Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 12 11月, 2013 6 次提交
    • R
      btrfs: remove unused parameter from btrfs_header_fsid · 0a4e5586
      由 Ross Kirk 提交于 
      Remove unused parameter, 'eb'. Unused since introduction in
5f39d397

Updated to be rebased against current upstream and correct diff supplied this time!
Signed-off-by: NRoss Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      0a4e5586
    • J
      Btrfs: fix two use-after-free bugs with transaction cleanup · 724e2315
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I was noticing the slab redzone stuff going off every once and a while during
transaction aborts.  This was caused by two things

1) We would walk the pending snapshots and set their error to -ECANCELED.  We
don't need to do this, the snapshot stuff waits for a transaction commit and if
there is a problem we just free our pending snapshot object and exit.  Doing
this was causing us to touch the pending snapshot object after the thing had
already been freed.

2) We were freeing the transaction manually with wanton disregard for it's
use_count reference counter.  To fix this I cleaned up the transaction freeing
loop to either wait for the transaction commit to finish if it was in the middle
of that (since it will be cleaned and freed up there) or to do the cleanup
oursevles.

I also moved the global "kill all things dirty everywhere" stuff outside of the
transaction cleanup loop since that only needs to be done once.  With this patch
I'm no longer seeing slab corruption because of use after frees.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      724e2315
    • J
      Btrfs: don't delete ordered roots from list during cleanup · 1de2cfde
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      During transaction cleanup after an abort we are just removing roots from the
ordered roots list which is incorrect.  We have a BUG_ON() to make sure that the
root is still part of the ordered roots list when we put our ordered extent
which we were tripping in this case.  So do like we do everywhere else and just
move it to the tail of the ordered roots list and allow the normal cleanup to
take care of stuff.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      1de2cfde
    • J
      Btrfs: cleanup transaction on abort · 4e121c06
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      If we abort not during a transaction commit we won't clean up anything until we
unmount.  Unfortunately if we abort in the middle of writing out an ordered
extent we won't clean it up and if somebody is waiting on that ordered extent
they will wait forever.  To fix this just make the transaction kthread call the
cleanup transaction stuff if it notices theres an error, and make
btrfs_end_transaction wake up the transaction kthread if there is an error.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      4e121c06
    • J
      Btrfs: add a sanity test for btrfs_split_item · 06ea65a3
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      While looking at somebodys corruption I became completely convinced that
btrfs_split_item was broken, so I wrote this test to verify that it was working
as it was supposed to.  Thankfully it appears to be working as intended, so just
add this test to make sure nobody breaks it in the future.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      06ea65a3
    • S
      Btrfs: eliminate the exceptional root_tree refs=0 · 69e9c6c6
      由 Stefan Behrens 提交于 
      The fact that btrfs_root_refs() returned 0 for the tree_root caused
bugs in the past, therefore it is set to 1 with this patch and
(hopefully) all affected code is adapted to this change.

I verified this change by temporarily adding WARN_ON() checks
everywhere where btrfs_root_refs() is used, checking whether the
logic of the code is changed by btrfs_root_refs() returning 1
instead of 0 for root->root_key.objectid == BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID.
With these added checks, I ran the xfstests './check -g auto'.

The two roots chunk_root and log_root_tree that are only referenced
by the superblock and the log_roots below the log_root_tree still
have btrfs_root_refs() == 0, only the tree_root is changed.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      69e9c6c6
  3. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: fix oops caused by the space balance and dead roots · c00869f1
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      When doing space balance and subvolume destroy at the same time, we met
the following oops:

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2247!
RIP: 0010: [<ffffffffa04cec16>] prepare_to_merge+0x154/0x1f0 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa04b5ab7>] relocate_block_group+0x466/0x4e6 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04b5c7a>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x143/0x275 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0495c56>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.27+0x5c/0x5a2 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0459871>] ? btrfs_item_key_to_cpu+0x15/0x31 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa048b46a>] ? btrfs_get_token_64+0x7e/0xcd [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a3467>] ? btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking+0xb2/0xb7 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049907d>] btrfs_balance+0x9c7/0xb6f [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa049ef84>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x234/0x2ac [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04a1e8e>] btrfs_ioctl+0xd87/0x1ef9 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81122f53>] ? path_openat+0x234/0x4db
 [<ffffffff813c3b78>] ? __do_page_fault+0x31d/0x391
 [<ffffffff810f8ab6>] ? vma_link+0x74/0x94
 [<ffffffff811250f5>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x39
 [<ffffffff811258c8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x32d/0x3e2
 [<ffffffff811259d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x83
 [<ffffffff813c3bfa>] ? do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff813c73c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

It is because we returned the error number if the reference of the root was 0
when doing space relocation. It was not right here, because though the root
was dead(refs == 0), but the space it held still need be relocated, or we
could not remove the block group. So in this case, we should return the root
no matter it is dead or not.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      c00869f1
  5. 21 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 01 9月, 2013 20 次提交
  9. 14 6月, 2013 11 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: do not pin while under spin lock · e78417d1
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      When testing a corrupted fs I noticed I was getting sleep while atomic errors
when the transaction aborted.  This is because btrfs_pin_extent may need to
allocate memory and we are calling this under the spin lock.  Fix this by moving
it out and doing the pin after dropping the spin lock but before dropping the
mutex, the same way it works when delayed refs run normally.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      e78417d1
    • J
      Btrfs: fix qgroup rescan resume on mount · b382a324
      由 Jan Schmidt 提交于 
      When called during mount, we cannot start the rescan worker thread until
open_ctree is done. This commit restuctures the qgroup rescan internals to
enable a clean deferral of the rescan resume operation.

First of all, the struct qgroup_rescan is removed, saving us a malloc and
some initialization synchronizations problems. Its only element (the worker
struct) now lives within fs_info just as the rest of the rescan code.

Then setting up a rescan worker is split into several reusable stages.
Currently we have three different rescan startup scenarios:
	(A) rescan ioctl
	(B) rescan resume by mount
	(C) rescan by quota enable

Each case needs its own combination of the four following steps:
	(1) set the progress [A, C: zero; B: state of umount]
	(2) commit the transaction [A]
	(3) set the counters [A, C: zero; B: state of umount]
	(4) start worker [A, B, C]

qgroup_rescan_init does step (1). There's no extra function added to commit
a transaction, we've got that already. qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking does
step (3). Step (4) is nothing more than a call to the generic
btrfs_queue_worker.

We also get rid of a double check for the rescan progress during
btrfs_qgroup_account_ref, which is no longer required due to having step 2
from the list above.

As a side effect, this commit prepares to move the rescan start code from
btrfs_run_qgroups (which is run during commit) to a less time critical
section.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      b382a324
    • M
      Btrfs: make the state of the transaction more readable · 4a9d8bde
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      We used 3 variants to track the state of the transaction, it was complex
and wasted the memory space. Besides that, it was hard to understand that
which types of the transaction handles should be blocked in each transaction
state, so the developers often made mistakes.

This patch improved the above problem. In this patch, we define 6 states
for the transaction,
  enum btrfs_trans_state {
	TRANS_STATE_RUNNING		= 0,
	TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED		= 1,
	TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START	= 2,
	TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING	= 3,
	TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED		= 4,
	TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED		= 5,
	TRANS_STATE_MAX			= 6,
  }
and just use 1 variant to track those state.

In order to make the blocked handle types for each state more clear,
we introduce a array:
  unsigned int btrfs_blocked_trans_types[TRANS_STATE_MAX] = {
	[TRANS_STATE_RUNNING]		= 0U,
	[TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED]		= (__TRANS_USERSPACE |
					   __TRANS_START),
	[TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START]	= (__TRANS_USERSPACE |
					   __TRANS_START |
					   __TRANS_ATTACH),
	[TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING]	= (__TRANS_USERSPACE |
					   __TRANS_START |
					   __TRANS_ATTACH |
					   __TRANS_JOIN),
	[TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED]		= (__TRANS_USERSPACE |
					   __TRANS_START |
					   __TRANS_ATTACH |
					   __TRANS_JOIN |
					   __TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK),
	[TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED]		= (__TRANS_USERSPACE |
					   __TRANS_START |
					   __TRANS_ATTACH |
					   __TRANS_JOIN |
					   __TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK),
  }
it is very intuitionistic.

Besides that, because we remove ->in_commit in transaction structure, so
the lock ->commit_lock which was used to protect it is unnecessary, remove
->commit_lock.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      4a9d8bde
    • M
      Btrfs: cleanup unnecessary assignment when cleaning up all the residual transaction · ac673879
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      When we umount a fs with serious errors, we will invoke btrfs_cleanup_transactions()
to clean up the residual transaction. At this time, It is impossible to start a new
transaction, so we needn't assign trans_no_join to 1, and also needn't clear running
transaction every time we destroy a residual transaction.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      ac673879
    • M
      Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list · 199c2a9c
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same
as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      199c2a9c
    • M
      Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list · eb73c1b7
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the
fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce
per-subvolume delalloc inode list.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      eb73c1b7
    • M
      Btrfs: introduce grab/put functions for the root of the fs/file tree · b0feb9d9
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      The grab/put funtions will be used in the next patch, which need grab
the root object and ensure it is not freed. We use reference counter
instead of the srcu lock is to aovid blocking the memory reclaim task,
which invokes synchronize_srcu().
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      b0feb9d9
    • M
      Btrfs: cleanup the similar code of the fs root read · cb517eab
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      There are several functions whose code is similar, such as
  btrfs_find_last_root()
  btrfs_read_fs_root_no_radix()

Besides that, some functions are invoked twice, it is unnecessary,
for example, we are sure that all roots which is found in
  btrfs_find_orphan_roots()
have their orphan items, so it is unnecessary to check the orphan
item again.

So cleanup it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      cb517eab
    • M
      Btrfs: make the snap/subv deletion end more early when the fs is R/O · babbf170
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      The snapshot/subvolume deletion might spend lots of time, it would make
the remount task wait for a long time. This patch improve this problem,
we will break the deletion if the fs is remounted to be R/O. It will make
the users happy.

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      babbf170
    • M
      Btrfs: move the R/O check out of btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot() · dc7f370c
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      If the fs is remounted to be R/O, it is unnecessary to call
btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(), so move the R/O check out of
this function. And besides that, it can make the check logic in the
caller more clear.

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      dc7f370c
    • M
      Btrfs: make the cleaner complete early when the fs is going to be umounted · 05323cd1
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      05323cd1