1. 15 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  2. 08 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 25 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs · cbbc0de7
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      To fix a bug and address the reviewers' comments regarding the ACPI
      GPE refcounting patch, do the following additional changes:
      
      o Remove the second argument of acpi_ev_enable_gpe(),
        'write_to_hardware', because it is not necessary any more.
      
      o Add the "bad parameter" test against 'type' in
        acpi_enable_gpe() and acpi_disable_gpe().
      
      o Make acpi_enable_gpe() only check 'status' for runtime GPEs if
        acpi_ev_enable_gpe() was actually called.
      
      o Make acpi_disable_gpe() return 'status' returned by
        acpi_ev_disable_gpe() and fix a bug where ACPI_GPE_TYPE_WAKE
        and ACPI_GPE_TYPE_RUNTIME were exchanged by mistake.
      
      o Add comments explaining why acpi_set_gpe() is used by the ACPI EC
        driver.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      cbbc0de7
  4. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 23 2月, 2010 5 次提交
    • R
      PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up · b67ea761
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
      principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
      platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
      events that can be delivered to the kernel.  If ACPI is used for this
      purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI
      GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that
      we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
      correctly.
      
      Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated
      with them is quite limited.  The devices without dedicated GPEs have
      to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of
      cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to
      generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them.
      
      Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up:
      o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify
        handlers for run-time PM.
      o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct
        pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to
        generate wake-up events for given device.  Implemet this callback
        for the ACPI platform.
      o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and
        make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all
        PCI devices present in the ACPI tables.
      o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to
        check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at
        run time.
      
      Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      b67ea761
    • R
      ACPI / ACPICA: Multiple system notify handlers per device · 3f0be671
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently it only is possible to install one system notify handler
      per namespace node, but this is not enough for PCI run-time power
      management, because we need to install power management notifiers for
      devices that already have hotplug notifiers installed.  While in
      principle this could be handled at the PCI level, that would be
      suboptimal due to the way in which the ACPI-based PCI hotplug code is
      designed.
      
      For this reason, modify ACPICA so that it is possible to install more
      than one system notify handler per namespace node.  Namely, make
      acpi_install_notify_handler(), acpi_remove_notify_handler() and
      acpi_ev_notify_dispatch() use a list of system notify handler objects
      associated with a namespace node.
      
      Make acpi_remove_notify_handler() call acpi_os_wait_events_complete()
      upfront to avoid a situation in which concurrent instance of
      acpi_remove_notify_handler() removes the handler from under us while
      we're waiting for the event queues to flush.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      3f0be671
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Add more run-time wake-up fields · f517709d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up
      events may be generated by the platform.  Introduce a new wake-up
      flag, always_enabled, for marking devices that should be permanently
      enabled to generate run-time events.  Also, introduce a reference
      counter for run-wake devices and a function that will initialize all
      of the run-time wake-up fields for given device.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      f517709d
    • R
      ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs · 9630bdd9
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      ACPI GPEs may map to multiple devices.  The current GPE interface
      only provides a mechanism for enabling and disabling GPEs, making
      it difficult to change the state of GPEs at runtime without extensive
      cooperation between devices.
      
      Add an API to allow devices to indicate whether or not they want
      their device's GPE to be enabled for both runtime and wakeup events.
      
      Remove the old GPE type handling entirely, which gets rid of various
      quirks, like the implicit disabling with GPE type setting. This
      requires a small amount of rework in order to ensure that non-wake
      GPEs are enabled by default to preserve existing behaviour.
      
      Based on patches from Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      9630bdd9
    • P
      ACPI: Be in TS_POLLING state during mwait based C-state entry · d306ebc2
      Pallipadi, Venkatesh 提交于
      ACPI deep C-state entry had a long standing bug/missing feature, wherein we were sending
      resched IPIs when an idle CPU is in mwait based deep C-state. Only mwait based C1 was using
      the write to the monitored address to wake up mwait'ing CPU.
      
      This patch changes the code to retain TS_POLLING bit if we are entering an mwait based
      deep C-state.
      
      The patch has been verified to reduce the number of resched IPIs in general and also
      improves the performance/power on workloads with low system utilization (i.e., when mwait based
      deep C-states are being used).
      
      Fixes "netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f6"
      http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126441481427331&w=4Reported-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d306ebc2
  6. 19 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • D
      ACPI: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 · 455c0d71
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      Earlier, Ingo Molnar posted a patch to make it so that the kernel would avoid
      reading _PPC on his broken T60.  Unfortunately, it seems that with Thomas
      Renninger's patch last July to eliminate _PPC evaluations when the processor
      driver loads, the kernel never actually reads _PPC at all!  This is problematic
      if you happen to boot your non-T60 computer in a state where the BIOS _wants_
      _PPC to be something other than zero.
      
      So, put the _PPC evaluation back into acpi_processor_get_performance_info if
      ignore_ppc isn't 1.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      455c0d71
  7. 18 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  8. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left · a29d8b8e
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one
      of the previous patches.  All converions are trivial.
      
      These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be
      in a different address space and warn if accessed without going
      through percpu accessors.  This patch doesn't affect normal builds.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      a29d8b8e
  9. 16 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  10. 09 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 04 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 01 2月, 2010 2 次提交
  13. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 23 1月, 2010 8 次提交
  15. 20 1月, 2010 5 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: delete acpi_processor_power_verify_c2() · d22edd29
      Len Brown 提交于
      no functional change -- cleanup only.
      
      acpi_processor_power_verify_c2() was nearly empty due to a previous patch,
      so expand its remains into its one caller and delete it.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d22edd29
    • L
      ACPI: allow C3 > 1000usec · a6d72c18
      Len Brown 提交于
      Do for C3 what the previous patch did for C2.
      
      The C2 patch was in response to a highly visible
      and multiply reported C-state/turbo failure,
      while this change has no bug report in-hand.
      
      This will enable C3 in Linux on systems where BIOS
      overstates C3 latency in _CST.  It will also enable
      future systems which may actually have C3 > 1000usec.
      
      Linux has always ignored ACPI BIOS C3 with exit latency > 1000 usec,
      and the ACPI spec is clear that is correct FADT-supplied C3.
      
      However, the ACPI spec explicitly states that _CST-supplied C-states
      have no latency limits.
      
      So move the 1000usec C3 test out of the code shared
      by FADT and _CST code-paths, and into the FADT-specific path.
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      a6d72c18
    • L
      ACPI: enable C2 and Turbo-mode on Nehalem notebooks on A/C · 5d76b6f6
      Len Brown 提交于
      Linux has always ignored ACPI BIOS C2 with exit latency > 100 usec,
      and the ACPI spec is clear that is correct FADT-supplied C2.
      
      However, the ACPI spec explicitly states that _CST-supplied C-states
      have no latency limits.
      
      So move the 100usec C2 test out of the code shared
      by FADT and _CST code-paths, and into the FADT-specific path.
      
      This bug has not been visible until Nehalem, which advertises
      a CPU-C2 worst case exit latency on servers of 205usec.
      That (incorrect) figure is being used by BIOS writers
      on mobile Nehalem systems for the AC configuration.
      Thus, Linux ignores C2 leaving just C1, which is
      saves less power, and also impacts performance
      by preventing the use of turbo mode.
      
      http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15064Tested-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      5d76b6f6
    • D
      ACPI: power_meter: remove double kfree() · 7f07a605
      Darren Jenkins 提交于
      resource->domain_devices can be double kfree()'d in a couple of places.
      Fix this by setting num_domain_devices = 0 after the kfree().
      
      Coverity CID: 13356, 13355, 13354
      Signed-off-by: NDarren Jenkins <darrenrjenkins@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      7f07a605
    • A
      ACPI: processor: restrict early _PDC to opt-in platforms · 2205cbe8
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      Commit 78f16996 (ACPI: processor: call _PDC early) blindly walks
      the namespace and calls _PDC on every processor object it finds.
      
      This change may cause issues on platforms that declare dummy
      values for SSDTs on non-present processors (disabled in MADT).
      When we call _PDC and dynamically attempt to execute the AML
      Load() op on these dummy SSDTs, there's no telling what might
      happen.
      
      Rather than finding every platform that has bogus SSDTs, restrict
      early _PDC calls to platforms that are known to need early
      evaluation of _PDC.
      
      This is a minimal, temporary fix (given the context of the
      current release cycle). A real solution of checking the MADT for
      non-present processors will be written for the next merge window.
      
      References:
      
      	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
      	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14954Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      2205cbe8
  16. 17 1月, 2010 2 次提交
  17. 16 1月, 2010 4 次提交