Rename the freeze_state enum representing the suspend-to-idle state
machine states to s2idle_states and rename the related variables and
functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, an error from wakeup_sysfs_add() in
device_set_wakeup_capable() causes the device's power.can_wakeup
flag to remain unset even though the device technically is capable
of signaling wakeup.

If wakeup_sysfs_add() fails user space may not be able to enable
the device to wake up the system from sleep states, but at least
for some devices that does not matter.

For this reason, set or clear power.can_wakeup upfront and if
wakeup_sysfs_add() returns an error, print a message to the log.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The wakeirq infrastructure uses RCU to protect the list of wakeirqs. That
breaks the irq bus locking infrastructure, which is allows sleeping
functions to be called so interrupt controllers behind slow busses,
e.g. i2c, can be handled.

The wakeirq functions hold rcu_read_lock and call into irq functions, which
in case of interrupts using the irq bus locking will trigger a
might_sleep() splat.

Convert the wakeirq infrastructure to Sleepable RCU and unbreak it.

Fixes: 4990d4fe (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling)
Reported-by: NBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: NBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: 4.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ
during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events
signaled through it wake up the system from that state.  However,
on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while
suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up.  In fact,
quite often they should just be discarded.

Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in
order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume
and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point
when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after
executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path.

For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the
platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines
like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be
used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops.

In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI
has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced
system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually
processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should
resume.  In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event
queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due
to race conditions.

In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs
to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that
it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup
events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from
suspending is not enabled.  However, to preserve the existing
behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in
the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while
suspended.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Revert commit eed4d47e (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups
from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered
a number of different issues on various systems.

That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts
on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik.

The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and
will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work
is needed for this purpose.
Reported-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 8a537ece (PM / wakeup: Integrate mechanism to abort
transitions in progress) modified wakeup_source_report_event()
and wakeup_source_activate() to make it possible to call
pm_system_wakeup() from the latter if so indicated by the
caller of the former (via a new function argument added by that
commit), but it overlooked the fact that in some situations
wakeup_source_report_event() is called to signal a "hard" event
(ie. such that should abort a system suspend in progress) after
pm_stay_awake() has been called for the same wakeup source object,
in which case the pm_system_wakeup() will not trigger.

To work around this issue, modify wakeup_source_activate() and
wakeup_source_report_event() again so that pm_system_wakeup() is
called by the latter directly (if its last argument is true), in
which case the additional argument does not need to be passed
to wakeup_source_activate() any more, so drop it from there.

Fixes: 8a537ece (PM / wakeup: Integrate mechanism to abort transitions in progress)
Reported-by: NDavid E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ
during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events
signaled through it wake up the system from that state.  However,
on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while
suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up.  In fact,
quite often they should just be discarded.

Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in
order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume
and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point
when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after
executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path.

For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the
platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines
like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be
used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops.

In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI
has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced
system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually
processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should
resume.  In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event
queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due
to race conditions.

In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs
to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that
it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup
events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from
suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced
wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The system wakeup framework is not very consistent with respect to
the way it handles suspend-to-idle and generally wakeup events
occurring during transitions to system low-power states.

First off, system transitions in progress are aborted by the event
reporting helpers like pm_wakeup_event() only if the wakeup_count
sysfs attribute is in use (as documented), but there are cases in
which system-wide transitions should be aborted even if that is
not the case.  For example, a wakeup signal from a designated
wakeup device during system-wide PM transition, it should cause
the transition to be aborted right away.

Moreover, there is a freeze_wake() call in wakeup_source_activate(),
but that really is only effective after suspend_freeze_state has
been set to FREEZE_STATE_ENTER by freeze_enter().  However, it
is very unlikely that wakeup_source_activate() will ever be called
at that time, as it could only be triggered by a IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
interrupt handler, so wakeups from suspend-to-idle don't really
occur in wakeup_source_activate().

At the same time there is a way to abort a system suspend in
progress (or wake up the system from suspend-to-idle), which is by
calling pm_system_wakeup(), but in turn that doesn't cause any
wakeup source objects to be activated, so it will not be covered
by wakeup source statistics and will not prevent the system from
suspending again immediately (in case autosleep is used, for
example).  Consequently, if anyone wants to abort system transitions
in progress and allow the wakeup_count mechanism to work, they need
to use both pm_system_wakeup() and pm_wakeup_event(), say, at the
same time which is awkward.

For the above reasons, make it possible to trigger
pm_system_wakeup() from within wakeup_source_activate() and
provide a new pm_wakeup_hard_event() helper to do so within the
wakeup framework.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from <linux/sched.h> into <linux/sched/signal.h>

Fix up affected files that include this signal functionality via sched.h.
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

ktime_set(S,N) was required for the timespec storage type and is still
useful for situations where a Seconds and Nanoseconds part of a time value
needs to be converted. For anything where the Seconds argument is 0, this
is pointless and can be replaced with a simple assignment.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

ktime is a union because the initial implementation stored the time in
scalar nanoseconds on 64 bit machine and in a endianess optimized timespec
variant for 32bit machines. The Y2038 cleanup removed the timespec variant
and switched everything to scalar nanoseconds. The union remained, but
become completely pointless.

Get rid of the union and just keep ktime_t as simple typedef of type s64.

The conversion was done with coccinelle and some manual mopping up.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

If there are any wakeup events being processed, read operation
on /sys/power/wakeup_count will be blocked, so print the names
of all active wakeup sources to help to find out who is preventing
system suspend from triggering.

While at it change pr_info() in pm_print_active_wakeup_sources()
to pr_debug() to avoid excessive log noise.
Signed-off-by: Nxing wei <xing.wei@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The following functions test whether their argument is NULL
and then return immediately.
 * dev_pm_arm_wake_irq
 * dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq
 * wakeup_source_unregister

Thus the test around the calls is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
[ rjw: Minor whitespace adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Now wakeirq stops working for device if wakeup option for
this device will be reconfigured through sysfs, like:

echo disabled > /sys/devices/platform/extcon_usb1/power/wakeup
echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/extcon_usb1/power/wakeup

Once above set of commands is executed the device's wakeup_source
opject will be recreated and dev->power.wakeup->wakeirq field will
contain NULL. As result, device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs() will not arm
wakeirq for the affected device.

Hece, lets try to fix it in the following way:
  check for dev->wakeirq field when device_wakeup_attach() is called
  and if !NULL re-attach wakeirq to the device
Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Using kstrdup_const allows us to save a little runtime memory (and a
string copy) in the common case where name is a string literal.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add a sysfs attribute, /sys/power/pm_wakeup_irq, reporting the IRQ
number of the first wakeup interrupt (that is, the first interrupt
from an IRQ line armed for system wakeup) seen by the kernel during
the most recent system suspend/resume cycle.

This feature will be useful for system wakeup diagnostics of
spurious wakeup interrupts.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Fixed up pm_wakeup_irq definition ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() fails, the device's power.wakeirq field
should not be set to point to the struct wake_irq passed to that
function, as that object will be freed going forward.

For this reason, make dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() first call
device_wakeup_attach_irq() and only set the device's power.wakeirq
field if that's successful.

That requires device_wakeup_attach_irq() to be called under the
device's power.lock lock, but since dev_pm_attach_wake_irq() is
the only caller of it, the requisite changes are easy to make.

Fixes: 4990d4fe (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling)
Reported-by: NFelipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Turns out we can automate the handling for the device_may_wakeup()
quite a bit by using the kernel wakeup source list as suggested
by Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>.

And as some hardware has separate dedicated wake-up interrupt
in addition to the IO interrupt, we can automate the handling by
adding a generic threaded interrupt handler that just calls the
device PM runtime to wake up the device.

This allows dropping code from device drivers as we currently
are doing it in multiple ways, and often wrong.

For most drivers, we should be able to drop the following
boilerplate code from runtime_suspend and runtime_resume
functions:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		enable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
		disable_irq_wake(irq);
	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

We can replace it with just the following init and exit
time code:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...

And for hardware with dedicated wake-up interrupts:

	...
	device_init_wakeup(dev, true);
	dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq);
	...
	dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
	device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
	...
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

After a wakeup_source is destroyed, we lost all information such as how
long this wakeup_source has been active. Add a dummy wakeup_source to
record such info.
Signed-off-by: NJin Qian <jinqian@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

A rogue wakeup source not registered in wakeup_sources list is not visible
from wakeup_sources_stats_show. Check if the wakeup source is registered
properly by looking at the timer struct.
Signed-off-by: NJin Qian <jinqian@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.

See: commit 1f33c41c ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
     seq_has_overflowed() and make public")
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Export pm_system_wakeup function to allow irq handlers to deal with system
wakeup.

This is needed for shared IRQ lines where one of the handler is registered
with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, while the other ones want to configure it as a wakeup
source.

In this specific case, irq core does not handle the wakeup process and
leave the decision to each irq handler.
Signed-off-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

It sometimes may be necessary to abort a system suspend in
progress or wake up the system from suspend-to-idle even if the
pm_wakeup_event()/pm_stay_awake() mechanism is not enabled.

For this purpose, introduce a new global variable pm_abort_suspend
and make pm_wakeup_pending() check its value.  Also add routines
for manipulating that variable.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When enabling a device' wakeup capability, a wakeup source
is created for the device automatically. But the wakeup source
is not unregistered when disabling the device' wakeup capability.

This results in zombie wakeup sources, after devices/drivers are unregistered.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit a938da06 introduced a useful little log message to tell
users/debuggers which wakeup source aborted a suspend.  However,
this message is only printed if the abort happens during the
in-kernel suspend path (after writing /sys/power/state).

The full specification of the /sys/power/wakeup_count facility
allows user-space power managers to double-check if wakeups have
already happened before it actually tries to suspend (e.g. while it
was running user-space pre-suspend hooks), by writing the last known
wakeup_count value to /sys/power/wakeup_count.  This patch changes
the sysfs handler for that node to also print said log message if
that write fails, so that we can figure out the offending wakeup
source for both kinds of suspend aborts.
Signed-off-by: NJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This adds in a new message to the wakeup code which adds an
indication to the log that suspend was cancelled due to a wake event
occouring during the suspend sequence. It also adjusts the message
printed in suspend.c to reflect the potential that a suspend was
aborted, as opposed to a device failing to suspend.

Without these message adjustments one can end up with a kernel log
that says that a device failed to suspend with no actual device
suspend failures, which can be confusing to the log examiner.
Signed-off-by: NBernie Thompson <bhthompson@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE state is a general state that
does not need any platform specific support, it equals
frozen processes + suspended devices + idle processors.

Compared with PM_SUSPEND_MEMORY,
PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE saves less power
because the system is still in a running state.
PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE has less resume latency because it does not
touch BIOS, and the processors are in idle state.

Compared with RTPM/idle,
PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE saves more power as
1. the processor has longer sleep time because processes are frozen.
   The deeper c-state the processor supports, more power saving we can get.
2. PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE uses system suspend code path, thus we can get
   more power saving from the devices that does not have good RTPM support.

This state is useful for
1) platforms that do not have STR, or have a broken STR.
2) platforms that have an extremely low power idle state,
   which can be used to replace STR.

The following describes how PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE state works.
1. echo freeze > /sys/power/state
2. the processes are frozen.
3. all the devices are suspended.
4. all the processors are blocked by a wait queue
5. all the processors idles and enters (Deep) c-state.
6. an interrupt fires.
7. a processor is woken up and handles the irq.
8. if it is a general event,
   a) the irq handler runs and quites.
   b) goto step 4.
9. if it is a real wake event, say, power button pressing, keyboard touch, mouse moving,
   a) the irq handler runs and activate the wakeup source
   b) wakeup_source_activate() notifies the wait queue.
   c) system starts resuming from PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE
10. all the devices are resumed.
11. all the processes are unfrozen.
12. system is back to working.

Known Issue:
The wakeup of this new PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE state may behave differently
from the previous suspend state.
Take ACPI platform for example, there are some GPEs that only enabled
when the system is in sleep state, to wake the system backk from S3/S4.
But we are not touching these GPEs during transition to PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE.
This means we may lose some wake event.
But on the other hand, as we do not disable all the Interrupts during
PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE, we may get some extra "wakeup" Interrupts, that are
not available for S3/S4.

The patches has been tested on an old Sony laptop, and here are the results:

Average Power:
1. RPTM/idle for half an hour:
   14.8W, 12.6W, 14.1W, 12.5W, 14.4W, 13.2W, 12.9W
2. Freeze for half an hour:
   11W, 10.4W, 9.4W, 11.3W 10.5W
3. RTPM/idle for three hours:
   11.6W
4. Freeze for three hours:
   10W
5. Suspend to Memory:
   0.5~0.9W

Average Resume Latency:
1. RTPM/idle with a black screen: (From pressing keyboard to screen back)
   Less than 0.2s
2. Freeze: (From pressing power button to screen back)
   2.50s
3. Suspend to Memory: (From pressing power button to screen back)
   4.33s

>From the results, we can see that all the platforms should benefit from
this patch, even if it does not have Low Power S0.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Jon Medhurst (Tixy) recently noticed a problem with the
events_lock usage. One of the Android patches that uses
wakeup_sources calls wakeup_source_add() with irqs disabled.
However, the event_lock usage in wakeup_source_add() uses
spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq(), which reenables interrupts.
This results in lockdep warnings.

The fix is to use spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore()
instead for the events_lock.

References: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-landing-team-arm/+bug/1037565Reported-and-debugged-by: NJon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

A driver or app may repeatedly request a wakeup source while the system
is attempting to enter suspend, which may indicate a bug or at least
point out a highly active system component that is responsible for
decreased battery life on a mobile device.  Even when the incidence
of suspend abort is not severe, identifying wakeup sources that
frequently abort suspend can be a useful clue for power management
analysis.

In some cases the existing stats can point out the offender where there is
an unexpectedly high activation count that stands out from the others, but
in other cases the wakeup source frequently taken just after the rest of
the system thinks its time to suspend might not stand out in the overall
stats.

It is also often useful to have information about what's been happening
recently, rather than totals of all activity for the system boot.

It's suggested to dump a line about which wakeup source
aborted suspend to aid analysis of these situations.
Signed-off-by: NTodd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Android allows user space to manipulate wakelocks using two
sysfs file located in /sys/power/, wake_lock and wake_unlock.
Writing a wakelock name and optionally a timeout to the wake_lock
file causes the wakelock whose name was written to be acquired (it
is created before is necessary), optionally with the given timeout.
Writing the name of a wakelock to wake_unlock causes that wakelock
to be released.

Implement an analogous interface for user space using wakeup sources.
Add the /sys/power/wake_lock and /sys/power/wake_unlock files
allowing user space to create, activate and deactivate wakeup
sources, such that writing a name and optionally a timeout to
wake_lock causes the wakeup source of that name to be activated,
optionally with the given timeout.  If that wakeup source doesn't
exist, it will be created and then activated.  Writing a name to
wake_unlock causes the wakeup source of that name, if there is one,
to be deactivated.  Wakeup sources created with the help of
wake_lock that haven't been used for more than 5 minutes are garbage
collected and destroyed.  Moreover, there can be only WL_NUMBER_LIMIT
wakeup sources created with the help of wake_lock present at a time.

The data type used to track wakeup sources created by user space is
called "struct wakelock" to indicate the origins of this feature.

This version of the patch includes an rbtree manipulation fix from John Stultz.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Android uses one wakelock statistics that is only necessary for
opportunistic sleep.  Namely, the prevent_suspend_time field
accumulates the total time the given wakelock has been locked
while "automatic suspend" was enabled.  Add an analogous field,
prevent_sleep_time, to wakeup sources and make it behave in a similar
way.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Introduce a mechanism by which the kernel can trigger global
transitions to a sleep state chosen by user space if there are no
active wakeup sources.

It consists of a new sysfs attribute, /sys/power/autosleep, that
can be written one of the strings returned by reads from
/sys/power/state, an ordered workqueue and a work item carrying out
the "suspend" operations.  If a string representing the system's
sleep state is written to /sys/power/autosleep, the work item
triggering transitions to that state is queued up and it requeues
itself after every execution until user space writes "off" to
/sys/power/autosleep.

That work item enables the detection of wakeup events using the
functions already defined in drivers/base/power/wakeup.c (with one
small modification) and calls either pm_suspend(), or hibernate() to
put the system into a sleep state.  If a wakeup event is reported
while the transition is in progress, it will abort the transition and
the "system suspend" work item will be queued up again.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

Add tracepoints to wakeup_source_activate and wakeup_source_deactivate.
Useful for checking that specific wakeup sources overlap as expected.
Signed-off-by: NArve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Wakeup statistics used by Android are slightly different from what we
have in wakeup sources at the moment and there aren't any known
users of those statistics other than Android, so modify them to make
it easier for Android to switch to wakeup sources.

This removes the struct wakeup_source's hit_cout field, which is very
rough and therefore not very useful, and adds two new fields,
wakeup_count and expire_count.  The first one tracks how many times
the wakeup source is activated with events_check_enabled set (which
roughly corresponds to the situations when a system power transition
to a sleep state is in progress and would be aborted by this wakeup
source if it were the only active one at that time) and the second
one is the number of times the wakeup source has been activated with
a timeout that expired.

Additionally, the last_time field is now updated when the wakeup
source is deactivated too (previously it was only updated during
the wakeup source's activation), which seems to be what Android does
with the analogous counter for wakelocks.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The current wakeup source deactivation code doesn't do anything when
the counter of wakeup events in progress goes down to zero, which
requires pm_get_wakeup_count() to poll that counter periodically.
Although this reduces the average time it takes to deactivate a
wakeup source, it also may lead to a substantial amount of unnecessary
polling if there are extended periods of wakeup activity.  Thus it
seems reasonable to use a wait queue for signaling the "no wakeup
events in progress" condition and remove the polling.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Nmark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The existing wakeup source initialization routines are not
particularly useful for wakeup sources that aren't created by
wakeup_source_create(), because their users have to open code
filling the objects with zeros and setting their names.  For this
reason, introduce routines that can be used for initializing, for
example, static wakeup source objects.
Requested-by: NArve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

If __pm_stay_awake() is called after __pm_wakeup_event() for the same
wakep source object before its timer expires, it won't cancel the
timer, so the wakeup source will be deactivated from the timer
function as scheduled by __pm_wakeup_event().  In that case
__pm_stay_awake() doesn't have any effect beyond incrementing
the wakeup source's event_count field, although it should cancel
the timer and make the wakeup source stay active until __pm_relax()
is called for it.

To fix this problem make __pm_stay_awake() delete the wakeup source's
timer and ensure that it won't be deactivated from the timer funtion
afterwards by clearing its timer_expires field.
Reported-by: NArve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

If __pm_wakeup_event() has been used (with a nonzero timeout) to
report a wakeup event and then __pm_relax() immediately followed by
__pm_stay_awake() is called or __pm_wakeup_event() is called once
again for the same wakeup source object before its timer expires, the
timer function pm_wakeup_timer_fn() may still be run as a result of
the previous __pm_wakeup_event() call.  In either of those cases it
may mistakenly deactivate the wakeup source that has just been
activated.

To prevent that from happening, make wakeup_source_deactivate()
clear the wakeup source's timer_expires field and make
pm_wakeup_timer_fn() check if timer_expires is different from zero
and if it's not in future before calling wakeup_source_deactivate()
(if timer_expires is 0, it means that the timer has just been
deleted and if timer_expires is in future, it means that the timer
has just been rescheduled to a different time).
Reported-by: NArve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

If wakeup_source_destroy() is called for an active wakeup source that
is never deactivated, it will spin forever.  To prevent that from
happening, make wakeup_source_destroy() call __pm_relax() for the
wakeup source object it is about to free instead of waiting until
it will be deactivated by someone else.  However, for this to work
it also needs to make sure that the timer function will not be
executed after the final __pm_relax(), so make it run
del_timer_sync() on the wakeup source's timer beforehand.

Additionally, update the kerneldoc comment to document the
requirement that __pm_stay_awake() and __pm_wakeup_event() must not
be run in parallel with wakeup_source_destroy().
Reported-by: NArve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Initialize wakeup source locks in wakeup_source_add() instead of
wakeup_source_create(), because otherwise the locks of the wakeup
sources that haven't been allocated with wakeup_source_create()
aren't initialized and handled properly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>