Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 12 11月, 2015 6 次提交
  5. 10 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 09 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 08 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 07 11月, 2015 4 次提交
    • M
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep... · d0164adc
      由 Mel Gorman 提交于 
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd

__GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".

Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
reserves.

This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
__GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
kswapd for background reclaim.

This patch then converts a number of sites

o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
  pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.

o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
  into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
  are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.

o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
  helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
  checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
  positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
  is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
  flag manipulations.

o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
  and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.

The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.

The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d0164adc
    • Z
      arm64: bpf: fix mod-by-zero case · 14e589ff
      由 Zi Shen Lim 提交于 
      Turns out in the case of modulo by zero in a BPF program:
	A = A % X;  (X == 0)
the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0.

The bug in JIT is exposed by a new test case [1].

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/4/499Signed-off-by: NZi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Reported-by: NXi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Fixes: e54bcde3 ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      14e589ff
    • Z
      arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case · 251599e1
      由 Zi Shen Lim 提交于 
      In the case of division by zero in a BPF program:
	A = A / X;  (X == 0)
the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0.

This is confirmed by the test case introduced in commit 86bf1721
("test_bpf: add tests checking that JIT/interpreter sets A and X to 0.").
Reported-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
CC: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: e54bcde3 ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: NZi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      251599e1
    • C
      arm64: Enable CRYPTO_CRC32_ARM64 in defconfig · 4d17da4c
      由 Catalin Marinas 提交于 
      CONFIG_CRYPTO_CRC32_ARM64 has been around since commit f6f203fa
("crypto: crc32 - Add ARM64 CRC32 hw accelerated module") but defconfig
did not automatically enable it.
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      4d17da4c
  13. 06 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      arm64: cmpxchg_dbl: fix return value type · 57a65667
      由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于 
      The current arm64 __cmpxchg_double{_mb} implementations carry out the
compare exchange by first comparing the old values passed in to the
values read from the pointer provided and by stashing the cumulative
bitwise difference in a 64-bit register.

By comparing the register content against 0, it is possible to detect if
the values read differ from the old values passed in, so that the compare
exchange detects whether it has to bail out or carry on completing the
operation with the exchange.

Given the current implementation, to detect the cmpxchg operation
status, the __cmpxchg_double{_mb} functions should return the 64-bit
stashed bitwise difference so that the caller can detect cmpxchg failure
by comparing the return value content against 0. The current implementation
declares the return value as an int, which means that the 64-bit
value stashing the bitwise difference is truncated before being
returned to the __cmpxchg_double{_mb} callers, which means that
any bitwise difference present in the top 32 bits goes undetected,
triggering false positives and subsequent kernel failures.

This patch fixes the issue by declaring the arm64 __cmpxchg_double{_mb}
return values as a long, so that the bitwise difference is
properly propagated on failure, restoring the expected behaviour.

Fixes: e9a4b795 ("arm64: cmpxchg_dbl: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      57a65667
  15. 31 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  17. 30 10月, 2015 4 次提交
  19. 29 10月, 2015 9 次提交
  21. 28 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  23. 26 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  25. 24 10月, 2015 2 次提交