Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 150
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 21 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 17 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI: Retry BARs restoration for Type 0 headers only · a6cb9ee7
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Some shortcomings introduced into pci_restore_state() by commit
26f41062 ("PCI: check for pci bar restore completion and retry")
have been fixed by recent commit ebfc5b80 ("PCI: Fix regression in
pci_restore_state(), v3"), but that commit treats all PCI devices as
those with Type 0 configuration headers.

That is not entirely correct, because Type 1 and Type 2 headers have
different layouts.  In particular, the area occupied by BARs in Type 0
config headers contains the secondary status register in Type 1 ones and
it doesn't make sense to retry the restoration of that register even if
the value read back from it after a write is not the same as the written
one (it very well may be different).

For this reason, make pci_restore_state() only retry the restoration
of BARs for Type 0 config headers.  This effectively makes it behave
as before commit 26f41062 for all header types except for Type 0.
Tested-by: NMikko Vinni <mmvinni@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a6cb9ee7
  5. 16 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI: Fix regression in pci_restore_state(), v3 · ebfc5b80
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit 26f41062 ("PCI: check for pci bar restore completion and
retry") attempted to address problems with PCI BAR restoration on
systems where FLR had not been completed before pci_restore_state() was
called, but it did that in an utterly wrong way.

First off, instead of retrying the writes for the BAR registers only, it
did that for all of the PCI config space of the device, including the
status register (whose value after the write quite obviously need not be
the same as the written one).  Second, it added arbitrary delay to
pci_restore_state() even for systems where the PCI config space
restoration was successful at first attempt.  Finally, the mdelay(10) it
added to every iteration of the writing loop was way too much of a delay
for any reasonable device.

All of this actually caused resume failures for some devices on Mikko's
system.

To fix the regression, make pci_restore_state() only retry the writes
for BAR registers and only wait if the first read from the register
doesn't return the written value.  Additionaly, make it wait for 1 ms,
instead of 10 ms, after every failing attempt to write into config
space.
Reported-by: NMikko Vinni <mmvinni@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ebfc5b80
  7. 02 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI / PCIe: Introduce command line option to disable ARI · 6748dcc2
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      There are PCIe devices on the market that report ARI support but
then fail to initialize correctly when ARI is actually used.  This
leads to situations in which kernels 2.6.34 and newer fail to handle
systems where the previous kernels worked without any apparent
problems.  Unfortunately, it is currently unknown how many such
devices are there.

For this reason, introduce a new kernel command line option,
pci=noari, allowing users to disable PCIe ARI altogether if they
see problems with PCIe device initialization.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      6748dcc2
  9. 25 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  11. 24 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • Y
      PCI: move pci_find_saved_cap out of linux/pci.h · 34a4876e
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      Only one user in driver/pci/pci.c, so we don't need to put it in global
pci.h
Reviewed-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      34a4876e
    • Y
      PCI: fix memleak for pci dev removing during hotplug · f796841e
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      unreferenced object 0xffff880276d17700 (size 64):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294897182 (age 3976.028s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 18 f9 de 76 02 88 ff ff  ...........v....
    10 00 00 00 0e 00 00 00 0f 28 40 00 00 00 00 00  .........(@.....
  backtrace:
    [<ffffffff81c8aede>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x43
    [<ffffffff811385f0>] __kmalloc+0x121/0x183
    [<ffffffff813cf821>] pci_add_cap_save_buffer+0x35/0x7c
    [<ffffffff813d12b7>] pci_allocate_cap_save_buffers+0x1d/0x65
    [<ffffffff813cdb52>] pci_device_add+0x92/0xf1
    [<ffffffff81c8afe6>] pci_scan_single_device+0x9f/0xa1
    [<ffffffff813cdbd2>] pci_scan_slot.part.20+0x21/0x106
    [<ffffffff813cdce2>] pci_scan_slot+0x2b/0x35
    [<ffffffff81c8dae4>] __pci_scan_child_bus+0x51/0x107
    [<ffffffff81c8d75b>] pci_scan_bridge+0x376/0x6ae
    [<ffffffff81c8db60>] __pci_scan_child_bus+0xcd/0x107
    [<ffffffff81c8dbab>] pci_scan_child_bus+0x11/0x2a
    [<ffffffff81cca58c>] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x18b/0x21c
    [<ffffffff81c916be>] acpi_pci_root_add+0x1e1/0x42a
    [<ffffffff81406210>] acpi_device_probe+0x50/0x190
    [<ffffffff814a0227>] really_probe+0x99/0x126

Need to free saved_buffer for capabilities.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      f796841e
  13. 15 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  15. 24 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      kernel-doc: fix new warnings in pci · 6e9292c5
      由 Randy Dunlap 提交于 
      Fix new kernel-doc warnings:

Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2811): No description found for parameter 'dev'
Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2811): Excess function parameter 'pdev' description in 'pci_intx_mask_supported'
Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2894): No description found for parameter 'dev'
Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2894): Excess function parameter 'pdev' description in 'pci_check_and_mask_intx'
Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2908): No description found for parameter 'dev'
Warning(drivers/pci/pci.c:2908): Excess function parameter 'pdev' description in 'pci_check_and_unmask_intx'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6e9292c5
  17. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • K
      pci: Introduce __pci_reset_function_locked to be used when holding device_lock. · a96d627a
      由 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 提交于 
      The use case of this is when a driver wants to call FLR when a device
is attached to it using the SysFS "bind" or "unbind" functionality.

The call chain when a user does "bind" looks as so:

 echo "0000:01.07.0" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/XXXX/bind

and ends up calling:
  driver_bind:
    device_lock(dev);  <=== TAKES LOCK
    XXXX_probe:
         .. pci_enable_device()
         ...__pci_reset_function(), which calls
                 pci_dev_reset(dev, 0):
                        if (!0) {
                                device_lock(dev) <==== DEADLOCK

The __pci_reset_function_locked function allows the the drivers
'probe' function to call the "pci_reset_function" while still holding
the driver mutex lock.
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      a96d627a
  19. 07 1月, 2012 6 次提交
  21. 19 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 15 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      PCI: Set device power state to PCI_D0 for device without native PM support · b51306c6
      由 Ajaykumar Hotchandani 提交于 
      During test of one IB card with guest VM, found that, msi is not
initialized properly.

It turns out __write_msi_msg will do nothing if device current_state is
not PCI_D0.  And, that pci device does not have pm_cap in guest VM.

There is an error in setting of power state to PCI_D0 in
pci_enable_device(), but error is not returned for this.  Following is
code flow:

pci_enable_device() -->   __pci_enable_device_flags() -->
do_pci_enable_device() -->   pci_set_power_state() -->
__pci_start_power_transition()

We have following condition inside __pci_start_power_transition():
         if (platform_pci_power_manageable(dev)) {
                 error = platform_pci_set_power_state(dev, state);
                 if (!error)
                         pci_update_current_state(dev, state);
         } else {
                 error = -ENODEV;
                 /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
                 if (!dev->pm_cap)
                         dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
         }

Here, from platform_pci_set_power_state(), acpi_pci_set_power_state() is
getting called and that is failing with ENODEV because of following
condition:

         if (!handle || ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0",&tmp)))
                 return -ENODEV;

Because of that, pci_update_current_state() is not getting called.

With this patch, if device power state can not be set via
platform_pci_set_power_state and that device does not have native pm
support, then PCI device power state will be set to PCI_D0.

-v2: This also reverts 47e9037a, as it's
     not needed after this change.
Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ajaykumar Hotchandani<ajaykumar.hotchandani@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yinghai.lu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      b51306c6
  25. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI: defer enablement of SRIOV BARS · bbef98ab
      由 Ram Pai 提交于 
      All the PCI BARs of a device are enabled when the device is enabled
using pci_enable_device().  This unnecessarily enables SRIOV BARs of the
device.

On some platforms, which do not support SRIOV as yet, the
pci_enable_device() fails to enable the device if its SRIOV BARs are not
allocated resources correctly.

The following patch fixes the above problem. The SRIOV BARs are now
enabled when IOV capability of the device is enabled in sriov_enable().

NOTE: Note, there is subtle change in the pci_enable_device() API.  Any
driver that depends on SRIOV BARS to be enabled in pci_enable_device()
can fail.

The patch has been touch tested on power and x86 platform.
Tested-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRam Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      bbef98ab
  27. 28 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI / PM: Extend PME polling to all PCI devices · 379021d5
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The land of PCI power management is a land of sorrow and ugliness,
especially in the area of signaling events by devices.  There are
devices that set their PME Status bits, but don't really bother
to send a PME message or assert PME#.  There are hardware vendors
who don't connect PME# lines to the system core logic (they know
who they are).  There are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother
to trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the devices
below.  There are ACPI BIOSes that forget to provide _PRW methods for
devices capable of signaling wakeup.  Finally, there are BIOSes that
do provide _PRW methods for such devices, but then don't bother to
call Notify() for those devices from the corresponding _Lxx/_Exx
GPE-handling methods.  In all of these cases the kernel doesn't have
a chance to receive a proper notification that it should wake up a
device, so devices stay in low-power states forever.  Worse yet, in
some cases they continuously send PME Messages that are silently
ignored, because the kernel simply doesn't know that it should clear
the device's PME Status bit.

This problem was first observed for "parallel" (non-Express) PCI
devices on add-on cards and Matthew Garrett addressed it by adding
code that polls PME Status bits of such devices, if they are enabled
to signal PME, to the kernel.  Recently, however, it has turned out
that PCI Express devices are also affected by this issue and that it
is not limited to add-on devices, so it seems necessary to extend
the PME polling to all PCI devices, including PCI Express and planar
ones.  Still, it would be wasteful to poll the PME Status bits of
devices that are known to receive proper PME notifications, so make
the kernel (1) poll the PME Status bits of all PCI and PCIe devices
enabled to signal PME and (2) disable the PME Status polling for
devices for which correct PME notifications are received.
Tested-by: NSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      379021d5
  31. 05 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 10 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  35. 21 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  37. 02 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      PCI: Set PCI-E Max Payload Size on fabric · b03e7495
      由 Jon Mason 提交于 
      On a given PCI-E fabric, each device, bridge, and root port can have a
different PCI-E maximum payload size.  There is a sizable performance
boost for having the largest possible maximum payload size on each PCI-E
device.  However, if improperly configured, fatal bus errors can occur.
Thus, it is important to ensure that PCI-E payloads sends by a device
are never larger than the MPS setting of all devices on the way to the
destination.

This can be achieved two ways:

- A conservative approach is to use the smallest common denominator of
  the entire tree below a root complex for every device on that fabric.

This means for example that having a 128 bytes MPS USB controller on one
leg of a switch will dramatically reduce performances of a video card or
10GE adapter on another leg of that same switch.

It also means that any hierarchy supporting hotplug slots (including
expresscard or thunderbolt I suppose, dbl check that) will have to be
entirely clamped to 128 bytes since we cannot predict what will be
plugged into those slots, and we cannot change the MPS on a "live"
system.

- A more optimal way is possible, if it falls within a couple of
  constraints:
* The top-level host bridge will never generate packets larger than the
  smallest TLP (or if it can be controlled independently from its MPS at
  least)
* The device will never generate packets larger than MPS (which can be
  configured via MRRS)
* No support of direct PCI-E <-> PCI-E transfers between devices without
  some additional code to specifically deal with that case

Then we can use an approach that basically ignores downstream requests
and focuses exclusively on upstream requests. In that case, all we need
to care about is that a device MPS is no larger than its parent MPS,
which allows us to keep all switches/bridges to the max MPS supported by
their parent and eventually the PHB.

In this case, your USB controller would no longer "starve" your 10GE
Ethernet and your hotplug slots won't affect your global MPS.
Additionally, the hotplugged devices themselves can be configured to a
larger MPS up to the value configured in the hotplug bridge.

To choose between the two available options, two PCI kernel boot args
have been added to the PCI calls.  "pcie_bus_safe" will provide the
former behavior, while "pcie_bus_perf" will perform the latter behavior.
By default, the latter behavior is used.

NOTE: due to the location of the enablement, each arch will need to add
calls to this function.  This patch only enables x86.

This patch includes a number of changes recommended by Benjamin
Herrenschmidt.

Tested-by: Jordan_Hargrave@dell.com
Signed-off-by: NJon Mason <mason@myri.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      b03e7495
  39. 23 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  41. 22 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  43. 09 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  45. 14 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  47. 02 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  49. 22 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  51. 12 5月, 2011 3 次提交
  53. 11 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  55. 04 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • D
      vgaarb: use bridges to control VGA routing where possible. · 3448a19d
      由 Dave Airlie 提交于 
      So in a lot of modern systems, a GPU will always be below a parent bridge that won't share with any other GPUs. This means VGA arbitration on those GPUs can be controlled by using the bridge routing instead of io/mem decodes.

The problem is locating which GPUs share which upstream bridges. This patch attempts to identify all the GPUs which can be controlled via bridges, and ones that can't. This patch endeavours to work out the bridge sharing semantics.

When disabling GPUs via a bridge, it doesn't do irq callbacks or touch the io/mem decodes for the gpu.
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      3448a19d
  57. 22 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • N
      PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode · 1a680b7c
      由 Naga Chumbalkar 提交于 
      v3 -> v2: Moved ASPM enabling logic to pci_set_power_state()
v2 -> v1: Preserved the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state()
	: Added ASPM enabling logic after scanning Root Bridge
	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130046996216391&w=2
v1	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2

The assumption made in commit 41cd766b
(PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that
pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is
POWERSAVE is no longer valid.  This is due to commit
97c145f7 (PCI: read current power state
at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. Due to this the
call to pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() is never made. Note the equality check
(below) that returns early:
./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state()
546         /* Check if we're already there */
547         if (dev->current_state == state)
548                 return 0;

Therefore OSPM never configures the PCIe links for ASPM to turn them "on".

Fix it by configuring ASPM from the pci_enable_device() code path. This
also allows a driver such as the e1000e networking driver a chance to
disable ASPM (L0s, L1), if need be, prior to enabling the device. A
driver may perform this action if the device is known to mis-behave
wrt ASPM.
Signed-off-by: NNaga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      1a680b7c