1. 10 4月, 2012 34 次提交
  2. 06 4月, 2012 2 次提交
    • S
      simple_open: automatically convert to simple_open() · 234e3405
      Stephen Boyd 提交于
      Many users of debugfs copy the implementation of default_open() when
      they want to support a custom read/write function op.  This leads to a
      proliferation of the default_open() implementation across the entire
      tree.
      
      Now that the common implementation has been consolidated into libfs we
      can replace all the users of this function with simple_open().
      
      This replacement was done with the following semantic patch:
      
      <smpl>
      @ open @
      identifier open_f != simple_open;
      identifier i, f;
      @@
      -int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f)
      -{
      (
      -if (i->i_private)
      -f->private_data = i->i_private;
      |
      -f->private_data = i->i_private;
      )
      -return 0;
      -}
      
      @ has_open depends on open @
      identifier fops;
      identifier open.open_f;
      @@
      struct file_operations fops = {
      ...
      -.open = open_f,
      +.open = simple_open,
      ...
      };
      </smpl>
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      234e3405
    • A
      sysrq: use SEND_SIG_FORCED instead of force_sig() · b82c3287
      Anton Vorontsov 提交于
      Change send_sig_all() to use do_send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_FORCED) instead
      of force_sig(SIGKILL).  With the recent changes we do not need force_ to
      kill the CLONE_NEWPID tasks.
      
      And this is more correct.  force_sig() can race with the exiting thread,
      while do_send_sig_info(group => true) kill the whole process.
      
      Some more notes from Oleg Nesterov:
      
      > Just one note. This change makes no difference for sysrq_handle_kill().
      > But it obviously changes the behaviour sysrq_handle_term(). I think
      > this is fine, if you want to really kill the task which blocks/ignores
      > SIGTERM you can use sysrq_handle_kill().
      >
      > Even ignoring the reasons why force_sig() is simply wrong here,
      > force_sig(SIGTERM) looks strange. The task won't be killed if it has
      > a handler, but SIG_IGN can't help. However if it has the handler
      > but blocks SIGTERM temporary (this is very common) it will be killed.
      
      Also,
      
      > force_sig() can't kill the process if the main thread has already
      > exited. IOW, it is trivial to create the process which can't be
      > killed by sysrq.
      
      So, this patch fixes the issue.
      Suggested-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Acked-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAnton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
      Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b82c3287
  3. 04 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 31 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交