- 30 10月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Request by Ville in his review of the CRC stuff. This converts everything but ilk_display_irq_handler since that needs a bit more than a simple search&replace to look nice. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The bbstate contains useful bits of debugging information such as whether the batch is being read from GTT or PPGTT, or whether it is allowed to execute privileged instructions. v2: Only record BB_STATE for gen4+ Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Otherwise QA will report this as a real hang when running igt ZZ_missed_irq. v2: Actually test the right stuff and really shut up the DRM_ERROR output ... Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70747Tested-by: Nlu hua <huax.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Similarly rename the other related functions in the power domain interface. Higher level driver code calling these functions knows only about power domains, not the underlying power wells which may be different on different platforms. Also these functions really init/cleanup/resume power domains and only through that all related power wells, so rename them accordingly. Note that I left i915_{request,release}_power_well as is, since that really changes the state only of a single power well (and is HSW specific). It should also get a better name once we make it more generic by controlling things through a new audio power domain. v4: - use intel prefix instead of i915 everywhere (Paulo) - use a $prefix_$block_$action format (Daniel) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We store cursor_x/y as int16_t internally, but the user provided coordinates are int32_t. Clamp the coordinates so that they don't overflow the int16_t. Since the cursor is only 64x64 in size, the clamping can't cause any visual changes. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 28 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
The only real need for this field was in i915_{request,release}_power_well, but there we can get at it by a container_of magic. Also since in the future we'll have multiple power wells each with its own power_well struct it makes sense to remove the field from there where it'd be just redundancy. Suggested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Currently we make sure that all power domains are enabled during driver init and turn off unneded ones only after the first modeset. Similarly during suspend we enable all power domains, which will remain on through the following resume until the first modeset. This logic is supported by intel_set_power_well() in the power domain framework. It would be nice to simplify the API, so that we only have get/put functions and make it more explicit on the higher level how this "power well on during init" logic works. This will make it also easier if in the future we want to shorten the time the power wells are on. For this add a new device private flag tracking whether we have the power wells on because of init/suspend and use only intel_display_power_get()/put(). As nothing else uses intel_set_power_well() we can remove it. This also fixes commit 6efdf354 Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Date: Wed Oct 16 17:25:52 2013 +0300 drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset where removing intel_set_power_well() resulted in not releasing the reference on the power well that was taken during init and thus leaving the power well on all the time. Regression reported by Paulo. v2: - move the init_power_on flag to the power_domains struct (Daniel) v3: - add note about this being a regression fix too (Paulo) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
In the future we'll need to support multiple power wells, so prepare for that here. Create a new power domains struct which contains all power domain/well specific fields. Since we'll have one lock protecting all power wells, move power_well->lock to the new struct too. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 27 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Production HSW does not need it. I confirmed this with Art. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Production IVB does not need it. I confirmed this with Art. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
All our registers which are written through the MCHBAR are defined descriptively as an offset to the MCHBAR. We had 3 outliers here. Convert these as well so all registers which are offsets are MCHBAR can be easily identified/found within the code. With this, convert DCLK to also follow this format. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 22 10月, 2013 17 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Daniel pointed out that it was hard to get anything lockless to work correctly, so don't even try for this non critical piece of code and just use a spin lock. v2: Make intel_pipe_crc->opened a bool v3: Use assert_spin_locked() instead of a comment (Daniel Vetter) v4: Use spin_lock_irq() in the debugfs functions (they can only be called from process context), Use spin_lock() in the pipe_crc_update() function that can only be called from an interrupt handler, Use wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq() when waiting for data in the cicular buffer to ensure proper locking around the condition we are waiting for. (Daniel Vetter) Suggested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Adding stuff to the bottom of struct drm_i915_driver_private is nowadays considered uncool. Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
So far the modeset code enabled all power domains if it needed any. It wasn't a problem since HW generations so far only had one always-on power well and one dynamic power well that can be enabled/disabled. For domains powered by always-on power wells (panel fitter on pipe A and the eDP transcoder) we didn't do anything, for all other domains we just enabled the single dynamic power well. Future HW generations will change this, as they add multiple dynamic power wells. Support for these will be added later, this patch prepares for those by making sure we only enable the required domains. Note that after this change on HSW we'll enable all power domains even if it was the domain for the panel fitter on pipe A or the eDP transcoder. This isn't a problem since the power domain framework already checks if the domain is on an always-on power well and doesn't do anything in this case. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
We'll need the same functionality for other HW generations. The support for these will be added by upcoming patches. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
There is no hard need for this to be a spin lock, as we don't take these locks in irq context from anywhere. An upcoming patch will add calls to punit read/write functions from within regions protected by this lock and those functions need a mutex in turn. As a solution for that convert the spin lock to be a mutex. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
It is just cleaner this way and makes it easier to add support for other HW generations with always-on power wells powering a different set of domains. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Upcoming patches will add tracking for a set of power domains via a bitmask; to make things simple there remove the current gap in the enum values. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
- Give them an _irq_handler postfix, like all the other irq stuff. - Shuffle the DEBUG_FS=n dummy functions around a bit. This is prep work to extract all the crc debug stuff into intel_display_testing.c Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
v2: Actually enable it. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Really simple, and we don't even have working frame numbers. v2: Actually enable it ... v3: Review from Ville: - Unconditionally enable the border in the CRC checksum for consistency with gen3+. - Handle the "none" source to be able to disable the CRC machinery again. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
On pre-gen5 and vlv we can't use the pipe source when TV-out or a DP port is connected to the pipe. Hence we need to expose new CRC sources. Also simplify the existing pipe source platform code a bit by rejecting all unhandled sources by default. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The PIPE_B #define was missing the display mmio offset. Use the _PIPE_INC macro instead, it's simpler. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
And throw in a tiny for_each_pipe refactoring for gen2. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
A bit a mess, since with DP/TV outputs we can't use the pipe CRC. Also, no plane CRCs, so we need to update the basic testcases. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Should work down to gen2. The #defines for the interrupt sources are already there in PIPESTAT and are the same on all gmch platforms for gen2 up to vlv. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 21 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The current output looks like: Num Pipes: 2 Pipe [0]: SRC: 027f01df Plane [0]: CNTR: d9000000 STRIDE: 00001400 SIZE: 031f04ff POS: 00000000 ADDR: 00020000 Cursor [0]: CNTR: 00000000 POS: 00000000 BASE: 00000000 Pipe [1]: SRC: 04ff031f Plane [1]: CNTR: 01000000 STRIDE: 00000000 SIZE: 018f02cf POS: 00000000 ADDR: 00000000 Cursor [1]: CNTR: 00000000 POS: 00000000 BASE: 00000000 CPU transcoder: A CONF: 00000000 HTOTAL: 031f027f HBLANK: 03170287 HSYNC: 02ef028f VTOTAL: 020c01df VBLANK: 020401e7 VSYNC: 01eb01e9 CPU transcoder: B CONF: 80000000 HTOTAL: 059f04ff HBLANK: 059f04ff HSYNC: 054f052f VTOTAL: 0336031f VBLANK: 0336031f VSYNC: 03280322 which lacks the important visual clue to demarque the transcoder blocks from the last cursor. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
Use the nice Kernel macro, it makes the code much more readable. Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Since we use intel_enable_rc6() now for more than just when we're enabling RC6, we'll see this message many times, and it is just confusing. As an example, calc_residency calls this function whenever poked via sysfs. This leaves the impression in dmesg that we're constantly re-enabling RC6. While at it, move the defines and description from drv.h to intel_pm.c, since these are only ever used in that code. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 10月, 2013 9 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
This is useful with the follow-up patch that frobs dev_priv->vbt.edp_bpp, and the value no longer comes directly from VBT. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
In Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Wed Jun 5 13:34:23 2013 +0200 drm/i915: consolidate pch pll enable sequence I've removed all the code from this if block, but somehow forgotten to kill the block itself. Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
hw designers decided to change the CRC registers and coalesce them all into one. Otherwise nothing changed. I've opted for a new hsw_ version to grab the crc sample since hsw+1 will have the same crc registers, but different interrupt source registers. So this little helper function will come handy there. Also refactor the display error handler with a neat pipe loop. v2: Use for_each_pipe. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We've set up all files, but removed only those for which we have a pipe. Which leaves the one for pipe C on machines with less than 2 pipes, breaking module reload. v2: We can't get at the drm device this early (wtf), so just register all the files and also remove them all again. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This avoids a spurious spurious interrupt warning. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Suggested by Ville. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
We enable the interrupt unconditionally and only control it through the enable bit in the CRC control register. v2: Extract per-platform helpers to compute the register values. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Also add a new _PIPE_INC macro which takes an base plus increment. Much less likely to botch the job by missing an s/A/B/ somewhere. v2: They've moved the bitfield. Argh! Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The ringbuffer update logic should always be the same, but different platforms have different amounts of CRC registers. Hence extract it. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-