1. 20 3月, 2006 5 次提交
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Fix _PAGE_EXEC handling. · 45f791eb
      David S. Miller 提交于
      First of all, use the known _PAGE_EXEC_{4U,4V} value instead
      of loading _PAGE_EXEC from memory.  We either know which one
      to use by context, or we can code patch the test.
      
      Next, we need to check executability of a PTE in the generic
      TSB miss handler.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      45f791eb
    • D
      [SPARC64]: More TLB/TSB handling fixes. · 8b234274
      David S. Miller 提交于
      The SUN4V convention with non-shared TSBs is that the context
      bit of the TAG is clear.  So we have to choose an "invalid"
      bit and initialize new TSBs appropriately.  Otherwise a zero
      TAG looks "valid".
      
      Make sure, for the window fixup cases, that we use the right
      global registers and that we don't potentially trample on
      the live global registers in etrap/rtrap handling (%g2 and
      %g6) and that we put the missing virtual address properly
      in %g5.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      8b234274
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Deal with PTE layout differences in SUN4V. · c4bce90e
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Yes, you heard it right, they changed the PTE layout for
      SUN4V.  Ho hum...
      
      This is the simple and inefficient way to support this.
      It'll get optimized, don't worry.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c4bce90e
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Access TSB with physical addresses when possible. · 517af332
      David S. Miller 提交于
      This way we don't need to lock the TSB into the TLB.
      The trick is that every TSB load/store is registered into
      a special instruction patch section.  The default uses
      virtual addresses, and the patch instructions use physical
      address load/stores.
      
      We can't do this on all chips because only cheetah+ and later
      have the physical variant of the atomic quad load.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      517af332
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Move away from virtual page tables, part 1. · 74bf4312
      David S. Miller 提交于
      We now use the TSB hardware assist features of the UltraSPARC
      MMUs.
      
      SMP is currently knowingly broken, we need to find another place
      to store the per-cpu base pointers.  We hid them away in the TSB
      base register, and that obviously will not work any more :-)
      
      Another known broken case is non-8KB base page size.
      
      Also noticed that flush_tlb_all() is not referenced anywhere, only
      the internal __flush_tlb_all() (local cpu only) is used by the
      sparc64 port, so we can get rid of flush_tlb_all().
      
      The kernel gets it's own 8KB TSB (swapper_tsb) and each address space
      gets it's own private 8K TSB.  Later we can add code to dynamically
      increase the size of per-process TSB as the RSS grows.  An 8KB TSB is
      good enough for up to about a 4MB RSS, after which the TSB starts to
      incur many capacity and conflict misses.
      
      We even accumulate OBP translations into the kernel TSB.
      
      Another area for refinement is large page size support.  We could use
      a secondary address space TSB to handle those.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      74bf4312