Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 17 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 28 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 11 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 14 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  13. 09 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 30 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 10 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • T
      locking/mcs: Allow architecture specific asm files to be used for contended case · ddf1d169
      由 Tim Chen 提交于 
      This patch allows each architecture to add its specific assembly optimized
arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended and arch_mcs_spinlock_uncontended for
MCS lock and unlock functions.
Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: AswinChandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: Rik vanRiel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: MichelLespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1390347382.3138.67.camel@schen9-DESKSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      ddf1d169
    • T
      locking/mcs: Order the header files in Kbuild of each architecture in alphabetical order · b119fa61
      由 Tim Chen 提交于 
      We perform a clean up of the Kbuid files in each architecture.
We order the files in each Kbuild in alphabetical order
by running the below script.

for i in arch/*/include/asm/Kbuild
do
        cat $i | gawk '/^generic-y/ {
                i = 3;
                do {
                        for (; i <= NF; i++) {
                                if ($i == "\\") {
                                        getline;
                                        i = 1;
                                        continue;
                                }
                                if ($i != "")
                                        hdr[$i] = $i;
                        }
                        break;
                } while (1);
                next;
        }
        // {
                print $0;
        }
        END {
                n = asort(hdr);
                for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
                        print "generic-y += " hdr[i];
        }' > ${i}.sorted;
        mv ${i}.sorted $i;
done
Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Cc: AswinChandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: MichelLespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Fixed build bug. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b119fa61
  19. 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 25 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 03 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 14 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 12 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 20 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 25 8月, 2012 3 次提交
    • R
      ARM: 7494/1: use generic termios.h · e780c452
      由 Rob Herring 提交于 
      As pointed out by Arnd Bergmann, this fixes a couple of issues but will
increase code size:

The original macro user_termio_to_kernel_termios was not endian safe. It
used an unsigned short ptr to access the low bits in a 32-bit word.

Both user_termio_to_kernel_termios and kernel_termios_to_user_termio are
missing error checking on put_user/get_user and copy_to/from_user.
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      e780c452
    • R
      ARM: 7493/1: use generic unaligned.h · d25c881a
      由 Rob Herring 提交于 
      This moves ARM over to the asm-generic/unaligned.h header. This has the
benefit of better code generated especially for ARMv7 on gcc 4.7+
compilers.

As Arnd Bergmann, points out: The asm-generic version uses the "struct"
version for native-endian unaligned access and the "byteshift" version
for the opposite endianess. The current ARM version however uses the
"byteshift" implementation for both.

Thanks to Nicolas Pitre for the excellent analysis:

Test case:

int foo (int *x) { return get_unaligned(x); }
long long bar (long long *x) { return get_unaligned(x); }

With the current ARM version:

foo:
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B]
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B]
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	mov	r3, r3, asl #16	@ tmp154, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B],
	ldrb	r0, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B]
	orr	r3, r3, r1, asl #8	@, tmp155, tmp154, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B],
	orr	r3, r3, r2	@ tmp157, tmp155, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	orr	r0, r3, r0, asl #24	@,, tmp157, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B],
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	stmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}	@,
	mov	r2, #0	@ tmp184,
	ldrb	r5, [r0, #6]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B]
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #5]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B]
	ldrb	ip, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B]
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #4]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B]
	mov	r5, r5, asl #16	@ tmp175, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 6B],
	ldrb	r7, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B]
	orr	r5, r5, r4, asl #8	@, tmp176, tmp175, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 5B],
	ldrb	r6, [r0, #7]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B]
	orr	r5, r5, r1	@ tmp178, tmp176, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 4B]
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	mov	ip, ip, asl #16	@ tmp188, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 2B],
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B], MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B]
	orr	ip, ip, r7, asl #8	@, tmp189, tmp188, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 1B],
	orr	r3, r5, r6, asl #24	@,, tmp178, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 7B],
	orr	ip, ip, r4	@ tmp191, tmp189, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D)]
	orr	ip, ip, r1, asl #24	@, tmp194, tmp191, MEM[(const u8 *)x_1(D) + 3B],
	mov	r1, r3	@,
	orr	r0, r2, ip	@ tmp171, tmp184, tmp194
	ldmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}
	bx	lr

In both cases the code is slightly suboptimal.  One may wonder why
wasting r2 with the constant 0 in the second case for example.  And all
the mov's could be folded in subsequent orr's, etc.

Now with the asm-generic version:

foo:
	ldr	r0, [r0, #0]	@ unaligned	@,* x
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	mov	r3, r0	@ x, x
	ldr	r0, [r0, #0]	@ unaligned	@,* x
	ldr	r1, [r3, #4]	@ unaligned	@,
	bx	lr	@

This is way better of course, but only because this was compiled for
ARMv7. In this case the compiler knows that the hardware can do
unaligned word access.  This isn't that obvious for foo(), but if we
remove the get_unaligned() from bar as follows:

long long bar (long long *x) {return *x; }

then the resulting code is:

bar:
	ldmia	r0, {r0, r1}	@ x,,
	bx	lr	@

So this proves that the presumed aligned vs unaligned cases does have
influence on the instructions the compiler may use and that the above
unaligned code results are not just an accident.

Still... this isn't fully conclusive without at least looking at the
resulting assembly fron a pre ARMv6 compilation.  Let's see with an
ARMv5 target:

foo:
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp139,* x
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp140,
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp143,
	ldrb	r0, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp146,
	orr	r3, r3, r1, asl #8	@, tmp142, tmp139, tmp140,
	orr	r3, r3, r2, asl #16	@, tmp145, tmp142, tmp143,
	orr	r0, r3, r0, asl #24	@,, tmp145, tmp146,
	bx	lr	@

bar:
	stmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}	@,
	ldrb	r2, [r0, #0]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp139,* x
	ldrb	r7, [r0, #1]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp140,
	ldrb	r3, [r0, #4]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp149,
	ldrb	r6, [r0, #5]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp150,
	ldrb	r5, [r0, #2]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp143,
	ldrb	r4, [r0, #6]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp153,
	ldrb	r1, [r0, #7]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp156,
	ldrb	ip, [r0, #3]	@ zero_extendqisi2	@ tmp146,
	orr	r2, r2, r7, asl #8	@, tmp142, tmp139, tmp140,
	orr	r3, r3, r6, asl #8	@, tmp152, tmp149, tmp150,
	orr	r2, r2, r5, asl #16	@, tmp145, tmp142, tmp143,
	orr	r3, r3, r4, asl #16	@, tmp155, tmp152, tmp153,
	orr	r0, r2, ip, asl #24	@,, tmp145, tmp146,
	orr	r1, r3, r1, asl #24	@,, tmp155, tmp156,
	ldmfd	sp!, {r4, r5, r6, r7}
	bx	lr

Compared to the initial results, this is really nicely optimized and I
couldn't do much better if I were to hand code it myself.
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      d25c881a
    • R
      ARM: 7491/1: use generic version of identical asm headers · 4a8052d8
      由 Rob Herring 提交于 
      Inspired by the AArgh64 claim that it should be separate from ARM and one
reason was being able to use more asm-generic headers. Doing a diff of
arch/arm/include/asm and include/asm-generic there are numerous asm
headers which are functionally identical to their asm-generic counterparts.
Delete the ARM version and use the generic ones.
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Reviewed-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      4a8052d8
  37. 17 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  39. 15 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  41. 15 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  43. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  45. 03 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  47. 12 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  49. 18 6月, 2006 1 次提交