- 20 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tony Lindgren 提交于
Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup() quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>. And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the device PM runtime to wake up the device. This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong. For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume functions: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); ... if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) enable_irq_wake(irq); ... if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) disable_irq_wake(irq); ... device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... We can replace it with just the following init and exit time code: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq); ... dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev); device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts: ... device_init_wakeup(dev, true); dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq); ... dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev); device_init_wakeup(dev, false); ... Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If PM domains are in use, it may be necessary to prepare the code handling a PM domain for driver probing. For example, in some cases device drivers rely on the ability to power on the devices with the help of the IO runtime PM framework and the PM domain code needs to be ready for that. Also, if that code has not been fully initialized yet, the driver probing should be deferred. Moreover, after the probing is complete, it may be necessary to put the PM domain in question into the state reflecting the current needs of the devices in it, for example, so that power is not drawn in vain. The same should be done after removing a driver from a device, as the PM domain state may need to be changed to reflect the new situation. For these reasons, introduce new PM domain callbacks, ->activate, ->sync and ->dismiss called, respectively, before probing for a device driver, after the probing has completed successfully and if the probing has failed or the driver has been removed. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 04 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Clients using the dev_pm_put_subsys_data() API isn't interested of a return value. They care only of decreasing a reference to the device's pm_subsys_data. So, let's convert the API to a void function, which anyway seems like reasonable thing to do. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
There're now no users left of the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macro, since all have converted to use the SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macro instead, so let's remove it. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macros are identical except that one of them is not empty for CONFIG_PM set, while the other one is not empty for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME set, respectively. However, after commit b2b49ccb (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so one of these macros is now redundant. For this reason, replace SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() with SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() everywhere and redefine the SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS symbol as SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS in case new code is starting to use the macro being removed here. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit b2b49ccb (PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is selected) PM_RUNTIME is always set if PM is set, so quite a few depend on CONFIG_PM or even may be dropped entirely in some cases. Replace CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME with CONFIG_PM in the PM core code. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
The definition of the struct pm_domain_data better belongs in the header for the PM domains, let's move it there. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Subsequent change sets will add platform-related operations between dpm_suspend_late() and dpm_suspend_noirq() as well as between dpm_resume_noirq() and dpm_resume_early() in suspend_enter(), so export these functions for suspend_enter() to be able to call them separately and split the invocations of dpm_suspend_end() and dpm_resume_start() in there accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
The commit 46420dd7 (PM / Domains: Add APIs to attach/detach a PM domain for a device) started using errno values in pm.h header file. It also failed to include the header for these, thus it caused compiler errors. Instead of including the errno header to pm.h, let's move the functions to pm_domain.h, since it's a better match. Fixes: 46420dd7 (PM / Domains: Add APIs to attach/detach a PM domain for a device) Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Acked-by: NWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
To maintain scalability let's add common methods to attach and detach a PM domain for a device, dev_pm_domain_attach|detach(). Typically dev_pm_domain_attach() shall be invoked from subsystem level code at the probe phase to try to attach a device to its PM domain. The reversed actions may be done a the remove phase and then by invoking dev_pm_domain_detach(). When attachment succeeds, the attach function should assign its corresponding detach function to a new ->detach() callback added in the struct dev_pm_domain. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Tested-by: NPhilipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
The intent of this callback is to simplify detachment of devices from their PM domains. Further patches will show the benefit. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, some subsystems (e.g. PCI and the ACPI PM domain) have to resume all runtime-suspended devices during system suspend, mostly because those devices may need to be reprogrammed due to different wakeup settings for system sleep and for runtime PM. For some devices, though, it's OK to remain in runtime suspend throughout a complete system suspend/resume cycle (if the device was in runtime suspend at the start of the cycle). We would like to do this whenever possible, to avoid the overhead of extra power-up and power-down events. However, problems may arise because the device's descendants may require it to be at full power at various points during the cycle. Therefore the most straightforward way to do this safely is if the device and all its descendants can remain runtime suspended until the complete stage of system resume. To this end, introduce a new device PM flag, power.direct_complete and modify the PM core to use that flag as follows. If the ->prepare() callback of a device returns a positive number, the PM core will regard that as an indication that it may leave the device runtime-suspended. It will then check if the system power transition in progress is a suspend (and not hibernation in particular) and if the device is, indeed, runtime-suspended. In that case, the PM core will set the device's power.direct_complete flag. Otherwise it will clear power.direct_complete for the device and it also will later clear it for the device's parent (if there's one). Next, the PM core will not invoke the ->suspend() ->suspend_late(), ->suspend_irq(), ->resume_irq(), ->resume_early(), or ->resume() callbacks for all devices having power.direct_complete set. It will invoke their ->complete() callbacks, however, and those callbacks are then responsible for resuming the devices as appropriate, if necessary. For example, in some cases they may need to queue up runtime resume requests for the devices using pm_request_resume(). Changelog partly based on an Alan Stern's description of the idea (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139940466625569&w=2). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
rjw> Why exactly are they errors? Geert> checkpatch.pl says: "WARNING: please, no space before tabs", Vim (with "let c_space_errors=1") shows them in red. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
As of commit 45f0a85c ('PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine'), the return value of ->runtime_idle() is no longer ignored by the PM core, but used to decide whether to suspend the device or not. Update the documentation to match the code. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
Previously only a subset of the functions were defined and set to NULL while !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP. Let's make them all available so they can be used no matter of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or not. Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lad, Prabhakar 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu, Chuansheng 提交于
The patch is a helper adding two new flags for implementing async threads for suspend_noirq and suspend_late. Signed-off-by: NChuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new latency tolerance device PM QoS type to be use for specifying active state (RPM_ACTIVE) memory access (DMA) latency tolerance requirements for devices. It may be used to prevent hardware from choosing overly aggressive energy-saving operation modes (causing too much latency to appear) for the whole platform. This feature reqiures hardware support, so it only will be available for devices having a new .set_latency_tolerance() callback in struct dev_pm_info populated, in which case the routine pointed to by it should implement whatever is necessary to transfer the effective requirement value to the hardware. Whenever the effective latency tolerance changes for the device, its .set_latency_tolerance() callback will be executed and the effective value will be passed to it. If that value is negative, which means that the list of latency tolerance requirements for the device is empty, the callback is expected to switch the underlying hardware latency tolerance control mechanism to an autonomous mode if available. If that value is PM_QOS_LATENCY_ANY, in turn, and the hardware supports a special "no requirement" setting, the callback is expected to use it. That allows software to prevent the hardware from automatically updating the device's latency tolerance in response to its power state changes (e.g. during transitions from D3cold to D0), which generally may be done in the autonomous latency tolerance control mode. If .set_latency_tolerance() is present for the device, a new pm_qos_latency_tolerance_us attribute will be present in the devivce's power directory in sysfs. Then, user space can use that attribute to specify its latency tolerance requirement for the device, if any. Writing "any" to it means "no requirement, but do not let the hardware control latency tolerance" and writing "auto" to it allows the hardware to be switched to the autonomous mode if there are no other requirements from the kernel side in the device's list. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
By having the runtime PM callbacks implemented for CONFIG_PM, these becomes available in all combinations of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME. The benefit using this, is that we don't need to implement the wrapper functions which handles runtime PM resourses, typically called from both runtime PM and system PM callbacks. Instead the runtime PM callbacks can be invoked directly from system PM callbacks, which is useful for some drivers, subsystems and power domains. Use the new macro SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS in cases were the above makes sense. Make sure the callbacks are encapsulated within CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME. Do note that the old macro SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS, which is being quite widely used right now, requires the callbacks to be defined for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME. In many cases it will certainly be convenient to convert to the new macro above, but that will have to be distinguished in case by case. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Ulf Hansson 提交于
We use the same approach as for the existing SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, but for the late and early callbacks instead. The new SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, defined for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, will point ->suspend_late, ->freeze_late and ->poweroff_late to the same function. Vice verse happens for ->resume_early, ->thaw_early and ->restore_early. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ming Lei 提交于
Introduce the flag memalloc_noio in 'struct dev_pm_info' to help PM core to teach mm not allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL flag for avoiding probable deadlock. As explained in the comment, any GFP_KERNEL allocation inside runtime_resume() or runtime_suspend() on any one of device in the path from one block or network device to the root device in the device tree may cause deadlock, the introduced pm_runtime_set_memalloc_noio() sets or clears the flag on device in the path recursively. Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kosina@suse.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Decotigny <david.decotigny@google.com> Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
KMS drivers can potentially restore the display configuration without userspace help. Such drivers can can call a new funciton, pm_vt_switch_required(false) if they support this feature. In that case, the PM layer won't VT switch to the suspend console at suspend time and then back to the original VT on resume, but rather leave things alone for a nicer looking suspend and resume sequence. v2: make a function so we can handle multiple drivers (Alan) v3: use a list to track device requests (Rafael) v4: Squash in build fix from Jesse for CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE_SLEEP=n v5: Squash in patch from Wu Fengguang to add a few missing static qualifiers. v6: Add missing EXPORT_SYMBOL. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> (v3) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
pm_idle appears in no generic Linux code, it appears only in architecture-specific code. Thus, pm_idle should not be declared in pm.h. Architectures that use an idle function pointer should delcare one local to their architecture, and/or use cpuidle. Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Tested-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
-
- 24 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Define two device PM QoS flags, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF and PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP, and introduce routines dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() allowing the caller to expose those two flags to user space or to hide them from it, respectively. After the flags have been exposed, user space will see two additional sysfs attributes, pm_qos_no_power_off and pm_qos_remote_wakeup, under the device's /sys/devices/.../power/ directory. Then, writing 1 to one of them will update the PM QoS flags request owned by user space so that the corresponding flag is requested to be set. In turn, writing 0 to one of them will cause the corresponding flag in the user space's request to be cleared (however, the owners of the other PM QoS flags requests for the same device may still request the flag to be set and it may be effectively set even if user space doesn't request that). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Acked-by: Nmark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently struct dev_pm_info contains only one PM QoS constraints pointer reserved for latency requirements. Since one more device constraints type (i.e. flags) will be necessary, introduce a new structure, struct dev_pm_qos, that eventually will contain all of the available device PM QoS constraints and replace the "constraints" pointer in struct dev_pm_info with a pointer to the new structure called "qos". Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The syscore device PM flag used to mark the devices (belonging to PM domains) that should never be turned off, except for the system core (syscore) suspend/hibernation and resume stages, need not be accessed by the runtime PM core functions, because all of the devices it is set for need to be marked as "irq safe" anyway and are protected from being turned off by runtime PM by ensuring that their usage counters are always set. For this reason, make the syscore flag system-wide PM-specific and simplify the code used for manipulating it, because it need not acquire the device's power.lock any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The syscore device PM flag is used to mark the devices (belonging to a PM domain) that should never be turned off, except for the system core (syscore) suspend/hibernation and resume stages. That flag is stored in the device's struct pm_subsys_data object whose address is available from struct device. However, in some situations it may be convenient to set that flag before the device is added to a PM domain, so it is better to move it directly to the "power" member of struct device. Then, it can be checked by the routines in drivers/base/power/runtime.c and drivers/base/power/main.c, which is more straightforward. This also reduces the number of dev_gpd_data() invocations in the generic PM domains framework, so the overhead related to the syscore flag is slightly smaller. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NMagnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Runtime PM helper functions, like pm_runtime_get_sync(), cannot be called by early platform device drivers, because the devices' power management locks are not initialized at that time. This is quite inconvenient, so modify early_platform_add_devices() to initialize the devices power management locks as appropriate and make sure that they won't be initialized more than once if an early platform device is going to be used as a regular one later. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 17 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ming Lei 提交于
dpm_list and its pm lock provide a good way to iterate all devices in system. Except this way, there is no other easy way to iterate devices in system. firmware loader need to cache firmware images for devices before system sleep, so introduce the function to meet its demand. Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 02 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After the previous changes in default_stop_ok() and default_power_down_ok() for PM domains, there are two fields in struct dev_pm_info that aren't necessary any more, suspend_time and max_time_suspended_ns. Remove those fields along with all of the code that accesses them, which simplifies the runtime PM framework quite a bit. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 14 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
A runtime suspend of a device (e.g. an MMC controller) belonging to a power domain or, in a more complicated scenario, a runtime suspend of another device in the same power domain, may cause power to be removed from the entire domain. In that case, the amount of time necessary to runtime-resume the given device (e.g. the MMC controller) is often substantially greater than the time needed to run its driver's runtime resume callback. That may hurt performance in some situations, because user data may need to wait for the device to become operational, so we should make it possible to prevent that from happening. For this reason, introduce a new sysfs attribute for devices, power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us, allowing user space to specify the upper bound of the time necessary to bring the (runtime-suspended) device up after the resume of it has been requested. However, make that attribute appear only for the devices whose drivers declare support for it by calling the (new) dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit() helper function with the appropriate initial value of the attribute. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 18 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS() macro is slightly misleading, because it may suggest that it's a good idea to point runtime PM callback pointers to the same routines as system suspend/resume callbacks .suspend() and .resume(), which is not the case. For this reason, add a comment to include/linux/pm.h, next to the definition of UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS(), describing how device PM callbacks are related to each other. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 30 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce generic subsystem callbacks for the new phases of device suspend/resume during system power transitions: "late suspend", "early resume", "late freeze", "early thaw", "late poweroff", "early restore". Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The current device suspend/resume phases during system-wide power transitions appear to be insufficient for some platforms that want to use the same callback routines for saving device states and related operations during runtime suspend/resume as well as during system suspend/resume. In principle, they could point their .suspend_noirq() and .resume_noirq() to the same callback routines as their .runtime_suspend() and .runtime_resume(), respectively, but at least some of them require device interrupts to be enabled while the code in those routines is running. It also makes sense to have device suspend-resume callbacks that will be executed with runtime PM disabled and with device interrupts enabled in case someone needs to run some special code in that context during system-wide power transitions. Apart from this, .suspend_noirq() and .resume_noirq() were introduced as a workaround for drivers using shared interrupts and failing to prevent their interrupt handlers from accessing suspended hardware. It appears to be better not to use them for other porposes, or we may have to deal with some serious confusion (which seems to be happening already). For the above reasons, introduce new device suspend/resume phases, "late suspend" and "early resume" (and analogously for hibernation) whose callback will be executed with runtime PM disabled and with device interrupts enabled and whose callback pointers generally may point to runtime suspend/resume routines. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the PM core is now going to execute driver callbacks directly if the corresponding subsystem callbacks are not present, forward-only subsystem callbacks (i.e. such that only execute the corresponding driver callbacks) are not necessary any more. Thus it is possible to remove generic_subsys_pm_ops, because the only callback in there that is not forward-only, .runtime_idle, is not really used by the only user of generic_subsys_pm_ops, which is vio_bus_type. However, the generic callback routines themselves cannot be removed from generic_ops.c, because they are used individually by a number of subsystems. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 02 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make the runtime PM core use device PM QoS constraints to check if it is allowed to suspend a given device, so that an error code is returned if the device's own PM QoS constraint is negative or one of its children has already been suspended for too long. If this is not the case, the maximum estimated time the device is allowed to be suspended, computed as the minimum of the device's PM QoS constraint and the PM QoS constraints of its children (reduced by the difference between the current time and their suspend times) is stored in a new device's PM field power.max_time_suspended_ns that can be used by the device's subsystem or PM domain to decide whether or not to put the device into lower-power (and presumably higher-latency) states later (if the constraint is 0, which means "no constraint", the power.max_time_suspended_ns is set to -1). Additionally, the time of execution of the subsystem-level .runtime_suspend() callback for the device is recorded in the new power.suspend_time field for later use by the device's subsystem or PM domain along with power.max_time_suspended_ns (it also is used by the core code when the device's parent is suspended). Introduce a new helper function, pm_runtime_update_max_time_suspended(), allowing subsystems and PM domains (or device drivers) to update the power.max_time_suspended_ns field, for example after changing the power state of a suspended device. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 29 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The comments describing device power management callbacks in include/pm.h are outdated and somewhat confusing, so make them reflect the reality more accurately. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 18 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 4ca46ff3 (PM / Sleep: Mark devices involved in wakeup signaling during suspend) introduced the power.wakeup_path field in struct dev_pm_info to mark devices whose children are enabled to wake up the system from sleep states, so that power domains containing the parents that provide their children with wakeup power and/or relay their wakeup signals are not turned off. Unfortunately, that introduced a PM regression on SH7372 whose power consumption in the system "memory sleep" state increased as a result of it, because it prevented the power domain containing the I2C controller from being turned off when some children of that controller were enabled to wake up the system, although the controller was not necessary for them to signal wakeup. To fix this issue use the observation that devices whose power.ignore_children flag is set for runtime PM should be treated analogously during system suspend. Namely, they shouldn't be included in wakeup paths going through their children. Since the SH7372 I2C controller's power.ignore_children flag is set, doing so will restore the previous behavior of that SOC. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 22 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The generic PM domains code in drivers/base/power/domain.c has to avoid powering off domains that provide power to wakeup devices during system suspend. Currently, however, this only works for wakeup devices directly belonging to the given domain and not for their children (or the children of their children and so on). Thus, if there's a wakeup device whose parent belongs to a power domain handled by the generic PM domains code, the domain will be powered off during system suspend preventing the device from signaling wakeup. To address this problem introduce a device flag, power.wakeup_path, that will be set during system suspend for all wakeup devices, their parents, the parents of their parents and so on. This way, all wakeup paths in the device hierarchy will be marked and the generic PM domains code will only need to avoid powering off domains containing devices whose power.wakeup_path is set. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 05 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
To read the current PM QoS value for a given device we need to make sure that the device's power.constraints object won't be removed while we're doing that. For this reason, put the operation under dev->power.lock and acquire the lock around the initialization and removal of power.constraints. Moreover, since we're using the value of power.constraints to determine whether or not the object is present, the power.constraints_state field isn't necessary any more and may be removed. However, dev_pm_qos_add_request() needs to check if the device is being removed from the system before allocating a new PM QoS constraints object for it, so make it use the power.power_state field of struct device for this purpose. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-