tsk_nr_cpus_allowed() is an accessor for task->nr_cpus_allowed which allows
us to change the representation of ->nr_cpus_allowed if required.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462969411-17735-2-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Use the future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462969411-17735-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We got this warning:

    WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2468 at kernel/sched/core.c:1161 set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    [...]
    Call Trace:

    dump_stack+0x63/0x87
    __warn+0xd1/0xf0
    warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
    set_task_cpu+0x1af/0x1c0
    push_dl_task.part.34+0xea/0x180
    push_dl_tasks+0x17/0x30
    __balance_callback+0x45/0x5c
    __sched_setscheduler+0x906/0xb90
    SyS_sched_setattr+0x150/0x190
    do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
    entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

This corresponds to:

    WARN_ON_ONCE(p->state == TASK_RUNNING &&
             p->sched_class == &fair_sched_class &&
             (p->on_rq && !task_on_rq_migrating(p)))

It happens because in find_lock_later_rq(), the task whose scheduling
class was changed to fair class is still pushed away as if it were
a deadline task ...

So, check in find_lock_later_rq() after double_lock_balance(), if the
scheduling class of the deadline task was changed, break and retry.

Apply the same logic to RT tasks.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462767091-1215-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The problem with the existing lock pinning is that each pin is of
value 1; this mean you can simply unpin if you know its pinned,
without having any extra information.

This scheme generates a random (16 bit) cookie for each pin and
requires this same cookie to unpin. This means you have to keep the
cookie in context.

No objsize difference for !LOCKDEP kernels.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

In order to be able to pass around more than just the IRQ flags in the
future, add a rq_flags structure.

No difference in code generation for the x86_64-defconfig build I
tested.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sometimes delta_exec is 0 due to update_curr() is called multiple times,
this is captured by:

	u64 delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;

This patch optimizes the cpufreq update kicker by bailing out when nothing
changed, it will benefit the upcoming schedutil, since otherwise it will
(over)react to the special util/max combination.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461316044-9520-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Introduce a mechanism by which parts of the cpufreq subsystem
("setpolicy" drivers or the core) can register callbacks to be
executed from cpufreq_update_util() which is invoked by the
scheduler's update_load_avg() on CPU utilization changes.

This allows the "setpolicy" drivers to dispense with their timers
and do all of the computations they need and frequency/voltage
adjustments in the update_load_avg() code path, among other things.

The update_load_avg() changes were suggested by Peter Zijlstra.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The dl_new field of struct sched_dl_entity is currently used to
identify new deadline tasks, so that their deadline and runtime
can be properly initialised.

However, these tasks can be easily identified by checking if
their deadline is smaller than the current time when they switch
to SCHED_DEADLINE. So, dl_new can be removed by introducing this
check in switched_to_dl(); this allows to simplify the
SCHED_DEADLINE code.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457350024-7825-2-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.itSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

	if (A || B) {

	} else if (A && !B) {

	}

If A we'll take the first branch, if !A we will not satisfy the second.
Therefore the second branch will never be taken.
Reported-by: Nluca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160225140149.GK6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Steven noticed that occasionally a sched_yield() call would not result
in a wait for the next period edge as expected.

It turns out that when we call update_curr_dl() and end up with
delta_exec <= 0, we will bail early and fail to throttle.

Further inspection of the yield code revealed that yield_task_dl()
clearing dl.runtime is wrong too, it will not account the last bit of
runtime which could result in dl.runtime < 0, which in turn means that
replenish would gift us with too much runtime.

Fix both issues by not relying on the dl.runtime value for yield.
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160223122822.GP6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It's "too much" not "to much".
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160210120422.4ca77e68@gandalf.local.homeSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

earliest_dl.next should cache deadline of the earliest ready task that
is also enqueued in the pushable rbtree, as pull algorithm uses this
information to find candidates for migration: if the earliest_dl.next
deadline of source rq is earlier than the earliest_dl.curr deadline of
destination rq, the task from the source rq can be pulled.

However, current implementation only guarantees that earliest_dl.next is
the deadline of the next ready task instead of the next pushable task;
which will result in potentially holding both rqs' lock and find nothing
to migrate because of affinity constraints. In addition, current logic
doesn't update the next candidate for pushing in pick_next_task_dl(),
even if the running task is never eligible.

This patch fixes both problems by updating earliest_dl.next when
pushable dl task is enqueued/dequeued, similar to what we already do for
RT.
Tested-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449135730-27202-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Luca and Wanpeng reported two missing annotations that led to
false lockdep complaints. Add the missing annotations.
Reported-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Reported-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: cbce1a68 ("sched,lockdep: Employ lock pinning")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151023095008.GY17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Commit:

  9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")

broke select_task_rq_dl() and find_lock_later_rq(), because it introduced
a comparison between the local task's deadline and dl.earliest_dl.curr of
the remote queue.

However, if the remote runqueue does not contain any SCHED_DEADLINE
task its earliest_dl.curr is 0 (always smaller than the deadline of
the local task) and the remote runqueue is not selected for pushing.

As a result, if an application creates multiple SCHED_DEADLINE
threads, they will never be pushed to runqueues that do not already
contain SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.

This patch fixes the issue by checking if dl.dl_nr_running == 0.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 9d514262 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444982781-15608-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.itSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The "dl_boosted" flag is set by comparing *absolute* deadlines
(c.f., rt_mutex_setprio()).
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438782979-9057-2-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The comment is "misleading"; fix it by adapting a comment from
push_rt_tasks().
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438782979-9057-1-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Change the calling context of sched_class::set_cpus_allowed() such
that we can assume the task is inactive.

This allows us to easily make changes that affect accounting done by
enqueue/dequeue. This does in fact completely remove
set_cpus_allowed_rt() and greatly reduces set_cpus_allowed_dl().
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150515154833.667516139@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Give every class a set_cpus_allowed() method, this enables some small
optimization in the RT,DL implementation by avoiding a double
cpumask_weight() call.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150515154833.614517487@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

'p' has been already queued at this point, so "!task_running(rq, p)"
and "p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1" imply that "has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq)"
is true, so it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435995563-3723-2-git-send-email-xlpang@126.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sine commit 269ad801 ("sched/deadline: Avoid double-accounting in
case of missed deadlines), parameter 'rq' is no longer used, so
remove it.
Signed-off-by: NZhiqiang Zhang <zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434338120-43773-1-git-send-email-zhangzhiqiang.zhang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch adds a check that prevents futile attempts to move DL tasks
to a CPU with active tasks of equal or earlier deadline. The same
behavior as commit 80e3d87b ("sched/rt: Reduce rq lock contention
by eliminating locking of non-feasible target") for rt class.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It's a bootstrap function, make init_sched_dl_class() __init.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

pull_dl_task() uses pick_next_earliest_dl_task() to select a migration
candidate; this is sub-optimal since the next earliest task -- as per
the regular runqueue -- might not be migratable at all. This could
result in iterating the entire runqueue looking for a task.

Instead iterate the pushable queue -- this queue only contains tasks
that have at least 2 cpus set in their cpus_allowed mask.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
[ Improved the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431496867-4194-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no
'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124744.003233193@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We still have a few pending issues with the deadline code, one of which
is that switching between scheduling classes can 'leak' CBS state.

Close the hole by retaining the current CBS state when leaving
SCHED_DEADLINE and unconditionally programming the deadline timer.
The timer will then reset the CBS state if the task is still
!SCHED_DEADLINE by the time it hits.

If the task left SCHED_DEADLINE it will not call task_dead_dl() and
we'll not cancel the hrtimer, leaving us a pending timer in free
space. Avoid this by giving the timer a task reference, this avoids
littering the task exit path for this rather uncommon case.

In order to do this, I had to move dl_task_offline_migration() below
the replenishment, such that the task_rq()->lock fully covers that.
While doing this, I noticed that it (was) buggy in assuming a task is
enqueued and or we need to enqueue the task now. Fixing this means
select_task_rq_dl() might encounter an offline rq -- look into that.

As a result this kills cancel_dl_timer() which included a rq->lock
break.

Fixes: 40767b0d ("sched/deadline: Fix deadline parameter modification handling")
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124743.574192138@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Remove the direct {push,pull} balancing operations from
switched_{from,to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() and use the balance
callback queue.

Again, err on the side of too many reschedules; since too few is a
hard bug while too many is just annoying.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.968262663@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

In order to be able to use pull_dl_task() from a callback, we need to
do away with the return value.

Since the return value indicates if we should reschedule, do this
inside the function. Since not all callers currently do this, this can
increase the number of reschedules due rt balancing.

Too many reschedules is not a correctness issues, too few are.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.859398977@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Generalize the post_schedule() stuff into a balance callback list.
This allows us to more easily use it outside of schedule() and cross
sched_class.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@gmail.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@linaro.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.424032725@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

ACCESS_ONCE doesn't work reliably on non-scalar types. This patch removes
the rest of the existing usages of ACCESS_ONCE() in the scheduler, and use
the new READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() APIs as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NWaiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430251224-5764-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.627353666@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

I observed that DL tasks can't be migrated to other CPUs during CPU
hotplug, in addition, task may/may not be running again if CPU is
added back.

The root cause which I found is that DL tasks will be throtted and
removed from the DL rq after comsuming all their budget, which
leads to the situation that stop task can't pick them up from the
DL rq and migrate them to other CPUs during hotplug.

The method to reproduce:

  schedtool -E -t 50000:100000 -e ./test

Actually './test' is just a simple for loop. Then observe which CPU the
test task is on and offline it:

  echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/online

This patch adds the DL task migration during CPU hotplug by finding a
most suitable later deadline rq after DL timer fires if current rq is
offline.

If it fails to find a suitable later deadline rq then it falls back to
any eligible online CPU in so that the deadline task will come back
to us, and the push/pull mechanism should then move it around properly.
Suggested-and-Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427411315-4298-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

dl_task_timer() may fire on a different rq from where a task was removed
after throttling. Since the call path is:

  dl_task_timer() ->
    enqueue_task_dl() ->
      enqueue_dl_entity() ->
        replenish_dl_entity()

and replenish_dl_entity() uses dl_se's rq, we can't use current's rq
in dl_task_timer(), but we need to lock the task's previous one.
Tested-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: 3960c8c0 ("sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427792017-7356-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Obviously, 'rq' is not used in these two functions, therefore,
there is no reason for it to be passed as an argument.
Signed-off-by: NAbel Vesa <abelvesa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425383427-26244-1-git-send-email-abelvesa@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Since commit 40767b0d ("sched/deadline: Fix deadline parameter
modification handling") we clear the thottled state when switching
from a dl task, therefore we should never find it set in switching to
a dl task.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
[ Improved the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426590931-4639-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This patch adds rq->clock update skip for SCHED_DEADLINE task yield,
to tell update_rq_clock() that we've just updated the clock, so that
we don't do a microscopic update in schedule() and double the
fastpath cost.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425961200-3809-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

update_curr_dl() needs actual rq clock.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423040972.18770.10.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

A deadline task may be throttled and dequeued at the same time.
This happens, when it becomes throttled in schedule(), which
is called to go to sleep:

current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule()
    deactivate_task()
        dequeue_task_dl()
            update_curr_dl()
                start_dl_timer()
            __dequeue_task_dl()
    prev->on_rq = 0;

Later the timer fires, but the task is still dequeued:

dl_task_timer()
    enqueue_task_dl() /* queues on dl_rq; on_rq remains 0 */

Someone wakes it up:

try_to_wake_up()

    enqueue_dl_entity()
        BUG_ON(on_dl_rq())

Patch fixes this problem, it prevents queueing !on_rq tasks
on dl_rq.
Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Wrote comment. ]
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Fixes: 1019a359 ("sched/deadline: Fix stale yield state")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1374601424090314@web4j.yandex.ruSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Kirill reported that a dl task can be throttled and dequeued at the
same time. This happens, when it becomes throttled in schedule(),
which is called to go to sleep:

current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule()
    deactivate_task()
        dequeue_task_dl()
            update_curr_dl()
                start_dl_timer()
            __dequeue_task_dl()
    prev->on_rq = 0;

This invalidates the assumption from commit 0f397f2c ("sched/dl:
Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):

  "The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
   we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
   thus free of ttwu races".

And therefore we have to use the full task_rq_lock() here.

This further amends the fact that we forgot to update the rq lock loop
for TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATE, from commit cca26e80 ("sched: Teach
scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state").
Reported-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150217123139.GN5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When we fail to start the deadline timer in update_curr_dl(), we
forget to clear ->dl_yielded, resulting in wrecked time keeping.

Since the natural place to clear both ->dl_yielded and ->dl_throttled
is in replenish_dl_entity(); both are after all waiting for that event;
make it so.

Luckily since 67dfa1b7 ("sched/deadline: Implement
cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()") the
task_on_rq_queued() condition in dl_task_timer() must be true, and can
therefore call enqueue_task_dl() unconditionally.
Reported-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-4-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

After update_curr_dl() the current task might not be the leftmost task
anymore. In that case do not start a new hrtick for it.

In this case NEED_RESCHED will be set and the next schedule will start
the hrtick for the new task if and when appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
[ Rewrote the changelog and comment. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1416962647-76792-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>