- 23 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
Up until now we have always paid attention to make sure the length of the new instruction replacing the old one is at least less or equal to the length of the old instruction. If the new instruction is longer, at the time it replaces the old instruction it will overwrite the beginning of the next instruction in the kernel image and cause your pants to catch fire. So instead of having to pay attention, teach the alternatives framework to pad shorter old instructions with NOPs at buildtime - but only in the case when len(old instruction(s)) < len(new instruction(s)) and add nothing in the >= case. (In that case we do add_nops() when patching). This way the alternatives user shouldn't have to care about instruction sizes and simply use the macros. Add asm ALTERNATIVE* flavor macros too, while at it. Also, we need to save the pad length in a separate struct alt_instr member for NOP optimization and the way to do that reliably is to carry the pad length instead of trying to detect whether we're looking at single-byte NOPs or at pathological instruction offsets like e9 90 90 90 90, for example, which is a valid instruction. Thanks to Michael Matz for the great help with toolchain questions. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
-
- 18 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fenghua Yu 提交于
Intel processors are adding enhancements to REP MOVSB/STOSB and the use of REP MOVSB/STOSB for optimal memcpy/memset or similar functions is recommended. Enhancement availability is indicated by CPUID.7.0.EBX[9] (Enhanced REP MOVSB/ STOSB). Support clear_page() with rep stosb for processor supporting enhanced REP MOVSB /STOSB. On processors supporting enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB, the alternative clear_page_c_e function using enhanced REP STOSB overrides the original function and the fast string function. Signed-off-by: NFenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1305671358-14478-6-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
We already have cpufeature indicies above 255, so use a 16-bit number for the alternatives index. This consumes a padding field and so doesn't add any size, but it means that abusing the padding field to create assembly errors on overflow no longer works. We can retain the test simply by redirecting it to the .discard section, however. [ v3: updated to include open-coded locations ] Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> LKML-Reference: <tip-f88731e3068f9d1392ba71cc9f50f035d26a0d4f@git.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Galbraith 提交于
Noticed the zero-sized function symbol while looking at 'perf' profiles, it causes the profiler to display those addresses in hexa. Turns out that this was wrong/bogus for an eternity. Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Acked-by: NAlexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> Acked-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> LKML-Reference: <1246366820.6538.1.camel@marge.simson.net> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
Add unwind annotations to arch/x86_64/lib/*.S, and also use the macros provided by linux/linkage.h where-ever possible. Some of the alternative instructions handling needed to be adjusted so that the replacement code would also have valid unwind information. Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-
- 05 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
They cause quite bad performance regressions on Netburst This is temporary until we can get new optimized functions for these CPUs. This undoes changes that were done in 2.6.15 and in 2.6.16-rc1, essentially bringing the code back to 2.6.14 level. Only change is I renamed the X86_FEATURE_K8_C flag to X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD and fixed the check for the flag and also fixed some comments. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 15 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
B stepping were the first shipping Opterons. memcpy/memset/copy_page/ clear_page had special optimized version for them. These are really old and in the minority now and the difference to the generic versions (using rep microcode) is not that big anyways. So just remove them. TODO: figure out optimized versions for Intel Netburst based EM64T Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-