1. 13 1月, 2010 2 次提交
  2. 12 1月, 2010 5 次提交
  3. 08 1月, 2010 2 次提交
  4. 07 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      NOMMU: Avoiding duplicate icache flushes of shared maps · cfe79c00
      Mike Frysinger 提交于
      When working with FDPIC, there are many shared mappings of read-only
      code regions between applications (the C library, applet packages like
      busybox, etc.), but the current do_mmap_pgoff() function will issue an
      icache flush whenever a VMA is added to an MM instead of only doing it
      when the map is initially created.
      
      The flush can instead be done when a region is first mmapped PROT_EXEC.
      Note that we may not rely on the first mapping of a region being
      executable - it's possible for it to be PROT_READ only, so we have to
      remember whether we've flushed the region or not, and then flush the
      entire region when a bit of it is made executable.
      
      However, this also affects the brk area.  That will no longer be
      executable.  We can mprotect() it to PROT_EXEC on MPU-mode kernels, but
      for NOMMU mode kernels, when it increases the brk allocation, making
      sys_brk() flush the extra from the icache should suffice.  The brk area
      probably isn't used by NOMMU programs since the brk area can only use up
      the leavings from the stack allocation, where the stack allocation is
      larger than requested.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cfe79c00
  5. 05 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI/PM: Use per-device D3 delays · 1ae861e6
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      It turns out that some PCI devices require extra delays when changing
      power state from D3 to D0 (and the other way around).  Although this
      is against the PCI specification, we can handle it quite easily by
      allowing drivers to define arbitrary D3 delays for devices known to
      require extra time for switching power states.
      
      Introduce additional field d3_delay in struct pci_dev and use it to
      store the value of the device's D0->D3 delay, in miliseconds.  Make
      the PCI PM core code use the per-device d3_delay unless
      pci_pm_d3_delay is greater (in which case the latter is used).
      [This also allows the driver to specify d3_delay shorter than the
       10 ms required by the PCI standard if the device is known to be able
       to handle that.]
      
      Make the sky2 driver set d3_delay to 150 for devices handled by it.
      
      Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14730 which is a
      listed regression from 2.6.30.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      1ae861e6
  6. 04 1月, 2010 2 次提交
    • J
      resource: add helpers for fetching rlimits · 3e10e716
      Jiri Slaby 提交于
      We want to be sure that compiler fetches the limit variable only
      once, so add helpers for fetching current and maximal resource
      limits which do that.
      
      Add them to sched.h (instead of resource.h) due to circular dependency
       sched.h->resource.h->task_struct
      Alternative would be to create a separate res_access.h or similar.
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      3e10e716
    • J
      resource: move kernel function inside __KERNEL__ · 96d07d21
      Jiri Slaby 提交于
      It is an internal function. Move it inside __KERNEL__ ifdef, along
      with task_struct declaration.
      
      Then we get:
      --- /usr/include/linux/resource.h       2009-09-14 15:09:29.000000000 +0200
      +++ usr/include/linux/resource.h       2010-01-04 11:30:54.000000000 +0100
      @@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
      
       #include <linux/time.h>
      
      -struct task_struct;
      -
       /*
        * Resource control/accounting header file for linux
        */
      @@ -70,6 +68,5 @@
        */
       #include <asm/resource.h>
      
      -int getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int who, struct rusage *ru);
      
       #endif
      
      ***********
      
      include/linux/Kbuild is untouched, since unifdef is run even on
      headers-y nowadays.
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      96d07d21
  7. 02 1月, 2010 2 次提交
    • F
      reiserfs: Warn on lock relax if taken recursively · c4a62ca3
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      When we relax the reiserfs lock to avoid creating unwanted
      dependencies against others locks while grabbing these,
      we want to ensure it has not been taken recursively, otherwise
      the lock won't be really relaxed. Only its depth will be decreased.
      The unwanted dependency would then actually happen.
      
      To prevent from that, add a reiserfs_lock_check_recursive() call
      in the places that need it.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c4a62ca3
    • F
      reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> i_xattr_sem dependency inversion · 0719d343
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      i_xattr_sem depends on the reiserfs lock. But after we grab
      i_xattr_sem, we may relax/relock the reiserfs lock while waiting
      on a freezed filesystem, creating a dependency inversion between
      the two locks.
      
      In order to avoid the i_xattr_sem -> reiserfs lock dependency, let's
      create a reiserfs_down_read_safe() that acts like
      reiserfs_mutex_lock_safe(): relax the reiserfs lock while grabbing
      another lock to avoid undesired dependencies induced by the
      heivyweight reiserfs lock.
      
      This fixes the following warning:
      
      [  990.005931] =======================================================
      [  990.012373] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      [  990.013233] 2.6.33-rc1 #1
      [  990.013233] -------------------------------------------------------
      [  990.013233] dbench/1891 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  990.013233]  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81159505>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] but task is already holding lock:
      [  990.013233]  (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8115899a>] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] which lock already depends on the new lock.
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] -> #1 (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}:
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81063afc>] __lock_acquire+0xf9c/0x1560
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8106414f>] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff814ac194>] down_write+0x44/0x80
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8115899a>] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81158e30>] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8115a6aa>] user_set+0x8a/0x90
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8115901a>] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e2596>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e26bc>] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e2780>] setxattr+0xc0/0x150
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e289d>] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81002dab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] -> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81063e30>] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1560
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8106414f>] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff814aba77>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x3b0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff814abebe>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3e/0x50
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81159505>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff811340e5>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x45/0x180
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81158bb6>] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x2a6/0x470
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81158e30>] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8115a6aa>] user_set+0x8a/0x90
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff8115901a>] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e2596>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e26bc>] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e2780>] setxattr+0xc0/0x150
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff810e289d>] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0
      [  990.013233]        [<ffffffff81002dab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] 2 locks held by dbench/1891:
      [  990.013233]  #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810e2678>] vfs_setxattr+0x78/0xc0
      [  990.013233]  #1:  (&REISERFS_I(inode)->i_xattr_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8115899a>] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470
      [  990.013233]
      [  990.013233] stack backtrace:
      [  990.013233] Pid: 1891, comm: dbench Not tainted 2.6.33-rc1 #1
      [  990.013233] Call Trace:
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81061639>] print_circular_bug+0xe9/0xf0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81063e30>] __lock_acquire+0x12d0/0x1560
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8115899a>] ? reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8106414f>] lock_acquire+0x8f/0xb0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81159505>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8115899a>] ? reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x8a/0x470
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff814aba77>] __mutex_lock_common+0x47/0x3b0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81159505>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81159505>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81062592>] ? mark_held_locks+0x72/0xa0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff814ab81d>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xbd/0x140
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810628ad>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x1a0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff814abebe>] mutex_lock_nested+0x3e/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81159505>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x35/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff811340e5>] reiserfs_prepare_write+0x45/0x180
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81158bb6>] reiserfs_xattr_set_handle+0x2a6/0x470
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81158e30>] reiserfs_xattr_set+0xb0/0x150
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff814abcb4>] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x284/0x3b0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8115a6aa>] user_set+0x8a/0x90
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8115901a>] reiserfs_setxattr+0xaa/0xb0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810e2596>] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x36/0xa0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810e26bc>] vfs_setxattr+0xbc/0xc0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810e2780>] setxattr+0xc0/0x150
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81056018>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb8/0x100
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff8105eded>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810560a3>] ? cpu_clock+0x43/0x50
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810c6820>] ? fget+0xb0/0x110
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810c6770>] ? fget+0x0/0x110
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81002ddc>] ? sysret_check+0x27/0x62
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff810e289d>] sys_fsetxattr+0x8d/0xa0
      [  990.013233]  [<ffffffff81002dab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      Reported-and-tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      0719d343
  8. 31 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  9. 30 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  10. 29 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 26 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      net: restore ip source validation · 28f6aeea
      Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
      when using policy routing and the skb mark:
      there are cases where a back path validation requires us
      to use a different routing table for src ip validation than
      the one used for mapping ingress dst ip.
      One such a case is transparent proxying where we pretend to be
      the destination system and therefore the local table
      is used for incoming packets but possibly a main table would
      be used on outbound.
      Make the default behavior to allow the above and if users
      need to turn on the symmetry via sysctl src_valid_mark
      Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28f6aeea
  12. 24 12月, 2009 6 次提交
  13. 23 12月, 2009 11 次提交