- 12 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederik Deweerdt 提交于
I've got the following linking error when building 2.6.21-mm2 on ARM: ERROR: "csum_partial_copy_from_user" [net/rxrpc/af-rxrpc.ko] undefined! Linking fails because "csum_partial_copy_from_user" is not exported to modules. This patch adds it to the list of exported symbols. Signed-off-by: NFrederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
MMUless systems have only one address space for all threads, so both the usual access_ok() checks, and the exception handling do not make much sense. Hence, discard the fixup and exception tables at link time, use memcpy/memset for the user copy/clearing functions, and define the permission check macros to be constants. Some of this patch was derived from the equivalent patch by Hyok S. Choi. Signed-off-by: NHyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Back in the days when we had armo (26-bit) and armv (32-bit) combined, we had an additional layer to the uaccess macros to ensure correct typing. Since we no longer have 26-bit in this tree, we no longer need this layer, so eliminate it. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kyle McMartin 提交于
While cleaning up parisc_ksyms.c earlier, I noticed that strpbrk wasn't being exported from lib/string.c. Investigating further, I noticed a changeset that removed its export and added it to _ksyms.c on a few more architectures. The justification was that "other arches do it." I think this is wrong, since no architecture currently defines __HAVE_ARCH_STRPBRK, there's no reason for any of them to be exporting it themselves. Therefore, consolidate the export to lib/string.c. Signed-off-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 01 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Komal Shah 提交于
Patch from Komal Shah This patch fixes the duplicate exports of string library functions. Signed-off-by: NKomal Shah <komal_shah802003@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 15 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Patch from Nicolas Pitre The ARM EABI defines new names for GCC helper functions. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Russell King 提交于
Unfortunately, later gcc versions error out when our get_user is passed a const pointer, since we write to a temporary variable declared as typeof(*(p)) which propagates the const-ness. Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 09 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Patch from Nicolas Pitre Noticed by Woody Suwalski <woodys@xandros.com>. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Dooks 提交于
Patch from Ben Dooks The items in the export table do not need to be exported elsehwere, so quash the sparse warning by making the symbol for the table entry static. Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Todd Poynor 提交于
Patch from Todd Poynor Fix module versioning for 3 ARM symbols that do not have CRCs added, avoid "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" errors at module load time. From David Singleton. Signed-off-by: NTodd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas Pitre 提交于
Patch from Nicolas Pitre Those are big, slow and generally not recommended for kernel code. They are even not present on i386. So it should be concluded that one could as well get away with do_div() alone. Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-