- 11 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
kcalloc manages count*sizeof overflow. Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve French 提交于
The "sfu" mount option did not work on SMB2/SMB3 mounts. With these changes when the "sfu" mount option is passed in on an smb2/smb2.1/smb3 mount the client can emulate (and recognize) fifo and device (character and device files). In addition the "sfu" mount option should not conflict with "mfsymlinks" (symlink emulation) as we will never create "sfu" style symlinks, but using "sfu" mount option will allow us to recognize existing symlinks, created with Microsoft "Services for Unix" (SFU and SUA). To enable the "sfu" mount option for SMB2/SMB3 the calling syntax of the generic cifs/smb2/smb3 sync_read and sync_write protocol dependent function needed to be changed (we don't have a file struct in all cases), but this actually ended up simplifying the code a little. Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we got a reconnect error from async readv we re-add pages back to page_list and continue loop. That is wrong because these pages have been already added to the pagecache but page_list has pages that have not been added to the pagecache yet. This ends up with a general protection fault in put_pages after readpages. Fix it by not retrying the read of these pages and falling back to readpage instead. Fixes debian bug 762306 Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com> Tested-by: NArthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
-
- 22 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Namjae Jeon 提交于
Currently cifs have all or nothing approach for directIO operations. cache=strict mode does not allow directIO while cache=none mode performs all the operations as directIO even when user does not specify O_DIRECT flag. This patch enables strict cache mode to honour directIO semantics. Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 17 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
SMB2 servers indicates the end of a directory search with STATUS_NO_MORE_FILE error code that is not processed now. This causes generic/257 xfstest to fail. Fix this by triggering the end of search by this error code in SMB2_query_directory. Also when negotiating CIFS protocol we tell the server to close the search automatically at the end and there is no need to do it itself. In the case of SMB2 protocol, we need to close it explicitly - separate close directory checks for different protocols. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 02 8月, 2014 22 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
by marking pages with a data from a partially received response up-to-date. This is suitable for non-signed connections. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
by filling the output buffer with a data got from a partially received response and requesting the remaining data from the server. This is suitable for non-signed connections. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If there was a short read in the middle of the rdata list, we can end up with a corrupt output buffer. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
that let us know how many bytes we have already got before reconnect. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
and don't mix it with the number of bytes that was requested. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
that let us not mix it with EAGAIN. Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we negotiate SMB 2.1 and higher version of the protocol and a server supports large read buffer size, we need to consume 1 credit per 65536 bytes. So, we need to know how many credits we have and obtain the required number of them before constructing a readdata structure in readpages and user read. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read requests (rsize) on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in cifs_read. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read (rsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in user read. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server changes maximum buffer size for read (rsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in readpages. Fix this by checking rsize all the time before repeating requests. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we negotiate SMB 2.1 and higher version of the protocol and a server supports large write buffer size, we need to consume 1 credit per 65536 bytes. So, we need to know how many credits we have and obtain the required number of them before constructing a writedata structure in writepages and iovec write. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server change maximum buffer size for write (wsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in iovec write. Fix this by checking wsize all the time before repeating request in iovec write. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If a server change maximum buffer size for write (wsize) requests on reconnect we can fail on repeating with a big size buffer on -EAGAIN error in writepages. Fix this by checking wsize all the time before repeating request in writepages. Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Reviewed-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <spargaonkar@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于
If we get into read_into_pages() from cifs_readv_receive() and then loose a network, we issue cifs_reconnect that moves all mids to a private list and issue their callbacks. The callback of the async read request sets a mid to retry, frees it and wakes up a process that waits on the rdata completion. After the connection is established we return from read_into_pages() with a short read, use the mid that was freed before and try to read the remaining data from the a newly created socket. Both actions are not what we want to do. In reconnect cases (-EAGAIN) we should not mask off the error with a short read but should return the error code instead. Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action' function to be provided which does the actual waiting. There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical. Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule(). So: Rename wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock to wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action to make it explicit that they need an action function. Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use a standard one. The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action function. All instances of the old wait_on_bit and wait_on_bit_lock which can use the new version have been changed accordingly and their action functions have been discarded. wait_on_bit{_lock} does not return any specific error code in the event of a signal so the caller must check for non-zero and interpolate their own error code as appropriate. The wait_on_bit() call in __fscache_wait_on_invalidate() was ambiguous as it specified TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but used fscache_wait_bit_interruptible as an action function. David Howells confirms this should be uniformly "uninterruptible" The main remaining user of wait_on_bit{,_lock}_action is NFS which needs to use a freezer-aware schedule() call. A comment in fs/gfs2/glock.c notes that having multiple 'action' functions is useful as they display differently in the 'wchan' field of 'ps'. (and /proc/$PID/wchan). As the new bit_wait{,_io} functions are tagged "__sched", they will not show up at all, but something higher in the stack. So the distinction will still be visible, only with different function names (gds2_glock_wait versus gfs2_glock_dq_wait in the gfs2/glock.c case). Since first version of this patch (against 3.15) two new action functions appeared, on in NFS and one in CIFS. CIFS also now uses an action function that makes the same freezer aware schedule call as NFS. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> (fscache, keys) Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> (gfs2) Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051603.28027.72349.stgit@notabene.brownSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The handling of the CIFS_INO_INVALID_MAPPING flag is racy. It's possible for two tasks to attempt to revalidate the mapping at the same time. The first sees that CIFS_INO_INVALID_MAPPING is set. It clears the flag and then calls invalidate_inode_pages2 to start shooting down the pagecache. While that's going on, another task checks the flag and sees that it's clear. It then ends up trusting the pagecache to satisfy a read when it shouldn't. Fix this by adding a bitlock to ensure that the clearing of the flag is atomic with respect to the actual cache invalidation. Also, move the other existing users of cifs_invalidate_mapping to use a new cifs_zap_mapping() function that just sets the INVALID_MAPPING bit and then uses the standard codepath to handle the invalidation. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In later patches, we'll need to have a bitlock, so go ahead and convert these bools to use atomic bitops instead. Also, clean up the initialization of the flags field. There's no need to unset each bit individually just after it was zeroed on allocation. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
For now, just use the same thing we pass to ->direct_IO() - it's all iovec-based at the moment. Pass it explicitly to iov_iter_init() and account for kvec vs. iovec in there, by the same kludge NFS ->direct_IO() uses. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
unmodified, for now Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all callers can use copy_page_from_iter() and it actually simplifies them. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Opdenacker 提交于
This issue was found by Coverity (CID 1202536) This proposes a fix for a statement that creates dead code. The "rc < 0" statement is within code that is run with "rc > 0". It seems like "err < 0" was meant to be used here. This way, the error code is returned by the function. Signed-off-by: NMichael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Coverity says: *** CID 1202537: Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) /fs/cifs/file.c: 2873 in cifs_user_readv() 2867 cur_len = min_t(const size_t, len - total_read, cifs_sb->rsize); 2868 npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(cur_len, PAGE_SIZE); 2869 2870 /* allocate a readdata struct */ 2871 rdata = cifs_readdata_alloc(npages, 2872 cifs_uncached_readv_complete); >>> CID 1202537: Dereference after null check (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Comparing "rdata" to null implies that "rdata" might be null. 2873 if (!rdata) { 2874 rc = -ENOMEM; 2875 goto error; 2876 } 2877 2878 rc = cifs_read_allocate_pages(rdata, npages); ...when we "goto error", rc will be non-zero, and then we end up trying to do a kref_put on the rdata (which is NULL). Fix this by replacing the "goto error" with a "break". Reported-by: <scan-admin@coverity.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
由 Sachin Prabhu 提交于
Problem reported in Red Hat bz 1040329 for strict writes where we cache only when we hold oplock and write direct to the server when we don't. When we receive an oplock break, we first change the oplock value for the inode in cifsInodeInfo->oplock to indicate that we no longer hold the oplock before we enqueue a task to flush changes to the backing device. Once we have completed flushing the changes, we return the oplock to the server. There are 2 ways here where we can have data corruption 1) While we flush changes to the backing device as part of the oplock break, we can have processes write to the file. These writes check for the oplock, find none and attempt to write directly to the server. These direct writes made while we are flushing from cache could be overwritten by data being flushed from the cache causing data corruption. 2) While a thread runs in cifs_strict_writev, the machine could receive and process an oplock break after the thread has checked the oplock and found that it allows us to cache and before we have made changes to the cache. In that case, we end up with a dirty page in cache when we shouldn't have any. This will be flushed later and will overwrite all subsequent writes to the part of the file represented by this page. Before making any writes to the server, we need to confirm that we are not in the process of flushing data to the server and if we are, we should wait until the process is complete before we attempt the write. We should also wait for existing writes to complete before we process an oplock break request which changes oplock values. We add a version specific downgrade_oplock() operation to allow for differences in the oplock values set for the different smb versions. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NSachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru> Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
On 32 bit, size_t is "unsigned int", not "unsigned long", causing the following warning when comparing with PAGE_SIZE, which is always "unsigned long": fs/cifs/file.c: In function ‘cifs_readdata_to_iov’: fs/cifs/file.c:2757: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Introduced by commit 7f25bba8 ("cifs_iovec_read: keep iov_iter between the calls of cifs_readdata_to_iov()"), which changed the signedness of "remaining" and the code from min_t() to min(). Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-