1. 09 10月, 2010 2 次提交
    • M
      OMAP: mach-omap2: Fix static declaration warnings · 38815733
      Manjunath Kondaiah G 提交于
      This patch fixes sparse warnings due to non declaration of
      static structures and variables.
      
      Sparse warning logs fixed:
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:88:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_secure_ram_storage' was not declared. Should it be static?
      n
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:50:22: warning: symbol 'gptimer_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer-gp.c:240:18: warning: symbol 'omap_timer' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c:121:24: warning: symbol 'prcm_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2420.c:510:29: warning: symbol 'omap2420_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux2430.c:589:29: warning: symbol 'omap2430_pop_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:934:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1080:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cus_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1272:28: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1393:29: warning: symbol 'omap3_cbb_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1603:28: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_subset' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux34xx.c:1821:29: warning: symbol 'omap36xx_cbp_ball' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-debug.c:165:15: warning: symbol 'pm_dbg_dir' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:587:30: warning: symbol 'ads7846_config' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c:606:23: warning: symbol 'omap3evm_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:46:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_sdrc_params' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-sdram.c:211:25: warning: symbol 'rx51_get_sdram_timings' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c:64:15: warning: symbol 'touchbook_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-am3517evm.c:350:24: warning: symbol 'am3517_evm_dss_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c:567:23: warning: symbol 'omap3stalker_spi_board_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      38815733
    • M
      OMAP: mach-omap2: Fix incorrect assignment warnings · 4d63bc1d
      Manjunath Kondaiah G 提交于
      This patch fixes below sparse warnings for incorrect assignments.
      
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:195:16: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:195:16:    expected unsigned int [usertype] *v_addr
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:195:16:    got void [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:199:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:199:25:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:199:25:    got unsigned int [usertype] *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:320:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:320:28:    expected void *[noderef] <asn:2>scratchpad_address
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:320:28:    got void [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:321:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:321:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:321:9:    got void *[noderef] <asn:2>scratchpad_address
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:324:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:324:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:324:9:    got void *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:327:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:327:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:327:9:    got void *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:334:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:334:9:    expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:334:9:    got void *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:321:9: warning: dereference of noderef expression
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:324:9: warning: dereference of noderef expression
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:327:9: warning: dereference of noderef expression
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:334:9: warning: dereference of noderef expression
      
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:323:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:323:28:    expected unsigned int [usertype] *scratchpad_address
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:323:28:    got void [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:326:26: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:326:26:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:326:26:    got unsigned int [usertype] *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:329:26: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:329:26:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:329:26:    got unsigned int [usertype] *
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:334:29: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:334:29:    expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*<noident>
      arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:334:29:    got unsigned int [usertype] *
      Signed-off-by: NManjunath Kondaiah G <manjugk@ti.com>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      4d63bc1d
  2. 05 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 30 9月, 2010 2 次提交
  4. 29 9月, 2010 5 次提交
  5. 28 9月, 2010 24 次提交
  6. 25 9月, 2010 5 次提交
  7. 24 9月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      omap4: Fix bootup crash observed with higher CPU clocks · e7193cc8
      Santosh Shilimkar 提交于
      This patch is temporary fix to below crash. This is observed when
      CPU is clocked more than 600 MHz.
      
      Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406) at 0xbf9ef65c
      Internal error: : 1406 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      last sysfs file:
      Modules linked in:
      CPU: 0    Not tainted  (2.6.36-rc3+ #18)
      PC is at kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x14
      LR is at kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x14
      pc : [<c003ce14>]    lr : [<c003ce14>]    psr: 00000093
      sp : dc83bff8  ip : 00000000  fp : 00000000
      r10: 00000000  r9 : 00000000  r8 : 00000000
      r7 : 00000013  r6 : c003ce28  r5 : c008935c  r4 : 00000000
      r3 : 00000000  r2 : 00000000  r1 : 00000000  r0 : 00000000
      Flags: nzcv  IRQs off  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment kernel
      Control: 10c53c7f  Table: 8000404a  DAC: 00000017
      Process swapper (pid: 2, stack limit = 0xdc83a2f0)
      Stack: (0xdc83bff8 to 0xdc83c000)
      bfe0: 00000000 ffffffff
      [<c003ce14>] (kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x14) from [<fffffffe>] (0xfffffffe)
      Code: c03a0ba3 c03a5fcb c045c880 c0394035 (eb017701)
      ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
      
      The timer hwmod adaptation will eventually fix it in a proper way.
      Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      e7193cc8