- 15 5月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 07f07f55a29cb705e221eda7894dd67ab81ef343 upstream Add a static key which controls the invocation of the CPU buffer clear mechanism on idle entry. This is independent of other MDS mitigations because the idle entry invocation to mitigate the potential leakage due to store buffer repartitioning is only necessary on SMT systems. Add the actual invocations to the different halt/mwait variants which covers all usage sites. mwaitx is not patched as it's not available on Intel CPUs. The buffer clear is only invoked before entering the C-State to prevent that stale data from the idling CPU is spilled to the Hyper-Thread sibling after the Store buffer got repartitioned and all entries are available to the non idle sibling. When coming out of idle the store buffer is partitioned again so each sibling has half of it available. Now CPU which returned from idle could be speculatively exposed to contents of the sibling, but the buffers are flushed either on exit to user space or on VMENTER. When later on conditional buffer clearing is implemented on top of this, then there is no action required either because before returning to user space the context switch will set the condition flag which causes a flush on the return to user path. Note, that the buffer clearing on idle is only sensible on CPUs which are solely affected by MSBDS and not any other variant of MDS because the other MDS variants cannot be mitigated when SMT is enabled, so the buffer clearing on idle would be a window dressing exercise. This intentionally does not handle the case in the acpi/processor_idle driver which uses the legacy IO port interface for C-State transitions for two reasons: - The acpi/processor_idle driver was replaced by the intel_idle driver almost a decade ago. Anything Nehalem upwards supports it and defaults to that new driver. - The legacy IO port interface is likely to be used on older and therefore unaffected CPUs or on systems which do not receive microcode updates anymore, so there is no point in adding that. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 04dcbdb8057827b043b3c71aa397c4c63e67d086 upstream Add a static key which controls the invocation of the CPU buffer clear mechanism on exit to user space and add the call into prepare_exit_to_usermode() and do_nmi() right before actually returning. Add documentation which kernel to user space transition this covers and explain why some corner cases are not mitigated. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 6a9e529272517755904b7afa639f6db59ddb793e upstream The Microarchitectural Data Sampling (MDS) vulernabilities are mitigated by clearing the affected CPU buffers. The mechanism for clearing the buffers uses the unused and obsolete VERW instruction in combination with a microcode update which triggers a CPU buffer clear when VERW is executed. Provide a inline function with the assembly magic. The argument of the VERW instruction must be a memory operand as documented: "MD_CLEAR enumerates that the memory-operand variant of VERW (for example, VERW m16) has been extended to also overwrite buffers affected by MDS. This buffer overwriting functionality is not guaranteed for the register operand variant of VERW." Documentation also recommends to use a writable data segment selector: "The buffer overwriting occurs regardless of the result of the VERW permission check, as well as when the selector is null or causes a descriptor load segment violation. However, for lowest latency we recommend using a selector that indicates a valid writable data segment." Add x86 specific documentation about MDS and the internal workings of the mitigation. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-