- 02 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All calls of ceph_osdc_start_request() are preceded (in the case of rbd, almost) immediately by a call to ceph_osdc_build_request(). Move the build calls at the top of ceph_osdc_start_request() out of there and into the ceph_osdc_build_request(). Nothing prevents moving these calls to the top of ceph_osdc_build_request(), either (and we're going to want them there in the next patch) so put them at the top. This and the next patch are related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This simply moves ceph_osdc_build_request() later in its source file without any change. Done as a separate patch to facilitate review of the change in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An object class method is formatted using a pagelist which contains the class name, the method name, and the data concatenated into an osd request's outbound data. Currently when a class op is initialized in osd_req_op_cls_init(), the lengths of and pointers to these three items are recorded. Later, when the op is getting formatted into the request message, a new pagelist is created and that is when these items get copied into the pagelist. This patch makes it so the pagelist to hold these items is created when the op is initialized instead. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request now holds all of its source op structures, and every place that initializes one of these is in fact initializing one of the entries in the the osd request's array. So rather than supplying the address of the op to initialize, have caller specify the osd request and an indication of which op it would like to initialize. This better hides the details the op structure (and faciltates moving the data pointers they use). Since osd_req_op_init() is a common routine, and it's not used outside the osd client code, give it static scope. Also make it return the address of the specified op (so all the other init routines don't have to repeat that code). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An extent type osd operation currently implies that there will be corresponding data supplied in the data portion of the request (for write) or response (for read) message. Similarly, an osd class method operation implies a data item will be supplied to receive the response data from the operation. Add a ceph_osd_data pointer to each of those structures, and assign it to point to eithre the incoming or the outgoing data structure in the osd message. The data is not always available when an op is initially set up, so add two new functions to allow setting them after the op has been initialized. Begin to make use of the data item pointer available in the osd operation rather than the request data in or out structure in places where it's convenient. Add some assertions to verify pointers are always set the way they're expected to be. This is a sort of stepping stone toward really moving the data into the osd request ops, to allow for some validation before making that jump. This is the first in a series of patches that resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are fields "indata" and "indata_len" defined the ceph osd request op structure. The "in" part is with from the point of view of the osd server, but is a little confusing here on the client side. Change their names to use "request" instead of "in" to indicate that it defines data provided with the request (as opposed the data returned in the response). Rename the local variable in osd_req_encode_op() to match. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request keeps a pointer to the osd operations (ops) array that it builds in its request message. In order to allow each op in the array to have its own distinct data, we will need to keep track of each op's data, and that information does not go over the wire. As long as we're tracking the data we might as well just track the entire (source) op definition for each of the ops. And if we're doing that, we'll have no more need to keep a pointer to the wire-encoded version. This patch makes the array of source ops be kept with the osd request structure, and uses that instead of the version encoded in the message in places where that was previously used. The array will be embedded in the request structure, and the maximum number of ops we ever actually use is currently 2. So reduce CEPH_OSD_MAX_OP to 2 to reduce the size of the structure. The result of doing this sort of ripples back up, and as a result various function parameters and local variables become unnecessary. Make r_num_ops be unsigned, and move the definition of struct ceph_osd_req_op earlier to ensure it's defined where needed. It does not yet add per-op data, that's coming soon. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4656Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
One more osd data helper, which returns the length of the data item, regardless of its type. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define ceph_osd_data_init() and ceph_osd_data_release() to clean up a little code. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define and use functions that encapsulate the initializion of a ceph_osd_data structure. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This is a simple change, extracting the number of incoming data bytes just once in handle_reply(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Hold off building the osd request message in ceph_writepages_start() until just before it will be submitted to the osd client for execution. We'll still create the request and allocate the page pointer array after we learn we have at least one page to write. A local variable will be used to keep track of the allocated array of pages. Wait until just before submitting the request for assigning that page array pointer to the request message. Create ands use a new function osd_req_op_extent_update() whose purpose is to serve this one spot where the length value supplied when an osd request's op was initially formatted might need to get changed (reduced, never increased) before submitting the request. Previously, ceph_writepages_start() assigned the message header's data length because of this update. That's no longer necessary, because ceph_osdc_build_request() will recalculate the right value to use based on the content of the ops in the request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Defer building the osd request until just before submitting it in all callers except ceph_writepages_start(). (That caller will be handed in the next patch.) Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch moves the call to ceph_osdc_build_request() out of ceph_osdc_new_request() and into its caller. This is in order to defer formatting osd operation information into the request message until just before request is started. The only unusual (ab)user of ceph_osdc_build_request() is ceph_writepages_start(), where the final length of write request may change (downward) based on the current inode size or the oldest snapshot context with dirty data for the inode. The remaining callers don't change anything in the request after has been built. This means the ops array is now supplied by the caller. It also means there is no need to pass the mtime to ceph_osdc_new_request() (it gets provided to ceph_osdc_build_request()). And rather than passing a do_sync flag, have the number of ops in the ops array supplied imply adding a second STARTSYNC operation after the READ or WRITE requested. This and some of the patches that follow are related to having the messenger (only) be responsible for filling the content of the message header, as described here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4589Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Keep track of the length of the data portion for a message in a separate field in the ceph_msg structure. This information has been maintained in wire byte order in the message header, but that's going to change soon. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A field in an osd request keeps track of whether a connection is currently filling the request's reply message. This patch gets rid of that field. An osd request includes two messages--a request and a reply--and they're both associated with the connection that existed to its the target osd at the time the request was created. An osd request can be dropped early, even when it's in flight. And at that time both messages are released. It's possible the reply message has been supplied to its connection to receive an incoming response message at the time the osd request gets dropped. So ceph_osdc_release_request() revokes that message from the connection before releasing it so things get cleaned up properly. Previously this may have caused a problem, because the connection that a message was associated with might have gone away before the revoke request. And to avoid any problems using that connection, the osd client held a reference to it when it supplies its response message. However since this commit: 38941f80 libceph: have messages point to their connection all messages hold a reference to the connection they are associated with whenever the connection is actively operating on the message (i.e. while the message is queued to send or sending, and when it data is being received into it). And if a message has no connection associated with it, ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() won't do anything when asked to revoke it. As a result, there is no need to keep an additional reference to the connection associated with a message when we hand the message to the messenger when it calls our alloc_msg() method to receive something. If the connection *were* operating on it, it would have its own reference, and if not, there's no work to be done when we need to revoke it. So get rid of the osd request's r_con_filling_msg field. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4647Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are two basically identical definitions of __decode_pgid() in libceph, one in "net/ceph/osdmap.c" and the other in "net/ceph/osd_client.c". Get rid of both, and instead define a single inline version in "include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h". Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd client mutex is acquired just before getting a reference to a request in handle_reply(). However the error paths after that don't drop the mutex before returning as they should. Drop the mutex after dropping the request reference. Also add a bad_mutex label at that point and use it so the failed request lookup case can be handled with the rest. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4615Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Use osd_req_op_extent_init() in ceph_osdc_new_request() to initialize the one or two ops built in that function. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
All callers of ceph_osd_new_request() pass either CEPH_OSD_OP_READ or CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE as the opcode value. The function assumes it by filling in the extent fields in the ops array it builds. So just assert that is the case, and don't bother calling op_has_extent() before filling in the first osd operation in the array. Define some local variables to gather the information to fill into the first op, and then fill in the op array all in one place. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The ceph_osdc_new_request() an array of osd operations is built up and filled in partially within that function and partially in the called function calc_layout(). Move the latter part back out to ceph_osdc_new_request() so it's all done in one place. This makes it unnecessary to pass the op pointer to calc_layout(), so get rid of that parameter. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The purpose of calc_layout() is to determine, given a file offset and length and a layout describing the placement of file data across objects, where in "object space" that data resides. Specifically, it determines which object should hold the first part of the specified range of file data, and the offset and length of data within that object. The length will not exceed the bounds of the object, and the caller is informed of that maximum length. Add two parameters to calc_layout() to allow the object-relative offset and length to be passed back to the caller. This is the first steps toward having ceph_osdc_new_request() build its osd op structure using osd_req_op_extent_init(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The rbd code has a function that allocates and populates a ceph_osd_req_op structure (the in-core version of an osd request operation). When reviewed, Josh suggested two things: that the big varargs function might be better split into type-specific functions; and that this functionality really belongs in the osd client rather than rbd. This patch implements both of Josh's suggestions. It breaks up the rbd function into separate functions and defines them in the osd client module as exported interfaces. Unlike the rbd version, however, the functions don't allocate an osd_req_op structure; they are provided the address of one and that is initialized instead. The rbd function has been eliminated and calls to it have been replaced by calls to the new routines. The rbd code now now use a stack (struct) variable to hold the op rather than allocating and freeing it each time. For now only the capabilities used by rbd are implemented. Implementing all the other osd op types, and making the rest of the code use it will be done separately, in the next few patches. Note that only the extent, cls, and watch portions of the ceph_osd_req_op structure are currently used. Delete the others (xattr, pgls, and snap) from its definition so nobody thinks it's actually implemented or needed. We can add it back again later if needed, when we know it's been tested. This (and a few follow-on patches) resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3861Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a separate function to determine the validity of an opcode, and use it inside osd_req_encode_op() in order to unclutter that function. Don't update the destination op at all--and return zero--if an unsupported or unrecognized opcode is seen in osd_req_encode_op(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In ceph_osdc_build_request() there is a call to cpu_to_le16() which provides a 64-bit value as its argument. Because of the implied byte swapping going on it looked pretty suspect to me. At the moment it turns out the behavior is well defined, but masking off those bottom bits explicitly eliminates this distraction, and is in fact more directly related to the purpose of the message header's data_off field. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4125Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd expects the transaction ids of arriving request messages from a given client to a given osd to increase monotonically. So the osd client needs to send its requests in ascending tid order. The transaction id for a request is set at the time it is registered, in __register_request(). This is also where the request gets placed at the end of the osd client's unsent messages list. At the end of ceph_osdc_start_request(), the request message for a newly-mapped osd request is supplied to the messenger to be sent (via __send_request()). If any other messages were present in the osd client's unsent list at that point they would be sent *after* this new request message. Because those unsent messages have already been registered, their tids would be lower than the newly-mapped request message, and sending that message first can violate the tid ordering rule. Rather than sending the new request only, send all queued requests (including the new one) at that point in ceph_osdc_start_request(). This ensures the tid ordering property is preserved. With this in place, all messages should now be sent in tid order regardless of whether they're being sent for the first time or re-sent as a result of a call to osd_reset(). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In __map_request(), when adding a request to an osd client's unsent list, add it to the tail rather than the head. That way the newest entries (with the highest tid value) will be last. Maintain an osd's request list in order of increasing tid also. Finally--to be consistent--maintain an osd client's "notarget" list in that order as well. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd expects incoming requests for a given object from a given client to arrive in order, with the tid for each request being greater than the tid for requests that have already arrived. This patch fixes two places the osd client might not maintain that ordering. For the osd client, the connection fault method is osd_reset(). That function calls __reset_osd() to close and re-open the connection, then calls __kick_osd_requests() to cause all outstanding requests for the affected osd to be re-sent after the connection has been re-established. When an osd is reset, any in-flight messages will need to be re-sent. An osd client maintains distinct lists for unsent and in-flight messages. Meanwhile, an osd maintains a single list of all its requests (both sent and un-sent). (Each message is linked into two lists--one for the osd client and one list for the osd.) To process an osd "kick" operation, the request list for the *osd* is traversed, and each request is moved off whichever osd *client* list it was on (unsent or sent) and placed onto the osd client's unsent list. (It remains where it is on the osd's request list.) When that is done, osd_reset() calls __send_queued() to cause each of the osd client's unsent messages to be sent. OK, with that background... As the osd request list is traversed each request is prepended to the osd client's unsent list in the order they're seen. The effect of this is to reverse the order of these requests as they are put (back) onto the unsent list. Instead, build up a list of only the requests for an osd that have already been sent (by checking their r_sent flag values). Once an unsent request is found, stop examining requests and prepend the requests that need re-sending to the osd client's unsent list. Preserve the original order of requests in the process (previously re-queued requests were reversed in this process). Because they have already been sent, they will have lower tids than any request already present on the unsent list. Just below that, traverse the linger list in forward order as before, but add them to the *tail* of the list rather than the head. These requests get re-registered, and in the process are give a new (higher) tid, so the should go at the end. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Since we no longer drop the request mutex between registering and mapping an osd request in ceph_osdc_start_request(), there is no chance of a race with kick_requests(). We can now therefore map and send the new request unconditionally (but we'll issue a warning should it ever occur). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
One of the first things ceph_osdc_start_request() does is register the request. It then acquires the osd client's map semaphore and request mutex and proceeds to map and send the request. There is no reason the request has to be registered before acquiring the map semaphore. So hold off doing so until after the map semaphore is held. Since register_request() is nothing more than a wrapper around __register_request(), call the latter function instead, after acquiring the request mutex. That leaves register_request() unused, so get rid of it. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4392Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Use wrapper functions that check whether the auth op exists so that callers do not need a bunch of conditional checks. Simplifies the external interface. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
Currently the messenger calls out to a get_authorizer con op, which will create a new authorizer if it doesn't yet have one. In the meantime, when we rotate our service keys, the authorizer doesn't get updated. Eventually it will be rejected by the server on a new connection attempt and get invalidated, and we will then rebuild a new authorizer, but this is not ideal. Instead, if we do have an authorizer, call a new update_authorizer op that will verify that the current authorizer is using the latest secret. If it is not, we will build a new one that does. This avoids the transient failure. This fixes one of the sorry sequence of events for bug http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4282Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The osd trail is a pagelist, used only for a CALL osd operation to hold the class and method names, along with any input data for the call. It is only currently used by the rbd client, and when it's used it is the only bit of outbound data in the osd request. Since we already support (non-trail) pagelist data in a message, we can just save this outbound CALL data in the "normal" pagelist rather than the trail, and get rid of the trail entirely. The existing pagelist support depends on the pagelist being dynamically allocated, and ownership of it is passed to the messenger once it's been attached to a message. (That is to say, the messenger releases and frees the pagelist when it's done with it). That means we need to dynamically allocate the pagelist also. Note that we simply assert that the allocation of a pagelist structure succeeds. Appending to a pagelist might require a dynamic allocation, so we're already assuming we won't run into trouble doing so (we're just ignore any failures--and that should be fixed at some point). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4407Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add support for recording a ceph pagelist as data associated with an osd request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The length of outgoing data in an osd request is dependent on the osd ops that are embedded in that request. Each op is encoded into a request message using osd_req_encode_op(), so that should be used to determine the amount of outgoing data implied by the op as it is encoded. Have osd_req_encode_op() return the number of bytes of outgoing data implied by the op being encoded, and accumulate and use that in ceph_osdc_build_request(). As a result, ceph_osdc_build_request() no longer requires its "len" parameter, so get rid of it. Using the sum of the op lengths rather than the length provided is a valid change because: - The only callers of osd ceph_osdc_build_request() are rbd and the osd client (in ceph_osdc_new_request() on behalf of the file system). - When rbd calls it, the length provided is only non-zero for write requests, and in that case the single op has the same length value as what was passed here. - When called from ceph_osdc_new_request(), (it's not all that easy to see, but) the length passed is also always the same as the extent length encoded in its (single) write op if present. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4406Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When an incoming message is destined for the osd client, the messenger calls the osd client's alloc_msg method. That function looks up which request has the tid matching the incoming message, and returns the request message that was preallocated to receive the response. The response message is therefore known before the request is even started. Between the start of the request and the receipt of the response, the request and its data fields will not change, so there's no reason we need to hold off setting them. In fact it's preferable to set them just once because it's more obvious that they're unchanging. So set up the fields describing where incoming data is to land in a response message at the beginning of ceph_osdc_start_request(). Define a helper function that sets these fields, and use it to set the fields for both outgoing data in the request message and incoming data in the response. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4284Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Change it so we only assign outgoing data information for messages if there is outgoing data to send. This then allows us to add a few more (currently commented-out) assertions. This is related to: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4284Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define ceph_msg_data_set_pagelist(), ceph_msg_data_set_bio(), and ceph_msg_data_set_trail() to clearly abstract the assignment of the remaining data-related fields in a ceph message structure. Use the new functions in the osd client and mds client. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4263Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
When setting page array information for message data, provide the byte length rather than the page count ceph_msg_data_set_pages(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a function ceph_msg_data_set_pages(), which more clearly abstracts the assignment page-related fields for data in a ceph message structure. Use this new function in the osd client and mds client. Ideally, these fields would never be set more than once (with BUG_ON() calls to guarantee that). At the moment though the osd client sets these every time it receives a message, and in the event of a communication problem this can happen more than once. (This will be resolved shortly, but setting up these helpers first makes it all a bit easier to work with.) Rearrange the field order in a ceph_msg structure to group those that are used to define the possible data payloads. This partially resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4263Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-