- 23 6月, 2015 40 次提交
-
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the various ring->dispatch_execbuffer() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the ring->emit_request() implementation to take a request instead of a ringbuf/request pair. Also removed its use of the OLR for obtaining the request's seqno. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the various ring->add_request() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR to obtain the seqno value that the request should be tagged with. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the various ring->emit_flush() implementations to take a request instead of a ringbuf/context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(), gen7_render_ring_cs_stall_wa() and gen8_emit_pipe_control() to take requests instead of rings. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the various ring->flush() functions to take a request instead of a ring. Also updated the tracer to include the request id. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> [danvet: Rebase since I didn't merge the addition of req->uniq.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the switch_mm() code paths to take a request instead of a ring. This includes the myriad *_mm_switch functions themselves and a bunch of PDP related helper functions. v2: Rebased to newer tree. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the *_ring_flush_all_caches() functions to take requests instead of rings or ringbuf/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the *_ring_workarounds_emit() functions to take requests instead of ring/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated *_ring_invalidate_all_caches(), i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets() and i915_emit_box() to take request structures instead of ring or ringbuf/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated mi_set_context() to take a request structure instead of a ring and context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Converted i915_gem_l3_remap() to take a request structure instead of a ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that everything above has been converted to use request structures, it is possible to update the lower level move_to_active() functions to be request based as well. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that all callers of i915_add_request() have a request pointer to hand, it is possible to update the add request function to take a request pointer rather than pulling it out of the OLR. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the display page flip code to do explicit request creation and submission rather than relying on the OLR and just hoping that the request actually gets submitted at some random point. The sequence is now to create a request, queue the work to the ring, assign the known request to the flip queue work item then actually submit the work and post the request. Note that every single flip function used to finish with '__intel_ring_advance(ring);'. However, immediately after they return there is now an add request call which will do the advance anyway. Thus the many duplicate advance calls have been removed. v2: Updated commit message with comment about advance removal. v3: The request can now be allocated by the _sync() code earlier on. Thus the page flip path does not necessarily need to allocate a new request, it may be able to re-use one. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The overlay update code path to do explicit request creation and submission rather than relying on the OLR to do the right thing. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the i915_gem_object_sync() code path. v2: Much more complex patch to share a single request between the sync and the page flip. The _sync() function now supports lazy allocation of the request structure. That is, if one is passed in then that will be used. If one is not, then a request will be allocated and passed back out. Note that the _sync() code does not necessarily require a request. Thus one will only be created until certain situations. The reason the lazy allocation must be done within the _sync() code itself is because the decision to need one or not is not really something that code above can second guess (except in the case where one is definitely not required because no ring is passed in). The call chains above _sync() now support passing a request through which most callers passing in NULL and assuming that no request will be required (because they also pass in NULL for the ring and therefore can't be generating any ring code). The exeception is intel_crtc_page_flip() which now supports having a request returned from _sync(). If one is, then that request is shared by the page flip (if the page flip is of a type to need a request). If _sync() does not generate a request but the page flip does need one, then the page flip path will create its own request. v3: Updated comment description to be clearer about 'to_req' parameter (Tomas Elf review request). Rebased onto newer tree that significantly changed the synchronisation code. v4: Updated comments from review feedback (Tomas Elf) For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated the two render_state_init() functions to take a request pointer instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR. v2: Rebased to newer tree. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, it is possible to update init_context() to take a request pointer instead of a ring/context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In execlist mode, context initialisation is deferred until first use of the given context. This is because execlist mode has per ring context state and thus many more context storage objects than legacy mode and many are never actually used. Previously, the initialisation commands were written to the ring and tagged with some random request structure via the OLR. This seemed to be causing a null pointer deference bug under certain circumstances (BZ:88865). This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the deferred initialisation code path. Thus removing any reliance on or randomness caused by the OLR. Note that it should be possible to move the deferred context creation until even later - when the context is actually switched to rather than when it is merely validated. This would allow the initialisation to be done within the request of the work that is wanting to use the context. Hence, the extra request that is created, used and retired just for the context init could be removed completely. However, this is left for a follow up patch. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated do_switch() to take a request pointer instead of a ring/context pair. v2: Removed some overzealous req-> dereferencing. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that the request is guaranteed to specify the context, it is possible to update the context switch code to use requests rather than ring and context pairs. This patch updates i915_switch_context() accordingly. Also removed the warning that the request's context must match the last context switch's context. As the context switch now gets the context object from the request structure, there is no longer any scope for the two to become out of step. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The final step in removing the OLR from i915_gem_init_hw() is to pass the newly allocated request structure in to each step rather than passing a ring structure. This patch updates both i915_ppgtt_init_ring() and i915_gem_context_enable() to take request pointers. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Now that a single per ring loop is being done for all the different intialisation steps in i915_gem_init_hw(), it is possible to add proper request management as well. The last remaining issue is that the context enable call eventually ends up within *_render_state_init() and this does its own private _i915_add_request() call. This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the top level loop and removes the add_request() from deep within the sub-functions. v2: Updated for removal of batch_obj from add_request call in previous patch. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The render state initialisation code does an explicit i915_add_request() call to commit the init commands. It was passing in the initialisation batch buffer to add_request() as the batch object parameter. However, the batch object entry in the request structure (which is all that parameter is used for) is meant for keeping track of user generated batch buffers for blame tagging during GPU hangs. This patch clears the batch object parameter so that kernel generated batch buffers are not tagged as being user generated. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The start of day context initialisation code in i915_gem_context_enable() loops over each ring and calls the legacy switch context or the execlist init context code as appropriate. This patch moves the ring looping out of that function in to the top level caller i915_gem_init_hw(). This means the a single pass can be made over all rings doing the PPGTT, L3 remap and context initialisation of each ring altogether. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The i915_gem_init_hw() function calls a bunch of smaller initialisation functions. Multiple of which have generic sections and per ring sections. This means multiple passes are done over the rings. Each pass writes data to the ring which floats around in that ring's OLR until some random point in the future when an add_request() is done by some random other piece of code. This patch breaks i915_ppgtt_init_hw() in two with the per ring initialisation now being done in i915_ppgtt_init_ring(). The ring looping is now done at the top level in i915_gem_init_hw(). v2: Fix dumb loop variable re-use. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> (v1) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Added explicit request creation and submission to the GPU idle code path. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In order to explcitly track all GPU work (and completely remove the outstanding lazy request), it is necessary to add extra i915_add_request() calls to various places. Some of these do not need the implicit cache flush done as part of the standard batch buffer submission process. This patch adds a flag to _add_request() to specify whether the flush is required or not. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the execbuffer_move_to_active() code path. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the move_to_gpu() code paths. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Updated a couple of trace points to use the now cached request pointer rather than extracting it from the ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Rather than just having a local request variable in the execbuff code, the request pointer is now stored in the execbuff params structure. Also added explicit cleanup of the request (plus wiping the OLR to match) in the error case. This means that the execbuff code is no longer dependent upon the OLR keeping track of the request so as to not leak it when things do go wrong. Note that in the success case, the i915_add_request() at the end of the submission function will tidy up the request and clear the OLR. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The alloc_request() function does not actually return the newly allocated request. Instead, it must be pulled from ring->outstanding_lazy_request. This patch fixes this so that code can create a request and start using it knowing exactly which request it actually owns. v2: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Shrunk the parameter list of i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands() to a single structure as everything it requires is available in the execbuff_params object. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The do_execbuf() function takes quite a few parameters. The actual set of parameters is going to change with the conversion to passing requests around. Further, it is due to grow massively with the arrival of the GPU scheduler. This patch simplifies the prototype by passing a parameter structure instead. Changing the parameter set in the future is then simply a matter of adding/removing items to the structure. Note that the structure does not contain absolutely everything that is passed in. This is because the intention is to use this structure more extensively later in this patch series and more especially in the GPU scheduler that is coming soon. The latter requires hanging on to the structure as the final hardware submission can be delayed until long after the execbuf IOCTL has returned to user land. Thus it is unsafe to put anything in the structure that is local to the IOCTL call itself - such as the 'args' parameter. All entries must be copies of data or pointers to structures that are reference counted in some way and guaranteed to exist for the duration of the batch buffer's life. v2: Rebased to newer tree and updated for changes to the command parser. Specifically, a code shuffle has required saving the batch start address in the params structure. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
In execlist mode, the context object pointer is written in to the request structure (and reference counted) at the point of request creation. In legacy mode, this only happens inside i915_add_request(). This patch updates the legacy code path to match the execlist version. This allows all the intermediate code between request creation and request submission to get at the context object given only a request structure. Thus negating the need to pass context pointers here, there and everywhere. v2: Moved the context reference so it does not need to be undone if the get_seqno() fails. v3: Fixed execlist mode always hitting a warning about invalid last_contexts (which don't exist in execlist mode). v4: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
Start of explicit request management in the execbuffer code path. This patch adds a call to allocate a request structure before all the actual hardware work is done. Thus guaranteeing that all that work is tagged by a known request. At present, nothing further is done with the request, the rest comes later in the series. The only noticable change is that failure to get a request (e.g. due to lack of memory) will be caught earlier in the sequence. It now occurs right at the start before any un-undoable work has been done. v2: Simplified the error handling path. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call. At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been submitted. But it all sort of hangs together. This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more 'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing the early exit paths and the return code. Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete. v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request). For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 John Harrison 提交于
It is a bad idea for i915_add_request() to fail. The work will already have been send to the ring and will be processed, but there will not be any tracking or management of that work. The only way the add request call can fail is if it can't write its epilogue commands to the ring (cache flushing, seqno updates, interrupt signalling). The reasons for that are mostly down to running out of ring buffer space and the problems associated with trying to get some more. This patch prevents that situation from happening in the first place. When a request is created, it marks sufficient space as reserved for the epilogue commands. Thus guaranteeing that by the time the epilogue is written, there will be plenty of space for it. Note that a ring_begin() call is required to actually reserve the space (and do any potential waiting). However, that is not currently done at request creation time. This is because the ring_begin() code can allocate a request. Hence calling begin() from the request allocation code would lead to infinite recursion! Later patches in this series remove the need for begin() to do the allocate. At that point, it becomes safe for the allocate to call begin() and really reserve the space. Until then, there is a potential for insufficient space to be available at the point of calling i915_add_request(). However, that would only be in the case where the request was created and immediately submitted without ever calling ring_begin() and adding any work to that request. Which should never happen. And even if it does, and if that request happens to fall down the tiny window of opportunity for failing due to being out of ring space then does it really matter because the request wasn't doing anything in the first place? v2: Updated the 'reserved space too small' warning to include the offending sizes. Added a 'cancel' operation to clean up when a request is abandoned. Added re-initialisation of tracking state after a buffer wrap to keep the sanity checks accurate. v3: Incremented the reserved size to accommodate Ironlake (after finally managing to run on an ILK system). Also fixed missing wrap code in LRC mode. v4: Added extra comment and removed duplicate WARN (feedback from Tomas). For: VIZ-5115 CC: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-