Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 5月, 2010 2 次提交
    • T
      stop_machine: reimplement using cpu_stop · 3fc1f1e2
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      Reimplement stop_machine using cpu_stop.  As cpu stoppers are
guaranteed to be available for all online cpus,
stop_machine_create/destroy() are no longer necessary and removed.

With resource management and synchronization handled by cpu_stop, the
new implementation is much simpler.  Asking the cpu_stop to execute
the stop_cpu() state machine on all online cpus with cpu hotplug
disabled is enough.

stop_machine itself doesn't need to manage any global resources
anymore, so all per-instance information is rolled into struct
stop_machine_data and the mutex and all static data variables are
removed.

The previous implementation created and destroyed RT workqueues as
necessary which made stop_machine() calls highly expensive on very
large machines.  According to Dimitri Sivanich, preventing the dynamic
creation/destruction makes booting faster more than twice on very
large machines.  cpu_stop resources are preallocated for all online
cpus and should have the same effect.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
      3fc1f1e2
    • T
      cpu_stop: implement stop_cpu[s]() · 1142d810
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      Implement a simplistic per-cpu maximum priority cpu monopolization
mechanism.  A non-sleeping callback can be scheduled to run on one or
multiple cpus with maximum priority monopolozing those cpus.  This is
primarily to replace and unify RT workqueue usage in stop_machine and
scheduler migration_thread which currently is serving multiple
purposes.

Four functions are provided - stop_one_cpu(), stop_one_cpu_nowait(),
stop_cpus() and try_stop_cpus().

This is to allow clean sharing of resources among stop_cpu and all the
migration thread users.  One stopper thread per cpu is created which
is currently named "stopper/CPU".  This will eventually replace the
migration thread and take on its name.

* This facility was originally named cpuhog and lived in separate
  files but Peter Zijlstra nacked the name and thus got renamed to
  cpu_stop and moved into stop_machine.c.

* Better reporting of preemption leak as per Peter's suggestion.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
      1142d810
  3. 23 4月, 2010 3 次提交
    • S
      sched: Fix select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair() · 99bd5e2f
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      Issues in the current select_idle_sibling() logic in select_task_rq_fair()
in the context of a task wake-up:

a) Once we select the idle sibling, we use that domain (spanning the cpu that
   the task is currently woken-up and the idle sibling that we found) in our
   wake_affine() decisions. This domain is completely different from the
   domain(we are supposed to use) that spans the cpu that the task currently
   woken-up and the cpu where the task previously ran.

b) We do select_idle_sibling() check only for the cpu that the task is
   currently woken-up on. If select_task_rq_fair() selects the previously run
   cpu for waking the task, doing a select_idle_sibling() check
   for that cpu also helps and we don't do this currently.

c) In the scenarios where the cpu that the task is woken-up is busy but
   with its HT siblings are idle, we are selecting the task be woken-up
   on the idle HT sibling instead of a core that it previously ran
   and currently completely idle. i.e., we are not taking decisions based on
   wake_affine() but directly selecting an idle sibling that can cause
   an imbalance at the SMT/MC level which will be later corrected by the
   periodic load balancer.

Fix this by first going through the load imbalance calculations using
wake_affine() and once we make a decision of woken-up cpu vs previously-ran cpu,
then choose a possible idle sibling for waking up the task on.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1270079265.7835.8.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      99bd5e2f
    • P
      sched: Pre-compute cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd)) · 669c55e9
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Dave reported that his large SPARC machines spend lots of time in
hweight64(), try and optimize some of those needless cpumask_weight()
invocations (esp. with the large offstack cpumasks these are very
expensive indeed).
Reported-by: NDavid Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      669c55e9
    • P
      sched: Cure load average vs NO_HZ woes · 74f5187a
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Chase reported that due to us decrementing calc_load_task prematurely
(before the next LOAD_FREQ sample), the load average could be scewed
by as much as the number of CPUs in the machine.

This patch, based on Chase's patch, cures the problem by keeping the
delta of the CPU going into NO_HZ idle separately and folding that in
on the next LOAD_FREQ update.

This restores the balance and we get strict LOAD_FREQ period samples.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: NChase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
LKML-Reference: <1271934490.1776.343.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      74f5187a
  5. 15 4月, 2010 2 次提交
  7. 14 4月, 2010 4 次提交
  9. 13 4月, 2010 29 次提交