Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 16 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 01 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 27 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • L
      x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF · f8475cef
      由 Len Brown 提交于 
      The goal of this change is to give users a uniform and meaningful
result when they read /sys/...cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
on modern x86 hardware, as compared to what they get today.

Modern x86 processors include the hardware needed
to accurately calculate frequency over an interval --
APERF, MPERF, and the TSC.

Here we provide an x86 routine to make this calculation
on supported hardware, and use it in preference to any
driver driver-specific cpufreq_driver.get() routine.

MHz is computed like so:

MHz = base_MHz * delta_APERF / delta_MPERF

MHz is the average frequency of the busy processor
over a measurement interval.  The interval is
defined to be the time between successive invocations
of aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu(), which are expected to to
happen on-demand when users read sysfs attribute
cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq.

As with previous methods of calculating MHz,
idle time is excluded.

base_MHz above is from TSC calibration global "cpu_khz".

This x86 native method to calculate MHz returns a meaningful result
no matter if P-states are controlled by hardware or firmware
and/or if the Linux cpufreq sub-system is or is-not installed.

When this routine is invoked more frequently, the measurement
interval becomes shorter.  However, the code limits re-computation
to 10ms intervals so that average frequency remains meaningful.

Discerning users are encouraged to take advantage of
the turbostat(8) utility, which can gracefully handle
concurrent measurement intervals of arbitrary length.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      f8475cef
  7. 26 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 24 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • L
      x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz" · 51204e06
      由 Len Brown 提交于 
      cpufreq_quick_get() allows cpufreq drivers to over-ride cpu_khz
that is otherwise reported in x86 /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz".

There are four problems with this scheme,
any of them is sufficient justification to delete it.

 1. Depending on which cpufreq driver is loaded, the behavior
    of this field is different.

 2. Distros complain that they have to explain to users
    why and how this field changes.  Distros have requested a constant.

 3. The two major providers of this information, acpi_cpufreq
    and intel_pstate, both "get it wrong" in different ways.

    acpi_cpufreq lies to the user by telling them that
    they are running at whatever frequency was last
    requested by software.

    intel_pstate lies to the user by telling them that
    they are running at the average frequency computed
    over an undefined measurement.  But an average computed
    over an undefined interval, is itself, undefined...

 4. On modern processors, user space utilities, such as
    turbostat(1), are more accurate and more precise, while
    supporing concurrent measurement over arbitrary intervals.

Users who have been consulting /proc/cpuinfo to
track changing CPU frequency will be dissapointed that
it no longer wiggles -- perhaps being unaware of the
limitations of the information they have been consuming.

Yes, they can change their scripts to look in sysfs
cpufreq/scaling_cur_frequency.  Here they will find the same
data of dubious quality here removed from /proc/cpuinfo.
The value in sysfs will be addressed in a subsequent patch
to address issues 1-3, above.

Issue 4 will remain -- users that really care about
accurate frequency information should not be using either
proc or sysfs kernel interfaces.
They should be using using turbostat(8), or a similar
purpose-built analysis tool.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      51204e06
  11. 22 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  13. 21 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 20 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 14 6月, 2017 8 次提交
  19. 08 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      x86/cpu/cyrix: Add alternative Device ID of Geode GX1 SoC · ae1d557d
      由 Christian Sünkenberg 提交于 
      A SoC variant of Geode GX1, notably NSC branded SC1100, seems to
report an inverted Device ID in its DIR0 configuration register,
specifically 0xb instead of the expected 0x4.

Catch this presumably quirky version so it's properly recognized
as GX1 and has its cache switched to write-back mode, which provides
a significant performance boost in most workloads.

SC1100's datasheet "Geode™ SC1100 Information Appliance On a Chip",
states in section 1.1.7.1 "Device ID" that device identification
values are specified in SC1100's device errata. These, however,
seem to not have been publicly released.

Wading through a number of boot logs and /proc/cpuinfo dumps found on
pastebin and blogs, this patch should mostly be relevant for a number
of now admittedly aging Soekris NET4801 and PC Engines WRAP devices,
the latter being the platform this issue was discovered on.
Performance impact was verified using "openssl speed", with
write-back caching scaling throughput between -3% and +41%.
Signed-off-by: NChristian Sünkenberg <christian.suenkenberg@student.kit.edu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1496596719.26725.14.camel@student.kit.eduSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ae1d557d
  23. 29 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • B
      x86/microcode/AMD: Change load_microcode_amd()'s param to bool to fix preemptibility bug · dac6ca24
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      With CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled, I get:

  BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
  caller is debug_smp_processor_id
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc2+ #2
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack
   check_preemption_disabled
   debug_smp_processor_id
   save_microcode_in_initrd_amd
   ? microcode_init
   save_microcode_in_initrd
   ...

because, well, it says it above, we're using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible code.

But passing the CPU number is not really needed. It is only used to
determine whether we're on the BSP, and, if so, to save the microcode
patch for early loading.

 [ We don't absolutely need to do it on the BSP but we do that
   customarily there. ]

Instead, convert that function parameter to a boolean which denotes
whether the patch should be saved or not, thereby avoiding the use of
smp_processor_id() in preemptible code.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170528200414.31305-1-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      dac6ca24
  25. 26 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 22 5月, 2017 4 次提交
  29. 13 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 11 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 09 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  35. 02 5月, 2017 4 次提交
  37. 20 4月, 2017 3 次提交
  39. 19 4月, 2017 2 次提交
  41. 18 4月, 2017 1 次提交