There are a number of things in the driver that
may result in a BUG(), which is suboptimal since
it's hard to get debugging information out of
the driver in that case and the user experience
is also not good :-)

Almost all BUG_ON instances can be converted to
WARN_ON with a few lines of appropriate error
handling, so do that instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

The hw_rev variable is used only during init,
so there's no need to keep it around.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

When the driver was split, a bunch of definitions
for the 3945 and 4965 devices stayed around, but
they're now useless so remove (some of) them.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

A number of these devices have appeared "in the wild", and apparently
the Windows driver is perfectly happy to support this EEPROM version.
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Acked-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Adding EEPROM version for 2000 series devices
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Since 6005, 6030 and 6150 series are offical released, remove the reference
to gen2x and use the product number instead.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

This removes the old TX power reading code, it isn't
necessary since the new code is able to read all the
various EEPROM layouts due to relying on information
contained in the EEPROM.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

The current EEPROM reading code has some layout
assumptions that now turned out to be false with
some newer versions of the EEPROM. Luckily, we
can avoid all such assumptions by using data in
the EEPROM itself, so implement using that.

However, for risk mitigation purposes, keep the
old reading code for current hardware for now.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Some fields we didn't previously use from the
enhanced TX power structure will be needed in
the next patch, so rename them to their correct
names to be able to use them and change code
reading them accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The current EEPROM reading code has some layout
assumptions that now turned out to be false with
some newer versions of the EEPROM. Luckily, we
can avoid all such assumptions by using data in
the EEPROM itself, so implement using that.

However, for risk mitigation purposes, keep the
old reading code for current hardware for now.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Some fields we didn't previously use from the
enhanced TX power structure will be needed in
the next patch, so rename them to their correct
names to be able to use them and change code
reading them accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

was not used, remove it
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

EEPROM contain the SKU information for the device, use it.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Some of the functions in iwl-eeprom.c file are for agn devices only,
Those functions do not have to be part of iwlcore.ko, so move those
to iwl-agn-eeprom.c file.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

All drivers share the same implementation, so
there's no need to call this via a function
pointer nor to export it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Some devices may have multiple MAC
addresses in their EEPROM, read them
and advertise them to cfg80211.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

To enable 6050 series Gen 2 devices:
1) new PCI_IDs are added;
2) new EEPROM version and calibration version numbers defined;
3) new hardware REV number defined;
Signed-off-by: NShanyu Zhao <shanyu.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

cleanup patch.

Use new __packed annotation in drivers/net/
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch is to bring up 6000 Series 2x2 AGN Gen2 adapters.
Seperate various version numbers from 6000 Series definitions;
Add module firmware declaration for the new adapters;
Add additional device IDs and subsystem IDs;
Signed-off-by: NShanyu Zhao <shanyu.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Some definition for eeprom apply to more than 5000 series device, change
the name to reflect it for easy reading.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

For 6000 series, the 2.4G HT40 band regulatory settings address in EEPROM
was off by 2.

Before the fix, you'll see this in dmesg:
[79535.788877] ieee80211 phy8: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 7 [2.4GHz]
WIDE (0x61 0dBm): Ad-Hoc not supported
[79535.788880] ieee80211 phy8: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 11 [2.4GHz]
WIDE (0x61 0dBm): Ad-Hoc not supported

And after the fix:
[91132.688706] ieee80211 phy14: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 7 [2.4GHz]
IBSS ACTIVE WIDE (0x6f 0dBm): Ad-Hoc supported
[91132.688709] ieee80211 phy14: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 11 [2.4GHz]
IBSS ACTIVE WIDE (0x6f 0dBm): Ad-Hoc supported
Signed-off-by: NShanyu Zhao <shanyu.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Each device has it own eeprom, so the tx power version could be
different, define TX_POWER_VERSION per device.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Multiple iwlagn based devices share the same common functions.
Move those functions from iwl-5000.c to iwl-agn-lib.c file.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

I've also for a long time had a problem with the
temperature calculation code, which I had fixed
by byte-swapping the values, and now it turns out
that was the correct fix after all.

Also, any use of iwl_eeprom_query_addr() that is
for more than a u8 must be cast to little endian,
and some structs as well.

Fix all this. Again, no real impact on platforms
that already are little endian.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Validate enhanced tx power entry read from EEPROM before applying the
tx power value. Different versions of EEPROM might contain different size
of table; always a good idea to make sure the entry is valid before
applying to the targeted channel.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Adding support for 6x50 series EEPROM version check, 6x50 is wifi/wimax
combo device which has different EEPROM map
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In order to have an easier way to debug issues, create
trace events (using the ftrace framework) that will
allow us to follow exactly what the driver is doing
with the device.

The text format isn't all that useful, but the binary
format can also be obtained easily via debugfs and
then analysed on the fly or offline with debugging
tools.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In order to support different type of 1000 series NICs we release to
customers before the production release, iwlwifi driver need to support
all the NICs has EEPROM version greater than 0x15c.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Update EEPROM version requirement for 1000 and 6000 series of NIC
for EEPROM version verification.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Different NIC has different requirements for configuration. Currently all
5000 series hardware and later share the same configuration function even
though they do not need the same configurations. Fix this by separating the
needed configuration actions for each hardware model.

.5000 series: L1-ASPM H/W bug work-around
              configure radio
              write CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG for uCode use
              work-around for NIC get stuck after early PCIe power off

.1000 series: write CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG for uCode use
              setting digital SVR for 1000 card to 1.32V

.6000 series: configure radio
              write CSR_HW_IF_CONFIG_REG for uCode use
              write CSR_GP_DRIVER_REG to indicate radio sku
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Remove few of the parameters not used and no longer valid in EEPROM.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Set the correct EEPROM offset for enhance tx power for 6000 series
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

For 6000 series and up, additional enhanced regulatory tx power
limitation information is added to EEPROM image.

In order to setup the tx power limitation per channel correctly. Read
the enhanced tx power information from EEPROM image and update
accordingly.

The information is provided per SISO (a,b,c) chain based, it also has
information for both MIMO2 and MIMO3. For tx power regulatory
limitation, take the highest number from all the chains and update.
Also update tx_power_user_lmt to the highest power supported by any
channels and chains
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

For devices using OTP memory, EEPROM image can start from
any one of the OTP blocks. If shadow RAM is disabled, we need to
traverse link list to find the last valid block, then start the EEPROM
image reading.

If OTP is not full, the valid block is the block _before_ the last block
on the link list; the last block on the link list is the empty block
ready for next OTP refresh/update.

If OTP is full, then the last block is the valid block to be used for
configure the device.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Rename "fat" to "ht40"
The term "fat channel" is deprecated in favor of "HT40"
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Two type of NVM available for devices 1000, 6000 and after, adding
support to read OTP lower blocks if OTP is used instead of EEPROM.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The test to find out if we have FAT channels do not consider that
the value of regulatory_bands for the 5000 series is larger than its
eeprom size. Using the eeprom size is strange in itself.

Use a new EEPROM_REGULATORY_BAND_NO_FAT to indicate no FAT support
and test for that explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Acked-by: NSamuel Ortiz <samuel.ortiz@intel.com>
Tested-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

By adding the eeprom ops to the 3945 code, we can now use the iwlcore eeprom
routines (defined in iwl-eeprom.c).
We also removed the heavy eeprom39 reference from iwl_priv and use the eeprom
pointer instead.
Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <samuel.ortiz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>