Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Make cmci_discover() quiet · 4670a300
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      cmci_discover() works out which machine check banks support CMCI, and
which of those are shared by multiple logical processors. It uses this
information to ensure that exactly one cpu is designated the owner of
each bank so that when interrupts are broadcast to multiple cpus, only one
of them will look in a shared bank to log the error and clear the bank.

At boot time cmci_discover() performs this task silently. But during
certain cpu hotplug operations it prints out a set of summary lines
like this:

CPU 35 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 CMCI:7 CMCI:8 CMCI:9 CMCI:10 CMCI:11
CPU 1 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 39 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 38 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 32 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 37 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 36 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
CPU 34 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3

The value of these messages seems very low. A user might painstakingly
cross-check against the data sheet for a processor to ensure that all
CMCI supported banks are correctly reported, but this seems improbable.
If users really wanted to do this, we should print the information at
boot time too.

Remove the messages.
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      4670a300
  3. 04 8月, 2012 4 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 12 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Fix siginfo_t->si_addr value for non-recoverable memory faults · 6751ed65
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      In commit dad1743e ("x86/mce: Only restart instruction after machine
check recovery if it is safe") we fixed mce_notify_process() to force a
signal to the current process if it was not restartable (RIPV bit not
set in MCG_STATUS). But doing it here means that the process doesn't
get told the virtual address of the fault via siginfo_t->si_addr. This
would prevent application level recovery from the fault.

Make a new MF_MUST_KILL flag bit for memory_failure() et al. to use so
that we will provide the right information with the signal.
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org    # 3.4+
      6751ed65
  9. 07 6月, 2012 8 次提交
  11. 06 6月, 2012 4 次提交
  13. 31 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 24 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  17. 23 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 15 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  21. 30 4月, 2012 3 次提交
  23. 21 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 20 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Avoid reading every machine check bank register twice. · 95022b8c
      由 Tony Luck 提交于 
      Reading machine check bank registers is slow. There is a trend of
increasing the number of banks, and the number of cores. The main section
of do_machine_check() is a serialized section where each cpu in turn
checks every bank. Even on a little two socket SandyBridge-EP system
that multiplies out as:

	2 sockets * 8 cores * 2 hyperthreads * 20 banks = 640 MSRs

We already scan the banks in parallel in mce_no_way_out() to see if there
is a fatal error anywhere in the system. If we build a cache of VALID
bits during this scan, we can avoid uselessly re-reading banks that have
no data. Note that this cache is only a hint. If the valid bit is set in a
shared bank, all cpus that share that bank will see it during the parallel
scan, but the first to find it in the sequential scan will (usually) clear
the bank.
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      95022b8c
  27. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, mce: Fix rcu splat in drain_mce_log_buffer() · b11e3d78
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      While booting, the following message is seen:

[   21.665087] ===============================
[   21.669439] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[   21.673798] 3.2.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2 Not tainted
[   21.681353] -------------------------------
[   21.685864] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:194 suspicious rcu_dereference_index_check() usage!
[   21.695013]
[   21.695014] other info that might help us debug this:
[   21.695016]
[   21.703488]
[   21.703489] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[   21.710426] 3 locks held by modprobe/2139:
[   21.714754]  #0:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff8133afd3>] __driver_attach+0x53/0xa0
[   21.725020]  #1:
[   21.725323] ioatdma: Intel(R) QuickData Technology Driver 4.00
[   21.733206]  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff8133afe1>] __driver_attach+0x61/0xa0
[   21.743015]  #2:  (i7core_edac_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa01cfa5f>] i7core_probe+0x1f/0x5c0 [i7core_edac]
[   21.753708]
[   21.753709] stack backtrace:
[   21.758429] Pid: 2139, comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.2.0-0.0.0.28.36b5ec9-default #2
[   21.768253] Call Trace:
[   21.770838]  [<ffffffff810977cd>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xcd/0x100
[   21.777366]  [<ffffffff8101aa41>] drain_mcelog_buffer+0x191/0x1b0
[   21.783715]  [<ffffffff8101aa78>] mce_register_decode_chain+0x18/0x20
[   21.790430]  [<ffffffffa01cf8db>] i7core_register_mci+0x2fb/0x3e4 [i7core_edac]
[   21.798003]  [<ffffffffa01cfb14>] i7core_probe+0xd4/0x5c0 [i7core_edac]
[   21.804809]  [<ffffffff8129566b>] local_pci_probe+0x5b/0xe0
[   21.810631]  [<ffffffff812957c9>] __pci_device_probe+0xd9/0xe0
[   21.816650]  [<ffffffff813362e4>] ? get_device+0x14/0x20
[   21.822178]  [<ffffffff81296916>] pci_device_probe+0x36/0x60
[   21.828061]  [<ffffffff8133ac8a>] really_probe+0x7a/0x2b0
[   21.833676]  [<ffffffff8133af23>] driver_probe_device+0x63/0xc0
[   21.839868]  [<ffffffff8133b01b>] __driver_attach+0x9b/0xa0
[   21.845718]  [<ffffffff8133af80>] ? driver_probe_device+0xc0/0xc0
[   21.852027]  [<ffffffff81339168>] bus_for_each_dev+0x68/0x90
[   21.857876]  [<ffffffff8133aa3c>] driver_attach+0x1c/0x20
[   21.863462]  [<ffffffff8133a64d>] bus_add_driver+0x16d/0x2b0
[   21.869377]  [<ffffffff8133b6dc>] driver_register+0x7c/0x160
[   21.875220]  [<ffffffff81296bda>] __pci_register_driver+0x6a/0xf0
[   21.881494]  [<ffffffffa01fe000>] ? 0xffffffffa01fdfff
[   21.886846]  [<ffffffffa01fe047>] i7core_init+0x47/0x1000 [i7core_edac]
[   21.893737]  [<ffffffff810001ce>] do_one_initcall+0x3e/0x180
[   21.899670]  [<ffffffff810a9b95>] sys_init_module+0xc5/0x220
[   21.905542]  [<ffffffff8149bc39>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Fix this by using ACCESS_ONCE() instead of rcu_dereference_check_mce()
over mcelog.next. Since the access to each entry is controlled by the
->finished field, ACCESS_ONCE() should work just fine. An rcu_dereference
is unnecessary here.
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      b11e3d78
  31. 23 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  33. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  39. 14 1月, 2012 1 次提交