Fengguang reported, that on openrisc and avr32 architectures, we get the following linker errors on *_defconfig builds that have no bpf syscall support: net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd0): undefined reference to `bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto' net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd4): undefined reference to `bpf_map_update_elem_proto' net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x1cd8): undefined reference to `bpf_map_delete_elem_proto' Fix it up by providing built-in weak definitions of the symbols, so they can be overridden when the syscall is enabled. I think the issue might be that gcc is not able to optimize all that away. This patch fixes the linker errors for me, tested with Fengguang's make.cross [1] script. [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.crossReported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Fixes: d4052c4a ("ebpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL ifdefs in socket filter code") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Nothing needs the module pointer any more, and the next patch will call it from RCU, where the module itself might no longer exist. Removing the arg is the safest approach. This just codifies the use of the module_alloc/module_free pattern which ftrace and bpf use. Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: linux-cris-kernel@axis.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
-
- 28 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
introduce two configs: - hidden CONFIG_BPF to select eBPF interpreter that classic socket filters depend on - visible CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL (default off) that tracing and sockets can use that solves several problems: - tracing and others that wish to use eBPF don't need to depend on NET. They can use BPF_SYSCALL to allow loading from userspace or select BPF to use it directly from kernel in NET-less configs. - in 3.18 programs cannot be attached to events yet, so don't force it on - when the rest of eBPF infra is there in 3.19+, it's still useful to switch it off to minimize kernel size bloat-o-meter on x64 shows: add/remove: 0/60 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-15601 (-15601) tested with many different config combinations. Hopefully didn't miss anything. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
eBPF programs are similar to kernel modules. They are loaded by the user process and automatically unloaded when process exits. Each eBPF program is a safe run-to-completion set of instructions. eBPF verifier statically determines that the program terminates and is safe to execute. The following syscall wrapper can be used to load the program: int bpf_prog_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, const struct bpf_insn *insns, int insn_cnt, const char *license) { union bpf_attr attr = { .prog_type = prog_type, .insns = ptr_to_u64(insns), .insn_cnt = insn_cnt, .license = ptr_to_u64(license), }; return bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr)); } where 'insns' is an array of eBPF instructions and 'license' is a string that must be GPL compatible to call helper functions marked gpl_only Upon succesful load the syscall returns prog_fd. Use close(prog_fd) to unload the program. User space tests and examples follow in the later patches Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Since BPF JIT depends on the availability of module_alloc() and module_free() helpers (HAVE_BPF_JIT and MODULES), we better build that code only in case we have BPF_JIT in our config enabled, just like with other JIT code. Fixes builds for arm/marzen_defconfig and sh/rsk7269_defconfig. ==================== kernel/built-in.o: In function `bpf_jit_binary_alloc': /home/cwang/linux/kernel/bpf/core.c:144: undefined reference to `module_alloc' kernel/built-in.o: In function `bpf_jit_binary_free': /home/cwang/linux/kernel/bpf/core.c:164: undefined reference to `module_free' make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 ==================== Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Fixes: 738cbe72 ("net: bpf: consolidate JIT binary allocator") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Introduced in commit 314beb9b ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks") and later on replicated in aa2d2c73 ("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") for s390 architecture, write protection for BPF JIT images got added and a random start address of the JIT code, so that it's not on a page boundary anymore. Since both use a very similar allocator for the BPF binary header, we can consolidate this code into the BPF core as it's mostly JIT independant anyway. This will also allow for future archs that support DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX to just reuse instead of reimplementing it. JIT tested on x86_64 and s390x with BPF test suite. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register. All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction. Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction: insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM insn[0].dst_reg = destination register insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit insn[1].code = 0 insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit All unused fields must be zero. Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register. x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64' arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter. It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions: BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32) BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32) BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32) BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2) User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only. To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide. For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose. src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and load in-kernel map pointer. src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other instructions. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way, hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow seems appropriate. This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to read-only pages. In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g. caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea is derived from commit 314beb9b ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks"). This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore. After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT image pointer). Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(), including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no performance penalty. Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual inspection of kernel_page_tables. Brad Spengler proposed the same idea via Twitter during development of this patch. Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa. Suggested-by: NBrad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 8月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
clean up names related to socket filtering and bpf in the following way: - everything that deals with sockets keeps 'sk_*' prefix - everything that is pure BPF is changed to 'bpf_*' prefix split 'struct sk_filter' into struct sk_filter { atomic_t refcnt; struct rcu_head rcu; struct bpf_prog *prog; }; and struct bpf_prog { u32 jited:1, len:31; struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog; unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct bpf_insn *filter); union { struct sock_filter insns[0]; struct bpf_insn insnsi[0]; struct work_struct work; }; }; so that 'struct bpf_prog' can be used independent of sockets and cleans up 'unattached' bpf use cases split SK_RUN_FILTER macro into: SK_RUN_FILTER to be used with 'struct sk_filter *' and BPF_PROG_RUN to be used with 'struct bpf_prog *' __sk_filter_release(struct sk_filter *) gains __bpf_prog_release(struct bpf_prog *) helper function also perform related renames for the functions that work with 'struct bpf_prog *', since they're on the same lines: sk_filter_size -> bpf_prog_size sk_filter_select_runtime -> bpf_prog_select_runtime sk_filter_free -> bpf_prog_free sk_unattached_filter_create -> bpf_prog_create sk_unattached_filter_destroy -> bpf_prog_destroy sk_store_orig_filter -> bpf_prog_store_orig_filter sk_release_orig_filter -> bpf_release_orig_filter __sk_migrate_filter -> bpf_migrate_filter __sk_prepare_filter -> bpf_prepare_filter API for attaching classic BPF to a socket stays the same: sk_attach_filter(prog, struct sock *)/sk_detach_filter(struct sock *) and SK_RUN_FILTER(struct sk_filter *, ctx) to execute a program which is used by sockets, tun, af_packet API for 'unattached' BPF programs becomes: bpf_prog_create(struct bpf_prog **)/bpf_prog_destroy(struct bpf_prog *) and BPF_PROG_RUN(struct bpf_prog *, ctx) to execute a program which is used by isdn, ppp, team, seccomp, ptp, xt_bpf, cls_bpf, test_bpf Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
to indicate that this function is converting classic BPF into eBPF and not related to sockets Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
trivial rename to indicate that this functions performs classic BPF checking Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
eBPF is used by socket filtering, seccomp and soon by tracing and exposed to userspace, therefore 'sock_filter_int' name is not accurate. Rename it to 'bpf_insn' Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
BPF is used in several kernel components. This split creates logical boundary between generic eBPF core and the rest kernel/bpf/core.c: eBPF interpreter net/core/filter.c: classic->eBPF converter, classic verifiers, socket filters This patch only moves functions. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-