Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 11月, 2015 12 次提交
  3. 04 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 29 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915/kbl: Introduce Kabylake platform defition. · ef11bdb3
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Kabylake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
following Skylake.

It is Gen9p5, so it inherits everything from Skylake.

Let's start by adding the platform separated from Skylake
but reusing most of all features, functions etc. Later we
rebase the PCI-ID patch without is_skylake=1
so we don't replace what original Author did there.

Few IS_SKYLAKEs if statements are not being covered by this patch
on purpose:
   - Workarounds: Kabylake is derivated from Skylake H0 so no
     		  W/As apply here.
   - GuC: A following patch removes Kabylake support with an
     	  explanation: No firmware available yet.
   - DMC/CSR: Done in a separated patch since we need to be carefull
     	      and load the version for revision 7 since
	      Kabylake is Skylake H0.

v2: relative cleaner commit message and added the missed
    IS_KABYLAKE to intel_i2c.c as pointed out by Jani.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      ef11bdb3
  7. 09 10月, 2015 2 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: fix FBC buffer size checks · 856312ae
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      According to my experiments (and later confirmation from the hardware
developers), the maximum sizes mentioned in the specification delimit
how far in the buffer the hardware tracking can go. And the hardware
calculates the size based on the plane address we provide - and the
provided plane address might not be the real x:0,y:0 point due to the
compute_page_offset() function.

On platforms that do the x/y offset adjustment trick it will be really
hard to reproduce a bug, but on the current SKL we can reproduce the
bug with igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence. With this
patch, we'll go from "CRC assertion failure" to "FBC unexpectedly
disabled", which is still a failure on the test suite but is not a
perceived user bug - you will just not save as much power as you could
if FBC is disabled.

v2, rewrite patch after clarification from the Hadware guys:
  - Rename function so it's clear what the check is for.
  - Use the new intel_fbc_get_plane_source_sizes() function in order
    to get the proper sizes as seen by FBC.
v3:
  - Rebase after the s/sizes/size/ on the previous patch.
  - Adjust comment wording (Ville).
  - s/used_/effective_/ (Ville).

Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-farfromfence (SKL)
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      856312ae
    • P
      drm/i915: fix CFB size calculation · c4ffd409
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      We were considering the whole framebuffer height, but the spec says we
should only consider the active display height size. There were still
some unclear questions based on the spec, but the hardware guys
clarified them for us. According to them:

- CFB size = CFB stride * Number of lines FBC writes to CFB
- CFB stride = plane stride / compression limit
- Number of lines FBC writes to CFB = MIN(plane source height, maximum
  number of lines FBC writes to CFB)
- Plane source height =
  - pipe source height (PIPE_SRCSZ register) (before SKL)
  - plane size register height (PLANE_SIZE register) (SKL+)
- Maximum number of lines FBC writes to CFB =
  - plane source height (before HSW)
  - 2048 (HSW+)

For the plane source height, I could just have made our code do
I915_READ() in order to be more future proof, but since it's not cool
to do register reads I decided to just recalculate the values we use
when we actually write to those registers.

With this patch, depending on your machine configuration, a lot of the
kms_frontbuffer_tracking subtests that used to result in a SKIP due to
not enough stolen memory still start resulting in a PASS.

v2: Use the clipped src size instead of pipe_src_h (Ville).
v3: Use the appropriate information provided by the hardware guys.
v4: Bikesheds: s/sizes/size/, s/fb_cpp/cpp/ (Ville).
v5: - Don't use crtc->config->pipe_src_x for BDW- (Ville).
    - Fix the register name written in the comment.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c4ffd409
  9. 30 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  11. 23 9月, 2015 10 次提交
  13. 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: fix FBC frontbuffer tracking flushing code · 6f4551fe
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Due to the way busy_bits was handled, we were not doing any flushes if
we didn't previously get an invalidate. Since it's possible to get
flushes without an invalidate first, remove the busy_bits early
return.

So now that we don't have the busy_bits guard anymore we'll need the
origin check for the GTT tracking (we were not doing anything on GTT
flushes due to the GTT check at invalidate()).

As a last detail, since we can get multiple consecutive flushes,
disable FBC before updating it, otherwise intel_fbc_update() will just
keep FBC enabled instead of restarting it.

Notice that this does not fix any of the current IGT tests due to the
fact that we still have a few intel_fbc() calls at points where we
also have the frontbuffer tracking calls: we didn't fully convert to
frontbuffer tracking yet. Once we remove those calls and start relying
only on the frontbuffer tracking infrastructure we'll need this patch.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6f4551fe
  15. 08 7月, 2015 6 次提交
  17. 06 7月, 2015 4 次提交
  19. 03 7月, 2015 1 次提交