You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
- 11 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Machek 提交于
For suspend/resume to work, spitz needs pxa_pm_suspend/resume to be called. Otherwise PSPR is not set properly, and system will die during resume. Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NEric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Miao 提交于
This isn't perfect but at least solves the problem of pm.c's dependency on register definitions in <mach/lubbock.h>, which doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: NEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Currently, we set PSPR just before entering sleep mode. However, some platforms have different requirements for setting PSPR in order to properly wake up. Set PSPR earlier in the suspend cycle so that platforms can change the setting by using a sysdev driver instead. Acked-by: NEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert Jarzmik 提交于
Each time a pxa type cpu went in suspend, a portion of kmalloc memory was corrupted. The issue was an incorrect length allocation introduced by the commit 711be5cc for the save registers array (=> overflow). Signed-off-by: NRobert Jarzmik <rjarzmik@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move the definition of 'struct pm_ops' and related functions from <linux/pm.h> to <linux/suspend.h> . There are, at least, the following reasons to do that: * 'struct pm_ops' is specifically related to suspend and not to the power management in general. * As long as 'struct pm_ops' is defined in <linux/pm.h>, any modification of it causes the entire kernel to be recompiled, which is unnecessary and annoying. * Some suspend-related features are already defined in <linux/suspend.h>, so it is logical to move the definition of 'struct pm_ops' into there. * 'struct hibernation_ops', being the hibernation-related counterpart of 'struct pm_ops', is defined in <linux/suspend.h> . Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Miao 提交于
1. split pxa_cpu_suspend to pxa25x_cpu_suspend and pxa27x_cpu_suspend and make pxa25x_cpu_pm_enter() and pxa27x_cpu_pm_enter() to invoke the corresponding _suspend functions, thus remove all those ugly #ifdef .. #endif out of sleep.S 2. move the declarations of those suspend functions to pm.h note: this is not a clean enough solution until all the pxa25x and pxa27x specific part is further removed out of sleep.S, sleep.S is supposed to contain generic code only Signed-off-by: Neric miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Eric Miao 提交于
1. introduce a structure pxa_cpu_pm_fns for pxa25x/pxa27x specific operations as follows: struct pxa_cpu_pm_fns { int save_size; void (*save)(unsigned long *); void (*restore)(unsigned long *); int (*valid)(suspend_state_t state); void (*enter)(suspend_state_t state); } 2. processor specific registers saving and restoring are performed by calling the corresponding (*save) and (*restore) 3. pxa_cpu_pm_fns->save_size should be initialized to the required size for processor specific registers saving, the allocated memory address will be passed to (*save) and (*restore) memory allocation happens early in pxa_pm_init(), and save_size should be assigned prior to this (which is usually true, since pxa_pm_init() happens in device_initcall() 4. there're some redundancies for those SLEEP_SAVE_XXX and related macros, will be fixed later, one way possible is for the system devices to handle the specific registers saving and restoring Signed-off-by: Neric miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
pxa_pm_finish() does nothing but return zero. The core code does nothing with this return value, and will not try to call the finish method in the pm_ops structure if it is NULL. Therefore, we can remove this useless function. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Purdie 提交于
Patch from Richard Purdie Update the PXA pm.c file to allow machines (such as the Sharp Zaurus) to override the standard pm functions but reuse/wrap them where needed. The init call is made slightly earlier to give machine code an init level to override them in removing any race. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Move the signal return code into the vector page instead of placing it on the user mode stack, which will allow us to avoid flushing the instruction cache on signals, as well as eventually allowing non-exec stack. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-