- 02 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
a9ab775b ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of workers from CPU_ONLINE") moved pool locking into rebind_workers() but left "pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED" in workqueue_cpu_up_callback(). There is nothing necessarily wrong with it, but there is no benefit either. Let's move it into rebind_workers() and achieve the following benefits: 1) better readability, POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared in rebind_workers() as expected. 2) we can guarantee that, when POOL_DISASSOCIATED is clear, the running workers of the pool are on the local CPU (pool->cpu). tj: Minor description update. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 20 6月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
In theory, pool->cpu is equals to @cpu in wq_worker_sleeping() after worker->flags is checked. And "pool->cpu != cpu" sanity check will help us if something wrong. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
When a worker is detached, the worker->flags may still have WORKER_UNBOUND or WORKER_REBOUND, it is OK for all cases: 1) if it is a normal worker, the worker will be dead, it is OK. 2) if it is a rescuer, it may re-attach to a pool with this leftover flag[s], it is still correct except it may cause unneeded wakeup. It is correct but not good, so we just remove the leftover flags. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The @cpu is fetched via smp_processor_id() in this function, so the check is useless. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
schedule_timeout_interruptible(CREATE_COOLDOWN) is exactly the same as the original code. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The commit ea1abd61 ("workqueue: reimplement idle worker rebinding") used a trick which simply removes all to-be-bound idle workers from the idle list and lets them add themselves back after completing rebinding. And this trick caused the @worker_pool->nr_idle may deviate than the actual number of idle workers on @worker_pool->idle_list. More specifically, nr_idle may be non-zero while ->idle_list is empty. All users of ->nr_idle and ->idle_list are audited. The only affected one is too_many_workers() which is updated to check %false if ->idle_list is empty regardless of ->nr_idle. The commit/trick was complicated due to it just tried to simplify an even more complicated problem (workers had to rebind itself). But the commit a9ab775b ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of workers from CPU_ONLINE") fixed all these problems and the mentioned trick was useless and is gone. So, now the @worker_pool->nr_idle is exactly the actual number of workers on @worker_pool->idle_list. too_many_workers() should recover as it was before the trick. So we remove the empty check. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
There is a piece of sanity checks code in the put_unbound_pool(). The meaning of this code is "if it is not an unbound pool, it will complain and return" IIUC. But the code uses "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED" imprecisely due to a non-unbound pool may also have this flags. We should use "pool->cpu < 0" to stand for an unbound pool, so we covert the code to it. There is no strictly wrong if we still keep "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED" here, but it is just a noise if we keep it: 1) we focus on "unbound" here, not "[dis]association". 2) "pool->cpu < 0" already implies "pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED". Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 28 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Valdis Kletnieks 提交于
This commit did an incorrect printk->pr_info conversion. If we were converting to pr_info() we should lose the log_level parameter. The problem is that this is called (indirectly) by show_regs_print_info(), which is called with various log_levels (from _INFO clear to _EMERG). So we leave it as a printk() call so the desired log_level is applied. Not a full revert, as the other half of the patch is correct. Signed-off-by: NValdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Currently, the global freezing state is propagated to worker_pools via POOL_FREEZING and then to each workqueue; however, the middle step - propagation through worker_pools - can be skipped as long as one or more max_active adjustments happens for each workqueue after the update to the global state is visible. The global workqueue freezing state and the max_active adjustments during workqueue creation and [un]freezing are serialized with wq_pool_mutex, so it's trivial to guarantee that max_actives stay in sync with global freezing state. POOL_FREEZING is unnecessary and makes the code more confusing and complicates freeze_workqueues_begin() and thaw_workqueues() by requiring them to walk through all pools. Remove POOL_FREEZING and use workqueue_freezing directly instead. tj: Description and comment updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
first_worker() actually returns the first idle workers, the name first_idle_worker() which is self-commnet will be better. All the callers of first_worker() expect it returns an idle worker, the name first_idle_worker() with "idle" notation makes reviewers happier. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 10 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
There are several problems with the code that rescuers use to bind themselve to the target pool's cpumask. 1) It is very different from how the normal workers bind to cpumask, increasing code complexity and maintenance overhead. 2) The code of cpu-binding for rescuers is complicated. 3) If one or more cpu hotplugs happen while a rescuer is processing its scheduled work items, the rescuer may not stay bound to the cpumask of the pool. This is an allowed behavior, but is still hairy. It will be better if the cpumask of the rescuer is always kept synchronized with the pool across cpu hotplugs. Using generic attach/detach routine will solve the above problems and results in much simpler code. tj: Minor description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Currently, the code to attach a new worker to its pool is embedded in create_worker(). Separating this code out will make the codes clearer and will allow rescuers to share the code path later. tj: Description and comment updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
manager_mutex is only used to protect the attaching for the pool and the pool->workers list. It protects the pool->workers and operations based on this list, such as: cpu-binding for the workers in the pool->workers the operations to set/clear WORKER_UNBOUND So let's rename manager_mutex to attach_mutex to better reflect its role. This patch is a pure rename. tj: Minor command and description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
In create_worker(), as pool->worker_ida now uses ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_put() and doesn't require external synchronization, it doesn't need manager_mutex. struct worker allocation and kthread allocation are not visible by any one before attached, so they don't need manager_mutex either. The above operations are before the attaching operation which attaches the worker to the pool. Between attaching and starting the worker, the worker is already attached to the pool, so the cpu hotplug will handle cpu-binding for the worker correctly and we don't need the manager_mutex after attaching. The conclusion is that only the attaching operation needs manager_mutex, so we narrow the protection section of manager_mutex in create_worker(). Some comments about manager_mutex are removed, because we will rename it to attach_mutex and add worker_attach_to_pool() later which will be self-explanatory. tj: Minor description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
We no longer iterate workers via worker_idr and worker_idr is used only for allocating/freeing ID, so we can convert it to worker_ida. By using ida_simple_get/remove(), worker_ida doesn't require external synchronization, so we don't need manager_mutex to protect it and the ID-removal code is allowed to be moved out from worker_detach_from_pool(). In a later patch, worker_detach_from_pool() will be used in rescuers which don't have IDs, so we move the ID-removal code out from worker_detach_from_pool() into worker_thread(). tj: Minor description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
worker_idr has the iteration (iterating for attached workers) and worker ID duties. These two duties don't have to be tied together. We can separate them and use a list for tracking attached workers and iteration. Before this separation, it wasn't possible to add rescuer workers to worker_idr due to rescuer workers couldn't allocate ID dynamically because ID-allocation depends on memory-allocation, which rescuer can't depend on. After separation, we can easily add the rescuer workers to the list for iteration without any memory-allocation. It is required when we attach the rescuer worker to the pool in later patch. tj: Minor description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Since destroy_worker() doesn't need to sleep nor require manager_mutex, destroy_worker() can be directly called in the idle timeout handler, it helps us remove POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS and maybe_destroy_worker() and simplify the manage_workers() After POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS is removed, worker_thread() doesn't need to test whether it needs to manage after processed works. So we can remove the test branch. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
worker destruction includes these parts of code: adjust pool's stats remove the worker from idle list detach the worker from the pool kthread_stop() to wait for the worker's task exit free the worker struct We can find out that there is no essential work to do after kthread_stop(), which means destroy_worker() doesn't need to wait for the worker's task exit, so we can remove kthread_stop() and free the worker struct in the worker exiting path. However, put_unbound_pool() still needs to sync the all the workers' destruction before destroying the pool; otherwise, the workers may access to the invalid pool when they are exiting. So we also move the code of "detach the worker" to the exiting path and let put_unbound_pool() to sync with this code via detach_completion. The code of "detach the worker" is wrapped in a new function "worker_detach_from_pool()" although worker_detach_from_pool() is only called once (in worker_thread()) after this patch, but we need to wrap it for these reasons: 1) The code of "detach the worker" is not short enough to unfold them in worker_thread(). 2) the name of "worker_detach_from_pool()" is self-comment, and we add some comments above the function. 3) it will be shared by rescuer in later patch which allows rescuer and normal thread use the same attach/detach frameworks. The worker id is freed when detaching which happens before the worker is fully dead, but this id of the dying worker may be re-used for a new worker, so the dying worker's task name is changed to "worker/dying" to avoid two or several workers having the same name. Since "detach the worker" is moved out from destroy_worker(), destroy_worker() doesn't require manager_mutex, so the "lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex)" in destroy_worker() is removed, and destroy_worker() is not protected by manager_mutex in put_unbound_pool(). tj: Minor description updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
We used to have the CPU online failure path where a worker is created and then destroyed without being started. A worker was created for the CPU coming online and if the online operation failed the created worker was shut down without being started. But this behavior was changed. The first worker is created and started at the same time for the CPU coming online. It means that we had already ensured in the code that destroy_worker() destroys only idle workers and we don't want to allow it to destroy any non-idle worker in the future. Otherwise, it may be buggy and it may be extremely hard to check. We should force destroy_worker() to destroy only idle workers explicitly. Since destroy_worker() destroys only idle workers, this patch does not change any functionality. We just need to update the comments and the sanity check code. In the sanity check code, we will refuse to destroy the worker if !(worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE). If the worker entered idle which means it is already started, so we remove the check of "worker->flags & WORKER_STARTED", after this removal, WORKER_STARTED is totally unneeded, so we remove WORKER_STARTED too. In the comments for create_worker(), "Create a new worker which is bound..." is changed to "... which is attached..." due to we change the name of this behavior to attaching. tj: Minor description / comment updates. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
worker_idr is highly bound to managers and is always/only accessed in manager lock context. So we don't need pool->lock for it. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
tj: Refreshed on top of wq/for-3.16. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 19 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daeseok Youn 提交于
workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() by jumping to use_dfl_pwq if the target cpumask equals wq's wq_update_unbound_numa(), when it's decided that the newly updated cpumask equals the default, looks at whether the current pwq is already the default one and skips setting pwq to the default one. This extra step is unnecessary and we can always jump to use_dfl_pwq instead. Simplify the code by removing the conditional. This doesn't make any functional difference. Signed-off-by: NDaeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
There is a race condition between rescuer_thread() and pwq_unbound_release_workfn(). Even after a pwq is scheduled for rescue, the associated work items may be consumed by any worker. If all of them are consumed before the rescuer gets to them and the pwq's base ref was put due to attribute change, the pwq may be released while still being linked on @wq->maydays list making the rescuer dereference already freed pwq later. Make send_mayday() pin the target pwq until the rescuer is done with it. tj: Updated comment and patch description. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+
-
- 18 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
After a @pwq is scheduled for emergency execution, other workers may consume the affectd work items before the rescuer gets to them. This means that a workqueue many have pwqs queued on @wq->maydays list while not having any work item pending or in-flight. If destroy_workqueue() executes in such condition, the rescuer may exit without emptying @wq->maydays. This currently doesn't cause any actual harm. destroy_workqueue() can safely destroy all the involved data structures whether @wq->maydays is populated or not as nobody access the list once the rescuer exits. However, this is nasty and makes future development difficult. Let's update rescuer_thread() so that it empties @wq->maydays after seeing should_stop to guarantee that the list is empty on rescuer exit. tj: Updated comment and patch description. Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
Replace various -20/+19 hardcoded nice values with MIN_NICE/MAX_NICE. Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ff13819fd09b7a5dba5ab5ae797f2e7019bdfa17.1394532288.git.yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: fcoe-devel@open-fcoe.org Cc: linux390@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: qla2xxx-upstream@qlogic.com Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org [ Consolidated the patches, twiddled the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daeseok Youn 提交于
wq_update_unbound_numa() failure path has the following two bugs. - alloc_unbound_pwq() is called without holding wq->mutex; however, if the allocation fails, it jumps to out_unlock which tries to unlock wq->mutex. - The function should switch to dfl_pwq on failure but didn't do so after alloc_unbound_pwq() failure. Fix it by regrabbing wq->mutex and jumping to use_dfl_pwq on alloc_unbound_pwq() failure. Signed-off-by: NDaeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> Acked-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 4c16bd32 ("workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues")
-
- 26 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
If a delayed or deferrable work is on stack we need to tell debug objects that we are destroying the timer and the work. Otherwise we leak the tracking object. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140323141939.911487677@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 23 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dongsheng Yang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6d85138180c00ce86975addab6e34b24b84f00a5.1392103744.git.yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
When a kworker should die, the kworkre is notified through WORKER_DIE flag instead of kthread_should_stop(). This, IIRC, is primarily to keep the test synchronized inside worker_pool lock. WORKER_DIE is first set while holding pool->lock, the lock is dropped and kthread_stop() is called. Unfortunately, this means that there's a slight chance that the target kworker may see WORKER_DIE before kthread_stop() finishes and exits and frees the target task before or during kthread_stop(). Fix it by pinning the target task before setting WORKER_DIE and putting it after kthread_stop() is done. tj: Improved patch description and comment. Moved pinning above WORKER_DIE for better signify what it's protecting. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 12 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuansheng Liu 提交于
In case CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK is defined, it is needed to call destroy_work_on_stack() which frees the debug object to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(). Signed-off-by: NLiu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 26 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This reverts commit c2fda509. c2fda509 removed lockdep annotation from work_on_cpu() to work around the PCI path that calls work_on_cpu() from within a work_on_cpu() work item (PF driver .probe() method -> pci_enable_sriov() -> add VFs -> VF driver .probe method). 961da7fb6b22 ("PCI: Avoid unnecessary CPU switch when calling driver .probe() method) avoids that recursive work_on_cpu() use in a different way, so this revert restores the work_on_cpu() lockdep annotation. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Li Bin 提交于
When one work starts execution, the high bits of work's data contain pool ID. It can represent a maximum of WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE. Pool ID is assigned WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE when the work being initialized indicating that no pool is associated and get_work_pool() uses it to check the associated pool. So if worker_pool_assign_id() assigns a ID greater than or equal WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE to a pool, it triggers leakage, and it may break the non-reentrance guarantee. This patch fix this issue by modifying the worker_pool_assign_id() function calling idr_alloc() by setting @end param WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE. Furthermore, in the current implementation, the BUILD_BUG_ON() in init_workqueues makes no sense. The number of worker pools needed cannot be determined at compile time, because the number of backing pools for UNBOUND workqueues is dynamic based on the assigned custom attributes. So remove it. tj: Minor comment and indentation updates. Signed-off-by: NLi Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Li Bin 提交于
It seems the "dying" should be "draining" here. Signed-off-by: NLi Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
An ordered workqueue implements execution ordering by using single pool_workqueue with max_active == 1. On a given pool_workqueue, work items are processed in FIFO order and limiting max_active to 1 enforces the queued work items to be processed one by one. Unfortunately, 4c16bd32 ("workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues") accidentally broke this guarantee by applying NUMA affinity to ordered workqueues too. On NUMA setups, an ordered workqueue would end up with separate pool_workqueues for different nodes. Each pool_workqueue still limits max_active to 1 but multiple work items may be executed concurrently and out of order depending on which node they are queued to. Fix it by using dedicated ordered_wq_attrs[] when creating ordered workqueues. The new attrs match the unbound ones except that no_numa is always set thus forcing all NUMA nodes to share the default pool_workqueue. While at it, add sanity check in workqueue creation path which verifies that an ordered workqueues has only the default pool_workqueue. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: NLibin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Move the setting of PF_NO_SETAFFINITY up before set_cpus_allowed() in create_worker(). Otherwise userland can change ->cpus_allowed in between. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
If !PREEMPT, a kworker running work items back to back can hog CPU. This becomes dangerous when a self-requeueing work item which is waiting for something to happen races against stop_machine. Such self-requeueing work item would requeue itself indefinitely hogging the kworker and CPU it's running on while stop_machine would wait for that CPU to enter stop_machine while preventing anything else from happening on all other CPUs. The two would deadlock. Jamie Liu reports that this deadlock scenario exists around scsi_requeue_run_queue() and libata port multiplier support, where one port may exclude command processing from other ports. With the right timing, scsi_requeue_run_queue() can end up requeueing itself trying to execute an IO which is asked to be retried while another device has an exclusive access, which in turn can't make forward progress due to stop_machine. Fix it by invoking cond_resched() after executing each work item. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: NJamie Liu <jamieliu@google.com> References: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1552567 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org -- kernel/workqueue.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
-
- 24 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
The dev_attrs field of struct bus_type is going away soon, dev_groups should be used instead. This converts the workqueue bus code to use the correct field. Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 21 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Libin 提交于
No functional change. The comment of function manage_workers() RETURNS description is obvious wrong, same as the CONTEXT. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NLibin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Libin 提交于
No functional change. There are two worker pools for each cpu in current implementation (one for normal work items and the other for high priority ones). tj: Whitespace adjustments. Signed-off-by: NLibin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 20 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yacine Belkadi 提交于
When building the htmldocs (in verbose mode), scripts/kernel-doc reports the following type of warnings: Warning(kernel/workqueue.c:653): No description found for return value of 'get_work_pool' Fix them by: - Using "Return:" sections to introduce descriptions of return values - Adding some missing descriptions Signed-off-by: NYacine Belkadi <yacine.belkadi.1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-