- 06 12月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
commit bb4b3b77 upstream If spectrev2 mitigation has been enabled, RSB is filled on context switch in order to protect from various classes of spectrev2 attacks. If this mitigation is enabled, say so in sysfs for spectrev2. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "SchauflerCasey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809251438580.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pmSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
commit 53c613fe upstream STIBP is a feature provided by certain Intel ucodes / CPUs. This feature (once enabled) prevents cross-hyperthread control of decisions made by indirect branch predictors. Enable this feature if - the CPU is vulnerable to spectre v2 - the CPU supports SMT and has SMT siblings online - spectre_v2 mitigation autoselection is enabled (default) After some previous discussion, this leaves STIBP on all the time, as wrmsr on crossing kernel boundary is a no-no. This could perhaps later be a bit more optimized (like disabling it in NOHZ, experiment with disabling it in idle, etc) if needed. Note that the synchronization of the mask manipulation via newly added spec_ctrl_mutex is currently not strictly needed, as the only updater is already being serialized by cpu_add_remove_lock, but let's make this a little bit more future-proof. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "SchauflerCasey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809251438240.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pmSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 23 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
This reverts commit 233b9d7d which is commit 53c613fe6349994f023245519265999eed75957f upstream. It's not ready for the stable trees as there are major slowdowns involved with this patch. Reported-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "SchauflerCasey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 14 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
commit 53c613fe6349994f023245519265999eed75957f upstream. STIBP is a feature provided by certain Intel ucodes / CPUs. This feature (once enabled) prevents cross-hyperthread control of decisions made by indirect branch predictors. Enable this feature if - the CPU is vulnerable to spectre v2 - the CPU supports SMT and has SMT siblings online - spectre_v2 mitigation autoselection is enabled (default) After some previous discussion, this leaves STIBP on all the time, as wrmsr on crossing kernel boundary is a no-no. This could perhaps later be a bit more optimized (like disabling it in NOHZ, experiment with disabling it in idle, etc) if needed. Note that the synchronization of the mask manipulation via newly added spec_ctrl_mutex is currently not strictly needed, as the only updater is already being serialized by cpu_add_remove_lock, but let's make this a little bit more future-proof. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: "WoodhouseDavid" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: "SchauflerCasey" <casey.schaufler@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1809251438240.15880@cbobk.fhfr.pmSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 27 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
On Nehalem and newer core CPUs the CPU cache internally uses 44 bits physical address space. The L1TF workaround is limited by this internal cache address width, and needs to have one bit free there for the mitigation to work. Older client systems report only 36bit physical address space so the range check decides that L1TF is not mitigated for a 36bit phys/32GB system with some memory holes. But since these actually have the larger internal cache width this warning is bogus because it would only really be needed if the system had more than 43bits of memory. Add a new internal x86_cache_bits field. Normally it is the same as the physical bits field reported by CPUID, but for Nehalem and newerforce it to be at least 44bits. Change the L1TF memory size warning to use the new cache_bits field to avoid bogus warnings and remove the bogus comment about memory size. Fixes: 17dbca11 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Add sysfs reporting for l1tf") Reported-by: NGeorge Anchev <studio@anchev.net> Reported-by: NChristopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: vbabka@suse.cz Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180824170351.34874-1-andi@firstfloor.org
-
- 24 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlastimil Babka 提交于
Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. Make the warning more helpful by suggesting the proper mem=X kernel boot parameter to make it effective and a link to the L1TF document to help decide if the mitigation is worth the unusable RAM. [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105536Suggested-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/966571f0-9d7f-43dc-92c6-a10eec7a1254@suse.cz
-
- 16 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guenter Roeck 提交于
allmodconfig+CONFIG_INTEL_KVM=n results in the following build error. ERROR: "l1tf_vmx_mitigation" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined! Fixes: 5b76a3cf ("KVM: VMX: Tell the nested hypervisor to skip L1D flush on vmentry") Reported-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Josh reported that the late SMT evaluation in cpu_smt_state_init() sets cpu_smt_control to CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED in case that 'nosmt' was supplied on the kernel command line as it cannot differentiate between SMT disabled by BIOS and SMT soft disable via 'nosmt'. That wreckages the state and makes the sysfs interface unusable. Rework this so that during bringup of the non boot CPUs the availability of SMT is determined in cpu_smt_allowed(). If a newly booted CPU is not a 'primary' thread then set the local cpu_smt_available marker and evaluate this explicitely right after the initial SMP bringup has finished. SMT evaulation on x86 is a trainwreck as the firmware has all the information _before_ booting the kernel, but there is no interface to query it. Fixes: 73d5e2b4 ("cpu/hotplug: detect SMT disabled by BIOS") Reported-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 05 8月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于
Bit 3 of ARCH_CAPABILITIES tells a hypervisor that L1D flush on vmentry is not needed. Add a new value to enum vmx_l1d_flush_state, which is used either if there is no L1TF bug at all, or if bit 3 is set in ARCH_CAPABILITIES. Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Paolo Bonzini 提交于
Three changes to the content of the sysfs file: - If EPT is disabled, L1TF cannot be exploited even across threads on the same core, and SMT is irrelevant. - If mitigation is completely disabled, and SMT is enabled, print "vulnerable" instead of "vulnerable, SMT vulnerable" - Reorder the two parts so that the main vulnerability state comes first and the detail on SMT is second. Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 03 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sai Praneeth 提交于
Future Intel processors will support "Enhanced IBRS" which is an "always on" mode i.e. IBRS bit in SPEC_CTRL MSR is enabled once and never disabled. From the specification [1]: "With enhanced IBRS, the predicted targets of indirect branches executed cannot be controlled by software that was executed in a less privileged predictor mode or on another logical processor. As a result, software operating on a processor with enhanced IBRS need not use WRMSR to set IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS after every transition to a more privileged predictor mode. Software can isolate predictor modes effectively simply by setting the bit once. Software need not disable enhanced IBRS prior to entering a sleep state such as MWAIT or HLT." If Enhanced IBRS is supported by the processor then use it as the preferred spectre v2 mitigation mechanism instead of Retpoline. Intel's Retpoline white paper [2] states: "Retpoline is known to be an effective branch target injection (Spectre variant 2) mitigation on Intel processors belonging to family 6 (enumerated by the CPUID instruction) that do not have support for enhanced IBRS. On processors that support enhanced IBRS, it should be used for mitigation instead of retpoline." The reason why Enhanced IBRS is the recommended mitigation on processors which support it is that these processors also support CET which provides a defense against ROP attacks. Retpoline is very similar to ROP techniques and might trigger false positives in the CET defense. If Enhanced IBRS is selected as the mitigation technique for spectre v2, the IBRS bit in SPEC_CTRL MSR is set once at boot time and never cleared. Kernel also has to make sure that IBRS bit remains set after VMEXIT because the guest might have cleared the bit. This is already covered by the existing x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest() and x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host() speculation control functions. Enhanced IBRS still requires IBPB for full mitigation. [1] Speculative-Execution-Side-Channel-Mitigations.pdf [2] Retpoline-A-Branch-Target-Injection-Mitigation.pdf Both documents are available at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199511Originally-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533148945-24095-1-git-send-email-sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com
-
- 31 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
The article "Spectre Returns! Speculation Attacks using the Return Stack Buffer" [1] describes two new (sub-)variants of spectrev2-like attacks, making use solely of the RSB contents even on CPUs that don't fallback to BTB on RSB underflow (Skylake+). Mitigate userspace-userspace attacks by always unconditionally filling RSB on context switch when the generic spectrev2 mitigation has been enabled. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.07940.pdfSigned-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1807261308190.997@cbobk.fhfr.pm
-
- 13 7月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
Introduce the 'l1tf=' kernel command line option to allow for boot-time switching of mitigation that is used on processors affected by L1TF. The possible values are: full Provides all available mitigations for the L1TF vulnerability. Disables SMT and enables all mitigations in the hypervisors. SMT control via /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control is still possible after boot. Hypervisors will issue a warning when the first VM is started in a potentially insecure configuration, i.e. SMT enabled or L1D flush disabled. full,force Same as 'full', but disables SMT control. Implies the 'nosmt=force' command line option. sysfs control of SMT and the hypervisor flush control is disabled. flush Leaves SMT enabled and enables the conditional hypervisor mitigation. Hypervisors will issue a warning when the first VM is started in a potentially insecure configuration, i.e. SMT enabled or L1D flush disabled. flush,nosmt Disables SMT and enables the conditional hypervisor mitigation. SMT control via /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control is still possible after boot. If SMT is reenabled or flushing disabled at runtime hypervisors will issue a warning. flush,nowarn Same as 'flush', but hypervisors will not warn when a VM is started in a potentially insecure configuration. off Disables hypervisor mitigations and doesn't emit any warnings. Default is 'flush'. Let KVM adhere to these semantics, which means: - 'lt1f=full,force' : Performe L1D flushes. No runtime control possible. - 'l1tf=full' - 'l1tf-flush' - 'l1tf=flush,nosmt' : Perform L1D flushes and warn on VM start if SMT has been runtime enabled or L1D flushing has been run-time enabled - 'l1tf=flush,nowarn' : Perform L1D flushes and no warnings are emitted. - 'l1tf=off' : L1D flushes are not performed and no warnings are emitted. KVM can always override the L1D flushing behavior using its 'vmentry_l1d_flush' module parameter except when lt1f=full,force is set. This makes KVM's private 'nosmt' option redundant, and as it is a bit non-systematic anyway (this is something to control globally, not on hypervisor level), remove that option. Add the missing Documentation entry for the l1tf vulnerability sysfs file while at it. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.202758176@linutronix.de
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED state is set (if the processor does not support SMT) when the sysfs SMT control file is initialized. That was fine so far as this was only required to make the output of the control file correct and to prevent writes in that case. With the upcoming l1tf command line parameter, this needs to be set up before the L1TF mitigation selection and command line parsing happens. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142323.121795971@linutronix.de
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
All mitigation modes can be switched at run time with a static key now: - Use sysfs_streq() instead of strcmp() to handle the trailing new line from sysfs writes correctly. - Make the static key management handle multiple invocations properly. - Set the module parameter file to RW Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142322.954525119@linutronix.de
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
If Extended Page Tables (EPT) are disabled or not supported, no L1D flushing is required. The setup function can just avoid setting up the L1D flush for the EPT=n case. Invoke it after the hardware setup has be done and enable_ept has the correct state and expose the EPT disabled state in the mitigation status as well. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142322.612160168@linutronix.de
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Store the effective mitigation of VMX in a status variable and use it to report the VMX state in the l1tf sysfs file. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180713142322.433098358@linutronix.de
-
- 03 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lendacky 提交于
On AMD, the presence of the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature does not imply that the SSBD mitigation support should use the SPEC_CTRL MSR. Other features could have caused the MSR_SPEC_CTRL feature to be set, while a different SSBD mitigation option is in place. Update the SSBD support to check for the actual SSBD features that will use the SPEC_CTRL MSR. Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 6ac2f49e ("x86/bugs: Add AMD's SPEC_CTRL MSR usage") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180702213602.29202.33151.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 21 6月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
Xen PV domain kernel is not by design affected by meltdown as it's enforcing split CR3 itself. Let's not report such systems as "Vulnerable" in sysfs (we're also already forcing PTI to off in X86_HYPER_XEN_PV cases); the security of the system ultimately depends on presence of mitigation in the Hypervisor, which can't be easily detected from DomU; let's report that. Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Latimer <mlatimer@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/nycvar.YFH.7.76.1806180959080.6203@cbobk.fhfr.pm [ Merge the user-visible string into a single line. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
The pr_warn in l1tf_select_mitigation would have used the prior pr_fmt which was defined as "Spectre V2 : ". Move the function to be past SSBD and also define the pr_fmt. Fixes: 17dbca11 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Add sysfs reporting for l1tf") Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
L1TF core kernel workarounds are cheap and normally always enabled, However they still should be reported in sysfs if the system is vulnerable or mitigated. Add the necessary CPU feature/bug bits. - Extend the existing checks for Meltdowns to determine if the system is vulnerable. All CPUs which are not vulnerable to Meltdown are also not vulnerable to L1TF - Check for 32bit non PAE and emit a warning as there is no practical way for mitigation due to the limited physical address bits - If the system has more than MAX_PA/2 physical memory the invert page workarounds don't protect the system against the L1TF attack anymore, because an inverted physical address will also point to valid memory. Print a warning in this case and report that the system is vulnerable. Add a function which returns the PFN limit for the L1TF mitigation, which will be used in follow up patches for sanity and range checks. [ tglx: Renamed the CPU feature bit to L1TF_PTEINV ] Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
-
- 06 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
Both AMD and Intel can have SPEC_CTRL_MSR for SSBD. However AMD also has two more other ways of doing it - which are !SPEC_CTRL MSR ways. Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de> Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180601145921.9500-4-konrad.wilk@oracle.com
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
The AMD document outlining the SSBD handling 124441_AMD64_SpeculativeStoreBypassDisable_Whitepaper_final.pdf mentions that if CPUID 8000_0008.EBX[24] is set we should be using the SPEC_CTRL MSR (0x48) over the VIRT SPEC_CTRL MSR (0xC001_011f) for speculative store bypass disable. This in effect means we should clear the X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD flag so that we would prefer the SPEC_CTRL MSR. See the document titled: 124441_AMD64_SpeculativeStoreBypassDisable_Whitepaper_final.pdf A copy of this document is available at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199889Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de> Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180601145921.9500-3-konrad.wilk@oracle.com
-
- 17 5月, 2018 10 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Add the necessary logic for supporting the emulated VIRT_SPEC_CTRL MSR to x86_virt_spec_ctrl(). If either X86_FEATURE_LS_CFG_SSBD or X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SPEC_CTRL is set then use the new guest_virt_spec_ctrl argument to check whether the state must be modified on the host. The update reuses speculative_store_bypass_update() so the ZEN-specific sibling coordination can be reused. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
x86_spec_ctrL_mask is intended to mask out bits from a MSR_SPEC_CTRL value which are not to be modified. However the implementation is not really used and the bitmask was inverted to make a check easier, which was removed in "x86/bugs: Remove x86_spec_ctrl_set()" Aside of that it is missing the STIBP bit if it is supported by the platform, so if the mask would be used in x86_virt_spec_ctrl() then it would prevent a guest from setting STIBP. Add the STIBP bit if supported and use the mask in x86_virt_spec_ctrl() to sanitize the value which is supplied by the guest. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
x86_spec_ctrl_set() is only used in bugs.c and the extra mask checks there provide no real value as both call sites can just write x86_spec_ctrl_base to MSR_SPEC_CTRL. x86_spec_ctrl_base is valid and does not need any extra masking or checking. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
x86_spec_ctrl_base is the system wide default value for the SPEC_CTRL MSR. x86_spec_ctrl_get_default() returns x86_spec_ctrl_base and was intended to prevent modification to that variable. Though the variable is read only after init and globaly visible already. Remove the function and export the variable instead. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
Function bodies are very similar and are going to grow more almost identical code. Add a bool arg to determine whether SPEC_CTRL is being set for the guest or restored to the host. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The upcoming support for the virtual SPEC_CTRL MSR on AMD needs to reuse speculative_store_bypass_update() to avoid code duplication. Add an argument for supplying a thread info (TIF) value and create a wrapper speculative_store_bypass_update_current() which is used at the existing call site. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Tom Lendacky 提交于
Some AMD processors only support a non-architectural means of enabling speculative store bypass disable (SSBD). To allow a simplified view of this to a guest, an architectural definition has been created through a new CPUID bit, 0x80000008_EBX[25], and a new MSR, 0xc001011f. With this, a hypervisor can virtualize the existence of this definition and provide an architectural method for using SSBD to a guest. Add the new CPUID feature, the new MSR and update the existing SSBD support to use this MSR when present. Signed-off-by: NTom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
AMD is proposing a VIRT_SPEC_CTRL MSR to handle the Speculative Store Bypass Disable via MSR_AMD64_LS_CFG so that guests do not have to care about the bit position of the SSBD bit and thus facilitate migration. Also, the sibling coordination on Family 17H CPUs can only be done on the host. Extend x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest() and x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host() with an extra argument for the VIRT_SPEC_CTRL MSR. Hand in 0 from VMX and in SVM add a new virt_spec_ctrl member to the CPU data structure which is going to be used in later patches for the actual implementation. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The SSBD enumeration is similarly to the other bits magically shared between Intel and AMD though the mechanisms are different. Make X86_FEATURE_SSBD synthetic and set it depending on the vendor specific features or family dependent setup. Change the Intel bit to X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL_SSBD to denote that SSBD is controlled via MSR_SPEC_CTRL and fix up the usage sites. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The availability of the SPEC_CTRL MSR is enumerated by a CPUID bit on Intel and implied by IBRS or STIBP support on AMD. That's just confusing and in case an AMD CPU has IBRS not supported because the underlying problem has been fixed but has another bit valid in the SPEC_CTRL MSR, the thing falls apart. Add a synthetic feature bit X86_FEATURE_MSR_SPEC_CTRL to denote the availability on both Intel and AMD. While at it replace the boot_cpu_has() checks with static_cpu_has() where possible. This prevents late microcode loading from exposing SPEC_CTRL, but late loading is already very limited as it does not reevaluate the mitigation options and other bits and pieces. Having static_cpu_has() is the simplest and least fragile solution. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
-
- 12 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
Fixes: 7bb4d366 ("x86/bugs: Make cpu_show_common() static") Fixes: 24f7fc83 ("x86/bugs: Provide boot parameters for the spec_store_bypass_disable mitigation") Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 11 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
cpu_show_common() is not used outside of arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c, so make it static. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
__ssb_select_mitigation() returns one of the members of enum ssb_mitigation, not ssb_mitigation_cmd; fix the prototype to reflect that. Fixes: 24f7fc83 ("x86/bugs: Provide boot parameters for the spec_store_bypass_disable mitigation") Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 10 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于
Intel collateral will reference the SSB mitigation bit in IA32_SPEC_CTL[2] as SSBD (Speculative Store Bypass Disable). Hence changing it. It is unclear yet what the MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (0x10a) Bit(4) name is going to be. Following the rename it would be SSBD_NO but that rolls out to Speculative Store Bypass Disable No. Also fixed the missing space in X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD. [ tglx: Fixup x86_amd_rds_enable() and rds_tif_to_amd_ls_cfg() as well ] Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 05 5月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Unless explicitly opted out of, anything running under seccomp will have SSB mitigations enabled. Choosing the "prctl" mode will disable this. [ tglx: Adjusted it to the new arch_seccomp_spec_mitigate() mechanism ] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The migitation control is simpler to implement in architecture code as it avoids the extra function call to check the mode. Aside of that having an explicit seccomp enabled mode in the architecture mitigations would require even more workarounds. Move it into architecture code and provide a weak function in the seccomp code. Remove the 'which' argument as this allows the architecture to decide which mitigations are relevant for seccomp. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
For certain use cases it is desired to enforce mitigations so they cannot be undone afterwards. That's important for loader stubs which want to prevent a child from disabling the mitigation again. Will also be used for seccomp(). The extra state preserving of the prctl state for SSB is a preparatory step for EBPF dymanic speculation control. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-