- 25 11月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, we have an active reference for the request until it is retired. Though it cannot be retired before it has been executed by hardware, the request may be completed before we have finished processing the execute fence, i.e. we may continue to process that fence as we free the request. Fixes: 5590af3e ("drm/i915: Drive request submission through fence callbacks") Fixes: 23902e49 ("drm/i915: Split request submit/execute phase into two") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161125131718.20978-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Before we return the request back to the kmem_cache after a failed i915_gem_request_alloc(), we should assert that it has not been added to any global state tracking. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161125131718.20978-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
While we will check that the request is completed prior to being retired, by placing an assert that the request is complete at the entrypoint of the function we can more clearly document the function's preconditions. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161125131718.20978-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Joonas Lahtinen 提交于
Rename i915_gem_timeline member 'next_seqno' into 'seqno' as the variable is pre-increment. We've already had two bugs due to the confusing name, second is fixed as follow-up patch. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161124144750.2610-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 21 11月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
Bannable property, banned status, guilty and active counts are properties of i915_gem_context. Make them so. v2: rebase Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479309634-28574-1-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
As hangcheck score was removed, the active decay of score was removed also. This removed feature for hangcheck to detect if the gpu client was accidentally or maliciously causing intermittent hangs. Reinstate the scoring as a per context property, so that if one context starts to act unfavourably, ban it. v2: ban_period_secs as a gate to score check (Chris) v3: decay in proper spot. scores as tunables (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Trying to chase an impossible bug (ivb): [ 207.765411] [drm:i915_reset_and_wakeup [i915]] resetting chip [ 207.765734] [drm:i915_gem_reset [i915]] resetting render ring to restart from tail of request 0x4ee834 [ 207.765791] [drm:intel_print_rc6_info [i915]] Enabling RC6 states: RC6 on RC6p on RC6pp off [ 207.767213] [drm:intel_guc_setup [i915]] GuC fw status: path (null), fetch NONE, load NONE [ 207.767515] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c:203! [ 207.767551] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 207.767576] Modules linked in: snd_hda_intel i915 cdc_ncm usbnet mii x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel lpc_ich snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core mei_me mei snd_pcm sdhci_pci sdhci mmc_core e1000e ptp pps_core [last unloaded: i915] [ 207.767808] CPU: 3 PID: 8855 Comm: gem_ringfill Tainted: G U 4.9.0-rc5-CI-Patchwork_3052+ #1 [ 207.767854] Hardware name: LENOVO 2356GCG/2356GCG, BIOS G7ET31WW (1.13 ) 07/02/2012 [ 207.767894] task: ffff88012c82a740 task.stack: ffffc9000383c000 [ 207.767927] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00a0a3a>] [<ffffffffa00a0a3a>] i915_gem_request_retire+0x2a/0x4b0 [i915] [ 207.767999] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000383fb20 EFLAGS: 00010293 [ 207.768027] RAX: 00000000004ee83c RBX: ffff880135dcb480 RCX: 00000000004ee83a [ 207.768062] RDX: ffff88012fea42a8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff88012c82af68 [ 207.768095] RBP: ffffc9000383fb48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 207.768129] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880135dcb480 [ 207.768163] R13: ffff88012fea42a8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000000001d8 [ 207.768200] FS: 00007f955f658740(0000) GS:ffff88013e2c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 207.768239] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 207.768258] CR2: 0000555899725930 CR3: 00000001316f6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 [ 207.768286] Stack: [ 207.768299] ffff880135dcb480 ffff880135dcbe00 ffff88012fea42a8 0000000000000000 [ 207.768350] 00000000000001d8 ffffc9000383fb70 ffffffffa00a1339 0000000000000000 [ 207.768402] ffff88012f296c88 00000000000003f0 ffffc9000383fbb0 ffffffffa00b582d [ 207.768453] Call Trace: [ 207.768493] [<ffffffffa00a1339>] i915_gem_request_retire_upto+0x49/0x90 [i915] [ 207.768553] [<ffffffffa00b582d>] intel_ring_begin+0x15d/0x2d0 [i915] [ 207.768608] [<ffffffffa00b59cb>] intel_ring_alloc_request_extras+0x2b/0x40 [i915] [ 207.768667] [<ffffffffa00a2fd9>] i915_gem_request_alloc+0x359/0x440 [i915] [ 207.768723] [<ffffffffa008bd03>] i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.15+0x783/0x1a10 [i915] [ 207.768766] [<ffffffff811a6a2e>] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 [ 207.768816] [<ffffffffa008d380>] i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xc0/0x250 [i915] [ 207.768854] [<ffffffff815532a6>] drm_ioctl+0x1f6/0x480 [ 207.768900] [<ffffffffa008d2c0>] ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x330/0x330 [i915] [ 207.768939] [<ffffffff81202f6e>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x690 [ 207.768972] [<ffffffff818193ac>] ? retint_kernel+0x2d/0x2d [ 207.769004] [<ffffffff810d6ef2>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x122/0x1b0 [ 207.769039] [<ffffffff812035ac>] SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70 [ 207.769068] [<ffffffff818189ae>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xb1 [ 207.769103] Code: 90 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 49 89 fc 53 8b 35 fa 7b e1 e1 85 f6 0f 85 55 03 00 00 41 8b 84 24 80 02 00 00 85 c0 75 02 <0f> 0b 49 8b 94 24 a8 00 00 00 48 8b 8a e0 01 00 00 8b 89 c0 00 [ 207.769400] RIP [<ffffffffa00a0a3a>] i915_gem_request_retire+0x2a/0x4b0 [i915] [ 207.769463] RSP <ffffc9000383fb20> Let's add a couple more BUG_ONs before this to ascertain that the request did make it to hardware. The impossible part of this stacktrace is that request must have been considered completed by the i915_request_wait() before we tried to retire it. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161118143412.26508-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Since we can retire requests from multiple paths, we cannot assume that i915_gem_retire_requests() is the sole path on which we can transition to gt.active_requests == 0. A consequence of this is that we would skip the function if we had already retired all the requests and not scheduled the idle worker. This is fallout from changing the routine from considering active_engines (for which it was the only consumer) to active_requests. v2: Move kicking the idle working to i915_gem_request_retire() otherwise we could postpone the idle callback everytime we called retire_requests even though we did no work. v3: We only need to move the idle work kicking! v4: Drop the BUG_ON(!awake) as we may be called from the shrinker in the middle of constructing a request before we have marked the device awake. v5: Add a BUG_ON() for active_requests underflow upon retirement (Joonas) Fixes: 28176ef4 ("drm/i915: Reserve space in the global seqno during request allocation") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161115164620.17185-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In order to support userspace defining different levels of importance to different contexts, and in particular the preferred order of execution, store a priority value on each context. By default, the kernel's context, which is used for idling and other background tasks, is given minimum priority (i.e. all user contexts will execute before the kernel). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Track the priority of each request and use it to determine the order in which we submit requests to the hardware via execlists. The priority of the request is determined by the user (eventually via the context) but may be overridden at any time by the driver. When we set the priority of the request, we bump the priority of all of its dependencies to match - so that a high priority drawing operation is not stuck behind a background task. When the request is ready to execute (i.e. we have signaled the submit fence following completion of all its dependencies, including third party fences), we put the request into a priority sorted rbtree to be submitted to the hardware. If the request is higher priority than all pending requests, it will be submitted on the next context-switch interrupt as soon as the hardware has completed the current request. We do not currently preempt any current execution to immediately run a very high priority request, at least not yet. One more limitation, is that this is first implementation is for execlists only so currently limited to gen8/gen9. v2: Replace recursive priority inheritance bumping with an iterative depth-first search list. v3: list_next_entry() for walking lists v4: Explain how the dfs solves the recursion problem with PI. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The scheduler needs to know the dependencies of each request for the lifetime of the request, as it may choose to reschedule the requests at any time and must ensure the dependency tree is not broken. This is in additional to using the fence to only allow execution after all dependencies have been completed. One option was to extend the fence to support the bidirectional dependency tracking required by the scheduler. However the mismatch in lifetimes between the submit fence and the request essentially meant that we had to build a completely separate struct (and we could not simply reuse the existing waitqueue in the fence for one half of the dependency tracking). The extra dependency tracking simply did not mesh well with the fence, and keeping it separate both keeps the fence implementation simpler and allows us to extend the dependency tracking into a priority tree (whilst maintaining support for reordering the tree). To avoid the additional allocations and list manipulations, the use of the priotree is disabled when there are no schedulers to use it. v2: Create a dedicated slab for i915_dependency. Rename the lists. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The start of the scheduler, add a hook into request submission for the scheduler to see the arrival of new requests and prepare its runqueues. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Defer the transfer from the client's timeline onto the execution timeline from the point of readiness to the point of actual submission. For example, in execlists, a request is finally submitted to hardware when the hardware is ready, and only put onto the hardware queue when the request is ready. By deferring the transfer, we ensure that the timeline is maintained in retirement order if we decide to queue the requests onto the hardware in a different order than fifo. v2: Rebased onto distinct global/user timeline lock classes. v3: Play with the position of the spin_lock(). v4: Nesting finally resolved with distinct sw_fence lock classes. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In order to support deferred scheduling, we need to differentiate between when the request is ready to run (i.e. the submit fence is signaled) and when the request is actually run (a new execute fence). This is typically split between the request itself wanting to wait upon others (for which we use the submit fence) and the CPU wanting to wait upon the request, for which we use the execute fence to be sure the hardware is ready to signal completion. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In order to simplify the lockdep annotation, as they become more complex in the future with deferred execution and multiple paths through the same functions, create a separate lockclass for the user timeline and the hardware execution timeline. We should only ever be locking the user timeline and the execution timeline in parallel so we only need to create two lock classes, rather than a separate class for every timeline. v2: Rename the lock classes to be more consistent with other lockdep. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161114204105.29171-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 09 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When we need to reset the global seqno on wraparound, we have to wait until the current rbtrees are drained (or otherwise the next waiter will be out of sequence). The current mechanism to kick and spin until complete, may exit too early as it would break if the target thread was currently running. Instead, we must wake up the threads, but keep spinning until the trees have been deleted. In order to appease Tvrtko, busy spin rather than yield(). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161108143719.32215-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Atm, in case an idle work handler is already pending but haven't yet started to run, retiring a new request will not extend the active period as required, rather simply leaves the pending idle work to be scheduled at the original expiration time. This may lead to idling the GPU too early. Fix this by using the delayed-work scheduler alternative which makes sure the handler's expiration time is extended in this case. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Requested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478510405-11799-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 29 10月, 2016 14 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
With the infrastructure converted over to tracking multiple timelines in the GEM API whilst preserving the efficiency of using a single execution timeline internally, we can now assign a separate timeline to every context with full-ppgtt. v2: Add a comment to indicate the xfer between timelines upon submission. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-35-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Defer the assignment of the global seqno on a request to its submission. In the next patch, we will only allocate the global seqno at that time, here we are just enabling the wait-for-submission before wait-for-seqno paths. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-34-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
A restriction on our global seqno is that they cannot wrap, and that we cannot use the value 0. This allows us to detect when a request has not yet been submitted, its global seqno is still 0, and ensures that hardware semaphores are monotonic as required by older hardware. To meet these restrictions when we defer the assignment of the global seqno, we must check that we have an available slot in the global seqno space during request construction. If that test fails, we wait for all requests to be completed and reset the hardware back to 0. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-33-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently we try to reduce the number of synchronisations (now the number of requests we need to wait upon) by noting that if we have earlier waited upon a request, all subsequent requests in the timeline will be after the wait. This only applies to requests in this timeline, as other timelines will not be ordered by that waiter. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-30-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Move the actual emission of the breadcrumb for closing the request from i915_add_request() to the submit callback. (It can be moved later when required.) This allows us to defer the allocation of the global_seqno from request construction to actual submission, allowing us to emit the requests out of order (wrt to the order of their construction, they still will only be executed one all of their dependencies are resolved including that all earlier requests on their timeline have been submitted.) We have to specialise how we then emit the request in order to write into the preallocated space, rather than at the tail of the ringbuffer (which will have been advanced by the addition of new requests). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-29-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In the next patch, we will use deferred breadcrumb emission. That requires reserving sufficient space in the ringbuffer to emit the breadcrumb, which first requires us to know how large the breadcrumb is. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-28-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Now that the emission of the request tail and its submission to hardware are two separate steps, engine->emit_request() is confusing. engine->emit_request() is called to emit the breadcrumb commands for the request into the ring, name it such (engine->emit_breadcrumb). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-27-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Though we will have multiple timelines, we still have a single timeline of execution. This we can use to provide an execution and retirement order of requests. This keeps tracking execution of requests simple, and vital for preserving a single waiter (i.e. so that we can order the waiters so that only the earliest to wakeup need be woken). To accomplish this we distinguish the seqno used to order requests per-context (external) and that used internally for execution. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In future patches, we will no longer be able to wait on a static global seqno and instead have to break our wait up into phases. First we wait for the global seqno assignment (upon submission to hardware), and once submitted we wait for the hardware to complete. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-25-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Our timelines are more than just a seqno. They also provide an ordered list of requests to be executed. Due to the restriction of handling individual address spaces, we are limited to a timeline per address space but we use a fence context per engine within. Our first step to introducing independent timelines per context (i.e. to allow each context to have a queue of requests to execute that have a defined set of dependencies on other requests) is to provide a timeline abstraction for the global execution queue. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-23-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In preparation to support many distinct timelines, we need to expand the activity tracking on the GEM object to handle more than just a request per engine. We already use the struct reservation_object on the dma-buf to handle many fence contexts, so integrating that into the GEM object itself is the preferred solution. (For example, we can now share the same reservation_object between every consumer/producer using this buffer and skip the manual import/export via dma-buf.) v2: Reimplement busy-ioctl (by walking the reservation object), postpone the ABI change for another day. Similarly use the reservation object to find the last_write request (if active and from i915) for choosing display CS flips. Caveats: * busy-ioctl: busy-ioctl only reports on the native fences, it will not warn of stalls (in set-domain-ioctl, pread/pwrite etc) if the object is being rendered to by external fences. It also will not report the same busy state as wait-ioctl (or polling on the dma-buf) in the same circumstances. On the plus side, it does retain reporting of which *i915* engines are engaged with this object. * non-blocking atomic modesets take a step backwards as the wait for render completion blocks the ioctl. This is fixed in a subsequent patch to use a fence instead for awaiting on the rendering, see "drm/i915: Restore nonblocking awaits for modesetting" * dynamic array manipulation for shared-fences in reservation is slower than the previous lockless static assignment (e.g. gem_exec_lut_handle runtime on ivb goes from 42s to 66s), mainly due to atomic operations (maintaining the fence refcounts). * loss of object-level retirement callbacks, emulated by VMA retirement tracking. * minor loss of object-level last activity information from debugfs, could be replaced with per-vma information if desired Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-21-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Add lockdep_assert_held(struct_mutex) to the API preamble of the internal GEM interfaces. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Our low-level wait routine has evolved from our generic wait interface that handled unlocked, RPS boosting, waits with time tracking. If we push our GEM fence tracking to use reservation_objects (required for handling multiple timelines), we lose the ability to pass the required information down to i915_wait_request(). However, if we push the extra functionality from i915_wait_request() to the individual callsites (i915_gem_object_wait_rendering and i915_gem_wait_ioctl) that make use of those extras, we can both simplify our low level wait and prepare for extending the GEM interface for use of reservation_objects. v2: Rewrite i915_wait_request() kerneldocs Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We will need to wait on DMA completion (as signaled via struct fence) before executing our i915_gem_request. Therefore we want to expose a method for adding the await on the fence itself to the request. v2: Add a comment detailing a failure to handle a signal-on-any fence-array. v3: Pretend that magic numbers don't exist. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161028125858.23563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 25 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct, and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA operations to make room. A consensus was reached in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing. Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it remains a good thing! (v2...: rebase, rerun spatch) v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke. v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel coccinelle script: @@ @@ - struct fence + struct dma_fence @@ @@ - struct fence_ops + struct dma_fence_ops @@ @@ - struct fence_cb + struct dma_fence_cb @@ @@ - struct fence_array + struct dma_fence_array @@ @@ - enum fence_flag_bits + enum dma_fence_flag_bits @@ @@ ( - fence_init + dma_fence_init | - fence_release + dma_fence_release | - fence_free + dma_fence_free | - fence_get + dma_fence_get | - fence_get_rcu + dma_fence_get_rcu | - fence_put + dma_fence_put | - fence_signal + dma_fence_signal | - fence_signal_locked + dma_fence_signal_locked | - fence_default_wait + dma_fence_default_wait | - fence_add_callback + dma_fence_add_callback | - fence_remove_callback + dma_fence_remove_callback | - fence_enable_sw_signaling + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling | - fence_is_signaled_locked + dma_fence_is_signaled_locked | - fence_is_signaled + dma_fence_is_signaled | - fence_is_later + dma_fence_is_later | - fence_later + dma_fence_later | - fence_wait_timeout + dma_fence_wait_timeout | - fence_wait_any_timeout + dma_fence_wait_any_timeout | - fence_wait + dma_fence_wait | - fence_context_alloc + dma_fence_context_alloc | - fence_array_create + dma_fence_array_create | - to_fence_array + to_dma_fence_array | - fence_is_array + dma_fence_is_array | - trace_fence_emit + trace_dma_fence_emit | - FENCE_TRACE + DMA_FENCE_TRACE | - FENCE_WARN + DMA_FENCE_WARN | - FENCE_ERR + DMA_FENCE_ERR ) ( ... ) Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Acked-by: NSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Acked-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 14 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Akash Goel 提交于
With the possibility of addition of many more number of rings in future, the drm_i915_private structure could bloat as an array, of type intel_engine_cs, is embedded inside it. struct intel_engine_cs engine[I915_NUM_ENGINES]; Though this is still fine as generally there is only a single instance of drm_i915_private structure used, but not all of the possible rings would be enabled or active on most of the platforms. Some memory can be saved by allocating intel_engine_cs structure only for the enabled/active engines. Currently the engine/ring ID is kept static and dev_priv->engine[] is simply indexed using the enums defined in intel_engine_id. To save memory and continue using the static engine/ring IDs, 'engine' is defined as an array of pointers. struct intel_engine_cs *engine[I915_NUM_ENGINES]; dev_priv->engine[engine_ID] will be NULL for disabled engine instances. There is a text size reduction of 928 bytes, from 1028200 to 1027272, for i915.o file (but for i915.ko file text size remain same as 1193131 bytes). v2: - Remove the engine iterator field added in drm_i915_private structure, instead pass a local iterator variable to the for_each_engine** macros. (Chris) - Do away with intel_engine_initialized() and instead directly use the NULL pointer check on engine pointer. (Chris) v3: - Remove for_each_engine_id() macro, as the updated macro for_each_engine() can be used in place of it. (Chris) - Protect the access to Render engine Fault register with a NULL check, as engine specific init is done later in Driver load sequence. v4: - Use !!dev_priv->engine[VCS] style for the engine check in getparam. (Chris) - Kill the superfluous init_engine_lists(). v5: - Cleanup the intel_engines_init() & intel_engines_setup(), with respect to allocation of intel_engine_cs structure. (Chris) v6: - Rebase. v7: - Optimize the for_each_engine_masked() macro. (Chris) - Change the type of 'iter' local variable to enum intel_engine_id. (Chris) - Rebase. v8: Rebase. v9: Rebase. v10: - For index calculation use engine ID instead of pointer based arithmetic in intel_engine_sync_index() as engine pointers are not contiguous now (Chris) - For appropriateness, rename local enum variable 'iter' to 'id'. (Joonas) - Use for_each_engine macro for cleanup in intel_engines_init() and remove check for NULL engine pointer in cleanup() routines. (Joonas) v11: Rebase. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NAkash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1476378888-7372-1-git-send-email-akash.goel@intel.com
-
- 10 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In order not to trigger hangcheck on a idle-but-waiting engine, we need to distinguish between the pending request queue and the actual execution queue. This is done later in "drm/i915: Enable multiple timelines" but for now we need a temporary fix to prevent blaming the wrong engine for a GPU hang. (Note that this causes a temporary subtle change in how we decide when to allow a waitboost to be re-awarded back to the waiter, the temporary effect is that if the wait is upon the most current execution the wait is given for free, instead of checking to see if the client stalled itself. This will be repaired in "drm/i915: Enable multiple timelines".) Fixes: 0a046a0e ("drm/i915: Nonblocking request submission") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98104Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161007065327.24515-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 8687b3ec) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 07 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
In order not to trigger hangcheck on a idle-but-waiting engine, we need to distinguish between the pending request queue and the actual execution queue. This is done later in "drm/i915: Enable multiple timelines" but for now we need a temporary fix to prevent blaming the wrong engine for a GPU hang. (Note that this causes a temporary subtle change in how we decide when to allow a waitboost to be re-awarded back to the waiter, the temporary effect is that if the wait is upon the most current execution the wait is given for free, instead of checking to see if the client stalled itself. This will be repaired in "drm/i915: Enable multiple timelines".) Fixes: 0a046a0e ("drm/i915: Nonblocking request submission") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98104Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161007065327.24515-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 09 9月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Now that we have fences in place to drive request submission, we can employ those to queue requests after their dependencies as opposed to stalling in the middle of an execbuf ioctl. (However, we still choose to spin before enabling the IRQ as that is faster - though contentious.) v2: Do the fence ordering first, where we can still fail. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We are about to specialize object synchronisation to enable nonblocking execbuf submission. First we make a copy of the current object synchronisation for execbuffer. The general i915_gem_object_sync() will be removed following the removal of CS flips in the near future. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Let's avoid mixing sealing the hardware commands for the request and adding the request to the software tracking. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Drive final request submission from a callback from the fence. This way the request is queued until all dependencies are resolved, at which point it is handed to the backend for queueing to hardware. At this point, no dependencies are set on the request, so the callback is immediate. A side-effect of imposing a heavier-irqsafe spinlock for execlist submission is that we lose the softirq enabling after scheduling the execlists tasklet. To compensate, we manually kickstart the softirq by disabling and enabling the bh around the fence signaling. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
If a waiter is holding the struct_mutex, then the reset worker cannot reset the GPU until the waiter returns. We do not want to return -EAGAIN form i915_wait_request as that breaks delicate operations like i915_vma_unbind() which often cannot be restarted easily, and returning -EIO is just as useless (and has in the past proven dangerous). The remaining WARN_ON(i915_wait_request) serve as a valuable reminder that handling errors from an indefinite wait are tricky. We can keep the current semantic that knowing after a reset is complete, so is the request, by performing the reset ourselves if we hold the mutex. uevent emission is still handled by the reset worker, so it may appear slightly out of order with respect to the actual reset (and concurrent use of the device). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-