7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be
dual licensed - GPL / BSD.
The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING
and not LICENSE.GPL.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Occasionally, we would run into this warning:

  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_protect_session extend 0x2601: only 200 ms left
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_remove_time_event Removing TE 0x2601
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd Sending command TIME_EVENT_CMD (#29), seq: 0x0925, 60 bytes at 37[5]:9
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_pcie_send_hcmd_sync Attempting to send sync command TIME_EVENT_CMD
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_pcie_send_hcmd_sync Setting HCMD_ACTIVE for command TIME_EVENT_CMD
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd Sending command TIME_EVENT_CMD (#29), seq: 0x0926, 60 bytes at 38[6]:9
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_time_event_response TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2601
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_hcmd_complete Clearing HCMD_ACTIVE for command TIME_EVENT_CMD
  iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_rx_time_event_notif Time event notification - UID = 0x2701 action 1
  wlan0: associate with 00:0a:b8:55:a8:30 (try 2/3)
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/time-event.c:269 iwl_mvm_time_event_send_add+0x163/0x1a0 [iwlmvm]()
  Modules linked in: [...]
  Call Trace:
   [<c1046e42>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0
   [<c1046e92>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x30
   [<f8cad913>] iwl_mvm_time_event_send_add+0x163/0x1a0 [iwlmvm]
   [<f8cadead>] iwl_mvm_protect_session+0xcd/0x1c0 [iwlmvm]
   [<f8ca2087>] iwl_mvm_mac_mgd_prepare_tx+0x67/0xa0 [iwlmvm]
   [<f882a130>] ieee80211_sta_work+0x8f0/0x1070 [mac80211]

The reason is a problem with asynchronous vs. synchronous
commands, what happens here is the following:
 * TE 0x2601 is removed, the TIME_EVENT_CMD for that is async
 * a new TE (will be 0x2701) is created, the TIME_EVENT_CMD
   for that is sync and also uses a notification wait for the
   response (to avoid another race condition)
 * the response for the TE 0x2601 removal comes from the
   firmware, and is handled by the notification wait handler
   that's really waiting for the second response, but can't
   tell the difference, we therefore see the message
   "TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2601" instead of
   "TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2701".

Fix this issue by making the TE removal synchronous as well,
this means that we wait for the response to that command
first, before there's any chance of sending a new one.

Also, to detect such issues more easily in the future, add
a warning to the notification handler that detects them.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

This is helpful for debugging the time event warning,
but also in general to see what's going on.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Now that mac80211 no longer starts the auth/assoc
timeouts when it transmits the frame, but only when
the frame status arrives, we no longer need to wait
for the session protection time event to start, we
can schedule it and enqueue the auth/assoc frame
right away. This reduces the amount of time we block
mac80211's workqueue.

Also, since now we no longer need different behavior
for session protection and P2P time events, refactor
the code to have just a common implementation.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

If we haven't heard a beacon before we associate we can
still start the association process and set the MAC in
the firmware to associated only after having received a
beacon with DTIM period by reacting to the new change
flag (BSS_CHANGED_DTIM_PERIOD) from mac80211.

This reduces the association time in these cases.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The TE_P2P_DEVICE_DISCOVERABLE time event type used for ROC is
assigned low priority in the FW, and thus has low chance of
being scheduled when there are active BSS or GO VMACs (even if
fragmentation is allowed). This is mainly problematic in for
cases where ROC is requested for sending action frames.

To overcome this, use a time event type that has priority equal
to that ot the time event type used by the FW to action scan.
Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Newer firmware revisions have a completely new
firmware API. This is the new driver for this
new API.

I've listed the people who directly contributed
code, but many others from various teams have
contributed in other ways.

Cc: Alexander Bondar <alexander.bondar@intel.com>
Cc: Amit Beka <amit.beka@intel.com>
Cc: Amnon Paz <amnonx.paz@intel.com>
Cc: Assaf Krauss <assaf.krauss@intel.com>
Cc: David Spinadel <david.spinadel@intel.com>
Cc: Dor Shaish <dor.shaish@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Cc: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>