Since the xtime lock was split into the timekeeping lock and
the jiffies lock, we no longer need to call update_wall_time()
while holding the jiffies lock.

Thus, this patch splits update_wall_time() out from do_timer().

This allows us to get away from calling clock_was_set_delayed()
in update_wall_time() and instead use the standard clock_was_set()
call that previously would deadlock, as it causes the jiffies lock
to be acquired.

Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

As part of normal operaions, the hrtimer subsystem frequently calls
into the timekeeping code, creating a locking order of
  hrtimer locks -> timekeeping locks

clock_was_set_delayed() was suppoed to allow us to avoid deadlocks
between the timekeeping the hrtimer subsystem, so that we could
notify the hrtimer subsytem the time had changed while holding
the timekeeping locks. This was done by scheduling delayed work
that would run later once we were out of the timekeeing code.

But unfortunately the lock chains are complex enoguh that in
scheduling delayed work, we end up eventually trying to grab
an hrtimer lock.

Sasha Levin noticed this in testing when the new seqlock lockdep
enablement triggered the following (somewhat abrieviated) message:

[  251.100221] ======================================================
[  251.100221] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  251.100221] 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053 Not tainted
[  251.101967] -------------------------------------------------------
[  251.101967] kworker/10:1/4506 is trying to acquire lock:
[  251.101967]  (timekeeper_seq){----..}, at: [<ffffffff81160e96>] retrigger_next_event+0x56/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] but task is already holding lock:
[  251.101967]  (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81160e7c>] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  251.101967]
-> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[snipped]
-> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[snipped]
-> #1 (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){-.-...}:
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81194803>] validate_chain+0x6c3/0x7b0
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81194d9d>] __lock_acquire+0x4ad/0x580
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81194ff2>] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff84398500>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81153e69>] __queue_work+0x1a9/0x3f0
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81154168>] queue_work_on+0x98/0x120
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff81161351>] clock_was_set_delayed+0x21/0x30
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff811c4bd1>] do_adjtimex+0x111/0x160
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff811e2711>] compat_sys_adjtimex+0x41/0x70
[  251.101967]        [<ffffffff843a4b49>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
[  251.101967]
-> #0 (timekeeper_seq){----..}:
[snipped]
[  251.101967] other info that might help us debug this:
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] Chain exists of:
  timekeeper_seq --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock#11

[  251.101967]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  251.101967]        ----                    ----
[  251.101967]   lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[  251.101967]                                lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[  251.101967]                                lock(hrtimer_bases.lock#11);
[  251.101967]   lock(timekeeper_seq);
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] 3 locks held by kworker/10:1/4506:
[  251.101967]  #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81154960>] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[  251.101967]  #1:  (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81154960>] process_one_work+0x200/0x530
[  251.101967]  #2:  (hrtimer_bases.lock#11){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81160e7c>] retrigger_next_event+0x3c/0x70
[  251.101967]
[  251.101967] stack backtrace:
[  251.101967] CPU: 10 PID: 4506 Comm: kworker/10:1 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc2-next-20131206-sasha-00005-g8be2375-dirty #4053
[  251.101967] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work

So the best solution is to avoid calling clock_was_set_delayed() while
holding the timekeeping lock, and instead using a flag variable to
decide if we should call clock_was_set() once we've released the locks.

This works for the case here, where the do_adjtimex() was the deadlock
trigger point. Unfortuantely, in update_wall_time() we still hold
the jiffies lock, which would deadlock with the ipi triggered by
clock_was_set(), preventing us from calling it even after we drop the
timekeeping lock. So instead call clock_was_set_delayed() at that point.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.10+
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

In 780427f0 (Indicate that clock was set in the pvclock
gtod notifier), logic was added to pass a CLOCK_WAS_SET
notification to the pvclock notifier chain.

While that patch added a action flag returned from
accumulate_nsecs_to_secs(), it only uses the returned value
in one location, and not in the logarithmic accumulation.

This means if a leap second triggered during the logarithmic
accumulation (which is most likely where it would happen),
the notification that the clock was set would not make it to
the pv notifiers.

This patch extends the logarithmic_accumulation pass down
that action flag so proper notification will occur.

This patch also changes the varialbe action -> clock_set
per Ingo's suggestion.

Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.11+
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Since 48cdc135 (Implement a shadow timekeeper), we have to
call timekeeping_update() after any adjustment to the timekeeping
structure in order to make sure that any adjustments to the structure
persist.

Unfortunately, the updates to the tai offset via adjtimex do not
trigger this update, causing adjustments to the tai offset to be
made and then over-written by the previous value at the next
update_wall_time() call.

This patch resovles the issue by calling timekeeping_update()
right after setting the tai offset.

Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.10+
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Fix some typos in timekeeping comments.
Signed-off-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[jstultz: Commit message tweaks]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Gerlando Falauto reported that when HRTICK is enabled, it is
possible to trigger system deadlocks. These were hard to
reproduce, as HRTICK has been broken in the past, but seemed
to be connected to the timekeeping_seq lock.

Since seqlock/seqcount's aren't supported w/ lockdep, I added
some extra spinlock based locking and triggered the following
lockdep output:

[   15.849182] ntpd/4062 is trying to acquire lock:
[   15.849765]  (&(&pool->lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810aa9b5>] __queue_work+0x145/0x480
[   15.850051]
[   15.850051] but task is already holding lock:
[   15.850051]  (timekeeper_lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff810df6df>] do_adjtimex+0x7f/0x100

<snip>

[   15.850051] Chain exists of: &(&pool->lock)->rlock --> &p->pi_lock --> timekeeper_lock
[   15.850051]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   15.850051]
[   15.850051]        CPU0                    CPU1
[   15.850051]        ----                    ----
[   15.850051]   lock(timekeeper_lock);
[   15.850051]                                lock(&p->pi_lock);
[   15.850051] lock(timekeeper_lock);
[   15.850051] lock(&(&pool->lock)->rlock);
[   15.850051]
[   15.850051]  *** DEADLOCK ***

The deadlock was introduced by 06c017fd ("timekeeping:
Hold timekeepering locks in do_adjtimex and hardpps") in 3.10

This patch avoids this deadlock, by moving the call to
schedule_delayed_work() outside of the timekeeper lock
critical section.
Reported-by: NGerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>
Tested-by: NLin Ming <minggr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.11, 3.10
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378943457-27314-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

If the clock was set (stepped), set the action parameter to functions
in the pvclock gtod notifier chain to non-zero.  This allows the
callee to only do work if the clock was stepped.

This will be used on Xen as the synchronization of the Xen wallclock
to the control domain's (dom0) system time will be done with this
notifier and updating on every timer tick is unnecessary and too
expensive.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372329348-20841-4-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Instead of passing multiple bools to timekeeping_updated(), define
flags and use a single 'action' parameter.  It is then more obvious
what each timekeeping_update() call does.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372329348-20841-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Below is a patch from android kernel that maintains a histogram of
suspend times. Please review and provide feedback.

Statistices on the time spent in suspend are kept in
/sys/kernel/debug/sleep_time.

Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Cc: San Mehat <san@google.com>
Cc: Benoit Goby <benoit@android.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NColin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NTodd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
[zoran.markovic@linaro.org: Re-formatted suspend time table to better
fit expected values. Moved accounting of suspend time into timekeeping
core. Removed CONFIG_SUSPEND_TIME flag and made the feature conditional
on CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. Changed the file name to sleep_time to better fit
terminology in timekeeping core. Changed seq_printf to seq_puts. Tweaked
commit message]
Signed-off-by: NZoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Since commit 31ade306, timekeeping_init()
checks for presence of persistent clock by attempting to read a non-zero
time value. This is an issue on platforms where persistent_clock (instead
is implemented as a free-running counter (instead of an RTC) starting
from zero on each boot and running during suspend. Examples are some ARM
platforms (e.g. PandaBoard).

An attempt to read such a clock during timekeeping_init() may return zero
value and falsely declare persistent clock as missing. Additionally, in
the above case suspend times may be accounted twice (once from
timekeeping_resume() and once from rtc_resume()), resulting in a gradual
drift of system time.

This patch does a run-time correction of the issue by doing the same check
during timekeeping_suspend().

A better long-term solution would have to return error when trying to read
non-existing clock and zero when trying to read an uninitialized clock, but
that would require changing all persistent_clock implementations.

This patch addresses the immediate breakage, for now.

Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NZoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>
[jstultz: Tweaked commit message and subject]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Add a module refcount, so the current clocksource cannot be removed
unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130425143435.762417789@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

timekeeping_notify() can fail due cs->enable() failure. Though the
caller does not notice and happily keeps the wrong clocksource as the
current one.

Let the caller know about failure, so the current clocksource will be
shown correctly in sysfs.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130425143435.696321912@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

commit 7ec98e15 (timekeeping: Delay update of clock->cycle_last)
forgot to update tk->cycle_last in the resume path. This results in a
stale value versus clock->cycle_last and prevents resume in the worst
case.
Reported-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Reported-and-tested-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1304211648150.21884@ionosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Now that we have CLOCK_TAI timers, make sure we notify hrtimer
code when TAI offset is changed.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1365622909-953-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Shorten the seqcount write hold region to the actual update of the
timekeeper and the related data (e.g vsyscall).

On a contemporary x86 system this reduces the maximum latencies on
Preempt-RT from 8us to 4us on the non-timekeeping cores.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Use the shadow timekeeper to do the update_wall_time() adjustments and
then copy it over to the real timekeeper.

Keep the shadow timekeeper in sync when updating stuff outside of
update_wall_time().

This allows us to limit the timekeeper_seq hold time to the update of
the real timekeeper and the vsyscall data in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

For calculating the new timekeeper values store the new cycle_last
value in the timekeeper and update the clock->cycle_last just when we
actually update the new values.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

For implementing a shadow timekeeper and a split calculation/update
region we need to store the cycle_last value in the timekeeper and
update the value in the clocksource struct only in the update region.

Add the extra storage to the timekeeper.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Since we are taking the timekeeping locks, just go ahead
and update any tai change directly, rather then dropping
the lock and calling a function that will just take it again.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

In moving the NTP state to be protected by the timekeeping locks,
be sure to acquire the timekeeping locks prior to calling
ntp functions.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Since ADJ_SETOFFSET adjusts the timekeeping state, process
it as part of the top level do_adjtimex() function in
timekeeping.c.

This avoids deadlocks that could occur once we change the
ntp locking rules.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

In order to change the locking rules, we need to provide
the timespec and tai values rather then having the ntp
logic acquire these values itself.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Move logic that does not need the ntp state to be done
in the timekeeping do_adjtimex() call.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

In preparation for changing the ntp locking rules, move
do_adjtimex and hardpps accessor functions to timekeeping.c,
but keep the code logic in ntp.c.

This patch also introduces a ntp_internal.h file so timekeeping
specific interfaces of ntp.c can be more limitedly shared with
timekeeping.c.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Yet again, the kbuild test robot saves the day, noting
I left out defining __timekeeping_set_tai_offset as
static. It even sent me this patch.
Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

We want to shorten the seqcount write hold time. So split the seqlock
into a lock and a seqcount.

Open code the seqwrite_lock in the places which matter and drop the
sequence counter update where it's pointless.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[jstultz: Merge fixups from CLOCK_TAI collisions]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Make the lock a separate entity. Preparatory patch for shadow
timekeeper structure.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[Merged with CLOCK_TAI changes]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Nothing outside of the timekeeping core needs that lock.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Calculate the cycle interval shifted value once. No functional change,
just makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Add hrtimer support for CLOCK_TAI, as well as posix timer interfaces.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

This add a CLOCK_TAI clockid and the needed accessors.

CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Currently NTP manages the TAI offset. Since there's plans for a
CLOCK_TAI clockid, push the TAI management into the timekeeping
core.

CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

There are some new processors whose TSC clocksource won't stop during
suspend. Currently, after system resumes, kernel will use persistent
clock or RTC to compensate the sleep time, but with these nonstop
clocksources, we could skip the special compensation from external
sources, and just use current clocksource for time recounting.

This can solve some time drift bugs caused by some not-so-accurate or
error-prone RTC devices.

The current way to count suspended time is first try to use the persistent
clock, and then try the RTC if persistent clock can't be used. This
patch will change the trying order to:
	suspend-nonstop clocksource -> persistent clock -> RTC

When counting the sleep time with nonstop clocksource, use an accurate way
suggested by Jason Gunthorpe to cover very large delta cycles.
Signed-off-by: NFeng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
[jstultz: Small optimization, avoiding re-reading the clocksource]
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

In current kernel, there are several places which need to check
whether there is a persistent clock for the platform. Current check
is done by calling the read_persistent_clock() and validating its
return value.

So one optimization is to do the check only once in timekeeping_init(),
and use a flag persistent_clock_exist to record it.

v2: Add a has_persistent_clock() helper function, as suggested by John.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NFeng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

The pstore RAM backend can get called during resume, and must be defensive
against a suspended time source. Expose getnstimeofday logic that returns
an error instead of a WARN. This can be detected and the timestamp can
be zeroed out.
Reported-by: NDoug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

Currently, whenever CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET is enabled, each
arch core provides a single implementation of arch_gettimeoffset(). In
many cases, different sub-architectures, different machines, or
different timer providers exist, and so the arch ends up implementing
arch_gettimeoffset() as a call-through-pointer anyway. Examples are
ARM, Cris, M68K, and it's arguable that the remaining architectures,
M32R and Blackfin, should be doing this anyway.

Modify arch_gettimeoffset so that it itself is a function pointer, which
the arch initializes. This will allow later changes to move the
initialization of this function into individual machine support or timer
drivers. This is particularly useful for code in drivers/clocksource
which should rely on an arch-independant mechanism to register their
implementation of arch_gettimeoffset().

This patch also converts the Cris architecture to set arch_gettimeoffset
directly to the final implementation in time_init(), because Cris already
had separate time_init() functions per sub-architecture. M68K and ARM
are converted to set arch_gettimeoffset to the final implementation in
later patches, because they already have function pointers in place for
this purpose.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: NJesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>

As suggested by John, export time data similarly to how its
done by vsyscall support. This allows KVM to retrieve necessary
information to implement vsyscall support in KVM guests.
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Now that timekeeping is protected by its own locks, rename
the xtime_lock to jifffies_lock to better describe what it
protects.

CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

We fixed a bunch of integer overflows in timekeeping code during the 3.6
cycle.  I did an audit based on that and found this potential overflow.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121009071823.GA19159@elgon.mountainSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org