1. 05 9月, 2008 3 次提交
  2. 28 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: generate names for /proc/cpuinfo from <asm/cpufeature.h> · 7414aa41
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      We have had a number of cases where <asm/cpufeature.h> (and its
      predecessors) have diverged substantially from the names list in
      /proc/cpuinfo.  This patch generates the latter from the former.
      
      It retains the option for explicitly overriding the strings, but by
      making that require a separate action it should at least be less
      likely to happen.
      
      It would be good to do a future pass and rename strings that are
      gratuituously different in the kernel (/proc/cpuinfo is a userspace
      interface and must remain constant.)
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      7414aa41
  3. 27 8月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: update defconfigs · c1b362e3
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Enable some option commonly used by testers in defconfig, including
      some very common device drivers and network boot support.  defconfig
      is still not meant to be a kitchen-sink configuration.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      c1b362e3
  4. 26 8月, 2008 4 次提交
  5. 25 8月, 2008 3 次提交
  6. 24 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 23 8月, 2008 3 次提交
    • R
      x86 MCE: Fix CPU hotplug problem with multiple multicore AMD CPUs · 8735728e
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      During CPU hot-remove the sysfs directory created by
      threshold_create_bank(), defined in
      arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd_64.c, has to be removed before
      its parent directory, created by mce_create_device(), defined in
      arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c .  Moreover, when the CPU in
      question is hotplugged again, obviously the latter has to be created
      before the former.  At present, the right ordering is not enforced,
      because all of these operations are carried out by CPU hotplug
      notifiers which are not appropriately ordered with respect to each
      other.  This leads to serious problems on systems with two or more
      multicore AMD CPUs, among other things during suspend and hibernation.
      
      Fix the problem by placing threshold bank CPU hotplug callbacks in
      mce_cpu_callback(), so that they are invoked at the right places,
      if defined.  Additionally, use kobject_del() to remove the sysfs
      directory associated with the kobject created by
      kobject_create_and_add() in threshold_create_bank(), to prevent the
      kernel from crashing during CPU hotplug operations on systems with
      two or more multicore AMD CPUs.
      
      This patch fixes bug #11337.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NAndi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
      Tested-by: NMark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8735728e
    • R
      x86: fix: make PCI ECS for AMD CPUs hotplug capable · 91ede005
      Robert Richter 提交于
      Until now, PCI ECS setup was performed at boot time only and for cpus
      that are enabled then. This patch fixes this and adds cpu hotplug.
      
      Tests sequence (check if ECS bit is set when bringing cpu online again):
      
       # ( perl -e 'sysseek(STDIN, 0xC001001F, 0)'; hexdump -n 8 -e '2/4 "%08x " "\n"' )   < /dev/cpu/1/msr
       00000008 00404010
       # ( perl -e 'sysseek(STDOUT, 0xC001001F, 0); print pack "l*", 8, 0x00400010' ) > /dev/cpu/1/msr
       # ( perl -e 'sysseek(STDIN, 0xC001001F, 0)'; hexdump -n 8 -e '2/4 "%08x " "\n"' )   < /dev/cpu/1/msr
       00000008 00400010
       # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
       # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
       # ( perl -e 'sysseek(STDIN, 0xC001001F, 0)'; hexdump -n 8 -e '2/4 "%08x " "\n"' )   < /dev/cpu/1/msr
       00000008 00404010
      Reported-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      91ede005
    • R
      x86: fix: do not run code in amd_bus.c on non-AMD CPUs · 9b4e27b5
      Robert Richter 提交于
      Jan Beulich wrote:
      
      > Even worse - this would even try to access the MSR on non-AMD CPUs
      > (currently probably prevented just by the fact that only AMD ones use
      > family values of 0x10 or higher).
      
      This patch adds cpu vendor check to the postcore_initcalls.
      Reported-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9b4e27b5
  8. 22 8月, 2008 7 次提交
    • I
      x86: work around MTRR mask setting, v2 · 9754a5b8
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      improve the debug printout:
      
      - make it actually display something
      - print it only once
      
      would be nice to have a WARN_ONCE() facility, to feed such things to
      kerneloops.org.
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9754a5b8
    • M
      x86: fix section mismatch warning - uv_cpu_init · c4bd1fda
      Marcin Slusarz 提交于
      WARNING: vmlinux.o(.cpuinit.text+0x3cc4): Section mismatch in reference from the function uv_cpu_init() to the function .init.text:uv_system_init()
      The function __cpuinit uv_cpu_init() references
      a function __init uv_system_init().
      If uv_system_init is only used by uv_cpu_init then
      annotate uv_system_init with a matching annotation.
      
      uv_system_init was ment to be called only once, so do it from codepath
      (native_smp_prepare_cpus) which is called once, right before activation
      of other cpus (smp_init).
      
      Note: old code relied on uv_node_to_blade being initialized to 0,
      but it'a not initialized from anywhere.
      Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NJack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c4bd1fda
    • Y
      x86_64: printout msr -v2 · b05f78f5
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      commandline show_msr=1 for bsp, show_msr=32 for all 32 cpus.
      
      [ mingo@elte.hu: added documentation ]
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b05f78f5
    • A
      x86: fix VMI for early params · 3a6ddd5f
      Alok Kataria 提交于
      while fixing a different bug i moved the call to vmi_init before
      early params could be parsed.
      
      This broke the vmi specific commandline parameters.
      Fix that, by moving vmi initialization after kernel has got a chance to
      parse early parameters.
      Signed-off-by: NAlok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      3a6ddd5f
    • J
      x86: fix two modpost warnings in mm/init_64.c · 9482ac6e
      Jan Beulich 提交于
      early_io{re,un}map() are __init and hence can't be called from __meminit
      functions.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9482ac6e
    • J
      x86: fix 1:1 mapping init on 64-bit (memory hotplug case) · 8ae3a5a8
      Jan Beulich 提交于
      While I don't have a hotplug capable system at hand, I think two issues need
      fixing:
      
      - pud_phys (in kernel_physical_ampping_init()) would remain uninitialized in
        the after_bootmem case
      
      - the locking done just around phys_pmd_{init,update}() would leave out pgd
        updates, and it was needlessly covering code portions that do allocations
        (perhaps using a more friendly gfp value in alloc_low_page() would then be
        possible)
      Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8ae3a5a8
    • Y
      x86: work around MTRR mask setting · 38cc1c3d
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      Joshua Hoblitt reported that only 3 GB of his 16 GB of RAM is
      usable. Booting with mtrr_show showed us the BIOS-initialized
      MTRR settings - which are all wrong.
      
      So the root cause is that the BIOS has not set the mask correctly:
      
      >               [    0.429971]  MSR00000200: 00000000d0000000
      >               [    0.433305]  MSR00000201: 0000000ff0000800
      > should be ==> [    0.433305]  MSR00000201: 0000003ff0000800
      >
      >               [    0.436638]  MSR00000202: 00000000e0000000
      >               [    0.439971]  MSR00000203: 0000000fe0000800
      > should be ==> [    0.439971]  MSR00000203: 0000003fe0000800
      >
      >               [    0.443304]  MSR00000204: 0000000000000006
      >               [    0.446637]  MSR00000205: 0000000c00000800
      > should be ==> [    0.446637]  MSR00000205: 0000003c00000800
      >
      >               [    0.449970]  MSR00000206: 0000000400000006
      >               [    0.453303]  MSR00000207: 0000000fe0000800
      > should be ==> [    0.453303]  MSR00000207: 0000003fe0000800
      >
      >               [    0.456636]  MSR00000208: 0000000420000006
      >               [    0.459970]  MSR00000209: 0000000ff0000800
      > should be ==> [    0.459970]  MSR00000209: 0000003ff0000800
      
      So detect this borkage and add the prefix 111.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      38cc1c3d
  9. 21 8月, 2008 9 次提交
  10. 20 8月, 2008 5 次提交
  11. 19 8月, 2008 3 次提交
    • H
      x86: use X86_FEATURE_NOPL in alternatives · f1c5d30e
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Use X86_FEATURE_NOPL to determine if it is safe to use P6 NOPs in
      alternatives.  Also, replace table and loop with simple if statement.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      f1c5d30e
    • H
      x86: add NOPL as a synthetic CPU feature bit · 7e00df58
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      The long noops ("NOPL") are supposed to be detected by family >= 6.
      Unfortunately, several non-Intel x86 implementations, both hardware
      and software, don't obey this dictum.  Instead, probe for NOPL
      directly by executing a NOPL instruction and see if we get #UD.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      7e00df58
    • H
      x86: boot: stub out unimplemented CPU feature words · e2fe16d9
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      The CPU feature detection code in the boot code is somewhat minimal,
      and doesn't include all possible CPUID words.  In particular, it
      doesn't contain the code for CPU feature words 2 (Transmeta),
      3 (Linux-specific), 5 (VIA), or 7 (scattered).  Zero them out, so we
      can still set those bits as known at compile time; in particular, this
      allows creating a Linux-specific NOPL flag and have it required (and
      therefore resolvable at compile time) in 64-bit mode.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      e2fe16d9