- 03 1月, 2013 15 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more. Accordingly, remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized. The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers runtime wakeup. Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one place. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add two new callbacks,.setup() and .cleanup(), struct acpi_bus_type and modify acpi_platform_notify() to call .setup() after executing acpi_bind_one() successfully and acpi_platform_notify_remove() to call .cleanup() before running acpi_unbind_one(). This will allow the users of struct acpi_bus_type, PCI in particular, to specify operations to be executed right after the given device has been associated with a companion struct acpi_device and right before it's going to be detached from that companion, respectively. The main motivation is to be able to get rid of acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind(), which are horrible horrible stuff. [In short, there are three problems with them: The way they populate the .bind() and .unbind() callbacks of ACPI devices is rather less than straightforward, they require special hotplug-specific paths to be present in the ACPI namespace scanning code and by the time acpi_pci_unbind() is called the PCI device object in question may not exist any more.] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add() too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that handle). For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device() anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan() executed directly from acpi_scan_init(). Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be replaced with a single flag. Do that calling the flag match_driver. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more, so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed lines of code (Linus will like that). Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make note to self to take care of that later). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more now. For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more, so remove it and all references to it. Also remove acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call acpi_start_single_object(). Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and update all of its former users accordingly. This change was previously proposed in a different from by Yinghai Lu. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move the code from the ACPI PCI root bridge's .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), directly into acpi_pci_root_add() and drop acpi_pci_root_start(). It is safe to do that, because it is now always guaranteed that when struct pci_dev objects are created, their companion struct acpi_device objects are already present, so it is not necessary to wait for them to be created before calling pci_bus_add_devices(). This change was previously proposed in a different form by Yinghai Lu. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If acpi_bus_check_add() is called for a handle already having an existing struct acpi_device object attached, it is not necessary to check the type and status of the device correspondig to it, so change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add() to avoid that. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that one member of struct acpi_bus_ops, acpi_op_add, is not used anywhere any more and the relationship between its remaining members, acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start, is such that it doesn't make sense to set the latter without setting the former at the same time. Therefore, replace struct acpi_bus_ops with new a enum type, enum acpi_bus_add_type, with three values, ACPI_BUS_ADD_BASIC, ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH, ACPI_BUS_ADD_START, corresponding to both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start unset, acpi_op_match set and acpi_op_start unset, and both acpi_op_match and acpi_op_start set, respectively. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Objects of type struct acpi_bus_ops are currently used to pass information between different parts of the ACPI namespace scanning code, sometimes in quite convoluted ways. It turns out that that is not necessary in some cases, so simplify the code by reducing the utilization of struct acpi_bus_ops objects where clearly possible. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The current ACPI namespace scanning code suggests that acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() share some code. In fact, however, they are completely different code paths (except for the initial checks), so refactor the code to make that distinction visibly clear. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Instead of running acpi_pci_root_init() from a separate subsys initcall, call it directly from acpi_scan_init() before scanning the ACPI namespace for the first time, so that the PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), is always run before binding ACPI drivers or attaching "companion" device objects to struct acpi_device objects below the root bridge's device node in the ACPI namespace. The first, simpler reason for doing this is that it makes the situation during boot more similar to the situation during hotplug, in which the ACPI PCI root bridge driver is always present. The second reason is that acpi_pci_root_init() causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for all PCI devices below the bridge and these objects may be necessary for whatever is done with the other ACPI device nodes in that namespace scope. For example, devices created by acpi_create_platform_device() sometimes may need to be added to the device hierarchy as children of PCI bridges. For this purpose, however, the struct pci_dev objects representing those bridges need to exist before the platform devices in question are registered. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Split the ACPI namespace scanning for devices into two passes, such that struct acpi_device objects are registerd in the first pass without probing ACPI drivers and the drivers are probed against them directly in the second pass. There are two main reasons for doing that. First, the ACPI PCI root bridge driver's .add() routine, acpi_pci_root_add(), causes struct pci_dev objects to be created for all PCI devices under the given root bridge. Usually, there are corresponding ACPI device nodes in the ACPI namespace for some of those devices and therefore there should be "companion" struct acpi_device objects to attach those struct pci_dev objects to. These struct acpi_device objects should exist when the corresponding struct pci_dev objects are created, but that is only guaranteed during boot and not during hotplug. This leads to a number of functional differences between the boot and the hotplug cases which are not strictly necessary and make the code more complicated. For example, this forces the ACPI PCI root bridge driver to defer the registration of the just created struct pci_dev objects and to use a special .start() callback routine, acpi_pci_root_start(), to make sure that all of the "companion" struct acpi_device objects will be present at PCI devices registration time during hotplug. If those differences can be eliminated, we will be able to consolidate the boot and hotplug code paths for the enumeration and registration of PCI devices and to reduce the complexity of that code quite a bit. The second reason is that, in general, it should be possible to resolve conflicts of resources assigned by the BIOS to different devices represented by ACPI namespace nodes before any drivers bind to them and before they are attached to "companion" objects representing physical devices (such as struct pci_dev). However, for this purpose we first need to enumerate all ACPI device nodes in the given namespace scope. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 08 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
All devices behind Haswell LPSS (Low Power Subsystem) should be represented as platform devices so add them to the acpi_platform_device_ids list. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Chen Gong 提交于
To handle error trigger table correctly, memory region must be removed from request region. We had a series of patches to do this culminating in: commit b4e008dc ACPI, APEI, EINJ, Refine the fix of resource conflict but when ACPI5 support was added, we missed updating this area. So when using EINJ table on an ACPI5 enabled machine, we get following error: APEI: Can not request [mem 0x526b80000-0x526b80007] for APEI EINJ Trigger registers Fix this by checking for the acpi5 case and using the same code that was added earlier. Signed-off-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 05 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Or else the laptop will boot with a dimmed screen. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51141Tested-by: NStefan Nagy <public@stefan-nagy.at> Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
When system enters power off, the _PSW of Lid device is enabled. But this may cause the system to reboot instead of power off. A proper way to fix this is to always disable lid wakeup capability for S5. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35262Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
The ACPI video driver can't control backlight correctly on Asus UL30VT. Vendor driver (asus-laptop) can work. This patch is to add "Asus UL30VT" to ACPI video detect blacklist in order to use asus-laptop for video control on the "Asus UL30VT" rather than ACPI video driver. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32592Reported-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
The current acpisleep DMI checks only run when CONFIG_SUSPEND is set. And this may break hibernation on some platforms when CONFIG_SUSPEND is cleared. Move acpisleep DMI check into #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP instead. [rjw: Added acpi_sleep_dmi_check() and rebased on top of earlier patches adding entries to acpisleep_dmi_table[].] References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45921Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
On some platforms, _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx have dependency. And there is no way for OS to detect this dependency. commit 9bcb8118 shows us a problem that _TMP must be evaluate after _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx, or else firmware will shutdown the system. But the machine in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43284 shows us that _PSV would return valid value only if _TMP has been evaluated once. With this patch, all of the control methods will be evaluated once, in the _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_CRT/_TMP order, before they are actually used. [rjw: Added a local variable for the handle and modified the loop slightly.] Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Nkatabami <katabami@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 27 11月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Julius Werner 提交于
Many cpuidle drivers measure their time spent in an idle state by reading the wallclock time before and after idling and calculating the difference. This leads to erroneous results when the wallclock time gets updated by another processor in the meantime, adding that clock adjustment to the idle state's time counter. If the clock adjustment was negative, the result is even worse due to an erroneous cast from int to unsigned long long of the last_residency variable. The negative 32 bit integer will zero-extend and result in a forward time jump of roughly four billion milliseconds or 1.3 hours on the idle state residency counter. This patch changes all affected cpuidle drivers to either use the monotonic clock for their measurements or make use of the generic time measurement wrapper in cpuidle.c, which was already working correctly. Some superfluous CLIs/STIs in the ACPI code are removed (interrupts should always already be disabled before entering the idle function, and not get reenabled until the generic wrapper has performed its second measurement). It also removes the erroneous cast, making sure that negative residency values are applied correctly even though they should not appear anymore. Signed-off-by: NJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
There is no need to initialize the node before appending it to the list. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
The internal.h declares the acpi_create_platform_device(). Without that include we get a following warning: drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c:133:24: warning: symbol 'acpi_create_platform_device' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于
[Issue] Currently, a variable name, which identifies each entry, consists of type, id and ctime. But if multiple events happens in a short time, a second/third event may fail to log because efi_pstore can't distinguish each event with current variable name. [Solution] A reasonable way to identify all events precisely is introducing a sequence counter to the variable name. The sequence counter has already supported in a pstore layer with "oopscount". So, this patch adds it to a variable name. Also, it is passed to read/erase callbacks of platform drivers in accordance with the modification of the variable name. <before applying this patch> a variable name of first event: dump-type0-1-12345678 a variable name of second event: dump-type0-1-12345678 type:0 id:1 ctime:12345678 If multiple events happen in a short time, efi_pstore can't distinguish them because variable names are same among them. <after applying this patch> it can be distinguishable by adding a sequence counter as follows. a variable name of first event: dump-type0-1-1-12345678 a variable name of Second event: dump-type0-1-2-12345678 type:0 id:1 sequence counter: 1(first event), 2(second event) ctime:12345678 In case of a write callback executed in pstore_console_write(), "0" is added to an argument of the write callback because it just logs all kernel messages and doesn't need to care about multiple events. Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NMike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于
[Issue] Currently, a variable name, which is used to identify each log entry, consists of type, id and ctime. But an erase callback does not use ctime. If efi_pstore supported just one log, type and id were enough. However, in case of supporting multiple logs, it doesn't work because it can't distinguish each entry without ctime at erasing time. <Example> As you can see below, efi_pstore can't differentiate first event from second one without ctime. a variable name of first event: dump-type0-1-12345678 a variable name of second event: dump-type0-1-23456789 type:0 id:1 ctime:12345678, 23456789 [Solution] This patch adds ctime to an argument of an erase callback. It works across reboots because ctime of pstore means the date that the record was originally stored. To do this, efi_pstore saves the ctime to variable name at writing time and passes it to pstore at reading time. Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Acked-by: NMike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make it possible to ask the routines used for adding/removing devices to/from the general ACPI PM domain, acpi_dev_pm_attach() and acpi_dev_pm_detach(), respectively, to change the power states of devices so that they are put into the full-power state automatically by acpi_dev_pm_attach() and into the lowest-power state available automatically by acpi_dev_pm_detach(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
Add the generic ACPI SDHCI device ID to acpi_platform_device_ids[] to make the ACPI core create a platform device object for the ACPI device node of that ID. [rjw: Added the changelog.] Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch adds helper functions to support I2C slave enumeration. An ACPI enabled I2C controller driver only needs to call acpi_i2c_register_devices() in order to get its slave devices enumerated, created and bound to the corresponding ACPI handle. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Cyril Roelandt 提交于
The LEN variable is unsigned, therefore checking whether it is less than 0 is useless. Also drop the LEN variable, since the COUNT parameter can be used instead. [rjw: Changed the subject.] Signed-off-by: NCyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Work around a defect in the printk subsystem introduced by a logging change. Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
Currently we have valid flag to represent if this ACPI device power state is valid. A device power state is valid does not necessarily mean we, as OSPM, has a mean to put the device into that power state, e.g. D3 cold is always a valid power state for any ACPI device, but if there is no _PS3 or _PRx for this device, we can't really put that device into D3 cold power state. The same is true for D0 power state. So here comes the os_accessible flag, which is only set if the device has provided us the required means to put it into that power state, e.g. if we have _PS3 or _PRx, we can put the device into D3 cold state and thus, D3 cold power state's os_accessible flag will be set in this case. And a new wrapper inline function is added to be used to check if firmware has provided us a way to power off the device during runtime. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
Updated Dock hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Replaced acpi_get_name() & kfree() with apci_handle_<level>(). Added error status to the messages where needed. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
Updated Container hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Removed an unnecessary check to the device arg in acpi_container_add(). Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
Updated Memory hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(), dev_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Added missing "\n". Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
Updated CPU hotplug error messages with acpi_handle_<level>(), dev_<level>() and pr_<level>(). Modified some messages for clarity. Added error status / id info to the messages where needed. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: NVijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
This patch introduces acpi_handle_<level>(), where <level> is a kernel message level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages for ACPI, esp. hot-plug operations. acpi_handle_<level>() appends "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages. This improves diagnosis of hotplug operations since an error message in a log file identifies an object that caused an issue. This interface acquires the global namespace mutex to obtain an object path. In interrupt context, it shows the object path as <n/a>. acpi_handle_<level>() takes acpi_handle as an argument, which is passed to ACPI hotplug notify handlers from the ACPICA. Therefore, it is always available unlike other kernel objects, such as device. For example: acpi_handle_err(handle, "Device don't exist, dropping EJECT\n"); logs an error message like this at KERN_ERR. ACPI: \_SB_.SCK4.CPU4: Device don't exist, dropping EJECT ACPI hot-plug drivers can use acpi_handle_<level>() when they need to identify a target ACPI object path in their messages, such as error cases. The usage model is similar to dev_<level>(). acpi_handle_<level>() can be used when a device is not created or is invalid during hot-plug operations. ACPI object path is also consistent on the platform, unlike device name that gets incremented over hotplug operations. ACPI drivers should use dev_<level>() when a device object is valid. Device name provides more user friendly information, and avoids acquiring the global ACPI namespace mutex. ACPI drivers also continue to use pr_<level>() when they do not need to specify device information, such as boot-up messages. Note: ACPI_[WARNING|INFO|ERROR]() are intended for the ACPICA and are not associated with the kernel message level. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: NVijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-