1. 28 5月, 2015 4 次提交
  2. 20 5月, 2015 10 次提交
  3. 11 5月, 2015 2 次提交
  4. 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 15 4月, 2015 2 次提交
  6. 08 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • W
      kvm: mmu: lazy collapse small sptes into large sptes · 3ea3b7fa
      Wanpeng Li 提交于
      Dirty logging tracks sptes in 4k granularity, meaning that large sptes
      have to be split.  If live migration is successful, the guest in the
      source machine will be destroyed and large sptes will be created in the
      destination. However, the guest continues to run in the source machine
      (for example if live migration fails), small sptes will remain around
      and cause bad performance.
      
      This patch introduce lazy collapsing of small sptes into large sptes.
      The rmap will be scanned in ioctl context when dirty logging is stopped,
      dropping those sptes which can be collapsed into a single large-page spte.
      Later page faults will create the large-page sptes.
      Reviewed-by: NXiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
      Message-Id: <1428046825-6905-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      3ea3b7fa
  7. 29 1月, 2015 5 次提交
  8. 19 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  10. 09 1月, 2015 5 次提交
  11. 28 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn() · d3fccc7e
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      This reverts commit 85c8555f ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn.
      
      The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code
      based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should
      be mapped as device memory.
      
      However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin,
      and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which
      suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn'
      from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on
      it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake
      and the patch above should be reverted.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      d3fccc7e
  13. 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn() · bf4bea8e
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      This reverts commit 85c8555f ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn.
      
      The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code
      based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should
      be mapped as device memory.
      
      However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin,
      and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which
      suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn'
      from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on
      it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake
      and the patch above should be reverted.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
      bf4bea8e
  14. 18 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 24 9月, 2014 4 次提交