- 11 5月, 2015 40 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Make trailing_symlink() return the pathname to traverse or ERR_PTR(-E...). A subtle point is that for "magic" symlinks it returns "" now - that leads to link_path_walk("", nd), which is immediately returning 0 and we are back to the treatment of the last component, at whereever the damn thing has left us. Reduces the stack footprint - link_path_walk() called on more shallow stack now. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* lift link_path_walk() into callers; moving it down into path_init() had been a mistake. Stack footprint, among other things... * do _not_ call path_cleanup() after path_init() failure; on all failure exits out of it we have nothing for path_cleanup() to do * have path_init() return pathname or ERR_PTR(-E...) Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we can do fdput() under rcu_read_lock() just fine; all we need to take care of is fetching nd->inode value first. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
new functions: filename_parentat() and path_parentat() resp. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Makes the situation much more regular - we avoid a strange state when the element just after the top of stack is used to store struct path of symlink, but isn't counted in nd->depth. This is much more regular, so the normal failure exits, etc., work fine. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Just store it in nd->stack[nd->depth].link right in pick_link(). Now that we make sure of stack expansion in pick_link(), we can do so... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
update the failure cleanup in may_follow_link() to match that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and don't open-code unlazy_walk() in there - the only reason for that is to avoid verfication of cached nd->root, which is trivially avoided by discarding said cached nd->root first. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
rather than letting the callers handle the jump-to-root part of semantics, do it right in get_link() and return the rest of the body for the caller to deal with - at that point it's treated the same way as relative symlinks would be. And return NULL when there's no "rest of the body" - those are treated the same as pure jump symlink would be. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Instead of saving name and branching to OK:, where we'll immediately restore it, and call walk_component() with WALK_PUT|WALK_GET and nd->last_type being LAST_BIND, which is equivalent to put_link(nd), err = 0, we can just treat that the same way we'd treat procfs-style "jump" symlinks - do put_link(nd) and move on. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
when cookie is NULL, put_link() is equivalent to path_put(), so as soon as we'd set last->cookie to NULL, we can bump nd->depth and let the normal logics in terminate_walk() to take care of cleanups. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
its only use is getting passed to nd_jump_link(), which can obtain it from current->nameidata Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
now that it gets nameidata, no reason to have setting LOOKUP_JUMPED on mountpoint crossing and calling path_put_conditional() on failures done in every caller. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
task_struct currently contains two ad-hoc members for use by the VFS: link_count and total_link_count. These are only interesting to fs/namei.c, so exposing them explicitly is poor layering. Incidentally, link_count isn't used anymore, so it can just die. This patches replaces those with a single pointer to 'struct nameidata'. This structure represents the current filename lookup of which there can only be one per process, and is a natural place to store total_link_count. This will allow the current "nameidata" argument to all follow_link operations to be removed as current->nameidata can be used instead in the _very_ few instances that care about it at all. As there are occasional circumstances where pathname lookup can recurse, such as through kern_path_locked, we always save and old current->nameidata (if there is one) when setting a new value, and make sure any active link_counts are preserved. follow_mount and follow_automount now get a 'struct nameidata *' rather than 'int flags' so that they can directly access total_link_count, rather than going through 'current'. Suggested-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... if it decides to follow, that is. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
instead of a single flag (!= 0 => we want to follow symlinks) pass two bits - WALK_GET (want to follow symlinks) and WALK_PUT (put_link() once we are done looking at the name). The latter matters only for success exits - on failure the caller will discard everything anyway. Suggestions for better variant are welcome; what this thing aims for is making sure that pending put_link() is done *before* walk_component() decides to pick a symlink up, rather than between picking it up and acting upon it. See the next commit for payoff. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
fewer labels that way; in particular, resuming after the end of nested symlink is straight-line. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
All callers of terminate_walk() are followed by more or less open-coded eqiuvalent of "do put_link() on everything left in nd->stack". Better done in terminate_walk() itself, and when we go for RCU symlink traversal we'll have to do it there anyway. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
rationale: we'll need to have terminate_walk() do put_link() on everything, which will mean that in some cases ..._last() will do put_link() anyway. Easier to have them do it in all cases. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
follow_dotdot_rcu() does an equivalent of terminate_walk() on failure; shifting it into callers makes for simpler rules and those callers already have terminate_walk() on other failure exits. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
The only reason why we needed one more was that purely nested MAXSYMLINKS symlinks could lead to path_init() using that many entries in addition to nd->stack[0] which it left unused. That can't happen now - path_init() starts with entry 0 (and trailing_symlink() is called only when we'd already encountered one symlink, so no more than MAXSYMLINKS-1 are left). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
get rid of orig_depth - we only use it on error exit to tell whether to stop doing put_link() when depth reaches 0 (call from path_init()) or when it reaches 1 (call from trailing_symlink()). However, in the latter case the caller would immediately follow with one more put_link(). Just keep doing it until the depth reaches zero (and simplify trailing_symlink() as the result). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Get rid of orig_depth checks in OK: logics. If nd->depth is zero, we had been called from path_init() and we are done. If it is greater than 1, we are not done, whether we'd been called from path_init() or trailing_symlink(). And in case when it's 1, we might have been called from path_init() and reached the end of nested symlink (in which case nd->stack[0].name will point to the rest of pathname and we are not done) or from trailing_symlink(), in which case we are done. Just have trailing_symlink() leave NULL in nd->stack[0].name and use that to discriminate between those cases. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Make link_path_walk() work with any value of nd->depth on entry - memorize it and use it in tests instead of comparing with 1. Don't bother with increment/decrement in path_init(). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all calls are preceded by decrement of nd->depth; move it into put_link() itself. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
move decrement of nd->depth on successful returns into the callers. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make get_link() increment nd->depth on successful exit Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
move increment of ->depth to the point where we'd discovered that get_link() has not returned an error, adjust exits accordingly. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
lift increment/decrement into link_path_walk() callers. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
remove decrement/increment surrounding nd_alloc_stack(), adjust the test in it. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
collapse adjacent increment/decrement pairs. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
nd->stack[0] is unused until the handling of trailing symlinks and we want to get rid of that. Having fucked that transformation up several times, I went for bloody pedantic series of provably equivalent transformations. Sorry. Step 1: keep nd->depth higher by one in link_path_walk() - increment upon entry, decrement on exits, adjust the arithmetics inside and surround the calls of functions that care about nd->depth value (nd_alloc_stack(), get_link(), put_link()) with decrement/increment pairs. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
The only restriction is that on the total amount of symlinks crossed; how they are nested does not matter Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same story as the previous commit Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-