- 01 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christophe RICARD 提交于
When a GPIO is used as an interrupt in ACPI, the irq_type was not available for device driver. Make available polarity and triggering information in acpi_find_gpio by renaming acpi_gpio_info field active_low to polarity and adding triggering field (edge/level). For sanity, in gpiolib.c replace info.active_low by "info.polarity == GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW". Set the irq_type if necessary in acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get. Signed-off-by: NChristophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@st.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
In Microsoft Surface3 the GPIO detecting lid state is shared between GPIO event and operation region. Below is simplied version of the DSDT from Surface3 including relevant parts: Scope (GPO0) { Name (_AEI, ResourceTemplate () { GpioInt (Edge, ActiveBoth, Shared, PullNone, 0x0000, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, , ) { // Pin list 0x004C } }) OperationRegion (GPOR, GeneralPurposeIo, Zero, One) Field (GPOR, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { Connection ( GpioIo (Shared, PullNone, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionNone, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer,,) { // Pin list 0x004C } ), HELD, 1 } Method (_E4C, 0, Serialized) // _Exx: Edge-Triggered GPE { If ((HELD == One)) { ^^LID.LIDB = One } Else { ^^LID.LIDB = Zero Notify (LID, 0x80) // Status Change } Notify (^^PCI0.SPI1.NTRG, One) // Device Check } } When GPIO 0x4c changes we call ASL method _E4C which tries to read HELD field (the same GPIO). This triggers following error on the console: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.GPO0._E4C] (Node ffff88013f4b4438), AE_ERROR (20150930/psparse-542) The error happens because ACPI GPIO operation region handler (acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler()) tries to acquire the very same GPIO which returns an error (-EBUSY) because the GPIO is already reserved for the GPIO event. Fix this so that we "borrow" the event GPIO if we find the GPIO belongs to an event. Allow this only for GPIOs that are read. To be able to go through acpi_gpio->events list for operation region access we need to make sure the list is properly initialized whenever GPIO chip is registered. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106571Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make device_get_next_child_node() work with ACPI data-only subnodes introduced previously. Namely, replace acpi_get_next_child() with acpi_get_next_subnode() that can handle (and return) child device objects as well as child data-only subnodes of the given device and modify the ACPI part of the GPIO subsystem to handle data-only subnodes returned by it. To that end, introduce acpi_node_get_gpiod() taking a struct fwnode_handle pointer as the first argument. That argument may point to an ACPI device object as well as to a data-only subnode and the function should do the right thing (ie. look for the matching GPIO descriptor correctly) in either case. Next, modify fwnode_get_named_gpiod() to use acpi_node_get_gpiod() instead of acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() which automatically causes devm_get_gpiod_from_child() to work with ACPI data-only subnodes that may be returned by device_get_next_child_node() which in turn is required by the users of that function (the gpio_keys_polled and gpio-leds drivers). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Split acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() into three smaller routines to allow the subsequent change of the generic firmware node properties code to be more strarightforward. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
Looks like the word "contiguous" is often mistyped. Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
If a driver requests a GPIO described in its _CRS but the GPIO host controller (gpiochip) driver providing the GPIO has not been loaded yet acpi_get_gpiod() returns -ENODEV which causes the calling driver to fail. If the gpiochip driver is loaded afterwards the driver requesting the GPIO will not notice this. Better approach is to return -EPROBE_DEFER in such case. Then when the gpiochip driver appears the driver requesting the GPIO will be probed again. This also aligns ACPI GPIO lookup code closer to DT as it does pretty much the same when no gpiochip driver was found. Reported-by: NTobias Diedrich <tobiasdiedrich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@tdiedrich.de> Reviewed-by: Amos Kong <kongjianjun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 10 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
acpi_gpiochip_request(free)_interrupts can be used for modules, so export them. This also fixs a compile error when xgene-sb configured as kernel module. Fixes: 733cf014 "gpio: xgene: add ACPI support for APM X-Gene GPIO standby driver" Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
ACPI specification knows two types of GPIOs: GpioIo and GpioInt. The latter is used to describe that a given device interrupt line is connected to a specific GPIO pin. Typical ACPI _CRS entry for such device looks like below: Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { I2cSerialBus (0x004A, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80, AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C6", 0x00, ResourceConsumer) GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer) { 0x004B } GpioInt (Level, ActiveLow, Shared, PullDefault, 0x0000, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer) { 0x004C } }) Currently drivers need to request a GPIO corresponding to the right GpioInt and then translate that to Linux IRQ number. This adds unnecessary lines of boiler-plate code. We can ease this a bit by introducing acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() analogous to of_irq_get(). This function translates given GpioInt resource under the device in question to the suitable Linux IRQ number. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 27 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qipeng Zha 提交于
The signed error will be wrongly used as valid gpio offset Reported-by: NDavid Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NQipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 19 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() the handle local variable already contains the value that we want to pass to acpi_walk_resources(), so it is better to use that variable instead of evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() once more for the same device. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 qipeng.zha 提交于
If GPIO driver use pin mapping, need to translate pin number between ACPI table and GPIO driver. This issue is found on one platform with Cherryview gpio controller, kernel is hang when executed _PS0 method of one ACPI device, since without this translation, it access invalid gpiodesc array. Verified it works again with this patch. Signed-off-by: Nqipeng.zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 05 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rojhalat Ibrahim 提交于
Introduce new functions for conveniently obtaining and disposing of an entire array of GPIOs with one function call. ACPI parts tested by Mika Westerberg, DT parts tested by Rojhalat Ibrahim. Change log: v5: move the ACPI functions to gpiolib-acpi.c v4: - use shorter names for members of struct gpio_descs - rename lut_gpio_count to platform_gpio_count for clarity - add check for successful memory allocation - use ERR_CAST() v3: - rebase on current linux-gpio devel branch - fix ACPI GPIO counting - allow for zero-sized arrays - make the flags argument mandatory for the new functions - clarify documentation v2: change interface Suggested-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 06 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The size_prop argument of the recently added function acpi_dev_get_property_reference() is not used by the only current caller of that function and is very unlikely to be used at any time going forward. Namely, for a property whose value is a list of items each containing a references to a device object possibly accompanied by some integers, the number of items in the list can always be computed as the number of elements of type ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE in the property package. Thus it should never be necessary to provide an additional "cells" property with a value equal to the number of items in that list. It also should never be necessary to provide a "cells" property specifying how many integers are supposed to be following each reference. For this reason, drop the size_prop argument from acpi_dev_get_property_reference() and update its caller accordingly. Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141511255610556&w=2Suggested-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Provide a way for device drivers using GPIOs described by ACPI GpioIo resources in _CRS to tell the GPIO subsystem what names (connection IDs) to associate with specific GPIO pins defined in there. To do that, a driver needs to define a mapping table as a NULL-terminated array of struct acpi_gpio_mapping objects that each contain a name, a pointer to an array of line data (struct acpi_gpio_params) objects and the size of that array. Each struct acpi_gpio_params object consists of three fields, crs_entry_index, line_index, active_low, representing the index of the target GpioIo()/GpioInt() resource in _CRS starting from zero, the index of the target line in that resource starting from zero, and the active-low flag for that line, respectively. Next, the mapping table needs to be passed as the second argument to acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() that will register it with the ACPI device object pointed to by its first argument. That should be done in the driver's .probe() routine. On removal, the driver should unregister its GPIO mapping table by calling acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios() on the ACPI device object where that table was previously registered. Included are fixes from Mika Westerberg. Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
With release of ACPI 5.1 and _DSD method we can finally name GPIOs (and other things as well) returned by _CRS. Previously we were only able to use integer index to find the corresponding GPIO, which is pretty error prone if the order changes. With _DSD we can now query GPIOs using name instead of an integer index, like the below example shows: // Bluetooth device with reset and shutdown GPIOs Device (BTH) { Name (_HID, ...) Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {15} GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0, ResourceConsumer) {27, 31} }) Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"reset-gpio", Package() {^BTH, 1, 1, 0 }}, Package () {"shutdown-gpio", Package() {^BTH, 0, 0, 0 }}, } }) } The format of the supported GPIO property is: Package () { "name", Package () { ref, index, pin, active_low }} ref - The device that has _CRS containing GpioIo()/GpioInt() resources, typically this is the device itself (BTH in our case). index - Index of the GpioIo()/GpioInt() resource in _CRS starting from zero. pin - Pin in the GpioIo()/GpioInt() resource. Typically this is zero. active_low - If 1 the GPIO is marked as active_low. Since ACPI GpioIo() resource does not have field saying whether it is active low or high, the "active_low" argument can be used here. Setting it to 1 marks the GPIO as active low. In our Bluetooth example the "reset-gpio" refers to the second GpioIo() resource, second pin in that resource with the GPIO number of 31. This patch implements necessary support to gpiolib for extracting GPIOs using _DSD device properties. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The GPIO resources (GpioIo/GpioInt) used in ACPI contain a GPIO number which is relative to the hardware GPIO controller. Typically this number can be translated directly to Linux GPIO number because the mapping is pretty much 1:1. However, when the GPIO driver is using pins exported by a pin controller driver via set of GPIO ranges, the mapping might not be 1:1 anymore and direct translation does not work. In such cases we need to translate the ACPI GPIO number to be suitable for the GPIO controller driver in question by checking all the pin controller GPIO ranges under the given device and using those to get the proper GPIO number. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
This function actually operates on a gpio_chip, so its prefix should reflect that fact for consistency with other functions defined in gpio/driver.h. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srinivas Pandruvada 提交于
Fix code when the operation region callback is for an gpio, which is not at index 0 and for partial pins in a GPIO definition. For example: Name (GMOD, ResourceTemplate () { //3 Outputs that define the Power mode of the device GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDown, , , , "\\_SB.GPI2") {10, 11, 12} }) } If opregion callback calls is for: - Set pin 10, then address = 0 and bit length = 1 - Set pin 11, then address = 1 and bit length = 1 - Set for both pin 11 and pin 12, then address = 1, bit length = 2 This change requires updated ACPICA gpio operation handler code to send the pin index and bit length. Fixes: 473ed7be (gpio / ACPI: Add support for ACPI GPIO operation regions) Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+: 75ec6e55 ACPICA: Update to GPIO region handler interface. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
The current prototype of gpiochip_request_own_desc() requires to obtain a pointer to a descriptor. This is in contradiction to all other GPIO request schemes, and imposes an extra step of obtaining a descriptor to drivers. Most drivers actually cannot even perform that step since the function that does it (gpichip_get_desc()) is gpiolib-private. Change gpiochip_request_own_desc() to return a descriptor from a (chip, hwnum) tuple and update users of this function (currently gpiolib-acpi only). Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GPIO descriptors are changing from unique and permanent tokens to allocated resources. Therefore gpiochip_get_desc() cannot be used as a way to obtain a global GPIO descriptor anymore. This patch updates the gpiolib ACPI support code to keep and use the descriptor returned by a centralized call to gpiochip_get_desc(). Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 28 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Since now we have irqchip helpers that the GPIO chip drivers are supposed to use if possible, we can move the registration of ACPI events to happen in these helpers. This seems to be more natural place and might encourage GPIO chip driver writers to take advantage of the irqchip helpers. We make the functions available to GPIO chip drivers via private gpiolib.h, just in case generic irqchip helpers are not suitable. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
gpio_lock/unlock_as_irq() are working with (chip, offset) arguments and are thus not using the old integer namespace. Therefore, there is no reason to have gpiod variants of these functions working with descriptors, especially since the (chip, offset) tuple is more suitable to the users of these functions (GPIO drivers, whereas GPIO descriptors are targeted at GPIO consumers). Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 23 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
The GPIO operation region handler should be called where sleep is allowed, so we should use the *_cansleep version of gpiod_get/set APIs or we will get a warning message complaining invalid context if the GPIO chip has the cansleep flag set. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 14 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Dan Carpenter's static code checker reports: The patch 473ed7be: "gpio / ACPI: Add support for ACPI GPIO operation regions" from Mar 14, 2014, leads to the following static checker warning: drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:454 acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler() warn: should 'gpiod_get_raw_value(desc) << i' be a 64 bit type? This is due the fact that *value is of type u64 and gpiod_get_raw_value() returns int. Since i can be larger than 31, it is possible that the value returned gets wrapped. Fix this by casting the return of gpiod_get_raw_value() to u64 first before shift. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Commit aa92b6f6 (gpio / ACPI: Allocate ACPI specific data directly in acpi_gpiochip_add()) moved ACPI handle checking to acpi_gpiochip_add() but forgot to check whether chip->dev is NULL before dereferencing it. Since chip->dev pointer is optional we can end up with crash like following: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000138 IP: [<c126c2b3>] acpi_gpiochip_add+0x13/0x190 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ssb(+) ... CPU: 0 PID: 512 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 3.14.0-rc7-next-20140324-t1 #24 Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude D830 /0UY141, BIOS A02 06/07/2007 task: f5799900 ti: f543e000 task.ti: f543e000 EIP: 0060:[<c126c2b3>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0 EIP is at acpi_gpiochip_add+0x13/0x190 EAX: 00000000 EBX: f57824c4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000 ESI: f57824c4 EDI: 00000010 EBP: f543fc54 ESP: f543fc40 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000138 CR3: 355f8000 CR4: 000007d0 Stack: f543fc5c fd1f7790 f57824c4 000000be 00000010 f543fc84 c1269f4e f543fc74 fd1f78bd 00008002 f57822b0 f5782090 fd1f8400 00000286 fd1f9994 00000000 f5782000 f543fc8c fd1f7e39 f543fcc8 fd1f0bd8 000000c0 00000000 00000000 Call Trace: [<fd1f7790>] ? ssb_pcie_mdio_write+0xa0/0xd0 [ssb] [<c1269f4e>] gpiochip_add+0xee/0x300 [<fd1f78bd>] ? ssb_pcicore_serdes_workaround+0xfd/0x140 [ssb] [<fd1f7e39>] ssb_gpio_init+0x89/0xa0 [ssb] [<fd1f0bd8>] ssb_attach_queued_buses+0xc8/0x2d0 [ssb] [<fd1f0f65>] ssb_bus_register+0x185/0x1f0 [ssb] [<fd1f3120>] ? ssb_pci_xtal+0x220/0x220 [ssb] [<fd1f106c>] ssb_bus_pcibus_register+0x2c/0x80 [ssb] [<fd1f40dc>] ssb_pcihost_probe+0x9c/0x110 [ssb] [<c1276c8f>] pci_device_probe+0x6f/0xc0 [<c11bdb55>] ? sysfs_create_link+0x25/0x40 [<c131d8b9>] driver_probe_device+0x79/0x360 [<c1276512>] ? pci_match_device+0xb2/0xc0 [<c131dc51>] __driver_attach+0x71/0x80 [<c131dbe0>] ? __device_attach+0x40/0x40 [<c131bd87>] bus_for_each_dev+0x47/0x80 [<c131d3ae>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [<c131dbe0>] ? __device_attach+0x40/0x40 [<c131d007>] bus_add_driver+0x157/0x230 [<c131e219>] driver_register+0x59/0xe0 ... Fix this by checking chip->dev pointer against NULL first. Also we can now remove redundant check in acpi_gpiochip_request/free_interrupts(). Reported-by: NSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NJosh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 15 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
GPIO operation regions is a new feature introduced in ACPI 5.0 specification. This feature adds a way for platform ASL code to call back to OS GPIO driver and toggle GPIO pins. An example ASL code from Lenovo Miix 2 tablet with only relevant part listed: Device (\_SB.GPO0) { Name (AVBL, Zero) Method (_REG, 2, NotSerialized) { If (LEqual (Arg0, 0x08)) { // Marks the region available Store (Arg1, AVBL) } } OperationRegion (GPOP, GeneralPurposeIo, Zero, 0x0C) Field (GPOP, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { Connection ( GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.GPO0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer,,) { 0x003B } ), SHD3, 1, } } Device (SHUB) { Method (_PS0, 0, Serialized) { If (LEqual (\_SB.GPO0.AVBL, One)) { Store (One, \_SB.GPO0.SHD3) Sleep (0x32) } } Method (_PS3, 0, Serialized) { If (LEqual (\_SB.GPO0.AVBL, One)) { Store (Zero, \_SB.GPO0.SHD3) } } } How this works is that whenever _PS0 or _PS3 method is run (typically when SHUB device is transitioned to D0 or D3 respectively), ASL code checks if the GPIO operation region is available (\_SB.GPO0.AVBL). If it is we go and store either 0 or 1 to \_SB.GPO0.SHD3. Now, when ACPICA notices ACPI GPIO operation region access (the store above) it will call acpi_gpio_adr_space_handler() that then toggles the GPIO accordingly using standard gpiolib interfaces. Implement the support by registering GPIO operation region handlers for all GPIO devices that have an ACPI handle. First time the GPIO is used by the ASL code we make sure that the GPIO stays requested until the GPIO chip driver itself is unloaded. If we find out that the GPIO is already requested we just toggle it according to the value got from ASL code. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The current ACPI GPIO event handling code was never tested against real hardware with functioning GPIO triggered events (at the time such hardware wasn't available). Thus it misses certain things like requesting the GPIOs properly, passing correct flags to the interrupt handler and so on. This patch reworks ACPI GPIO event handling so that we: 1) Use struct acpi_gpio_event for all GPIO signaled events. 2) Switch to use GPIO descriptor API and request GPIOs by calling gpiochip_request_own_desc() that we added in a previous patch. 3) Pass proper flags from ACPI GPIO resource to request_threaded_irq(). Also instead of open-coding the _AEI iteration loop we can use acpi_walk_resources(). This simplifies the code a bit and fixes memory leak that was caused by missing kfree() for buffer returned by acpi_get_event_resources(). Since the remove path now calls gpiochip_free_own_desc() which takes GPIO spinlock we need to call acpi_gpiochip_remove() outside of that lock (analogous to acpi_gpiochip_add() path where the lock is released before those funtions are called). Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
In order to consolidate _Exx, _Lxx and _EVT to use the same structure make the structure name to reflect that we are dealing with any event, not just _EVT. This is just rename, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
We are going to add more ACPI specific data to accompany GPIO chip so instead of allocating it per each use-case we allocate it once when acpi_gpiochip_add() is called and release it when acpi_gpiochip_remove() is called. Doing this allows us to add more ACPI specific data by merely adding new fields to struct acpi_gpio_chip. In addition we embed evt_pins member directly to the structure instead of having it as a pointer. This simplifies the code a bit since we don't need to check against NULL. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
gpio_to_desc() must die. Replace one of its usage by the newly-introduced gpiochip_get_desc() function. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 08 1月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to use either the GPIO descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid of acpi_gpio.h entirely. Once this is done the only interface to get GPIOs to drivers enumerated from ACPI namespace is the descriptor based interface. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Instead of asking each driver to register to ACPI events we can just call acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts() for each chip that has an ACPI handle. The function checks chip->to_irq and if it is set to NULL (a GPIO driver that doesn't do interrupts) the function does nothing. We also add the a new header drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h that is used for functions internal to gpiolib and add ACPI GPIO chip registering functions to that header. Once that is done we can remove call to acpi_gpiochip_register_interrupts() from its only user, pinctrl-baytrail.c Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Doing this allows drivers to distinguish between a real error case (if there was an error when we tried to resolve the GPIO) and when the optional GPIO line was not available. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 20 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The ACPI GpioInt resources contain polarity field that is used to specify whether the interrupt is active high or low. Since gpiolib supports GPIOF_ACTIVE_LOW we can pass this information in the flags field in acpi_find_gpio(), analogous to the DeviceTree version. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The new GPIO descriptor based interface is now preferred over the old integer based one. This patch converts the ACPI GPIO helpers to use this new interface internally. In addition to that provide compatibility function acpi_get_gpio_by_index() that converts the returned GPIO descriptor to an integer. We also drop acpi_get_gpio() as it is not used anywhere outside gpiolib-acpi and even there we use acpi_get_gpiod() instead. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
acpi_execute_simple_method() is a new ACPI API introduced to invoke an ACPI control method that has single integer parameter and no return value. Convert acpi_evaluate_object() to acpi_execute_simple_method() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
acpi_execute_simple_method() is a new ACPI API introduced to invoke an ACPI control method that has single integer parameter and no return value. Convert acpi_evaluate_object() to acpi_execute_simple_method() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Instead of open-coding ACPI GPIO resource lookup in each driver, we provide a helper function analogous to Device Tree version that allows drivers to specify which GPIO resource they are interested (using an index to the GPIO resources). The function then finds out the correct resource, translates the ACPI GPIO number to the corresponding Linux GPIO number and returns that. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 11 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 0d1c28a4 (gpiolib-acpi: Add ACPI5 event model support to gpio.) that added support for ACPI events signalled through GPIO interrupts covered only GPIO pins whose numbers are less than or equal to 255. However, there may be GPIO pins with numbers greater than 255 and the ACPI spec (ACPI 5.0, Section 5.6.5.1) requires the _EVT method to be used for handling events corresponding to those pins. Moreover, according to the spec, _EVT is the default mechanism for handling all ACPI events signalled through GPIO interrupts, so if the _Exx/_Lxx method is not present for the given pin, _EVT should be used instead. If present, though, _Exx/_Lxx take precedence over _EVT which shouldn't be executed in that case (ACPI 5.0, Section 5.6.5.3). Modify acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() to follow the spec as described above and add acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() needed to free interrupts associated with _EVT. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-