1. 13 11月, 2014 21 次提交
  2. 07 11月, 2014 8 次提交
  3. 06 11月, 2014 3 次提交
  4. 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/mst: rework payload table allocation to conform better. · dfda0df3
      Dave Airlie 提交于
      The old code has problems with the Dell MST monitors due to some
      assumptions I made that weren't true.
      
      I initially thought the Virtual Channel Payload IDs had to be in
      the DPCD table in ascending order, however it appears that assumption
      is bogus.
      
      The old code also assumed it was possible to insert a member
      into the table and it would move other members up, like it does
      when you remove table entries, however reality has shown this
      isn't true.
      
      So the new code allocates VCPIs separate from entries in the payload
      tracking table, and when we remove an entry from the DPCD table,
      I shuffle the tracking payload entries around in the struct.
      
      This appears to make VT switch more robust (still not perfect)
      with an MST enabled Dell monitor.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      dfda0df3
  5. 09 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 08 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 03 10月, 2014 5 次提交