- 24 12月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a flag to mark delegations as requiring return, then run a garbage collector. In the future, this will allow for more flexible delegation management, where delegations may be marked for return if it turns out that they are not being referenced. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we can update_open_stateid(), we need to be certain that we don't race with a delegation return. While we could do this by grabbing the nfs_client->cl_lock, a dedicated spin lock in the delegation structure will scale better. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Otherwise, there is a potential deadlock if the last dput() from an NFSv4 close() or other asynchronous operation leads to nfs_clear_inode calling the synchronous delegreturn. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There appear to be some rogue servers out there that issue multiple delegations with different stateids for the same file. Ensure that when we return delegations, we do so on a per-stateid basis rather than a per-file basis. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rename struct nfs4_client to struct nfs_client so that it can become the basis for a general client record for NFS2 and NFS3 in addition to NFS4. Signed-Off-By: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In the case where we hold a delegation stateid, use that in for inside SETATTR calls. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
According to RFC3530 we're supposed to cache the change attribute at the time the client receives a write delegation. If the inode is clean, a CB_GETATTR callback by the server to the client is supposed to return the cached change attribute. If, OTOH, the inode is dirty, the client should bump the cached change attribute by 1. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Delegations allow us to cache posix and BSD locks, however when the delegation is recalled, we need to "flush the cache" and send the cached LOCK requests to the server. This patch sets up the mechanism for doing so. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-