- 12 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Instead of relying on rtnl mutex bump device reference count. After this change, values reported can change in parallel, but thats not much different from current state, as anyone can change the settings right after rtnl_unlock (and before userspace processed reply). While at it, switch to GFP_KERNEL allocation. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
The use of the | operator always leads to true which looks rather suspect to me. Fix this by using & instead to just check the RTF_CACHE entry bit. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457734, #1457747 ("Wrong operator used") Fixes: 35732d01 ("ipv6: introduce a hash table to store dst cache") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Currently rt6_ex is being dereferenced before it is null checked hence there is a possible null dereference bug. Fix this by only dereferencing rt6_ex after it has been null checked. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457749 ("Dereference before null check") Fixes: 81eb8447 ("ipv6: take care of rt6_stats") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 10月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
This patch replaces rcu_deference() with rcu_dereference_bh() in ipv6_route_seq_next() to avoid the following warning: [ 19.431685] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 19.433451] 4.14.0-rc3-00914-g66f5d6ce #118 Not tainted [ 19.435509] ----------------------------- [ 19.437267] net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2259 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 19.440790] [ 19.440790] other info that might help us debug this: [ 19.440790] [ 19.444734] [ 19.444734] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 19.447757] 2 locks held by odhcpd/3720: [ 19.449480] #0: (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffb1231f7d>] seq_read+0x3c/0x333 [ 19.452720] #1: (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}, at: [<ffffffffb1d2b984>] ipv6_route_seq_start+0x5/0xfd [ 19.456323] [ 19.456323] stack backtrace: [ 19.458812] CPU: 0 PID: 3720 Comm: odhcpd Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3-00914-g66f5d6ce #118 [ 19.462042] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 19.465414] Call Trace: [ 19.466788] dump_stack+0x86/0xc0 [ 19.468358] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xea/0xf3 [ 19.470183] ipv6_route_seq_next+0x71/0x164 [ 19.471963] seq_read+0x244/0x333 [ 19.473522] proc_reg_read+0x48/0x67 [ 19.475152] ? proc_reg_write+0x67/0x67 [ 19.476862] __vfs_read+0x26/0x10b [ 19.478463] ? __might_fault+0x37/0x84 [ 19.480148] vfs_read+0xba/0x146 [ 19.481690] SyS_read+0x51/0x8e [ 19.483197] do_int80_syscall_32+0x66/0x15a [ 19.484969] entry_INT80_compat+0x32/0x50 [ 19.486707] RIP: 0023:0xf7f0be8e [ 19.488244] RSP: 002b:00000000ffa75d04 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 [ 19.491431] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: 0000000008056068 [ 19.493886] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0000000008056008 RDI: 0000000000001000 [ 19.496331] RBP: 00000000000001ff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 19.498768] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 19.501217] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Fixes: 66f5d6ce ("ipv6: replace rwlock with rcu and spinlock in fib6_table") Reported-by: NXiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
After previous patch ("ipv6: addrlabel: rework ip6addrlbl_get()") we can remove the refcount from struct ip6addrlbl_entry, since it is no longer elevated in p6addrlbl_get() Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
If we allocate skb before the lookup, we can use RCU without the need of ip6addrlbl_hold() This means that the following patch can get rid of refcounting. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
per cpu allocations are already zeroed, no need to clear them again. Fixes: d52d3997 ("ipv6: Create percpu rt6_info") Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
A recent patch removed the dst_free() on the allocated dst_entry in ipv6_blackhole_route(). The dst_free() marked the dst_entry as dead and added it to the gc list. I.e. it was setup for a one time usage. As a result we may now have a blackhole route cached at a socket on some IPsec scenarios. This makes the connection unusable. Fix this by marking the dst_entry directly at allocation time as 'dead', so it is used only once. Fixes: 587fea74 ("ipv6: mark DST_NOGC and remove the operation of dst_free()") Reported-by: NTobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2017 9 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Zhang 提交于
In function {ipv4,ipv6}_synproxy_hook we expect a normal tcp packet, but the real server maybe reply an icmp error packet related to the exist tcp conntrack, so we will access wrong tcp data. Fix it by checking for the protocol field and only process tcp traffic. Signed-off-by: NLin Zhang <xiaolou4617@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
By extending the rcu section a bit, we can avoid these very expensive in6_ifa_put()/in6_ifa_hold() calls done in __ipv6_dev_get_saddr() and ipv6_dev_get_saddr() Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Callers hold rcu_read_lock(), so we do not need the rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
inet6_ifa_finish_destroy() already uses kfree_rcu() to free inet6_ifaddr structs. We need to use proper list additions/deletions in order to allow readers to use RCU instead of idev->lock rwlock. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Ido reported following splat and provided a patch. [ 122.221814] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sshd/2672 [ 122.221845] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [ 122.221866] CPU: 0 PID: 2672 Comm: sshd Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3-idosch-next-custom #639 [ 122.221880] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 122.221893] Call Trace: [ 122.221919] dump_stack+0xb1/0x10c [ 122.221946] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x124/0x124 [ 122.221974] ? ___ratelimit+0xfe/0x240 [ 122.222020] check_preemption_disabled+0x173/0x1b0 [ 122.222060] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 [ 122.222083] ip6_pol_route+0x1482/0x24a0 ... I believe we can simplify this code path a bit, since we no longer hold a read_lock and need to release it to avoid a dead lock. By disabling BH, we make sure we'll prevent code re-entry and rt6_get_pcpu_route()/rt6_make_pcpu_route() run on the same cpu. Fixes: 66f5d6ce ("ipv6: replace rwlock with rcu and spinlock in fib6_table") Reported-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Tested-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Alexey Kodanev 提交于
When gso_size reset to zero for the tail segment in skb_segment(), later in ipv6_gso_segment(), __skb_udp_tunnel_segment() and gre_gso_segment() we will get incorrect results (payload length, pcsum) for that segment. inet_gso_segment() already has a check for gso_size before calculating payload. The issue was found with LTP vxlan & gre tests over ixgbe NIC. Fixes: 07b26c94 ("gso: Support partial splitting at the frag_list pointer") Signed-off-by: NAlexey Kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com> Acked-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 10月, 2017 17 次提交
-
-
由 Matteo Croce 提交于
Commit 35e015e1 ("ipv6: fix net.ipv6.conf.all interface DAD handlers") was intended to affect accept_dad flag handling in such a way that DAD operation and mode on a given interface would be selected according to the maximum value of conf/{all,interface}/accept_dad. However, addrconf_dad_begin() checks for particular cases in which we need to skip DAD, and this check was modified in the wrong way. Namely, it was modified so that, if the accept_dad flag is 0 for the given interface *or* for all interfaces, DAD would be skipped. We have instead to skip DAD if accept_dad is 0 for the given interface *and* for all interfaces. Fixes: 35e015e1 ("ipv6: fix net.ipv6.conf.all interface DAD handlers") Acked-by: NStefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMatteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> Reported-by: NErik Kline <ek@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
Currently, most of the rt6_stats are not hooked up correctly. As the last part of this patch series, hook up all existing rt6_stats and add one new stat fib_rt_uncache to indicate the number of routes in the uncached list. For details of the stats, please refer to the comments added in include/net/ip6_fib.h. Note: fib_rt_alloc and fib_rt_uncache are not guaranteed to be modified under a lock. So atomic_t is used for them. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
With all the preparation work before, we are now ready to replace rwlock with rcu and spinlock in fib6_table. That means now all fib6_node in fib6_table are protected by rcu. And when freeing fib6_node, call_rcu() is used to wait for the rcu grace period before releasing the memory. When accessing fib6_node, corresponding rcu APIs need to be used. And all previous sessions protected by the write lock will now be protected by the spin lock per table. All previous sessions protected by read lock will now be protected by rcu_read_lock(). A couple of things to note here: 1. As part of the work of replacing rwlock with rcu, the linked list of fn->leaf now has to be rcu protected as well. So both fn->leaf and rt->dst.rt6_next are now __rcu tagged and corresponding rcu APIs are used when manipulating them. 2. For fn->rr_ptr, first of all, it also needs to be rcu protected now and is tagged with __rcu and rcu APIs are used in corresponding places. Secondly, fn->rr_ptr is changed in rt6_select() which is a reader thread. This makes the issue a bit complicated. We think a valid solution for it is to let rt6_select() grab the tb6_lock if it decides to change it. As it is not in the normal operation and only happens when there is no valid neighbor cache for the route, we think the performance impact should be low. 3. fib6_walk_continue() has to be called with tb6_lock held even in the route dumping related functions, e.g. inet6_dump_fib(), fib6_tables_dump() and ipv6_route_seq_ops. It is because fib6_walk_continue() makes modifications to the walker structure, and so are fib6_repair_tree() and fib6_del_route(). In order to do proper syncing between them, we need to let fib6_walk_continue() hold the lock. We may be able to do further improvement on the way we do the tree walk to get rid of the need for holding the spin lock. But not for now. 4. When fib6_del_route() removes a route from the tree, we no longer mark rt->dst.rt6_next to NULL to make simultaneous reader be able to further traverse the list with rcu. However, rt->dst.rt6_next is only valid within this same rcu period. No one should access it later. 5. All the operation of atomic_inc(rt->rt6i_ref) is changed to be performed before we publish this route (either by linking it to fn->leaf or insert it in the list pointed by fn->leaf) just to be safe because as soon as we publish the route, some read thread will be able to access it. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
After rwlock is replaced with rcu and spinlock, fib6_lookup() could potentially return an intermediate node if other thread is doing fib6_del() on a route which is the only route on the node so that fib6_repair_tree() will be called on this node and potentially assigns fn->leaf to the its child's fn->leaf. In order to detect this situation in rt6_select(), we have to check if fn->fn_bit is consistent with the key length stored in the route. And depending on if the fn is in the subtree or not, the key is either rt->rt6i_dst or rt->rt6i_src. If any inconsistency is found, that means the node no longer holds valid routes in it. So net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry is returned. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
If rwlock is replaced with rcu and spinlock, it is possible that the reader thread will see fn->leaf as NULL in the following scenarios: 1. fib6_add() is in progress and we have already inserted a new node but not yet inserted the route. 2. fib6_del_route() is in progress and we have already set fn->leaf to NULL but not yet freed the node because of rcu grace period. This patch makes sure all the reader threads check fn->leaf first before using it. And together with later patch to grab rcu_read_lock() and rcu_dereference() fn->leaf, it makes sure reader threads are safe when accessing fn->leaf. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
fib6_add() logic currently calls fib6_add_1() to figure out what node should be used for the newly added route and then call fib6_add_rt2node() to insert the route to the node. And during the call of fib6_add_1(), fn_sernum is updated for all nodes that share the same prefix as the new route. This does not have issue in the current code because reader thread will not be able to access the tree while writer thread is inserting new route to it. However, it is not the case once we transition to use RCU. Reader thread could potentially see the new fn_sernum before the new route is inserted. As a result, reader thread's route lookup will return a stale route with the new fn_sernum. In order to solve this issue, we remove all the update of fn_sernum in fib6_add_1(), and instead, introduce a new function that updates fn_sernum for all related nodes and call this functions once the route is successfully inserted to the tree. Also, smp_wmb() is used after a route is successfully inserted into the fib tree and right before the updated of fn->sernum. And smp_rmb() is used right after fn->sernum is accessed in rt6_get_cookie_safe(). This is to guarantee that when the reader thread sees the new fn->sernum, the new route is already inserted in the tree in memory. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
With rwlock, it is safe to call dst_hold() in the read thread because read thread is guaranteed to be separated from write thread. However, after we replace rwlock with rcu, it is no longer safe to use dst_hold(). A dst might already have been deleted but is waiting for the rcu grace period to pass before freeing the memory when a read thread is trying to do dst_hold(). This could potentially cause double free issue. So this commit replaces all dst_hold() with dst_hold_safe() in all read thread to avoid this double free issue. And in order to make the code more compact, a new function ip6_hold_safe() is introduced. It calls dst_hold_safe() first, and if that fails, it will either fall back to hold and return net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry or set rt to NULL according to the caller's need. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
After rwlock is replaced with rcu and spinlock, route lookup can happen simultanously with route deletion. This patch removes the call to free_percpu(rt->rt6i_pcpu) from rt6_release() to avoid the race condition between rt6_release() and rt6_get_pcpu_route(). And as free_percpu(rt->rt6i_pcpu) is already called in ip6_dst_destroy() after the rcu grace period, it is safe to do this change. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
After rwlock is replaced with rcu and spinlock, ip6_pol_route() will be called with only rcu held. That means rt6 route deletion could happen simultaneously with rt6_make_pcpu_rt(). This could potentially cause memory leak if rt6_release() is called right before rt6_make_pcpu_rt() on the same route. This patch grabs rt->rt6i_ref safely before calling rt6_make_pcpu_rt() to make sure rt6_release() will not get triggered while rt6_make_pcpu_rt() is in progress. And rt6_release() is called after rt6_make_pcpu_rt() is finished. Note: As we are incrementing rt->rt6i_ref in ip6_pol_route(), there is a very slim chance that fib6_purge_rt() will be triggered unnecessarily when deleting a route if ip6_pol_route() running on another thread picks this route as well and tries to make pcpu cache for it. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
This commit makes use of the exception hash table implementation to store dst caches created by pmtu discovery and ip redirect into the hash table under the rt_info and no longer inserts these routes into fib6 tree. This makes the fib6 tree only contain static configured routes and could now be protected by rcu instead of a rw lock. With this change, in the route lookup related functions, after finding the rt6_info with the longest prefix, we also need to search for the exception table before doing backtracking. In the route delete function, if the route being deleted is not a dst cache, deletion of this route also need to flush the whole hash table under it. If it is a dst cache, then only delete the cached dst in the hash table. Note: for fib6_walk_continue() function, w->root now is always pointing to a root node considering that fib6_prune_clones() is removed from the code. So we add a WARN_ON() msg to make sure w->root always points to a root node and also removed the update of w->root in fib6_repair_tree(). This is a prerequisite for later patch because we don't need to make w->root as rcu protected when replacing rwlock with RCU. Also, we remove all prune related variables as it is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
fib6_locate() is used to find the fib6_node according to the passed in prefix address key. It currently tries to find the fib6_node with the exact match of the passed in key. However, when we move cached routes into the exception table, fib6_locate() will fail to find the fib6_node for it as the cached routes will be stored in the exception table under the fib6_node with the longest prefix match of the cache's dst addr key. This commit adds a new parameter to let the caller specify if it needs exact match or longest prefix match. Right now, all callers still does exact match when calling fib6_locate(). It will be changed in later commit where exception table is hooked up to store cached routes. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
If all dst cache entries are stored in the exception table under the main route, we have to go through them during fib6_age() when doing garbage collecting. Introduce a new function rt6_age_exception() which goes through all dst entries in the exception table and remove those entries that are expired. This function is called in fib6_age() so that all dst caches are also garbage collected. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
If we move all cached dst into the exception table under the main route, current rt6_clean_tohost() will no longer be able to access them. This commit makes fib6_clean_tohost() to also go through all cached routes in exception table and removes cached gateway routes to the passed in gateway. This is a preparation in order to move all cached routes into the exception table. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
If we move all cached dst into the exception table under the main route, current rt6_mtu_change() will no longer be able to access them. This commit makes rt6_mtu_change_route() function to also go through all cached routes in the exception table under the main route and do proper updates on the mtu. This is a preparation in order to move all cached routes into the exception table. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
After we move cached dst entries into the exception table under its parent route, current fib6_remove_prefsrc() no longer can access them. This commit makes fib6_remove_prefsrc() also go through all routes in the exception table to remove the pref src. This is a preparation patch in order to move all cached dst into the exception table. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
Add a hash table into struct rt6_info in order to store dst caches created by pmtu discovery and ip redirect in ipv6 routing code. APIs to add dst cache, delete dst cache, find dst cache and update dst cache in the hash table are implemented and will be used in later commits. This is a preparation work to move all cache routes into the exception table instead of getting inserted into the fib6 tree. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Wei Wang 提交于
This function takes a route as input and tries to update the sernum in the fib6_node this route is associated with. It will be used in later commit when adding a cached route into the exception table under that route. Signed-off-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
commit cc71b7b0 ("net/ipv6: remove unused err variable on icmpv6_push_pending_frames") exposed icmpv6_push_pending_frames return value not being used. Remove now unnecessary int err declarations and uses. Miscellanea: o Remove unnecessary goto and out: labels o Realign arguments Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Hansen 提交于
int err is unused by icmpv6_push_pending_frames(), this patch returns removes the variable and returns the function with 0. git bisect shows this variable has been around since linux has been in git in commit 1da177e4. This was found by running make coccicheck M=net/ipv6/ on linus' tree on commit 77ede3a0 (current HEAD as of this patch). Signed-off-by: NTim Hansen <devtimhansen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Lin Zhang 提交于
Storing the left length of skb into 'len' actually has no effect so we can remove it. Signed-off-by: NLin Zhang <xiaolou4617@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
switch the only caller to rtnl_af_unregister. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Xin Long 提交于
Now when updating mtu in tx path, it doesn't consider ARPHRD_ETHER tunnel device, like ip6gre_tap tunnel, for which it should also subtract ether header to get the correct mtu. Signed-off-by: NXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Xin Long 提交于
The patch 'ip_gre: ipgre_tap device should keep dst' fixed a issue that ipgre_tap mtu couldn't be updated in tx path. The same fix is needed for ip6gre_tap as well. Signed-off-by: NXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-