- 26 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Besides the minimal improvement in reducing the execbuffer overhead, the real benefit is clarifying a few routines. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 24 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
A glorified s/obj_priv/obj/ with a net reduction of over a 100 lines and many characters! Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 31 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Take two passes to evict everything whilst searching for sufficient free space to bind the batchbuffer. After searching for sufficient free space using LRU eviction, evict everything that is purgeable and try again. Only then if there is insufficient free space (or the GTT is too badly fragmented) evict everything from the aperture and try one last time. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 29 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
It is possible for the active list to only contain a read-only buffer so that the ring->gpu_write_list remains entry. This leads to an inconsistency between i915_gpu_is_active() and i915_gpu_idle() causing an infinite spin during the shrinker and an assertion failure that i915_gpu_idle() does indeed flush all buffers from the active lists. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Add a mappable parameter to i915_gem_evict_something to distinguish the two cases (non-restricted vs. mappable gtt allocations). No functional changes because the mappable limit is set to the end of the gtt currently. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 22 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Based on an original patch by Zhenyu Wang, this initializes the BLT ring for SandyBridge and enables support for user execbuffers. Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 20 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
To handle retirements, we need per-ring tracking of active objects. To handle evictions, we need global tracking of active objects. As we enable more rings, rebuilding the global list from the individual per-ring lists quickly grows tiresome and overly complicated. Tracking the active objects in two lists is the lesser of two evils. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
... by always initialising the empty ringbuffer it is always then safe to check whether it is active. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 01 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Now that we hold onto a reference whilst evicting objects, we need to be sure that we drop all the references taken -- even on the error paths. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 29 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
This has bitrotted through inuse and superseded by tracing and debugfs. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 21 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
During heavy aperture thrashing we may be forced to wait upon several active objects during eviction. The active list may be the last reference to these objects and so the action of waiting upon one of them may cause another to be freed (and itself unbound). To prevent the object disappearing underneath us, we need to acquire and hold a reference whilst unbinding. This should fix the reported page refcount OOPS: kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1444! ... RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0093026>] [<ffffffffa0093026>] i915_gem_object_put_pages+0x25/0xf5 [i915] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa009481d>] i915_gem_object_unbind+0xc5/0x1a7 [i915] [<ffffffffa0098ab2>] i915_gem_evict_something+0x3bd/0x409 [i915] [<ffffffffa0027923>] ? drm_gem_object_lookup+0x27/0x57 [drm] [<ffffffffa0093bc3>] i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt+0x1d3/0x279 [i915] [<ffffffffa0095b30>] i915_gem_object_pin+0xa3/0x146 [i915] [<ffffffffa0027948>] ? drm_gem_object_lookup+0x4c/0x57 [drm] [<ffffffffa00961bc>] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x50d/0xe32 [i915] Reported-by: NShawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18902Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 08 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
This spinlock only served debugging purposes in a time when we could not be sure of the mutex ever being released upon a GPU hang. As we now should be able rely on hangcheck to do the job for us (and that error reporting should not itself require the struct mutex) we can kill the incomplete attempt at protection. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 10 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Based in a large part upon Daniel Vetter's implementation and adapted for handling multiple rings in a single pass. This should lead to better gtt usage and fixes the page-fault-of-doom triggered. The fairness is provided by scanning through the GTT space amalgamating space in rendering order. As soon as we have a contiguous space in the GTT large enough for the new object (and its alignment), evict any object which lies within that space. This should keep more objects resident in the GTT. Doing throughput testing on a PineView machine with cairo-perf-trace indicates that there is very little difference with the new LRU scan, perhaps a small improvement... Except oddly for the poppler trace. Reference: Bug 15911 - Intermittent X crash (freeze) https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15911 Bug 20152 - cannot view JPG in firefox when running UXA https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20152 Bug 24369 - Hang when scrolling firefox page with window in front https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24369 Bug 28478 - Intermittent graphics lockups due to overflow/loop https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28478 v2: Attempt to clarify the logic and order of eviction through the use of comments and macros. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The eviction code is the gnarly underbelly of memory management, and is clearer if kept separated from the normal domain management in GEM. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
-