Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 8月, 2018 3 次提交
  3. 29 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  5. 26 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: Fix wrong first_key parameter in replace_path · 17515f1b
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Commit 581c1760 ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first
key") introduced new @first_key parameter for read_tree_block(), however
caller in replace_path() is parasing wrong key to read_tree_block().

It should use parameter @first_key other than @key.

Normally it won't expose problem as @key is normally initialzied to the
same value of @first_key we expect.
However in relocation recovery case, @key can be set to (0, 0, 0), and
since no valid key in relocation tree can be (0, 0, 0), it will cause
read_tree_block() to return -EUCLEAN and interrupt relocation recovery.

Fix it by setting @first_key correctly.

Fixes: 581c1760 ("btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key")
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      17515f1b
  7. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 31 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: Validate child tree block's level and first key · 581c1760
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child
tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with
valid generation and checksum.

Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like:
leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592

Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly.
At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(),
where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the
child tree block.

The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already
modified to extract expected level from its call chain.

While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such
check:
1) Root node/leaf
   As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check.
2) Direct backref
   Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key
   all by ourselves, skip @first_key check.

Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr
or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which
is limited to node/leaf boundary.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      581c1760
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Use separate meta reservation type for delalloc · 43b18595
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Before this patch, btrfs qgroup is mixing per-transcation meta rsv with
preallocated meta rsv, making it quite easy to underflow qgroup meta
reservation.

Since we have the new qgroup meta rsv types, apply it to delalloc
reservation.

Now for delalloc, most of its reserved space will use META_PREALLOC qgroup
rsv type.

And for callers reducing outstanding extent like btrfs_finish_ordered_io(),
they will convert corresponding META_PREALLOC reservation to
META_PERTRANS.

This is mainly due to the fact that current qgroup numbers will only be
updated in btrfs_commit_transaction(), that's to say if we don't keep
such placeholder reservation, we can exceed qgroup limitation.

And for callers freeing outstanding extent in error handler, we will
just free META_PREALLOC bytes.

This behavior makes callers of btrfs_qgroup_release_meta() or
btrfs_qgroup_convert_meta() to be aware of which type they are.
So in this patch, btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata() and its callers get
an extra parameter to info qgroup to do correct meta convert/release.

The good news is, even we use the wrong type (convert or free), it won't
cause obvious bug, as prealloc type is always in good shape, and the
type only affects how per-trans meta is increased or not.

So the worst case will be at most metadata limitation can be sometimes
exceeded (no convert at all) or metadata limitation is reached too soon
(no free at all).
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      43b18595
  11. 01 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks after buffered append writes · e3b8a485
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      The patch from commit a7e3b975 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode
blocks") introduced a regression where if we do a buffered write starting
at position equal to or greater than the file's size and then stat(2) the
file before writeback is triggered, the number of used blocks does not
change (unless there's a prealloc/unwritten extent). Example:

  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" foobar
  $ du -h foobar
  0	foobar
  $ sync
  $ du -h foobar
  64K	foobar

The first version of that patch didn't had this regression and the second
version, which was the one committed, was made only to address some
performance regression detected by the intel test robots using fs_mark.

This fixes the regression by setting the new delaloc bit in the range, and
doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() while setting the regular dealloc bit as
well, so that this way we set both bits at once avoiding navigation of the
inode's io tree twice. Doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() is also the most
meaninful place, as we should set the new dellaloc bit when if we set the
delalloc bit, which happens only if we copied bytes into the pages at
__btrfs_buffered_write().

This was making some of LTP's du tests fail, which can be quickly run
using a command line like the following:

  $ ./runltp -q -p -l /ltp.log -f commands -s du -d /mnt

Fixes: a7e3b975 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e3b8a485
  15. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents · 8b62f87b
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Right now we do a lot of weird hoops around outstanding_extents in order
to keep the extent count consistent.  This is because we logically
transfer the outstanding_extent count from the initial reservation
through the set_delalloc_bits.  This makes it pretty difficult to get a
handle on how and when we need to mess with outstanding_extents.

Fix this by revamping the rules of how we deal with outstanding_extents.
Now instead everybody that is holding on to a delalloc extent is
required to increase the outstanding extents count for itself.  This
means we'll have something like this

btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata	- outstanding_extents = 1
 btrfs_set_extent_delalloc	- outstanding_extents = 2
btrfs_release_delalloc_extents	- outstanding_extents = 1

for an initial file write.  Now take the append write where we extend an
existing delalloc range but still under the maximum extent size

btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata - outstanding_extents = 2
  btrfs_set_extent_delalloc
    btrfs_set_bit_hook		- outstanding_extents = 3
    btrfs_merge_extent_hook	- outstanding_extents = 2
btrfs_delalloc_release_extents	- outstanding_extnets = 1

In order to make the ordered extent transition we of course must now
make ordered extents carry their own outstanding_extent reservation, so
for cow_file_range we end up with

btrfs_add_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 2
clear_extent_bit		- outstanding_extents = 1
btrfs_remove_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 0

This makes all manipulations of outstanding_extents much more explicit.
Every successful call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata _must_ now be
combined with btrfs_release_delalloc_extents, even in the error case, as
that is the only function that actually modifies the
outstanding_extents counter.

The drawback to this is now we are much more likely to have transient
cases where outstanding_extents is much larger than it actually should
be.  This could happen before as we manipulated the delalloc bits, but
now it happens basically at every write.  This may put more pressure on
the ENOSPC flushing code, but I think making this code simpler is worth
the cost.  I have another change coming to mitigate this side-effect
somewhat.

I also added trace points for the counter manipulation.  These were used
by a bpf script I wrote to help track down leak issues.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8b62f87b
  17. 30 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 21 8月, 2017 3 次提交
  23. 16 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 30 6月, 2017 3 次提交
    • C
      btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr · 6374e57a
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
v4.12-rc6.  This was because commit 70e7af24 made it possible for
calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number.  It's not really a
bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.

This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Fixes: 70e7af24 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6374e57a
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges · bc42bda2
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      [BUG]
For the following case, btrfs can underflow qgroup reserved space
at an error path:
(Page size 4K, function name without "btrfs_" prefix)

         Task A                  |             Task B
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Buffered_write [0, 2K)           |
|- check_data_free_space()       |
|  |- qgroup_reserve_data()      |
|     Range aligned to page      |
|     range [0, 4K)          <<< |
|     4K bytes reserved      <<< |
|- copy pages to page cache      |
                                 | Buffered_write [2K, 4K)
                                 | |- check_data_free_space()
                                 | |  |- qgroup_reserved_data()
                                 | |     Range alinged to page
                                 | |     range [0, 4K)
                                 | |     Already reserved by A <<<
                                 | |     0 bytes reserved      <<<
                                 | |- delalloc_reserve_metadata()
                                 | |  And it *FAILED* (Maybe EQUOTA)
                                 | |- free_reserved_data_space()
                                      |- qgroup_free_data()
                                         Range aligned to page range
                                         [0, 4K)
                                         Freeing 4K
(Special thanks to Chandan for the detailed report and analyse)

[CAUSE]
Above Task B is freeing reserved data range [0, 4K) which is actually
reserved by Task A.

And at writeback time, page dirty by Task A will go through writeback
routine, which will free 4K reserved data space at file extent insert
time, causing the qgroup underflow.

[FIX]
For btrfs_qgroup_free_data(), add @reserved parameter to only free
data ranges reserved by previous btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data().
So in above case, Task B will try to free 0 byte, so no underflow.
Reported-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bc42bda2
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Introduce extent changeset for qgroup reserve functions · 364ecf36
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Introduce a new parameter, struct extent_changeset for
btrfs_qgroup_reserved_data() and its callers.

Such extent_changeset was used in btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() to record
which range it reserved in current reserve, so it can free it in error
paths.

The reason we need to export it to callers is, at buffered write error
path, without knowing what exactly which range we reserved in current
allocation, we can free space which is not reserved by us.

This will lead to qgroup reserved space underflow.
Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      364ecf36
  27. 20 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 28 2月, 2017 4 次提交
  31. 17 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  33. 14 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  35. 06 12月, 2016 5 次提交
  37. 30 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  39. 19 11月, 2016 1 次提交