1. 23 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 11 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • V
      mm: introduce idle page tracking · 33c3fc71
      Vladimir Davydov 提交于
      Knowing the portion of memory that is not used by a certain application or
      memory cgroup (idle memory) can be useful for partitioning the system
      efficiently, e.g.  by setting memory cgroup limits appropriately.
      Currently, the only means to estimate the amount of idle memory provided
      by the kernel is /proc/PID/{clear_refs,smaps}: the user can clear the
      access bit for all pages mapped to a particular process by writing 1 to
      clear_refs, wait for some time, and then count smaps:Referenced.  However,
      this method has two serious shortcomings:
      
       - it does not count unmapped file pages
       - it affects the reclaimer logic
      
      To overcome these drawbacks, this patch introduces two new page flags,
      Idle and Young, and a new sysfs file, /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap.
      A page's Idle flag can only be set from userspace by setting bit in
      /sys/kernel/mm/page_idle/bitmap at the offset corresponding to the page,
      and it is cleared whenever the page is accessed either through page tables
      (it is cleared in page_referenced() in this case) or using the read(2)
      system call (mark_page_accessed()). Thus by setting the Idle flag for
      pages of a particular workload, which can be found e.g.  by reading
      /proc/PID/pagemap, waiting for some time to let the workload access its
      working set, and then reading the bitmap file, one can estimate the amount
      of pages that are not used by the workload.
      
      The Young page flag is used to avoid interference with the memory
      reclaimer.  A page's Young flag is set whenever the Access bit of a page
      table entry pointing to the page is cleared by writing to the bitmap file.
      If page_referenced() is called on a Young page, it will add 1 to its
      return value, therefore concealing the fact that the Access bit was
      cleared.
      
      Note, since there is no room for extra page flags on 32 bit, this feature
      uses extended page flags when compiled on 32 bit.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: kpageidle requires an MMU]
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: decouple from page-flags rework]
      Signed-off-by: NVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
      Reviewed-by: NAndres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
      Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
      Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
      Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
      Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      33c3fc71
  3. 09 9月, 2015 12 次提交
  4. 05 9月, 2015 3 次提交
    • A
      userfaultfd: propagate the full address in THP faults · 230c92a8
      Andrea Arcangeli 提交于
      The THP faults were not propagating the original fault address.  The
      latest version of the API with uffd.arg.pagefault.address is supposed to
      propagate the full address through THP faults.
      
      This was not a kernel crashing bug and it wouldn't risk to corrupt user
      memory, but it would cause a SIGBUS failure because the wrong page was
      being copied.
      
      For various reasons this wasn't easily reproducible in the qemu workload,
      but the strestest exposed the problem immediately.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      230c92a8
    • A
      userfaultfd: prevent khugepaged to merge if userfaultfd is armed · c1294d05
      Andrea Arcangeli 提交于
      If userfaultfd is armed on a certain vma we can't "fill" the holes with
      zeroes or we'll break the userland on demand paging.  The holes if the
      userfault is armed, are really missing information (not zeroes) that the
      userland has to load from network or elsewhere.
      
      The same issue happens for wrprotected ptes that we can't just convert
      into a single writable pmd_trans_huge.
      
      We could however in theory still merge across zeropages if only
      VM_UFFD_MISSING is set (so if VM_UFFD_WP is not set)...  that could be
      slightly improved but it'd be much more complex code for a tiny corner
      case.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
      Cc: Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@gmail.com>
      Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com
      Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
      Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
      Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
      Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
      Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: "Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c1294d05
    • A
      userfaultfd: call handle_userfault() for userfaultfd_missing() faults · 6b251fc9
      Andrea Arcangeli 提交于
      This is where the page faults must be modified to call
      handle_userfault() if userfaultfd_missing() is true (so if the
      vma->vm_flags had VM_UFFD_MISSING set).
      
      handle_userfault() then takes care of blocking the page fault and
      delivering it to userland.
      
      The fault flags must also be passed as parameter so the "read|write"
      kind of fault can be passed to userland.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
      Cc: Sanidhya Kashyap <sanidhya.gatech@gmail.com>
      Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com
      Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
      Cc: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@google.com>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
      Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      Cc: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
      Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
      Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: "Huangpeng (Peter)" <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6b251fc9
  5. 07 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • N
      mm: check __PG_HWPOISON separately from PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_* · f4c18e6f
      Naoya Horiguchi 提交于
      The race condition addressed in commit add05cec ("mm: soft-offline:
      don't free target page in successful page migration") was not closed
      completely, because that can happen not only for soft-offline, but also
      for hard-offline.  Consider that a slab page is about to be freed into
      buddy pool, and then an uncorrected memory error hits the page just
      after entering __free_one_page(), then VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->flags &
      PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP) is triggered, despite the fact that it's not
      necessary because the data on the affected page is not consumed.
      
      To solve it, this patch drops __PG_HWPOISON from page flag checks at
      allocation/free time.  I think it's justified because __PG_HWPOISON
      flags is defined to prevent the page from being reused, and setting it
      outside the page's alloc-free cycle is a designed behavior (not a bug.)
      
      For recent months, I was annoyed about BUG_ON when soft-offlined page
      remains on lru cache list for a while, which is avoided by calling
      put_page() instead of putback_lru_page() in page migration's success
      path.  This means that this patch reverts a major change from commit
      add05cec about the new refcounting rule of soft-offlined pages, so
      "reuse window" revives.  This will be closed by a subsequent patch.
      Signed-off-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
      Cc: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f4c18e6f
  6. 25 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  7. 16 4月, 2015 5 次提交
  8. 15 4月, 2015 3 次提交
  9. 26 3月, 2015 4 次提交
    • M
      mm: numa: mark huge PTEs young when clearing NUMA hinting faults · b7b04004
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      Base PTEs are marked young when the NUMA hinting information is cleared
      but the same does not happen for huge pages which this patch addresses.
      
      Note that migrated pages are not marked young as the base page migration
      code does not assume that migrated pages have been referenced.  This
      could be addressed but beyond the scope of this series which is aimed at
      Dave Chinners shrink workload that is unlikely to be affected by this
      issue.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b7b04004
    • M
      mm: numa: slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur · 074c2381
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      Dave Chinner reported the following on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/1/226
      
        Across the board the 4.0-rc1 numbers are much slower, and the degradation
        is far worse when using the large memory footprint configs. Perf points
        straight at the cause - this is from 4.0-rc1 on the "-o bhash=101073" config:
      
         -   56.07%    56.07%  [kernel]            [k] default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys
            - default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys
               - 99.99% physflat_send_IPI_mask
                  - 99.37% native_send_call_func_ipi
                       smp_call_function_many
                     - native_flush_tlb_others
                        - 99.85% flush_tlb_page
                             ptep_clear_flush
                             try_to_unmap_one
                             rmap_walk
                             try_to_unmap
                             migrate_pages
                             migrate_misplaced_page
                           - handle_mm_fault
                              - 99.73% __do_page_fault
                                   trace_do_page_fault
                                   do_async_page_fault
                                 + async_page_fault
                    0.63% native_send_call_func_single_ipi
                       generic_exec_single
                       smp_call_function_single
      
      This is showing excessive migration activity even though excessive
      migrations are meant to get throttled.  Normally, the scan rate is tuned
      on a per-task basis depending on the locality of faults.  However, if
      migrations fail for any reason then the PTE scanner may scan faster if
      the faults continue to be remote.  This means there is higher system CPU
      overhead and fault trapping at exactly the time we know that migrations
      cannot happen.  This patch tracks when migration failures occur and
      slows the PTE scanner.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Tested-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      074c2381
    • M
      mm: numa: preserve PTE write permissions across a NUMA hinting fault · b191f9b1
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      Protecting a PTE to trap a NUMA hinting fault clears the writable bit
      and further faults are needed after trapping a NUMA hinting fault to set
      the writable bit again.  This patch preserves the writable bit when
      trapping NUMA hinting faults.  The impact is obvious from the number of
      minor faults trapped during the basis balancing benchmark and the system
      CPU usage;
      
        autonumabench
                                                   4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4
                                                    baseline              preserve
        Time System-NUMA01                  107.13 (  0.00%)      103.13 (  3.73%)
        Time System-NUMA01_THEADLOCAL       131.87 (  0.00%)       83.30 ( 36.83%)
        Time System-NUMA02                    8.95 (  0.00%)       10.72 (-19.78%)
        Time System-NUMA02_SMT                4.57 (  0.00%)        3.99 ( 12.69%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA01                 515.78 (  0.00%)      517.26 ( -0.29%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA01_THEADLOCAL      384.10 (  0.00%)      384.31 ( -0.05%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA02                  48.86 (  0.00%)       48.78 (  0.16%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA02_SMT              47.98 (  0.00%)       48.12 ( -0.29%)
      
                     4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4
                      baseline    preserve
        User          44383.95    43971.89
        System          252.61      201.24
        Elapsed         998.68     1000.94
      
        Minor Faults   2597249     1981230
        Major Faults       365         364
      
      There is a similar drop in system CPU usage using Dave Chinner's xfsrepair
      workload
      
                                            4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4
                                             baseline              preserve
        Amean    real-xfsrepair      454.14 (  0.00%)      442.36 (  2.60%)
        Amean    syst-xfsrepair      277.20 (  0.00%)      204.68 ( 26.16%)
      
      The patch looks hacky but the alternatives looked worse.  The tidest was
      to rewalk the page tables after a hinting fault but it was more complex
      than this approach and the performance was worse.  It's not generally
      safe to just mark the page writable during the fault if it's a write
      fault as it may have been read-only for COW so that approach was
      discarded.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Tested-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b191f9b1
    • M
      mm: numa: group related processes based on VMA flags instead of page table flags · bea66fbd
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      These are three follow-on patches based on the xfsrepair workload Dave
      Chinner reported was problematic in 4.0-rc1 due to changes in page table
      management -- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/1/226.
      
      Much of the problem was reduced by commit 53da3bc2 ("mm: fix up numa
      read-only thread grouping logic") and commit ba68bc01 ("mm: thp:
      Return the correct value for change_huge_pmd").  It was known that the
      performance in 3.19 was still better even if is far less safe.  This
      series aims to restore the performance without compromising on safety.
      
      For the test of this mail, I'm comparing 3.19 against 4.0-rc4 and the
      three patches applied on top
      
        autonumabench
                                                      3.19.0             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4
                                                     vanilla               vanilla          vmwrite-v5r8         preserve-v5r8         slowscan-v5r8
        Time System-NUMA01                  124.00 (  0.00%)      161.86 (-30.53%)      107.13 ( 13.60%)      103.13 ( 16.83%)      145.01 (-16.94%)
        Time System-NUMA01_THEADLOCAL       115.54 (  0.00%)      107.64 (  6.84%)      131.87 (-14.13%)       83.30 ( 27.90%)       92.35 ( 20.07%)
        Time System-NUMA02                    9.35 (  0.00%)       10.44 (-11.66%)        8.95 (  4.28%)       10.72 (-14.65%)        8.16 ( 12.73%)
        Time System-NUMA02_SMT                3.87 (  0.00%)        4.63 (-19.64%)        4.57 (-18.09%)        3.99 ( -3.10%)        3.36 ( 13.18%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA01                 570.06 (  0.00%)      567.82 (  0.39%)      515.78 (  9.52%)      517.26 (  9.26%)      543.80 (  4.61%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA01_THEADLOCAL      393.69 (  0.00%)      384.83 (  2.25%)      384.10 (  2.44%)      384.31 (  2.38%)      380.73 (  3.29%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA02                  49.09 (  0.00%)       49.33 ( -0.49%)       48.86 (  0.47%)       48.78 (  0.63%)       50.94 ( -3.77%)
        Time Elapsed-NUMA02_SMT              47.51 (  0.00%)       47.15 (  0.76%)       47.98 ( -0.99%)       48.12 ( -1.28%)       49.56 ( -4.31%)
      
                      3.19.0   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4
                     vanilla     vanillavmwrite-v5r8preserve-v5r8slowscan-v5r8
        User        46334.60    46391.94    44383.95    43971.89    44372.12
        System        252.84      284.66      252.61      201.24      249.00
        Elapsed      1062.14     1050.96      998.68     1000.94     1026.78
      
      Overall the system CPU usage is comparable and the test is naturally a
      bit variable.  The slowing of the scanner hurts numa01 but on this
      machine it is an adverse workload and patches that dramatically help it
      often hurt absolutely everything else.
      
      Due to patch 2, the fault activity is interesting
      
                                        3.19.0   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4
                                       vanilla     vanillavmwrite-v5r8preserve-v5r8slowscan-v5r8
        Minor Faults                   2097811     2656646     2597249     1981230     1636841
        Major Faults                       362         450         365         364         365
      
      Note the impact preserving the write bit across protection updates and
      fault reduces faults.
      
        NUMA alloc hit                 1229008     1217015     1191660     1178322     1199681
        NUMA alloc miss                      0           0           0           0           0
        NUMA interleave hit                  0           0           0           0           0
        NUMA alloc local               1228514     1216317     1190871     1177448     1199021
        NUMA base PTE updates        245706197   240041607   238195516   244704842   115012800
        NUMA huge PMD updates           479530      468448      464868      477573      224487
        NUMA page range updates      491225557   479886983   476207932   489222218   229950144
        NUMA hint faults                659753      656503      641678      656926      294842
        NUMA hint local faults          381604      373963      360478      337585      186249
        NUMA hint local percent             57          56          56          51          63
        NUMA pages migrated            5412140     6374899     6266530     5277468     5755096
        AutoNUMA cost                    5121%       5083%       4994%       5097%       2388%
      
      Here the impact of slowing the PTE scanner on migratrion failures is
      obvious as "NUMA base PTE updates" and "NUMA huge PMD updates" are
      massively reduced even though the headline performance is very similar.
      
      As xfsrepair was the reported workload here is the impact of the series
      on it.
      
        xfsrepair
                                               3.19.0             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4             4.0.0-rc4
                                              vanilla               vanilla          vmwrite-v5r8         preserve-v5r8         slowscan-v5r8
        Min      real-fsmark        1183.29 (  0.00%)     1165.73 (  1.48%)     1152.78 (  2.58%)     1153.64 (  2.51%)     1177.62 (  0.48%)
        Min      syst-fsmark        4107.85 (  0.00%)     4027.75 (  1.95%)     3986.74 (  2.95%)     3979.16 (  3.13%)     4048.76 (  1.44%)
        Min      real-xfsrepair      441.51 (  0.00%)      463.96 ( -5.08%)      449.50 ( -1.81%)      440.08 (  0.32%)      439.87 (  0.37%)
        Min      syst-xfsrepair      195.76 (  0.00%)      278.47 (-42.25%)      262.34 (-34.01%)      203.70 ( -4.06%)      143.64 ( 26.62%)
        Amean    real-fsmark        1188.30 (  0.00%)     1177.34 (  0.92%)     1157.97 (  2.55%)     1158.21 (  2.53%)     1182.22 (  0.51%)
        Amean    syst-fsmark        4111.37 (  0.00%)     4055.70 (  1.35%)     3987.19 (  3.02%)     3998.72 (  2.74%)     4061.69 (  1.21%)
        Amean    real-xfsrepair      450.88 (  0.00%)      468.32 ( -3.87%)      454.14 ( -0.72%)      442.36 (  1.89%)      440.59 (  2.28%)
        Amean    syst-xfsrepair      199.66 (  0.00%)      290.60 (-45.55%)      277.20 (-38.84%)      204.68 ( -2.51%)      150.55 ( 24.60%)
        Stddev   real-fsmark           4.12 (  0.00%)       10.82 (-162.29%)       4.14 ( -0.28%)        5.98 (-45.05%)        4.60 (-11.53%)
        Stddev   syst-fsmark           2.63 (  0.00%)       20.32 (-671.82%)       0.37 ( 85.89%)       16.47 (-525.59%)      15.05 (-471.79%)
        Stddev   real-xfsrepair        6.87 (  0.00%)        4.55 ( 33.75%)        3.46 ( 49.58%)        1.78 ( 74.12%)        0.52 ( 92.50%)
        Stddev   syst-xfsrepair        3.02 (  0.00%)       10.30 (-241.37%)      13.17 (-336.37%)       0.71 ( 76.63%)        5.00 (-65.61%)
        CoeffVar real-fsmark           0.35 (  0.00%)        0.92 (-164.73%)       0.36 ( -2.91%)        0.52 (-48.82%)        0.39 (-12.10%)
        CoeffVar syst-fsmark           0.06 (  0.00%)        0.50 (-682.41%)       0.01 ( 85.45%)        0.41 (-543.22%)       0.37 (-478.78%)
        CoeffVar real-xfsrepair        1.52 (  0.00%)        0.97 ( 36.21%)        0.76 ( 49.94%)        0.40 ( 73.62%)        0.12 ( 92.33%)
        CoeffVar syst-xfsrepair        1.51 (  0.00%)        3.54 (-134.54%)       4.75 (-214.31%)       0.34 ( 77.20%)        3.32 (-119.63%)
        Max      real-fsmark        1193.39 (  0.00%)     1191.77 (  0.14%)     1162.90 (  2.55%)     1166.66 (  2.24%)     1188.50 (  0.41%)
        Max      syst-fsmark        4114.18 (  0.00%)     4075.45 (  0.94%)     3987.65 (  3.08%)     4019.45 (  2.30%)     4082.80 (  0.76%)
        Max      real-xfsrepair      457.80 (  0.00%)      474.60 ( -3.67%)      457.82 ( -0.00%)      444.42 (  2.92%)      441.03 (  3.66%)
        Max      syst-xfsrepair      203.11 (  0.00%)      303.65 (-49.50%)      294.35 (-44.92%)      205.33 ( -1.09%)      155.28 ( 23.55%)
      
      The really relevant lines as syst-xfsrepair which is the system CPU
      usage when running xfsrepair.  Note that on my machine the overhead was
      45% higher on 4.0-rc4 which may be part of what Dave is seeing.  Once we
      preserve the write bit across faults, it's only 2.51% higher on average.
      With the full series applied, system CPU usage is 24.6% lower on
      average.
      
      Again, the impact of preserving the write bit on minor faults is obvious
      and the impact of slowing scanning after migration failures is obvious
      on the PTE updates.  Note also that the number of pages migrated is much
      reduced even though the headline performance is comparable.
      
                                        3.19.0   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4
                                       vanilla     vanillavmwrite-v5r8preserve-v5r8slowscan-v5r8
        Minor Faults                 153466827   254507978   249163829   153501373   105737890
        Major Faults                       610         702         690         649         724
        NUMA base PTE updates        217735049   210756527   217729596   216937111   144344993
        NUMA huge PMD updates           129294       85044      106921      127246       79887
        NUMA pages migrated           21938995    29705270    28594162    22687324    16258075
      
                              3.19.0   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4   4.0.0-rc4
                             vanilla     vanillavmwrite-v5r8preserve-v5r8slowscan-v5r8
        Mean sdb-avgqusz       13.47        2.54        2.55        2.47        2.49
        Mean sdb-avgrqsz      202.32      140.22      139.50      139.02      138.12
        Mean sdb-await         25.92        5.09        5.33        5.02        5.22
        Mean sdb-r_await        4.71        0.19        0.83        0.51        0.11
        Mean sdb-w_await      104.13        5.21        5.38        5.05        5.32
        Mean sdb-svctm          0.59        0.13        0.14        0.13        0.14
        Mean sdb-rrqm           0.16        0.00        0.00        0.00        0.00
        Mean sdb-wrqm           3.59     1799.43     1826.84     1812.21     1785.67
        Max  sdb-avgqusz      111.06       12.13       14.05       11.66       15.60
        Max  sdb-avgrqsz      255.60      190.34      190.01      187.33      191.78
        Max  sdb-await        168.24       39.28       49.22       44.64       65.62
        Max  sdb-r_await      660.00       52.00      280.00       76.00       12.00
        Max  sdb-w_await     7804.00       39.28       49.22       44.64       65.62
        Max  sdb-svctm          4.00        2.82        2.86        1.98        2.84
        Max  sdb-rrqm           8.30        0.00        0.00        0.00        0.00
        Max  sdb-wrqm          34.20     5372.80     5278.60     5386.60     5546.15
      
      FWIW, I also checked SPECjbb in different configurations but it's
      similar observations -- minor faults lower, PTE update activity lower
      and performance is roughly comparable against 3.19.
      
      This patch (of 3):
      
      Threads that share writable data within pages are grouped together as
      related tasks.  This decision is based on whether the PTE is marked
      dirty which is subject to timing races between the PTE scanner update
      and when the application writes the page.  If the page is file-backed,
      then background flushes and sync also affect placement.  This is
      unpredictable behaviour which is impossible to reason about so this
      patch makes grouping decisions based on the VMA flags.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Tested-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      bea66fbd
  10. 13 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 12 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      mm: fix up numa read-only thread grouping logic · 53da3bc2
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Dave Chinner reported that commit 4d942466 ("mm: convert
      p[te|md]_mknonnuma and remaining page table manipulations") slowed down
      his xfsrepair test enormously.  In particular, it was using more system
      time due to extra TLB flushing.
      
      The ultimate reason turns out to be how the change to use the regular
      page table accessor functions broke the NUMA grouping logic.  The old
      special mknuma/mknonnuma code accessed the page table present bit and
      the magic NUMA bit directly, while the new code just changes the page
      protections using PROT_NONE and the regular vma protections.
      
      That sounds equivalent, and from a fault standpoint it really is, but a
      subtle side effect is that the *other* protection bits of the page table
      entries also change.  And the code to decide how to group the NUMA
      entries together used the writable bit to decide whether a particular
      page was likely to be shared read-only or not.
      
      And with the change to make the NUMA handling use the regular permission
      setting functions, that writable bit was basically always cleared for
      private mappings due to COW.  So even if the page actually ends up being
      written to in the end, the NUMA balancing would act as if it was always
      shared RO.
      
      This code is a heuristic anyway, so the fix - at least for now - is to
      instead check whether the page is dirty rather than writable.  The bit
      doesn't change with protection changes.
      
      NOTE! This also adds a FIXME comment to revisit this issue,
      
      Not only should we probably re-visit the whole "is this a shared
      read-only page" heuristic (we might want to take the vma permissions
      into account and base this more on those than the per-page ones, and
      also look at whether the particular access that triggers it is a write
      or not), but the whole COW issue shows that we should think about the
      NUMA fault handling some more.
      
      For example, maybe we should do the early-COW thing that a regular fault
      does.  Or maybe we should accept that while using the same bits as
      PROTNONE was a good thing (and got rid of the specual NUMA bit), we
      might still want to just preseve the other protection bits across NUMA
      faulting.
      
      Those are bigger questions, left for later.  This just fixes up the
      heuristic so that it at least approximates working again.  More analysis
      and work needed.
      Reported-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      Tested-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      53da3bc2
  12. 13 2月, 2015 5 次提交