The LE ATT server socket needs to be superseded by any ATT client
sockets. Previously this was done by looking at the hcon->out variable
(indicating whether the connection is outgoing or incoming) which is a
too crude way of determining whether the server socket needs to be
picked or not (an outgoing connection doesn't necessarily mean that an
ATT client socket has triggered it).

This patch extends the ATT server socket lookup function
(l2cap_le_conn_ready) to be used for all LE connections (regardless of
the hcon->out value) and adds an internal check into the function for
the existence of any ATT client sockets (in which case the server socket
should be skipped). For this to work reliably all lookups must be done
while the l2cap_conn->chan_lock is held, meaning also that the call to
l2cap_chan_add needs to be changed to its lockless __l2cap_chan_add
counterpart.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

There's no need to reset disc_timeout in l2cap_le_conn_ready since
HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT is the default when the hci_conn is created and
there should be no way for it to get changed between creation and
l2cap_le_conn_ready being called.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The L2CAP code has been incrementing the hci_conn reference for each
l2cap_chan instance in the l2cap_conn list. Likewise, the reference is
dropped each time an l2cap_chan is removed from the list. The reference
counting policy with respect to removal has been clear and explicit in
the l2cap_chan_del function, however for addition the function
calling 2cap_chan_add has always had to do a separate hci_conn_hold
call.

What made the counting even more hard to follow is that the
hci_connect() procedure increments the reference and the L2CAP layer
making this call took advantage of it to use it as its own reference.

This patch aims to clarify things by having the call to hci_conn_hold
inside __l2cap_chan_add, thereby removing the need to do it in the
functions calling __l2cap_chan_add. The reference count for hci_connect
is still kept as it's necessary for users such as mgmt_pair_device,
however for the L2CAP layer it means that an extra call to hci_conn_drop
must be performed once l2cap_chan_add has been done.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

In l2cap_att_channel() we're only interested in the BT_CONNECTED state
so this state can directly be passed to l2cap_global_chan_by_scid().
This way there's no need to do any additional state check later.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The sk variable is of quite little use since it's only used to simplify
access in the two bt_sk() calls.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

In l2cap_le_conn_ready() after doing l2cap_chann_add() the LE channel is
part of the list which is subsequently iterated in l2cap_conn_ready() in
this loop each channel will get l2cap_chan_ready() called which would
result in trying to set the channel two times into BT_CONNECTED state.
Instead it makes sense to just add the channel but not call chan_ready
in l2cap_le_conn_ready, which is what this patch does.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

There is an extra call to smp_conn_security() for outgoing LE
connections from l2cap_conn_ready() but the reason for this call is far
from clear. After a bit of commit history research and using git blame I
found out that this extra call is for socket-less pairing processes
added by commit 160dc6ac. This patch adds a clarifying comment to the
code for this.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

Since in the future more than the ATT CID may be permissible we should
not be hardcoding it for all LE connections in __l2cap_chan_add().
Instead, the source ATT CID should only be set if the destination is
also ATT, and in other cases we should just use the existing dynamic CID
allocation function.

Assigning scid based on dcid means that whenever __l2cap_chan_add() is
called that chan->dcid is properly initialized. l2cap_le_conn_ready()
wasn't initializing is properly so this is also taken care of in this
patch.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The current test in l2cap_chan_connect is intended to protect against
multiple conflicting connect attempts. However, it assumes that there
will ever only be a single CID that is connected to, which is not true.
We do need to check for conflicts with connect attempts to the same
destination CID but this check is not in anyway specific to LE but can
be applied to BR/EDR as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The choice between LE and BR/EDR should be made on the destination
address type instead of the destination CID. This is particularly
important when in the future more than one CID will be allowed for LE.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

In future Core Specification versions the ATT CID will be just one of
many possible CIDs that can be used for data transfer. Therefore, it
makes sense to rename the define for the ATT CID to something less
ambigous.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

The LE L2CAP signalling channel follows its own rules and will continue
to evolve independently from the BR/EDR signalling channel. Therefore,
it makes sense to have a clear split from BR/EDR by having a dedicated
function for handling LE signalling commands.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

After receiving channel switch announcement from AP, scan and
association on that channel is blocked for DFS_CHAN_MOVE_TIME
(10 seconds). Hence station will be able to connect to the AP,
once it is moved to new channel.
Signed-off-by: NAmitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NBing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Stewart <pstew@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This patch adds code to parse requested AP's 11h capabilities
and add 11h information in association request.

Also, deauth is sent to the AP after receiving channel switch
announcement event from firmware. This happens when AP advertises
WLAN_EID_CHANNEL_SWITCH IE in it's beacon.
Signed-off-by: NAmitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NBing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Stewart <pstew@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Do not unconditionally access the chan variable in
brcmf_cfg80211_mgmt_tx() as it may be NULL.
Use freq instead.

Introduced by c2ff8cad
("brcm80211: make mgmt_tx in brcmfmac accept a NULL channel")
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAntonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Use negative check (if(!bss_desc)) and return failure
instead of failing a NULL check later in
mwifiex_check_network_compatibility() routine.
Signed-off-by: NAmitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NBing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

A typo causes routine rtl92cu_phy_rf6052_set_cck_txpower() to test the
same condition twice. The problem was found using cppcheck-1.49, and the
proper fix was verified against the pre-mac80211 version of the code.

This patch was originally included as commit 1288aa4e, but was accidentally
reverted in a later patch.

Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> [original report]
Reported-by: Andrea Morello <andrea.merello@gmail.com> [report of accidental reversion]
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>  [back to 2.6.39]
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add scatter gather list support for better rx glom performance.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Introducing a new SDIO block data access interface function
brcmf_sdio_buffrw. It will act as a unified interface function for any block
data access to WiFi dongle through SDIO interface. This patch enables
the support for single skb transmission.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There is an ID table registered to SDIO stack which consists of all SDIO devices
supported by brcmfmac. It is not necessary to have an extra check.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NFranky Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Instead of allocating an empty list item and queue that for
the dpc data worker to dequeue an atomic counter is used.
Reviewed-by: NFranky (Zhenhui) Lin <frankyl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Just cleaning up and being consistent in naming operations
related to struct brcmf_fws_mac_descriptor objects.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The firmware-signalling code used NL80211_NUM_ACS, but it has
its own definition enum brcmf_fws_fifo, which is more appropriate
to use. This effectively removes the need to include nl80211.h.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The term prec (precedence) is different from the fifo number. Rename
use of prec with fifo to be consistent and clear.
Reviewed-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The firmware will sent an event message when bc/mc traffic should
be sent to the device using credit mechanism.
Reviewed-by: NArend Van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NHante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

CUS217 is a card based on AR9462.
Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This should be >= ARRAY_SIZE() instead of > ARRAY_SIZE().
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This allows writing MTD driver working as a platform driver. In
platform_data it will receive struct ssb_sflash, which contains all
important data about flash (window, size).
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

CUS198 and CUS230 are similar cards, both
are AR9485 + xLNA solutions. But, the subsystem IDs
differ - identify CUS230 explicitly to make things
clearer.
Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Use the REGULATORY debug level to print the target power
details. EEPROM can be used for other purposes and this
spams the log.
Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NSujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This is a new device for this driver.
Reported-by: NTobias Kluge <zielscheibe@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Tobias Kluge <zielscheibe@gmail.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This data allow writing for example MTD driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>