- 12 9月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
In cpufreq_policy_restore() before system suspend policy is read from percpu's cpufreq_cpu_data_fallback. It's a read operation rather than a write one, so take the lock for reading in there. Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
If update_policy_cpu() is invoked with the existing policy->cpu itself as the new-cpu parameter, then a lot of things can go terribly wrong. In its present form, update_policy_cpu() always assumes that the new-cpu is different from policy->cpu and invokes other functions to perform their respective updates. And those functions implement the actual update like this: per_cpu(..., new_cpu) = per_cpu(..., last_cpu); per_cpu(..., last_cpu) = NULL; Thus, when new_cpu == last_cpu, the final NULL assignment makes the per-cpu references vanish into thin air! (memory leak). From there, it leads to more problems: cpufreq_stats_create_table() now doesn't find the per-cpu reference and hence tries to create a new sysfs-group; but sysfs already had created the group earlier, so it complains that it cannot create a duplicate filename. In short, the repercussions of a rather innocuous invocation of update_policy_cpu() can turn out to be pretty nasty. Ideally update_policy_cpu() should handle this situation (new == last) gracefully, and not lead to such severe problems. So fix it by adding an appropriate check. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
In __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(), the code which decides whether to remove the sysfs link or nominate a new policy cpu, is governed by an if/else block with a rather complex set of conditionals. Worse, they harbor a subtlety which leads to certain unintended behavior. The code looks like this: if (cpu != policy->cpu && !frozen) { sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); } else if (cpus > 1) { new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(...); ... update_policy_cpu(..., new_cpu); } The original intention was: If the CPU going offline is not policy->cpu, just remove the link. On the other hand, if the CPU going offline is the policy->cpu itself, handover the policy->cpu job to some other surviving CPU in that policy. But because the 'if' condition also includes the 'frozen' check, now there are *two* possibilities by which we can enter the 'else' block: 1. cpu == policy->cpu (intended) 2. cpu != policy->cpu && frozen (unintended) Due to the second (unintended) scenario, we end up spuriously nominating a CPU as the policy->cpu, even when the existing policy->cpu is alive and well. This can cause problems further down the line, especially when we end up nominating the same policy->cpu as the new one (ie., old == new), because it totally confuses update_policy_cpu(). To avoid this mess, restructure the if/else block to only do what was originally intended, and thus prevent any unwelcome surprises. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Stephen Warren reported that the cpufreq-stats code hits a NULL pointer dereference during the second attempt to suspend a system. He also pin-pointed the problem to commit 5302c3fb "cpufreq: Perform light-weight init/teardown during suspend/resume". That commit actually ensured that the cpufreq-stats table and the cpufreq-stats sysfs entries are *not* torn down (ie., not freed) during suspend/resume, which makes it all the more surprising. However, it turns out that the root-cause is not that we access an already freed memory, but that the reference to the allocated memory gets moved around and we lose track of that during resume, leading to the reported crash in a subsequent suspend attempt. In the suspend path, during CPU offline, the value of policy->cpu is updated by choosing one of the surviving CPUs in that policy, as long as there is atleast one CPU in that policy. And cpufreq_stats_update_policy_cpu() is invoked to update the reference to the stats structure by assigning it to the new CPU. However, in the resume path, during CPU online, we end up assigning a fresh CPU as the policy->cpu, without letting cpufreq-stats know about this. Thus the reference to the stats structure remains (incorrectly) associated with the old CPU. So, in a subsequent suspend attempt, during CPU offline, we end up accessing an incorrect location to get the stats structure, which eventually leads to the NULL pointer dereference. Fix this by letting cpufreq-stats know about the update of the policy->cpu during CPU online in the resume path. (Also, move the update_policy_cpu() function higher up in the file, so that __cpufreq_add_dev() can invoke it). Reported-and-tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nell Hardcastle 提交于
Enable the intel_pstate driver for Haswell CPUs. One missing Ivy Bridge model (0x3E) is also included. Models referenced from tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.c:has_nehalem_turbo_ratio_limit Signed-off-by: NNell Hardcastle <nell@spicious.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 9月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 7c30ed53 (cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized) attempted to serialize frequency transitions by adding checks to the CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE and CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notifications. However, it assumed that the notifications will always originate from the driver's .target() callback, but they also can be triggered by cpufreq_out_of_sync() and that leads to warnings like this on some systems: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14543 at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:317 __cpufreq_notify_transition+0x238/0x260() In middle of another frequency transition accompanied by a call trace similar to this one: [<ffffffff81720daa>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58 [<ffffffff8106534c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [<ffffffff815b8560>] ? acpi_cpufreq_target+0x320/0x320 [<ffffffff81065436>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [<ffffffff815b1ec8>] __cpufreq_notify_transition+0x238/0x260 [<ffffffff815b33be>] cpufreq_notify_transition+0x3e/0x70 [<ffffffff815b345d>] cpufreq_out_of_sync+0x6d/0xb0 [<ffffffff815b370c>] cpufreq_update_policy+0x10c/0x160 [<ffffffff815b3760>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x160/0x160 [<ffffffff81413813>] cpufreq_set_cur_state+0x8c/0xb5 [<ffffffff814138df>] processor_set_cur_state+0xa3/0xcf [<ffffffff8158e13c>] thermal_cdev_update+0x9c/0xb0 [<ffffffff8159046a>] step_wise_throttle+0x5a/0x90 [<ffffffff8158e21f>] handle_thermal_trip+0x4f/0x140 [<ffffffff8158e377>] thermal_zone_device_update+0x57/0xa0 [<ffffffff81415b36>] acpi_thermal_check+0x2e/0x30 [<ffffffff81415ca0>] acpi_thermal_notify+0x40/0xdc [<ffffffff813e7dbd>] acpi_device_notify+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff813f8241>] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x41/0x5c [<ffffffff813e3fbe>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x25/0x32 [<ffffffff81081060>] process_one_work+0x170/0x4a0 [<ffffffff81082121>] worker_thread+0x121/0x390 [<ffffffff81082000>] ? manage_workers.isra.20+0x170/0x170 [<ffffffff81088fe0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [<ffffffff81088f20>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff8173582c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81088f20>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 For this reason, revert commit 7c30ed53 along with the fix 266c13d7 (cpufreq: Fix serialization of frequency transitions) on top of it and we will revisit the serialization problem later. Reported-by: NAlessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
There are places where the variable 'ret' is declared as unsigned int and then used to store negative return values such as -EINVAL. Fix them by declaring the variable as a signed quantity. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
Commit "cpufreq: serialize calls to __cpufreq_governor()" had been a temporary and partial solution to the race condition between writing to a cpufreq sysfs file and taking a CPU offline. Now that we have a proper and complete solution to that problem, remove the temporary fix. Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
The functions that are used to write to cpufreq sysfs files (such as store_scaling_max_freq()) are not hotplug safe. They can race with CPU hotplug tasks and lead to problems such as trying to acquire an already destroyed timer-mutex etc. Eg: __cpufreq_remove_dev() __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); cpufreq_governor_dbs() case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP: mutex_destroy(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex) cpu_cdbs->cur_policy = NULL; <PREEMPT> store() __cpufreq_set_policy() __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS: mutex_lock(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex); <-- Warning (destroyed mutex) if (policy->max < cpu_cdbs->cur_policy->cur) <- cur_policy == NULL So use get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() in the store_*() functions, to synchronize with CPU hotplug. However, there is an additional point to note here: some parts of the CPU teardown in the cpufreq subsystem are done in the CPU_POST_DEAD stage, with cpu_hotplug.lock *released*. So, using the get/put_online_cpus() functions alone is insufficient; we should also ensure that we don't race with those latter steps in the hotplug sequence. We can easily achieve this by checking if the CPU is online before proceeding with the store, since the CPU would have been marked offline by the time the CPU_POST_DEAD notifiers are executed. Reported-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
__cpufreq_remove_dev_finish() handles the kobject cleanup for a CPU going offline. But because we destroy the kobject towards the end of the CPU offline phase, there are certain race windows where a task can try to write to a cpufreq sysfs file (eg: using store_scaling_max_freq()) while we are taking that CPU offline, and this can bump up the kobject refcount, which in turn might hinder the CPU offline task from running to completion. (It can also cause other more serious problems such as trying to acquire a destroyed timer-mutex etc., depending on the exact stage of the cleanup at which the task managed to take a new refcount). To fix the race window, we will need to synchronize those store_*() call-sites with CPU hotplug, using get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus(). However, that in turn can cause a total deadlock because it can end up waiting for the CPU offline task to complete, with incremented refcount! Write to sysfs CPU offline task -------------- ---------------- kobj_refcnt++ Acquire cpu_hotplug.lock get_online_cpus(); Wait for kobj_refcnt to drop to zero **DEADLOCK** A simple way to avoid this problem is to perform the kobject cleanup in the CPU offline path, with the cpu_hotplug.lock *released*. That is, we can perform the wait-for-kobj-refcnt-to-drop as well as the subsequent cleanup in the CPU_POST_DEAD stage of CPU offline, which is run with cpu_hotplug.lock released. Doing this helps us avoid deadlocks due to holding kobject refcounts and waiting on each other on the cpu_hotplug.lock. (Note: We can't move all of the cpufreq CPU offline steps to the CPU_POST_DEAD stage, because certain things such as stopping the governors have to be done before the outgoing CPU is marked offline. So retain those parts in the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage itself). Reported-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
During CPU offline, the cpufreq core invokes __cpufreq_remove_dev() to perform work such as stopping the cpufreq governor, clearing the CPU from the policy structure etc, and finally cleaning up the kobject. There are certain subtle issues related to the kobject cleanup, and it would be much easier to deal with them if we separate that part from the rest of the cleanup-work in the CPU offline phase. So split the __cpufreq_remove_dev() function into 2 parts: one that handles the kobject cleanup, and the other that handles the rest of the work. Reported-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andreas Schwab 提交于
The time spent by a CPU under a given frequency is stored in jiffies unit in the cpu var cpufreq_stats_table->time_in_state[i], i being the index of the frequency. This is what is displayed in the following file on the right column: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state 2301000 19835820 2300000 3172 [...] Now cpufreq converts this jiffies unit delta to clock_t before returning it to the user as in the above file. And that conversion is achieved using the API cputime64_to_clock_t(). Although it accidentally works on traditional tick based cputime accounting, where cputime_t maps directly to jiffies, it doesn't work with other types of cputime accounting such as CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_* where cputime_t can map to nsecs or any granularity preffered by the architecture. For example we get a buggy zero delta on full dyntick configurations: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state 2301000 0 2300000 0 [...] Fix this with using the proper jiffies_64_t to clock_t conversion. Reported-and-tested-by: NCarsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org> Signed-off-by: NAndreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We can't take a big lock around __cpufreq_governor() as this causes recursive locking for some cases. But calls to this routine must be serialized for every policy. Otherwise we can see some unpredictable events. For example, consider following scenario: __cpufreq_remove_dev() __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); cpufreq_governor_dbs() case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP: mutex_destroy(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex) cpu_cdbs->cur_policy = NULL; <PREEMPT> store() __cpufreq_set_policy() __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); policy->governor->governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS); case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS: mutex_lock(&cpu_cdbs->timer_mutex); <-- Warning (destroyed mutex) if (policy->max < cpu_cdbs->cur_policy->cur) <- cur_policy == NULL And so store() will eventually result in a crash if cur_policy is NULL at this point. Introduce an additional variable which would guarantee serialization here. Reported-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
__cpufreq_governor() returns with -EBUSY when governor is already stopped and we try to stop it again, but when it is stopped we must not allow calls to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS event as well. This patch adds this check in __cpufreq_governor(). Reported-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Workqueues are preemptible even if works are queued on them with queue_work_on(). Let's use raw_smp_processor_id() here to silence the warning. BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/3:2/674 caller is gov_queue_work+0x28/0xb0 CPU: 0 PID: 674 Comm: kworker/3:2 Tainted: G W 3.10.0 #30 Workqueue: events od_dbs_timer [<c010c178>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0109dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0109dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c03885a4>] (debug_smp_processor_id+0xbc/0xf0) [<c03885a4>] (debug_smp_processor_id+0xbc/0xf0) from [<c0635864>] (gov_queue_work+0x28/0xb0) [<c0635864>] (gov_queue_work+0x28/0xb0) from [<c0635618>] (od_dbs_timer+0x108/0x134) [<c0635618>] (od_dbs_timer+0x108/0x134) from [<c01aa8f8>] (process_one_work+0x25c/0x444) [<c01aa8f8>] (process_one_work+0x25c/0x444) from [<c01aaf88>] (worker_thread+0x200/0x344) [<c01aaf88>] (worker_thread+0x200/0x344) from [<c01b03bc>] (kthread+0xa0/0xb0) [<c01b03bc>] (kthread+0xa0/0xb0) from [<c01061b8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
- 'Governer' should be 'Governor'. - 'S' is used for Siemens (electrical conductance) in SI units, so use small 's' for seconds. Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stratos Karafotis 提交于
Function __cpufreq_driver_target() checks if target_freq is within policy->min and policy->max range. generic_powersave_bias_target() also checks if target_freq is valid via a cpufreq_frequency_table_target() call. So, drop the unnecessary duplicate check in *_check_cpu(). Signed-off-by: NStratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
When a CPU is hot removed we'll cancel all the delayed work items via gov_cancel_work(). Normally this will just cancels a delayed timer on each CPU that the policy is managing and the work won't run, but if the work is already running the workqueue code will wait for the work to finish before continuing to prevent the work items from re-queuing themselves like they normally do. This scheme will work most of the time, except for the case where the work function determines that it should adjust the delay for all other CPUs that the policy is managing. If this scenario occurs, the canceling CPU will cancel its own work but queue up the other CPUs works to run. For example: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- cpu_down() ... __cpufreq_remove_dev() cpufreq_governor_dbs() case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP: gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy); cpu0 work is canceled timer is canceled cpu1 work is canceled <work runs> <waits for cpu1> od_dbs_timer() gov_queue_work(*, *, true); cpu0 work queued cpu1 work queued cpu2 work queued ... cpu1 work is canceled cpu2 work is canceled ... At the end of the GOV_STOP case cpu0 still has a work queued to run although the code is expecting all of the works to be canceled. __cpufreq_remove_dev() will then proceed to re-initialize all the other CPUs works except for the CPU that is going down. The CPUFREQ_GOV_START case in cpufreq_governor_dbs() will trample over the queued work and debugobjects will spit out a warning: WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc() ODEBUG: init active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x10 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1491 Comm: sh Tainted: G W 3.10.0 #19 [<c010c178>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c0109dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c0109dec>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c01904cc>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x6c) [<c01904cc>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x6c) from [<c019056c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2c/0x3c) [<c019056c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2c/0x3c) from [<c0388a7c>] (debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc) [<c0388a7c>] (debug_print_object+0x94/0xbc) from [<c0388e34>] (__debug_object_init+0x2d0/0x340) [<c0388e34>] (__debug_object_init+0x2d0/0x340) from [<c019e3b0>] (init_timer_key+0x14/0xb0) [<c019e3b0>] (init_timer_key+0x14/0xb0) from [<c0635f78>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x3e8/0x5f8) [<c0635f78>] (cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x3e8/0x5f8) from [<c06325a0>] (__cpufreq_governor+0xdc/0x1a4) [<c06325a0>] (__cpufreq_governor+0xdc/0x1a4) from [<c0633704>] (__cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.10+0x3b4/0x434) [<c0633704>] (__cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.10+0x3b4/0x434) from [<c08989f4>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x60/0x80) [<c08989f4>] (cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x60/0x80) from [<c08a43c0>] (notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x68) [<c08a43c0>] (notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x68) from [<c01938e0>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x40) [<c01938e0>] (__cpu_notify+0x28/0x40) from [<c0892ad4>] (_cpu_down+0x7c/0x2c0) [<c0892ad4>] (_cpu_down+0x7c/0x2c0) from [<c0892d3c>] (cpu_down+0x24/0x40) [<c0892d3c>] (cpu_down+0x24/0x40) from [<c0893ea8>] (store_online+0x2c/0x74) [<c0893ea8>] (store_online+0x2c/0x74) from [<c04519d8>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24) [<c04519d8>] (dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24) from [<c02a69d4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x148) [<c02a69d4>] (sysfs_write_file+0x100/0x148) from [<c0255c18>] (vfs_write+0xcc/0x174) [<c0255c18>] (vfs_write+0xcc/0x174) from [<c0255f70>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x64) [<c0255f70>] (SyS_write+0x38/0x64) from [<c0106120>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sascha Hauer 提交于
For changing the cpu frequency the i.MX6q has to be switched to some intermediate clock during the PLL reprogramming. The driver tries to be clever to keep the enable count correct but gets it wrong. If the cpufreq is increased it calls clk_disable_unprepare twice on pll2_pfd2_396m. This puts all other devices which get their clock from pll2_pfd2_396m into a nonworking state. Fix this by removing the clk enabling/disabling altogether since the clk core will do this automatically during a reparent. Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 24 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Lo 提交于
The "cpu" and "pclk_p_cclk" was a virtual clock name that was used in the legacy Tegra clock framework. It was not used after converting to CCF. Fix it as the correct clock name that we are using. Tested-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 21 8月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Acked-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Deepak Sikri <sikrid@qti.qualcomm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha 提交于
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Acked-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
-
由 Li Zhong 提交于
This patch tries to fix lockdep complaint attached below. It seems that we should always read acquire the cpufreq_rwsem, whether CONFIG_SMP is enabled or not. And CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU depends on CONFIG_SMP, so it seems we don't need CONFIG_SMP for the code enabled by CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU. [ 0.504191] ===================================== [ 0.504627] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] [ 0.504627] 3.11.0-rc6-next-20130819 #1 Not tainted [ 0.504627] ------------------------------------- [ 0.504627] swapper/1 is trying to release lock (cpufreq_rwsem) at: [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d927a>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x13a/0x3e0 [ 0.504627] but there are no more locks to release! [ 0.504627] [ 0.504627] other info that might help us debug this: [ 0.504627] 1 lock held by swapper/1: [ 0.504627] #0: (subsys mutex#4){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8134a7bf>] subsys_interface_register+0x4f/0xe0 [ 0.504627] [ 0.504627] stack backtrace: [ 0.504627] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.11.0-rc6-next-20130819 #1 [ 0.504627] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 0.504627] ffffffff813d927a ffff88007f847c98 ffffffff814c062b ffff88007f847cc8 [ 0.504627] ffffffff81098bce ffff88007f847cf8 ffffffff81aadc30 ffffffff813d927a [ 0.504627] 00000000ffffffff ffff88007f847d68 ffffffff8109d0be 0000000000000006 [ 0.504627] Call Trace: [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d927a>] ? cpufreq_add_dev+0x13a/0x3e0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff814c062b>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81098bce>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xfe/0x110 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d927a>] ? cpufreq_add_dev+0x13a/0x3e0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff8109d0be>] lock_release_non_nested+0x1ee/0x310 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81099d0e>] ? mark_held_locks+0xae/0x120 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff811510cb>] ? kfree+0xcb/0x1d0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d77ea>] ? cpufreq_policy_free+0x4a/0x60 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d927a>] ? cpufreq_add_dev+0x13a/0x3e0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff8109d2a4>] lock_release+0xc4/0x250 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff8106c9f3>] up_read+0x23/0x40 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d927a>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x13a/0x3e0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff8134a809>] subsys_interface_register+0x99/0xe0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81b19f3b>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff813d7f0d>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x9d/0x1d0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81b19f3b>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81b1a039>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xfe/0x1f8 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff810002ba>] do_one_initcall+0xda/0x180 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81ae301e>] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x1bb [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff81ae2841>] ? do_early_param+0x8c/0x8c [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff814b4dd0>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff814b4dde>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff814d029a>] ret_from_fork+0x7a/0xb0 [ 0.504627] [<ffffffff814b4dd0>] ? rest_init+0x140/0x140 Signed-off-by: NLi Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-and-tested-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
To iterate over all policies we currently iterate over all online CPUs and then get the policy for each of them which is suboptimal. Use the newly created cpufreq_policy_list for this purpose instead. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_policy_cpu per-cpu variables are used for storing the ID of the CPU that manages the given CPU's policy. However, we also store a policy pointer for each cpu in cpufreq_cpu_data, so the cpufreq_policy_cpu information is simply redundant. It is better to use cpufreq_cpu_data to retrieve a policy and get policy->cpu from there, so make that happen everywhere and drop the cpufreq_policy_cpu per-cpu variables which aren't necessary any more. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We don't need to check if event is CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT and put governor module as we are sure event can only be START/STOP here. Remove the useless check. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
cpufreq_policy_list is a list of active policies. We do remove policies from this list when all CPUs belonging to that policy are removed. But during system suspend we don't really free a policy struct as it will be used again during resume, so we didn't remove it from cpufreq_policy_list as well.. However, this is incorrect. We are saying this policy isn't valid anymore and must not be referenced (though we haven't freed it), but it can still be used by code that iterates over cpufreq_policy_list. Remove policy from this list during system suspend as well. Of course, we must add it back whenever the first CPU belonging to that policy shows up. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Align closing brace '}' of an if block. [rjw: Subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Revert commit eb608521 (cpufreq: Use cpufreq_policy_list for iterating over policies), because it breaks system suspend/resume on multiple machines. It either causes resume to block indefinitely or causes the BUG_ON() in lock_policy_rwsem_##mode() to trigger on sysfs accesses to cpufreq attributes. Conflicts: drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
-
- 15 8月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jingoo Han 提交于
This local symbol is used only in this file. Fix the following sparse warnings: drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'ucv2_verify_speed' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NJingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
__init belongs after the return type on functions, not before it. Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
__init belongs after the return type on functions, not before it. Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Hanjun Guo 提交于
__init belongs after the return type on functions, not before it. Signed-off-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-