- 27 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Nobody seems to be producing !SMP systems anymore, so this is just becoming a source of kernel bugs, particularly if people want to use coherent DMA with non-shared pages. This patch forces CONFIG_SMP=y for arm64, removing a modest amount of code in the process. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenzo Pieralisi 提交于
The code that initializes cpus on arm64 is currently split in two different code paths that carry out DT and ACPI cpus initialization. Most of the code executing SMP initialization is common and should be merged to reduce discrepancies between ACPI and DT initialization and to have code initializing cpus in a single common place in the kernel. This patch refactors arm64 SMP cpus initialization code to merge ACPI and DT boot paths in a common file and to create sanity checks that can be reused by both boot methods. Current code assumes PSCI is the only available boot method when arm64 boots with ACPI; this can be easily extended if/when the ACPI parking protocol is merged into the kernel. Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [DT] Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
MADT contains the information for MPIDR which is essential for SMP initialization, parse the GIC cpu interface structures to get the MPIDR value and map it to cpu_logical_map(), and add enabled cpu with valid MPIDR into cpu_possible_map. ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP, PSCI and Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is only specified for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only way for the SMP boot protocol before some updates for the ACPI spec or the Parking protocol spec. Parking protocol patches for SMP boot will be sent to upstream when the new version of Parking protocol is ready. CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Tested-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> Tested-by: NJon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> Tested-by: NTimur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NRobert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NTomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
ARM64 irq work self-IPI support depends on __smp_cross_call to point to some relevant IRQ controller operations. This information should be available after the call to init_IRQ(). Lets implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() accordingly. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
This patch adds the basic infrastructure necessary to support CPU_HOTPLUG on arm64, based on the arm implementation. Actual hotplug support will depend on an implementation's cpu_operations (e.g. PSCI). Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
The arm64 kernel has an internal holding pen, which is necessary for some systems where we can't bring CPUs online individually and must hold multiple CPUs in a safe area until the kernel is able to handle them. The current SMP infrastructure for arm64 is closely coupled to this holding pen, and alternative boot methods must launch CPUs into the pen, where they sit before they are launched into the kernel proper. With PSCI (and possibly other future boot methods), we can bring CPUs online individually, and need not perform the secondary_holding_pen dance. Instead, this patch factors the holding pen management code out to the spin-table boot method code, as it is the only boot method requiring the pen. A new entry point for secondaries, secondary_entry is added for other boot methods to use, which bypasses the holding pen and its associated overhead when bringing CPUs online. The smp.pen.text section is also removed, as the pen can live in head.text without problem. The cpu_operations structure is extended with two new functions, cpu_boot and cpu_postboot, for bringing a cpu into the kernel and performing any post-boot cleanup required by a bootmethod (e.g. resetting the secondary_holding_pen_release to INVALID_HWID). Documentation is added for cpu_operations. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
For hotplug support, we're going to want a place to store operations that do more than bring CPUs online, and it makes sense to group these with our current smp_enable_ops. For cpuidle support, we'll want to group additional functions, and we may want them even for UP kernels. This patch renames smp_enable_ops to the more general cpu_operations, and pulls the definitions out of smp code such that they can be used in UP kernels. While we're at it, fix up instances of the cpu parameter to be an unsigned int, drop the init markings and rename the *_cpu functions to cpu_* to reduce future churn when cpu_operations is extended. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Wire the PSCI implementation into the SMP secondary startup code. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to introduce PSCI support, let the SMP code handle multiple enabling methods. This also allow CPUs to be booted using different methods (though this feels a bit weird...). In the process, move the spin-table code to its own file. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin Marinas 提交于
This patch adds SMP initialisation and spinlocks implementation for AArch64. The spinlock support uses the new load-acquire/store-release instructions to avoid explicit barriers. The architecture also specifies that an event is automatically generated when clearing the exclusive monitor state to wake up processors in WFE, so there is no need for an explicit DSB/SEV instruction sequence. The SEVL instruction is used to set the exclusive monitor locally as there is no conditional WFE and a branch is more expensive. For the SMP booting protocol, see Documentation/arm64/booting.txt. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-